CAROLYN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Friend |
12
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Acquaintance |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Romantic |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Melissa
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Acquaintance |
11
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
location
Virginia
|
Recruiter recruit |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Recruiter victim |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
27 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn and Sean stole a car and ran away from Florida to Georgia. | Florida to Georgia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn and Ms. Roberts leaving Epstein's house after payment | Epstein's House | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits by Carolyn to Epstein's home. | Mr. Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Receipt of package containing lingerie and a movie. | West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Second visit to Epstein's property. Sean drove and waited in the car. Carolyn sat in the kitchen ... | Epstein's Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant (Maxwell) entered massage room while Carolyn was nude and touched her. | Massage room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial testimony regarding Count Five and Count Three. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn's second visit: Greeted by Sarah, Chef offered food, Sarah prepared table. | Epstein's residence (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn dropped out of school in the seventh grade. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn testified and wrote down her mother's phone number to avoid saying it aloud. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visit to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home. | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia and Carolyn enter Epstein's house for approximately one hour and five minutes. | Jeffrey Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage encounter where Epstein masturbated in Carolyn's presence. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn visited Jeffrey Epstein's house at age 14. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony given by Larry Visoski, Cimberly Espinosa, and Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn turned 18, marking the legal end of the specific charged sex-trafficking conspiracy regar... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn received a package via FedEx containing lingerie and a movie. | West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house. | Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony given by Carolyn and Juan Alessi regarding the roles of Maxwell and Kellen. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn going to Epstein's house for massages. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn observing Maxwell in the office area off the kitchen. | Jeffrey Epstein's house (of... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia brought Carolyn to the residence; Defendant greeted them and instructed Virginia. | The residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn witnessed Virginia give Epstein a sexualized massage involving sexual intercourse. | The residence | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010567.jpg
This legal document is a court filing that refutes two arguments made by the defendant. First, it argues that the standard for the victim's (Carolyn's) behavior is 'undue influence,' not complete lack of voluntary action. Second, it dismisses the defendant's claim of 'double-counting' in sentencing enhancements by citing legal precedents (Watkins, Kohlmeier, Arbaugh) which establish that different guideline provisions can address different harms from the same conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00010566.jpg
This document is page 31 of a legal filing (Document 670) from the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 22, 2022. The text argues for a sentencing enhancement based on 'undue influence' exerted over a victim named Carolyn. It details how the defendant (Maxwell) groomed Carolyn by exploiting her drug addiction with money, discussing her personal trauma, and directing Virginia (Giuffre) to teach Carolyn how to sexually gratify Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00010564.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (likely a government sentencing memorandum) arguing for sentencing enhancements for Ghislaine Maxwell. It details her role as an 'organizer' and 'second in command' who supervised Epstein's staff (including pilots Visoski and Rodgers and house manager Alessi) and directed the activities of Sarah Kellen and victims like Virginia and Carolyn. The text cites trial testimony to establish that Maxwell ran an extensive operation facilitating Epstein's abuse of minors.
DOJ-OGR-00010443.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 15, 2022, details the calculation of a corrected sentencing range of 51-63 months under the 2003 U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. It outlines the offense level calculations for three distinct groups of conduct related to individuals named Carolyn, "Jane," and Annie Farmer, all of which involved minor victims. The calculations result in adjusted offense levels for each group, contributing to the overall sentencing recommendation.
DOJ-OGR-00010442.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from June 15, 2022, argues against applying a sentencing enhancement for 'undue influence'. The text asserts that the evidence does not support the claim that a witness named Carolyn was unduly influenced by Epstein or Ms. Maxwell. To support this, it cites Carolyn's own testimony that she actively sought out massage appointments, recruited other minors for money, and refused offers to travel to Epstein's island, indicating her actions were voluntary.
DOJ-OGR-00010439.jpg
This document is a legal filing (page 18 of a brief filed 06/15/22) arguing against an 'aggravating role enhancement' for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. The text contends that Maxwell did not supervise Sarah Kellen, citing testimony from Juan Alessi and 'Carolyn' that Kellen independently took over scheduling duties at the Palm Beach residence. It further notes Maxwell's separation from Epstein and her subsequent relationship with Ted Waitt.
DOJ-OGR-00010438.jpg
This legal document, page 21 of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell should not receive an aggravating role enhancement because she did not supervise other criminal participants. It specifically refutes the idea that she supervised Sarah Kellen, presenting testimony from Cimberly Espinosa that Kellen was hired by Epstein to replace Maxwell's duties, not to work under her. The document also states that other employees, like pilots Larry Visoski and David Rodgers, had no knowledge of any criminal conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00010437.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 15, 2022, argues that Ms. Maxwell should not receive an aggravating role sentencing enhancement under USSG § 3B1.1. The core argument is that there is no evidence she supervised any other criminal participant in the offenses involving victims like 'Jane' and Annie Farmer. In fact, the document asserts that the trial record shows Ms. Maxwell was directed and managed by Epstein, making her ineligible for the enhancement.
DOJ-OGR-00010430.jpg
This document is a page from a defense sentencing memorandum for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed in June 2022. The defense argues against applying 2004 sentencing guidelines, asserting that Maxwell had ceased participation in the conspiracy by 2002/2003 and was 'replaced' by Sarah Kellen for scheduling duties at the Palm Beach residence. The text cites testimony from Cimberly Espinosa, Juan Alessi, and a witness named Carolyn to support the claim that Maxwell had moved on to a relationship with Ted Waitt and was not involved in Epstein's conduct in late 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00010428.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 15, 2022, argues that the defendant's offense conduct concluded by summer 2004. It disputes the validity of unauthenticated message slips (GX 4) presented by the government, contrasting them with other message books (GX 1-3) that were authenticated by Juan Alessi and Nicole Hesse and admitted into evidence. A footnote references a 2007 FBI interview with a victim, Carolyn, who stated her interactions with Epstein began when she was 14 and ended when she was 17.
DOJ-OGR-00010427.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes the testimony of a witness named Carolyn regarding her interactions with Epstein. The document argues that Carolyn's memory is unreliable and contradictory, pointing to inconsistencies in her timeline of events, particularly concerning her visits to Epstein's Palm Beach residence in 2004 after giving birth to her son. Evidence from message pads is cited to corroborate a timeline that conflicts with parts of her testimony, thereby attempting to discredit her as a witness.
DOJ-OGR-00010405.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a filing, likely from the prosecution, arguing against a Defendant's claim of prejudice due to a delay in prosecution. The prosecution asserts that the Defendant has failed to meet the high legal standard for proving prejudice, citing case law. The Defendant's claims are based on the loss of documentary evidence (flight, financial, phone, and property records related to Epstein) and the deaths of four potential witnesses (architects Albert Pinto and Roger Salhi, and property manager Sally Markham).
DOJ-OGR-00010387.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 29, 2022, is a court ruling denying a defendant's motions for acquittal and to vacate convictions. The ruling summarizes testimony from witnesses named Annie, Carolyn, and Kate, which established the Defendant's role in a conspiracy with Epstein to transport minors for illegal sexual activity. The evidence included the Defendant paying for sexualized massages, inappropriately touching a witness, and inviting underage girls to locations like New Mexico and Epstein's Caribbean island.
DOJ-OGR-00010385.jpg
This legal document details testimony from a witness named Carolyn, who states that the Defendant arranged for her to perform sexualized massages for Epstein while she was a minor between 2001 and 2004. The document outlines specific incidents, including one where the Defendant assaulted Carolyn at age fourteen, and mentions corroborating evidence from her boyfriend Shawn and physical evidence like phone messages. A footnote adds further evidence related to another victim, Virginia Roberts, including testimony from Juan Alessi and flight records, to support a conspiracy charge against the Defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00010380.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court order filed on April 29, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text analyzes legal factors regarding whether separate counts constitute a single conspiracy or multiple ones, specifically discussing location (New York/Florida), overt acts, and interdependence. It references specific victims (Carolyn, Jane, Annie) and the timeline of abuse (2001-2004) in relation to the enactment of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act.
DOJ-OGR-00010379.jpg
This legal document details how the Defendant and Epstein used financial gifts and payments as a method of grooming victims like Jane and Annie, paying for things like lessons, school, and promising trips. The document also discusses the geographic scope of the criminal conspiracy, noting that while specific counts focused on New York and Florida, witnesses testified to sexual conduct occurring in New Mexico and London as well. The text highlights the testimony of victims, including Carolyn and Virginia Roberts, who were paid for sexualized massages.
DOJ-OGR-00010377.jpg
This document is page 11 of a court filing from April 2022 related to the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It summarizes the Government's arguments regarding Maxwell's consistent 'playbook' of grooming victims (specifically naming Jane, Annie, Carolyn, and Kate) and her conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein to provide underage girls for abuse. The text details how their methods evolved around 2001 into a 'pyramid scheme' involving payments for massage appointments.
DOJ-OGR-00010373.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes two conspiracy counts against a defendant. Count Three (1994-2004) alleges violations of the Mann Act based on testimony from victims Jane, Carolyn, and Annie Farmer. Count Five (2001-2004) alleges violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act based on evidence related to Carolyn and Virginia Roberts. The defendant contends that Count Five is a subset of Count Three, an argument with which the Court agrees.
DOJ-OGR-00010286.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Document 647) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. The text argues that 'Count Five' (related to Florida/Carolyn) is multiplicitous because it is a subset of the broader 'Count Three,' citing the lack of independent conspiracy. It references testimony from victims Jane, Kate, and Annie Farmer regarding sexual abuse at Epstein's properties in New Mexico, London, the US Virgin Islands, and Palm Beach.
DOJ-OGR-00010284.jpg
This legal document argues that the government's charges related to sex trafficking constitute a single, decade-long conspiracy rather than separate offenses. The author points to the similarity in conduct between victims Carolyn (2000s) and Jane (1990s), the overlap of participants like Sarah Kellen, and the consistent location of the Palm Beach residence to support the claim of a single scheme involving Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. The document contends that the government only separated the charges due to a legal technicality regarding the enactment date of a sex trafficking statute.
DOJ-OGR-00010283.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal filing (likely a defense motion) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), arguing that certain counts in the indictment are multiplicitous. It details how the government incorporated the allegations of a witness named Carolyn (covering 2001-2004) into existing Mann Act conspiracies dating back to 1994, alongside victims Jane and Annie. The text highlights that Maxwell allegedly invited Carolyn to travel from Florida with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00010281.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the government's consistent theory during trial was that Ms. Maxwell and Epstein engaged in a single, overarching criminal conspiracy, not multiple separate ones. The filing cites the government's own arguments to the jury, which emphasized a 'common playbook' used against four accusers, to contend that the government's current position is a contradictory, 'after-the-fact attempt' to preserve convictions.
DOJ-OGR-00009867.jpg
This Reuters news article, dated January 5, 2022, reports on the jury deliberations in the Ghislaine Maxwell sex abuse trial. A juror, Scotty David, revealed that some jurors initially doubted the credibility of two accusers, Jane and Carolyn. David explained that he shared his own experience of childhood sexual abuse to help the other jurors understand the nature of memory and trauma, which ultimately swayed them and led to a unanimous guilty verdict on December 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00009862.jpg
This document is a printed Daily Mail article filed as a court exhibit (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It covers two main topics: an interview with a juror named 'Scotty' detailing the deliberations and voting splits in the Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking trial, and a separate legal hearing where Judge Kaplan appeared dismissive of Prince Andrew's lawyer's attempts to use a 2009 Epstein settlement to dismiss a civil suit by Virginia Roberts. The document highlights specific vote counts for the Maxwell charges and Judge Kaplan's skepticism toward Prince Andrew's defense arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00009852.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing containing an excerpt of an interview with a juror named David regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. David explains to 'The Independent' why the jury acquitted Maxwell on 'count two' related to accuser Jane, citing a lack of direct evidence for 'enticement' across state lines despite believing the victim. The text also highlights corroborating evidence such as flight logs and Epstein's 'little black book,' which contained names of victims alongside 'mom' and 'dad,' as well as Palm Beach police officers listed familiarly.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Sarah Kellen / Je... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Offer of 'five to $600' to take pictures of the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Massage book for dummies | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment made before Carolyn left the house with... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $400.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Victims' Compensa... | CAROLYN | $2,800,000.00 | Payout received by the witness Carolyn, cited b... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant (Ma... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Payments for sexualized massages, personally pa... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for an encounter involving a massage an... | View |
| N/A | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for each time Carolyn gave Epstein an e... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein sent her gifts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein paid Carolyn after sexual act. | View |
| N/A | Received | the defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Paid twice as much when she brought friends to ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | CAROLYN | Shawn | $0.00 | Money given to witness, ostensibly for gas, adm... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Ms. Roberts told Carolyn 'we could make money' ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein (... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Payment for massage/visit, paid in hundreds. | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Cash payment found on top of the sink after the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein /... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Carolyn begging to come over because she 'neede... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money received for attending 'appointments'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Over 100 paid sexualized massages. | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Large sums of money needed to fuel her drug add... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money for engaging in sex acts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | General statement that 'we could make money' by... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unnamed Older Man... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Proposed payment for providing a massage (discu... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Virginia... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Offer made by Virginia to Carolyn to 'make $300'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Concert tickets to Incubus | View |
Returned Call
Returning Carolyn's call (witness denies it was Epstein personally)
Massage Scheduling
Left a message with Sarah to schedule a massage session
No Subject
Called to set up massage appointments with Epstein.
No Subject
Talked about home life, said she was too young to travel and her mother wouldn't let her go on trips.
Scheduling
Calling to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein
Package contents
Package containing lingerie and a movie.
Unknown
Carolyn looked up number in phone book and called Epstein.
Unknown
Epstein or Kellen would call her.
Concert Tickets
Called to tell her about concert tickets.
Scheduling second visit
Return call to schedule an appointment.
Scheduling massages
Sarah Kellen calling to schedule massages for Carolyn.
Unknown
Message pads seized by government showing calls for Epstein, not Maxwell.
Recruitment/Offer
Virginia asked Carolyn if she would like to make $300.
Request for address
Maxwell asked for Carolyn's address so Epstein could send items.
Their son
Witness testifies they speak 'very rarely' and only about their son.
Solicitation for photos
Sarah called stating she was calling in regards to Mr. Epstein and offered payment for photos.
Maxwell's name
Carolyn told Shawn the woman's name was Maxwell but could not pronounce her first name.
Scheduling massages
Maxwell would call and set up appointment times.
Scheduling massages
Sarah Kellen took over calling for appointments.
Scheduling appointments
Carolyn sometimes called to make appointments herself.
Scheduling massage appointments
Maxwell calling to schedule massage appointments.
Scheduling massage appointments
Sarah Kellen took over the responsibility of scheduling appointments.
Recruitment for massages
Virginia told Carolyn she could make money giving massages to a guy in Palm Beach.
Investigation
Investigative interview
Incubus Tickets
Call from New York informing Carolyn that Epstein left concert tickets for her.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity