CAROLYN

Person
Mentions
1336
Relationships
426
Events
711
Documents
654

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
426 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
23
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Business associate
13 Very Strong
12
View
person Shawn
Friend
12 Very Strong
13
View
person Virginia Roberts
Acquaintance
12 Very Strong
10
View
person Shawn
Business associate
12 Very Strong
11
View
person Shawn
Romantic
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Epstein
Abuser victim
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Melissa
Friend
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Client
11 Very Strong
8
View
person Shawn
Acquaintance
11 Very Strong
8
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Abuser victim
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Ms. Comey
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
10
View
location Virginia
Recruiter recruit
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Victim abuser
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Abuser victim
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Acquaintance
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
10 Very Strong
9
View
person MAXWELL
Perpetrator victim
10 Very Strong
7
View
person MR. SCAROLA
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Epstein
Perpetrator victim
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Virginia Roberts
Recruiter victim
10 Very Strong
5
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
27
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Trial The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, where this summation was delivered. Southern District Court (im... View
N/A Crime Maxwell and Epstein used their wealth and privilege to manipulate, groom, and sexually abuse youn... N/A View
N/A Scheduling Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages. This is related to counts Five and Six. New York View
N/A Testimony Mr. Pagliuca summarizes testimony from four witnesses (Carolyn, Jane, Kate, Mr. Alessi) regarding... Courtroom View
N/A Court testimony Carolyn and Juan Alessi provided testimony during a trial regarding the roles of Ms. Maxwell and ... N/A View
N/A Conversation Virginia told Carolyn about an opportunity to make money by giving massages to a man in Palm Beach. N/A View
N/A Trip A group traveled to Jeffrey Epstein's house. Jeffrey Epstein's house View
N/A Trip Maxwell and Epstein invited Carolyn, under the age of 17, to travel from Florida to a place outsi... from Florida to a place out... View
N/A Meeting Carolyn had meetings with lawyers about the lawsuits before they were filed. N/A View
N/A Meeting Sean allegedly brought Melissa to a house with Carolyn. Carolyn's boyfriend's house View
N/A Legal action Carolyn hired an attorney and sued Epstein and his assistant, Sarah Kellen. N/A View
N/A Legal action Carolyn brought a second lawsuit against Epstein and Kellen. federal court in Florida View
N/A Drug abuse Shawn stated that he and Carolyn were abusing marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy, and other pills during... N/A View
N/A Recruitment/exploitation Epstein and Maxwell recruited Carolyn to engage in sex acts with Epstein, for which Maxwell paid ... Palm Beach Residence View
N/A Recruitment Epstein and Maxwell encouraged and enticed Carolyn to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex a... N/A View
N/A Trial testimony Carolyn testified, recalling that Sarah Kellen scheduled massages and Maxwell was present at the ... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Carolyn brought friends Amanda, Tatum, and Julie to Jeffrey Epstein's house. Jeffrey Epstein's house View
N/A Birthday Carolyn's 18th birthday is mentioned as a significant date that may mark the end of the conspirac... N/A View
N/A Crime A decade-long conspiracy of sexual abuse and federal sex-trafficking, which the government charge... N/A View
N/A Personal event Carolyn turned 18, which is legally significant as she could no longer be deemed a victim under t... N/A View
N/A Trial A trial was held where Carolyn provided testimony and a jury was present. N/A View
N/A Interview Carolyn was interviewed by the FBI about Epstein. N/A View
N/A Trip Carolyn brought her friends Amanda, Tatum, and Julie to Jeffrey Epstein's house on separate occas... Jeffrey Epstein's house View
N/A Activity Carolyn and a friend entered Jeffrey Epstein's house through the kitchen and went upstairs to a m... massage room View
N/A Introduction Carolyn was introduced to Epstein by Virginia Roberts. N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00013100.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. During this segment, the witness identifies Government Exhibit 11 (GX-11) as her birth certificate and confirms her full name and date of birth listed on the document without stating them aloud. The defense attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, offers no objection to the proceeding.

Court transcript (trial testimony)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013099.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records the beginning of the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The witness confirms she requested to testify using only her first name for privacy and identifies 'Government Exhibit 11' as her birth certificate.

Court transcript (trial testimony)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010560.jpg

This document is a page from a Government sentencing filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing for a 'Four-Point Leadership Enhancement' under sentencing guidelines. It asserts that the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) was a leader of an 'otherwise extensive' criminal conspiracy involving Jeffrey Epstein, spanning the UK, Virgin Islands, and three states. The text cites testimony from victims (Carolyn, Virginia) and staff (Juan Alessi, pilots) to demonstrate the scale of the operation and the defendant's role in recruiting victims and managing Epstein's properties.

Court filing / sentencing memorandum
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010558.jpg

This legal document is a filing by the prosecution arguing against the defendant's motions regarding sentencing. The prosecution asserts that the 2004 Sentencing Manual should apply, citing trial testimony that the conspiracy extended past 2004, and refutes the defendant's claim of having left the conspiracy and her association with Epstein in 2002. The document also notes that the government is prepared to present additional evidence, a message book seized by the Palm Beach Police Department, at the sentencing hearing.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010557.jpg

This legal document is a filing arguing against a defendant's request for the Court to discredit a victim's testimony at sentencing. It cites the trial testimony of the victim, Carolyn, who stated she stopped visiting Jeffrey Epstein's house at age 18, and presents documentary evidence from a seized message book with entries from November 2004 and March 2005 to corroborate her timeline. The filing asserts that the defendant's speculation about the evidence's authenticity is baseless and that the jury's conviction based on Carolyn's testimony should be respected.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010551.jpg

This document is a page from a government sentencing filing (likely the Government's sentencing memorandum) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details specific instances of sexual abuse involving a victim named Carolyn and a minor named Melissa (recruited by Carolyn at age 16) at Epstein's Palm Beach residence, describing a 'pyramid scheme' of recruitment starting with Virginia Giuffre. The text notes that the US Probation Office recommended a 20-year sentence, characterizing Maxwell's conduct as 'heinous and predatory.'

Legal filing (court document - sentencing memorandum/government submission)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010550.jpg

This legal document, filed on June 22, 2022, details the repeated sexual abuse of a minor named Carolyn, aged 14-15, by Epstein during massages. It outlines the significant role of an unnamed "defendant" who facilitated the abuse by scheduling the massages, paying Carolyn, and being aware of her age and vulnerable personal history. The defendant also invited Carolyn to travel with them and Epstein, further implicating them in the scheme.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010549.jpg

This legal document details a scheme of sexual abuse involving the defendant (Maxwell) and Epstein. It describes how Maxwell recruited 17-year-old Virginia Roberts in the summer of 2000, who was then paid for sexualized massages. The scheme escalated into a 'pyramid scheme' when Virginia, in 2001, introduced 14-year-old Carolyn, who was subsequently abused by Epstein over 100 times under the defendant's direction.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010545.jpg

This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Document 670, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated June 22, 2022, detailing the grooming and sexual abuse tactics used by the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) and Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how they monetarily incentivized girls to recruit others and specifically outlines the abuse of a victim named 'Jane,' whom they met at a summer camp in 1994 when she was 14. The text highlights the defendant's role in normalizing abuse, personally fondling victims, and using her social status to provide cover for Epstein's predation.

Legal filing (government sentencing memorandum/submission)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010540.jpg

This legal document, filed by the U.S. Government on June 22, 2022, provides background on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and an unnamed co-conspirator (the defendant). It outlines the timeline of the investigation, starting in November 2018, and details the indictments against Epstein and the defendant, which involved the abuse of several victims identified as Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, and Carolyn. The document asserts that the investigation was prompted by investigative journalism and not by civil litigants.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010537.jpg

This document is a Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 670, filed 06/22/22) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It outlines sections pertaining to a criminal case, including background, charges, summary of proof at trial concerning the sexual abuse of multiple individuals (Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, Carolyn, Melissa), pre-sentence report and sentencing guidelines, discussion on the defendant's conduct warranting imprisonment, and financial penalties. The document details various sentencing enhancements and arguments related to the defendant's sentence.

Legal document (table of contents for a court filing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010534.jpg

This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 22, 2022. The letter confirms that the government has complied with a court order by notifying the six victims in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa) of their rights to be heard at the upcoming sentencing on June 28, 2022, as stipulated by the Crime Victims' Rights Act.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009189.jpg

This document is a court filing containing a Reuters article printed on January 26, 2022. It details the controversy surrounding juror 'Scotty David' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, who revealed in an interview that he was a victim of sexual abuse, a fact he may not have disclosed during jury selection (voir dire). The U.S. Attorney's office wrote to Judge Alison Nathan requesting an inquiry into his service, potentially threatening the verdict. The text also details testimony from a victim named Carolyn regarding payments from Maxwell and Epstein.

Court filing / news article printout
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009188.jpg

This document is a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) containing a printout of a Reuters article dated January 5, 2022. The article details how juror Scotty David swayed fellow jurors during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial by sharing his own history of childhood sexual abuse to validate the imperfect memories of accusers 'Jane' and 'Carolyn.' The document highlights the internal deliberations of the jury that led to Maxwell's conviction on December 29, 2021.

Court filing / news article printout
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009183.jpg

This document details two related legal matters. First, it provides an inside account from a juror named Scotty on the deliberations in the Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking trial, explaining how the jury reached its verdict. Second, it reports on a court hearing for Prince Andrew, where Judge Kaplan appeared highly skeptical of arguments made by the prince's lawyer, Andrew Brettler, who sought to use a 2009 settlement between victim Virginia Roberts and Jeffrey Epstein to have the case dismissed.

News article
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009173.jpg

This legal document is a page from a court filing detailing a juror's (David's) explanation for Ghislaine Maxwell's acquittal on a specific charge (count two) involving the accuser 'Jane'. David clarifies to 'The Independent' that the jury's decision was based on a lack of direct evidence that Maxwell 'enticed' Jane to travel, not on a disbelief of Jane's testimony. The document also mentions corroborating evidence such as flight logs and Maxwell's 'little black book', which listed names of 'masseuses' and Palm Beach police officers.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009172.jpg

This document contains excerpts from an interview with a juror named David following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, filed as a court exhibit. David explains that while the jury could not convict based on accuser 'Kate's' testimony due to UK age of consent laws, her testimony was crucial in establishing Maxwell's grooming 'pattern' involving boundary confusion and massage. David also defends his own responses to the pre-trial questionnaire regarding sexual abuse history.

Court filing exhibit (media article/interview transcript)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009171.jpg

This document is a page from a court filing, detailing the perspective of a juror named David. David explains to The Independent why he and the jury found the victims credible, despite defense arguments about their behavior and the fallibility of memory. He emphasizes that the jury's role was to judge the stories, not the victims' decisions, and notes that the defense's memory expert, Professor Elizabeth Loftus, did not sway their verdict.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009040.jpg

This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, is part of Ms. Maxwell's defense, arguing against the reliability of her accusers' memories. It highlights similarities between the claims of accusers (Jane, Carolyn, Kate, Annie Farmer) and those of Juror No. 50, who also claims to be a victim of abuse. The document focuses on Juror No. 50's assertion that his memory can be 'replayed like a video,' directly contradicting the expert testimony of Dr. Loftus, who stated that memory is a constructive process, thereby questioning the validity of such memory claims and suggesting potential juror bias.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009022.jpg

This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details post-trial media interviews given by Juror No. 50 to Reuters and the Daily Mail. The text highlights that Juror No. 50 disclosed his own history of sexual abuse to the jury to help sway members who doubted the credibility of accusers Jane and Carolyn. Additionally, it notes that in a Daily Mail video (Exhibit 3), the juror explicitly denied being asked about his sexual abuse history in the jury questionnaire.

Court filing (legal brief/motion)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008957.jpg

This legal document argues that the defense was hindered by the unavailability of contemporaneous phone and property records for Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and accusers. It cites two examples: the inability to challenge Carolyn's testimony that Maxwell called her to set up appointments, and the inability to rebut accuser Jane's testimony about the timing of her sexual abuse at Epstein's New York townhouse, which she described in detail.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008954.jpg

This legal document is a motion arguing that Ms. Maxwell's conviction should be vacated and the S2 Indictment dismissed. The defense claims that the government's excessive and prejudicial delay in bringing the prosecution violated her due process rights by causing critical documentary evidence and witnesses to become unavailable. The motion reasserts arguments from previously denied pretrial motions, which the Court had granted leave to renew after the trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008953.jpg

This page of a court document discusses the legal arguments regarding the conspiracy charges against Ms. Maxwell and Epstein. It argues that despite violating different statutes, the actions constituted a single criminal agreement to groom and abuse minors, rather than separate independent conspiracies, and analyzes the interdependence between the counts.

Legal court filing (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008952.jpg

This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 600) in the case US v. Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022. It outlines the government's theory that Epstein and Maxwell operated a single criminal conspiracy using a specific 'playbook' to groom vulnerable minors across multiple locations (NY, Palm Beach, NM, USVI). The text cites trial transcripts regarding four specific accusers (Jane, Annie, Carolyn, Kate) and describes the targeting of children from single-mother households.

Legal filing / court motion (page 28 of 37)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017285.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey. They are debating whether the testimony of Special Agent Jason Richards is a relevant response to a jury note concerning an FBI deposition and the cross-examination of a person named Carolyn. The Court ultimately overrules the request to include the testimony but agrees to redact the jury foreperson's name from the notes before making them public.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$2,804,600.00
44 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
3 transactions
Net Flow
$2,804,600.00
47 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Sarah Kellen / Je... CAROLYN $600.00 Offer of 'five to $600' to take pictures of the... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $0.00 Gift: Massage book for dummies View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $300.00 Payment made before Carolyn left the house with... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $300.00 Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $400.00 Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... View
N/A Received Victims' Compensa... CAROLYN $2,800,000.00 Payout received by the witness Carolyn, cited b... View
N/A Received The defendant (Ma... CAROLYN $0.00 Payments for sexualized massages, personally pa... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $300.00 Payment for an encounter involving a massage an... View
N/A Received Ghislaine Maxwell... CAROLYN $300.00 Payment for each time Carolyn gave Epstein an e... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $0.00 Epstein sent her gifts. View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $0.00 Epstein paid Carolyn after sexual act. View
N/A Received the defendant CAROLYN $0.00 Paid twice as much when she brought friends to ... View
N/A Paid CAROLYN Shawn $0.00 Money given to witness, ostensibly for gas, adm... View
N/A Received Implied (Epstein/... CAROLYN $0.00 Ms. Roberts told Carolyn 'we could make money' ... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein (... CAROLYN $600.00 Payment for massage/visit, paid in hundreds. View
N/A Received Mr. Epstein (impl... CAROLYN $300.00 Cash payment found on top of the sink after the... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein /... CAROLYN $0.00 Carolyn begging to come over because she 'neede... View
N/A Received Implied (Epstein/... CAROLYN $0.00 Money received for attending 'appointments'. View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $0.00 Over 100 paid sexualized massages. View
N/A Received The defendant CAROLYN $0.00 Large sums of money needed to fuel her drug add... View
N/A Received The defendant CAROLYN $0.00 Money for engaging in sex acts. View
N/A Received Implied (Epstein/... CAROLYN $0.00 General statement that 'we could make money' by... View
N/A Received Unnamed Older Man... CAROLYN $300.00 Proposed payment for providing a massage (discu... View
N/A Received Implied (Virginia... CAROLYN $300.00 Offer made by Virginia to Carolyn to 'make $300'. View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein CAROLYN $0.00 Gift: Concert tickets to Incubus View
As Sender
124
As Recipient
122
Total
246

Returned Call

From: someone in Epstein's h...
To: CAROLYN

Returning Carolyn's call (witness denies it was Epstein personally)

Call
N/A

Massage Scheduling

From: CAROLYN
To: SARAH

Left a message with Sarah to schedule a massage session

Call
N/A

No Subject

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Called to set up massage appointments with Epstein.

Call
N/A

No Subject

From: CAROLYN
To: GHISLAINE MAXWELL

Talked about home life, said she was too young to travel and her mother wouldn't let her go on trips.

Conversation
N/A

Scheduling

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Calling to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein

Call
N/A

Package contents

From: Unknown (Return addres...
To: CAROLYN

Package containing lingerie and a movie.

Parcel delivery
N/A

Unknown

From: CAROLYN
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Carolyn looked up number in phone book and called Epstein.

Call
N/A

Unknown

From: Jeffrey Epstein or Kellen
To: CAROLYN

Epstein or Kellen would call her.

Call
N/A

Concert Tickets

From: SARAH
To: CAROLYN

Called to tell her about concert tickets.

Call
N/A

Scheduling second visit

From: Epstein (or staff)
To: CAROLYN

Return call to schedule an appointment.

Call
N/A

Scheduling massages

From: SARAH KELLEN
To: CAROLYN

Sarah Kellen calling to schedule massages for Carolyn.

Call
N/A

Unknown

From: CAROLYN
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Message pads seized by government showing calls for Epstein, not Maxwell.

Phone messages
N/A

Recruitment/Offer

From: Virginia
To: CAROLYN

Virginia asked Carolyn if she would like to make $300.

Conversation
N/A

Request for address

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell asked for Carolyn's address so Epstein could send items.

Meeting/conversation
N/A

Their son

From: Shawn
To: CAROLYN

Witness testifies they speak 'very rarely' and only about their son.

Conversation
N/A

Solicitation for photos

From: SARAH KELLEN
To: CAROLYN

Sarah called stating she was calling in regards to Mr. Epstein and offered payment for photos.

Call
N/A

Maxwell's name

From: CAROLYN
To: Shawn

Carolyn told Shawn the woman's name was Maxwell but could not pronounce her first name.

Meeting
N/A

Scheduling massages

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell would call and set up appointment times.

Call
N/A

Scheduling massages

From: SARAH KELLEN
To: CAROLYN

Sarah Kellen took over calling for appointments.

Call
N/A

Scheduling appointments

From: CAROLYN
To: Epstein House

Carolyn sometimes called to make appointments herself.

Call
N/A

Scheduling massage appointments

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell calling to schedule massage appointments.

Call
N/A

Scheduling massage appointments

From: SARAH KELLEN
To: CAROLYN

Sarah Kellen took over the responsibility of scheduling appointments.

Call
N/A

Recruitment for massages

From: Virginia
To: CAROLYN

Virginia told Carolyn she could make money giving massages to a guy in Palm Beach.

Meeting
N/A

Investigation

From: Florida Investigators
To: CAROLYN

Investigative interview

Interview
N/A

Incubus Tickets

From: SARAH
To: CAROLYN

Call from New York informing Carolyn that Epstein left concert tickets for her.

Call
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity