| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged co conspirators |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Victim perpetrator alleged |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
TODD BLANCHE
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Association |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Exploitative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Kellen
|
Employee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional conspiratorial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
victims
|
Criminal |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Perpetrator victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Denied association |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Alleged co conspirators |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator potential |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Scotty
|
Juror defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
USAO-SDNY
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Groomer victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Farmer
|
Victim perpetrator |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional criminal |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subjects of investigation |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Criminal association |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators alleged |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Groomer victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Guiffre
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal argument | Maxwell argues that Section 3283's phrase 'offense involving' requires looking only at the elemen... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An appeal is currently pending in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413. | 2d Cir. | View |
| N/A | Gift giving | Jeffrey Epstein sent Carolyn gifts including lingerie from Victoria's Secrets, a massage book, an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court ruling | The Court ruled that the perjury charges against Maxwell must be severed and tried separately fro... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | Maxwell arranged a return flight for Jane from New Mexico. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The jury convicted Maxwell on Count Four, potentially based on the New Mexico conduct. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Criminal activity | Maxwell and Epstein worked together to identify, groom, transport, and sexually abuse girls, some... | New York, Florida, New Mexi... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A substantial likelihood that Defendant Maxwell was convicted on Count Four based solely on condu... | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | Evidence was presented at a trial, including testimony from four women, former employees, and law... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Relationship start | Maxwell and Epstein began a close and intimate relationship, with Maxwell being Epstein's girlfri... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Departure | A. Farmer said good-bye to Epstein and Maxwell before leaving New Mexico. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Crime | A decades-long sex-trafficking enterprise involving thousands of victims. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grooming | Maxwell taught a 16-year-old girl named Annie how to give Epstein a foot massage. This is describ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grooming | Maxwell introduced Kate to Epstein and instructed her to squeeze his feet to show her strength. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal finding | Judge Nathan finding, three times, that the Government established Maxwell is a risk of flight an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Conversation | A. Farmer attempted to have an academic conversation with Maxwell on a deck area at the ranch in ... | the ranch in New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming sentencing for Maxwell for her criminal involvement in the conspiracy. | court of the United States | View |
| N/A | Jury conviction | A jury convicted the Defendant on all three conspiracy counts (Counts One, Three, and Five). | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| N/A | Grooming | Maxwell introduced Kate to Epstein and encouraged her to squeeze his feet to show her strength. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal ruling | The District Court denied Maxwell’s motion for a new trial in a written order. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | Maxwell was sentenced to a term of 240 months’ imprisonment to be followed by five years’ supervi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Arrest | The subject of the document was arrested in her home. | New Hampshire | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Defendant's trial, where Juror 50 served on the jury. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal motion | A potential future suppression motion that Maxwell could make before Judge Nathan. | N/A | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a weekend trip the witness took to New Mexico, specifically probing whether Ghislaine Maxwell transported them. The witness denies having personal knowledge of Ghislaine's involvement and confirms that the trip was over a weekend, a fact they discussed with their mother and disclosed to the government.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from a case identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It features the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer, who is questioned about a past settlement received from a fund, the dismissal of a lawsuit against Maxwell and Epstein, and whether their civil case is concluded. A. Farmer confirms the civil case is over, they do not expect more money, and have no financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness identified as A. Farmer. The witness explains their motivation for testifying was to seek accountability, and confirms they were interviewed by law enforcement in New York in 2019 and have met with the government five or six times since. The witness also confirms having previously sued individuals named Maxwell and Epstein.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The witness testifies about speaking to the media regarding their experiences with Maxwell and Epstein, confirming interviews with the FBI in 2006/2007 and with reporters in 2016 and 2019, for which they were not paid. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects to a question about the witness's difficulty in speaking publicly, but the objection is overruled by the court.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms having experiences with Epstein and Maxwell, which they first discussed with the media in 2002 and later with the FBI in 2006 or 2007. During the FBI interview, the witness reported that Maxwell had given them a massage and Epstein had gotten into bed with them.
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring testimony from a witness identified as A. Farmer, also referred to as Annie. Annie discusses events from 1996, including a trip to Thailand and Vietnam, a conversation with her mother about not being raped, and her relationship with Dave Mulligan, to whom she also disclosed incidents involving Maxwell and Epstein at 'the ranch.'
This court transcript details the testimony of a witness, A. Farmer, regarding her relationship with Maxwell and Epstein. Farmer describes feeling conflicted, being grateful for a trip they funded but also deeply disturbed by an uncomfortable experience with them in New Mexico, which made her want to avoid them permanently. She also testifies that the first person she told about the uncomfortable incident, without giving details, was her mother.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The witness describes flying home commercially to Phoenix, Arizona, and explains she did not write about her trip to New Mexico in her journal because she wanted to forget what happened there. She also confirms keeping boots that were purchased for her by Maxwell and Epstein during that trip, which were later packed away when her mother moved.
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness identified as 'A. Farmer'. Farmer recounts her last day at a ranch in New Mexico with Epstein and Maxwell, describing a feeling of disorientation as their interest in her seemed different from the academic support she expected. She details a final conversation where she tried to discuss her studies with Maxwell, who appeared completely disinterested, before saying goodbye to both of them and leaving.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. Farmer testifies that Ghislaine Maxwell set up a portable massage table in Farmer's room, instructed her to undress completely, and then touched her breasts inappropriately during the massage.
This document is a page from the court transcript of A. Farmer's direct examination, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness recounts going to a movie theater in New Mexico with Epstein and Maxwell to see 'Primal Fear', describing odd, playful behavior between Epstein and Maxwell. Farmer testifies that throughout the movie, Epstein inappropriately touched her hand, foot, and arm in a 'blatant' manner, which she contrasts with his more concealed behavior in New York.
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness identified as Farmer. She recounts being gifted expensive cowboy boots and subsequently going to the movies with Maxwell and Epstein. Farmer expresses initial hesitation about the movie outing due to a prior negative experience in a New York theater, but states she went because she believed it would be different with Maxwell present.
This document is a transcript of court testimony from a witness identified as A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. Farmer describes a weekend she spent as a teenager at a ranch with Epstein and Maxwell, noting that no other guests were present. She recounts her mixed feelings about the situation and describes her first impression of Maxwell as outgoing and seemingly expecting her arrival.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about her observations of Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, stating her belief that they were 'romantic partners' based on their intimate behavior. Farmer confirms that she, Epstein, and Maxwell were the only individuals staying in a small residence on the property.
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument over the admissibility of hearsay testimony during the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. Attorneys debate with the judge how to question the witness about why she was willing to see Jeffrey Epstein again, despite her discomfort, focusing on a conversation with her mother about Maxwell's presence. The discussion revolves around whether this testimony is offered for the truth of the matter asserted or to explain the witness's state of mind.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about a trip to New York after Christmas 1995, where she stayed with her sister for about a week and met Jeffrey Epstein twice. The witness is also asked to identify 'Government Exhibit 101', which she confirms is her high school photo from her junior year.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a witness named Annie Farmer identifies the defendant, Maxwell, in the courtroom and testifies that Maxwell gave her a massage when she was 16 years old. At that time, Farmer was living in Arizona with her mother and sister, Ashley.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Hesse, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Ms. Hesse testifies that she knew women came to a residence to give massages, even when Maxwell was absent, and that she took messages for them. She also confirms knowing about Maxwell's home in New York but denies any knowledge of a residence in Miami.
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, documenting the direct examination of a witness, Mrs. Hesse. The questioning, led by Ms. Moe, first confirms the name 'Carolyn' on an exhibit and then establishes that Mrs. Hesse's job was to work at the Palm Beach house specifically when Maxwell and Epstein were not there.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Mrs. Hesse. Hesse describes being instructed by Ghislaine (Maxwell) to record all phone messages in a specific notebook kept in the kitchen whenever Epstein and Maxwell were away from the house. The attorney, Ms. Moe, then presents Government Exhibits to the witness for identification.
This document is a personal statement from a victim of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, filed as part of a legal case. The author describes the severe, long-term physical (Complex Regional Pain Syndrome) and psychological trauma they endured, and their journey toward healing through therapy. The arrests of Epstein and Maxwell provided a sense of validation, prompting the author to attend Maxwell's trial in Manhattan to seek justice and closure for the abuse that derailed their life for over two decades.
This legal document is a victim's statement detailing her experience with Epstein and Maxwell. The narrator recounts being offered a job, which she declined, leading to anger from Maxwell. Later, Maxwell re-established contact, manipulated the narrator into a trip to Florida that cost her her job, and then began a three-year period of trafficking, rape, and assault in New York and Florida.
This document is page 20 of a legal filing dated June 23, 2022, regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that victims named Sarah and Elizabeth should be entitled to deliver oral victim impact statements at the sentencing. The filing requests that if the Court doubts this entitlement, they be granted more time to brief the issue, noting they only had 48 hours to respond to a previous court order.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that victims identified as Sarah and Elizabeth should be permitted to read their victim impact statements aloud at Maxwell's criminal sentencing. It cites legal precedents, such as United States v. Wilson and Kelly v. California, to support the court's authority to consider such testimony and asserts that doing so will not cause unfair prejudice to Maxwell. A footnote clarifies that Maxwell does not have the right to cross-examine victims during sentencing hearings.
This page from a legal document discusses the psychological impact of crime on victims, citing academic research on PTSD and other traumas. It highlights the therapeutic value of victim impact statements in sentencing, referencing a study from Australia. The document concludes by stating that victims named Sarah and Elizabeth have already benefited from the prosecution and conviction of an individual named Maxwell.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Maxwell instructed Kellen on how to schedule massages and manage a part of the criminal scheme that Maxwell had previously handled.
Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Maxwell would call Carolyn to set up appointments for massages, particularly in the first year or two.
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Carolyn named Maxwell as one of two people who would call her to schedule massages with Jeffrey Epstein.
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
A reply brief filed by the Defendant, Maxwell, which raises an argument about the jury instructions.
According to Kate's testimony, when Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, Maxwell told her to give his feet a squeeze to show how strong she was.
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
Carolyn's mom would receive a phone call, which Carolyn later learned was from Maxwell, and would hand the phone to Carolyn to schedule an appointment.
Shawn would receive a phone call from Maxwell and would then tell Carolyn that she had a phone call and instruct her to say yes to the appointment.
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of a response from the District Court, claiming it resulted in a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Maxwell asked Carolyn about her travel history and invited her to an island. Carolyn declined, stating she was too young and her mother would not permit it.
The question implies that Maxwell would call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein, even after learning she was 14.
Maxwell asked Carolyn what she wanted to do in the future, and Carolyn replied that she wanted to become a massage therapist.
Maxwell told the witness, Kate, that Epstein likes 'cute, young, pretty' girls and that he needed to have sex about three times a day. These conversations occurred frequently ('All the time') within the first couple of months after they met.
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity