CAROLYN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Friend |
12
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Acquaintance |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Romantic |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Melissa
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Acquaintance |
11
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
location
Virginia
|
Recruiter recruit |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Recruiter victim |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
27 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn and Sean stole a car and ran away from Florida to Georgia. | Florida to Georgia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn and Ms. Roberts leaving Epstein's house after payment | Epstein's House | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits by Carolyn to Epstein's home. | Mr. Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Receipt of package containing lingerie and a movie. | West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Second visit to Epstein's property. Sean drove and waited in the car. Carolyn sat in the kitchen ... | Epstein's Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant (Maxwell) entered massage room while Carolyn was nude and touched her. | Massage room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial testimony regarding Count Five and Count Three. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn's second visit: Greeted by Sarah, Chef offered food, Sarah prepared table. | Epstein's residence (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn dropped out of school in the seventh grade. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn testified and wrote down her mother's phone number to avoid saying it aloud. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visit to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home. | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia and Carolyn enter Epstein's house for approximately one hour and five minutes. | Jeffrey Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage encounter where Epstein masturbated in Carolyn's presence. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn visited Jeffrey Epstein's house at age 14. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony given by Larry Visoski, Cimberly Espinosa, and Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn turned 18, marking the legal end of the specific charged sex-trafficking conspiracy regar... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn received a package via FedEx containing lingerie and a movie. | West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house. | Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony given by Carolyn and Juan Alessi regarding the roles of Maxwell and Kellen. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn going to Epstein's house for massages. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn observing Maxwell in the office area off the kitchen. | Jeffrey Epstein's house (of... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia brought Carolyn to the residence; Defendant greeted them and instructed Virginia. | The residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn witnessed Virginia give Epstein a sexualized massage involving sexual intercourse. | The residence | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013100.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. During this segment, the witness identifies Government Exhibit 11 (GX-11) as her birth certificate and confirms her full name and date of birth listed on the document without stating them aloud. The defense attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, offers no objection to the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00013099.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records the beginning of the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The witness confirms she requested to testify using only her first name for privacy and identifies 'Government Exhibit 11' as her birth certificate.
DOJ-OGR-00010560.jpg
This document is a page from a Government sentencing filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing for a 'Four-Point Leadership Enhancement' under sentencing guidelines. It asserts that the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) was a leader of an 'otherwise extensive' criminal conspiracy involving Jeffrey Epstein, spanning the UK, Virgin Islands, and three states. The text cites testimony from victims (Carolyn, Virginia) and staff (Juan Alessi, pilots) to demonstrate the scale of the operation and the defendant's role in recruiting victims and managing Epstein's properties.
DOJ-OGR-00010558.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the prosecution arguing against the defendant's motions regarding sentencing. The prosecution asserts that the 2004 Sentencing Manual should apply, citing trial testimony that the conspiracy extended past 2004, and refutes the defendant's claim of having left the conspiracy and her association with Epstein in 2002. The document also notes that the government is prepared to present additional evidence, a message book seized by the Palm Beach Police Department, at the sentencing hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00010557.jpg
This legal document is a filing arguing against a defendant's request for the Court to discredit a victim's testimony at sentencing. It cites the trial testimony of the victim, Carolyn, who stated she stopped visiting Jeffrey Epstein's house at age 18, and presents documentary evidence from a seized message book with entries from November 2004 and March 2005 to corroborate her timeline. The filing asserts that the defendant's speculation about the evidence's authenticity is baseless and that the jury's conviction based on Carolyn's testimony should be respected.
DOJ-OGR-00010551.jpg
This document is a page from a government sentencing filing (likely the Government's sentencing memorandum) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details specific instances of sexual abuse involving a victim named Carolyn and a minor named Melissa (recruited by Carolyn at age 16) at Epstein's Palm Beach residence, describing a 'pyramid scheme' of recruitment starting with Virginia Giuffre. The text notes that the US Probation Office recommended a 20-year sentence, characterizing Maxwell's conduct as 'heinous and predatory.'
DOJ-OGR-00010550.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 22, 2022, details the repeated sexual abuse of a minor named Carolyn, aged 14-15, by Epstein during massages. It outlines the significant role of an unnamed "defendant" who facilitated the abuse by scheduling the massages, paying Carolyn, and being aware of her age and vulnerable personal history. The defendant also invited Carolyn to travel with them and Epstein, further implicating them in the scheme.
DOJ-OGR-00010549.jpg
This legal document details a scheme of sexual abuse involving the defendant (Maxwell) and Epstein. It describes how Maxwell recruited 17-year-old Virginia Roberts in the summer of 2000, who was then paid for sexualized massages. The scheme escalated into a 'pyramid scheme' when Virginia, in 2001, introduced 14-year-old Carolyn, who was subsequently abused by Epstein over 100 times under the defendant's direction.
DOJ-OGR-00010545.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Document 670, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated June 22, 2022, detailing the grooming and sexual abuse tactics used by the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) and Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how they monetarily incentivized girls to recruit others and specifically outlines the abuse of a victim named 'Jane,' whom they met at a summer camp in 1994 when she was 14. The text highlights the defendant's role in normalizing abuse, personally fondling victims, and using her social status to provide cover for Epstein's predation.
DOJ-OGR-00010540.jpg
This legal document, filed by the U.S. Government on June 22, 2022, provides background on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and an unnamed co-conspirator (the defendant). It outlines the timeline of the investigation, starting in November 2018, and details the indictments against Epstein and the defendant, which involved the abuse of several victims identified as Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, and Carolyn. The document asserts that the investigation was prompted by investigative journalism and not by civil litigants.
DOJ-OGR-00010537.jpg
This document is a Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 670, filed 06/22/22) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It outlines sections pertaining to a criminal case, including background, charges, summary of proof at trial concerning the sexual abuse of multiple individuals (Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, Carolyn, Melissa), pre-sentence report and sentencing guidelines, discussion on the defendant's conduct warranting imprisonment, and financial penalties. The document details various sentencing enhancements and arguments related to the defendant's sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00010534.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 22, 2022. The letter confirms that the government has complied with a court order by notifying the six victims in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa) of their rights to be heard at the upcoming sentencing on June 28, 2022, as stipulated by the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00009189.jpg
This document is a court filing containing a Reuters article printed on January 26, 2022. It details the controversy surrounding juror 'Scotty David' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, who revealed in an interview that he was a victim of sexual abuse, a fact he may not have disclosed during jury selection (voir dire). The U.S. Attorney's office wrote to Judge Alison Nathan requesting an inquiry into his service, potentially threatening the verdict. The text also details testimony from a victim named Carolyn regarding payments from Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00009188.jpg
This document is a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) containing a printout of a Reuters article dated January 5, 2022. The article details how juror Scotty David swayed fellow jurors during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial by sharing his own history of childhood sexual abuse to validate the imperfect memories of accusers 'Jane' and 'Carolyn.' The document highlights the internal deliberations of the jury that led to Maxwell's conviction on December 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00009183.jpg
This document details two related legal matters. First, it provides an inside account from a juror named Scotty on the deliberations in the Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking trial, explaining how the jury reached its verdict. Second, it reports on a court hearing for Prince Andrew, where Judge Kaplan appeared highly skeptical of arguments made by the prince's lawyer, Andrew Brettler, who sought to use a 2009 settlement between victim Virginia Roberts and Jeffrey Epstein to have the case dismissed.
DOJ-OGR-00009173.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing detailing a juror's (David's) explanation for Ghislaine Maxwell's acquittal on a specific charge (count two) involving the accuser 'Jane'. David clarifies to 'The Independent' that the jury's decision was based on a lack of direct evidence that Maxwell 'enticed' Jane to travel, not on a disbelief of Jane's testimony. The document also mentions corroborating evidence such as flight logs and Maxwell's 'little black book', which listed names of 'masseuses' and Palm Beach police officers.
DOJ-OGR-00009172.jpg
This document contains excerpts from an interview with a juror named David following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, filed as a court exhibit. David explains that while the jury could not convict based on accuser 'Kate's' testimony due to UK age of consent laws, her testimony was crucial in establishing Maxwell's grooming 'pattern' involving boundary confusion and massage. David also defends his own responses to the pre-trial questionnaire regarding sexual abuse history.
DOJ-OGR-00009171.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing, detailing the perspective of a juror named David. David explains to The Independent why he and the jury found the victims credible, despite defense arguments about their behavior and the fallibility of memory. He emphasizes that the jury's role was to judge the stories, not the victims' decisions, and notes that the defense's memory expert, Professor Elizabeth Loftus, did not sway their verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00009040.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, is part of Ms. Maxwell's defense, arguing against the reliability of her accusers' memories. It highlights similarities between the claims of accusers (Jane, Carolyn, Kate, Annie Farmer) and those of Juror No. 50, who also claims to be a victim of abuse. The document focuses on Juror No. 50's assertion that his memory can be 'replayed like a video,' directly contradicting the expert testimony of Dr. Loftus, who stated that memory is a constructive process, thereby questioning the validity of such memory claims and suggesting potential juror bias.
DOJ-OGR-00009022.jpg
This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details post-trial media interviews given by Juror No. 50 to Reuters and the Daily Mail. The text highlights that Juror No. 50 disclosed his own history of sexual abuse to the jury to help sway members who doubted the credibility of accusers Jane and Carolyn. Additionally, it notes that in a Daily Mail video (Exhibit 3), the juror explicitly denied being asked about his sexual abuse history in the jury questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00008957.jpg
This legal document argues that the defense was hindered by the unavailability of contemporaneous phone and property records for Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and accusers. It cites two examples: the inability to challenge Carolyn's testimony that Maxwell called her to set up appointments, and the inability to rebut accuser Jane's testimony about the timing of her sexual abuse at Epstein's New York townhouse, which she described in detail.
DOJ-OGR-00008954.jpg
This legal document is a motion arguing that Ms. Maxwell's conviction should be vacated and the S2 Indictment dismissed. The defense claims that the government's excessive and prejudicial delay in bringing the prosecution violated her due process rights by causing critical documentary evidence and witnesses to become unavailable. The motion reasserts arguments from previously denied pretrial motions, which the Court had granted leave to renew after the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00008953.jpg
This page of a court document discusses the legal arguments regarding the conspiracy charges against Ms. Maxwell and Epstein. It argues that despite violating different statutes, the actions constituted a single criminal agreement to groom and abuse minors, rather than separate independent conspiracies, and analyzes the interdependence between the counts.
DOJ-OGR-00008952.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 600) in the case US v. Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022. It outlines the government's theory that Epstein and Maxwell operated a single criminal conspiracy using a specific 'playbook' to groom vulnerable minors across multiple locations (NY, Palm Beach, NM, USVI). The text cites trial transcripts regarding four specific accusers (Jane, Annie, Carolyn, Kate) and describes the targeting of children from single-mother households.
DOJ-OGR-00017285.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey. They are debating whether the testimony of Special Agent Jason Richards is a relevant response to a jury note concerning an FBI deposition and the cross-examination of a person named Carolyn. The Court ultimately overrules the request to include the testimony but agrees to redact the jury foreperson's name from the notes before making them public.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Sarah Kellen / Je... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Offer of 'five to $600' to take pictures of the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Massage book for dummies | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment made before Carolyn left the house with... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $400.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Victims' Compensa... | CAROLYN | $2,800,000.00 | Payout received by the witness Carolyn, cited b... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant (Ma... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Payments for sexualized massages, personally pa... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for an encounter involving a massage an... | View |
| N/A | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for each time Carolyn gave Epstein an e... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein sent her gifts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein paid Carolyn after sexual act. | View |
| N/A | Received | the defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Paid twice as much when she brought friends to ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | CAROLYN | Shawn | $0.00 | Money given to witness, ostensibly for gas, adm... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Ms. Roberts told Carolyn 'we could make money' ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein (... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Payment for massage/visit, paid in hundreds. | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Cash payment found on top of the sink after the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein /... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Carolyn begging to come over because she 'neede... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money received for attending 'appointments'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Over 100 paid sexualized massages. | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Large sums of money needed to fuel her drug add... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money for engaging in sex acts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | General statement that 'we could make money' by... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unnamed Older Man... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Proposed payment for providing a massage (discu... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Virginia... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Offer made by Virginia to Carolyn to 'make $300'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Concert tickets to Incubus | View |
Returned Call
Returning Carolyn's call (witness denies it was Epstein personally)
Massage Scheduling
Left a message with Sarah to schedule a massage session
No Subject
Called to set up massage appointments with Epstein.
No Subject
Talked about home life, said she was too young to travel and her mother wouldn't let her go on trips.
Scheduling
Calling to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein
Package contents
Package containing lingerie and a movie.
Unknown
Carolyn looked up number in phone book and called Epstein.
Unknown
Epstein or Kellen would call her.
Concert Tickets
Called to tell her about concert tickets.
Scheduling second visit
Return call to schedule an appointment.
Scheduling massages
Sarah Kellen calling to schedule massages for Carolyn.
Unknown
Message pads seized by government showing calls for Epstein, not Maxwell.
Recruitment/Offer
Virginia asked Carolyn if she would like to make $300.
Request for address
Maxwell asked for Carolyn's address so Epstein could send items.
Their son
Witness testifies they speak 'very rarely' and only about their son.
Solicitation for photos
Sarah called stating she was calling in regards to Mr. Epstein and offered payment for photos.
Maxwell's name
Carolyn told Shawn the woman's name was Maxwell but could not pronounce her first name.
Scheduling massages
Maxwell would call and set up appointment times.
Scheduling massages
Sarah Kellen took over calling for appointments.
Scheduling appointments
Carolyn sometimes called to make appointments herself.
Scheduling massage appointments
Maxwell calling to schedule massage appointments.
Scheduling massage appointments
Sarah Kellen took over the responsibility of scheduling appointments.
Recruitment for massages
Virginia told Carolyn she could make money giving massages to a guy in Palm Beach.
Investigation
Investigative interview
Incubus Tickets
Call from New York informing Carolyn that Epstein left concert tickets for her.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity