Laura Menninger
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
39
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
R
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict for Laura Menninger | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-27 | N/A | Laura Menninger sends supplemental letter regarding anticipated testimony of Mr. [Redacted] to US... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-21 | N/A | Submission of proposed redactions regarding Witness-3 | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Exchange of legal documents regarding redactions for Witness-3 evidence. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Hard drive with discovery materials sent via FedEx to Laura Menninger's office in Colorado. | Colorado | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
EFTA00016302.pdf
An email dated September 4, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email submits agreed-upon proposed redactions to defense letters dated August 24, 2020, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Legal counsel Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Christian Everdell, and Mark S. Cohen are copied.
EFTA00016267.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 regarding 'U.S. v. Maxwell'. Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. sent 'Ms. Maxwell's Rule 16(b)(1)(C) Disclosures' to USANYS counsel at the request of Jeffrey Pagliuca. The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office.
EFTA00016265.pdf
This document is an email dated October 31, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to defense counsel (including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger) and prosecutors (USANYS) regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email serves to transmit an attached Order issued by Judge Nathan that was scheduled to be docketed the following morning.
EFTA00016204.pdf
This document contains an email chain dated November 3, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates courtesy copies of Electronic Case Files (ECF) filings, specifically a bail application and a document regarding the disclosure of juror names. The email is copied to other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00016203.pdf
An email dated November 3, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to a redacted recipient, copying attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email serves as a courtesy copy of an ECF filing in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330), specifically attaching a document regarding the disclosure of juror names.
EFTA00015968.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 17, 2020, between defense counsel (Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger) and government prosecutors regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as 'GM' in attachments). The defense provides a proposed Protective Order and argues for specific terms, including the removal of a 'Highly Confidential' designation and the provision of a laptop to Maxwell in the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) so she can review discovery materials, as in-person legal visits were not allowed at the time. The email emphasizes the defense's desire to avoid trying the case in the press and cites concerns about witness harassment.
EFTA00015823.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 16 evidence discs labeled as 'Epstein Encase Files.' The government identified these discs as containing a forensic image of a computer seized from Epstein's Palm Beach residence in 2005. However, the government concluded that the original warrant authorized seizure but not the search of the computer's contents, and thus they lack the lawful authority to review the files or allow the defense to access them.
EFTA00015804.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The discussions concern protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' materials, including nude images and physical evidence (such as massage tables and plaster busts) seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The parties negotiate the location of the review (FBI Bronx warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), the presence of the defendant, and the use of electronic devices by defense counsel during the review.
EFTA00015770.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The correspondence details negotiations over the location of the review (500 Pearl St vs. FBI Bronx Warehouse), the transportation of specific physical evidence (including excluding 'bulky' massage tables and cash), and protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' and 'obscene' electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The defense expresses concerns about missing items, the format of electronic surveillance, and the need for their client to meaningfully participate in the review.
EFTA00015753.pdf
This document contains a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Menninger, Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for case 20 Cr. 330. The discussions focus on scheduling physical evidence reviews at an FBI warehouse in the Bronx and electronic evidence reviews at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. Key evidence items discussed include massage tables, plaster busts, cash, shredded paper, and thousands of 'highly confidential' nude or partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices and residences.
EFTA00015738.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case US v. Maxwell. The emails discuss the scheduling of Maxwell's transport by Marshals to 500 Pearl Street to review 'Highly Confidential' materials, including 2,100 nude/partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The correspondence also details disputes over the transport of physical evidence from an FBI warehouse in the Bronx, specifically mentioning 'bulky' items like massage tables, plaster busts of female torsos, and a stuffed dog, which the government argued were difficult to transport.
EFTA00015636.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office regarding discovery disputes. Key issues include the logistics of providing electronic discovery to Maxwell in prison (MDC) because she cannot use disks, missing email attachments, and metadata discrepancies for thousands of files and photos recovered from Epstein's devices and residences. The prosecution explains that 'carved' or deleted files lack original metadata and that certain photos came from seized CDs rather than devices processed by the FBI's CART unit.
EFTA00015185.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell and others) dated October 8, 2021. The email serves as notification for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and discusses logistical arrangements for providing digital evidence to Ms. Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
EFTA00014984.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell. Nicole Simmons of the defense firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman sent Rule 16 disclosures to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) at the request of Jeff Pagliuca. The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the USANYS office with a note regarding a brief due on November 15th assigned to Ryan Hall.
EFTA00014884.pdf
An email dated November 24, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding the 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' case (implied by context and case number 20cr330). The email discusses the procedure for filing proposed redactions related to expert testimony and sealing specific exhibits, referencing Docket No. 495. Several attachments containing proposed redactions and responses are included.
EFTA00014710.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding *U.S. v. Maxwell*. Defense attorneys Bobbi Sternheim and Nicole Simmons communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers about submitting Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the response was submitted under temporary seal and that the government and moving parties were subsequently served after redactions were handled.
EFTA00014699.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorneys (Sternheim and Simmons) communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the submission of Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the EVCP has been served and discusses protocols for redactions and serving the moving parties.
EFTA00014695.pdf
An email dated November 22, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger. The email discusses the procedure for filing redacted versions of legal documents related to birth certificates, exhibit GX-52, and a motion to quash, referencing Docket Numbers 473, 474, and 476. The sender proposes a sequence for filing cover letters and redacted motions to the Court.
EFTA00014669.pdf
This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.
EFTA00014661.pdf
This document contains an email exchange between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Laura Menninger, and US Prosecutors regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, which limits press statements. Menninger initially flags comments made by attorney Spencer Kuvin in 'The Sun' as a potential violation. The prosecution responds that Kuvin does not represent any trial witnesses, but counters that Maxwell's own appellate attorney, David Markus, may have violated the rule via statements to the 'NY Post'.
EFTA00014655.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 20, 2021, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca). The correspondence concerns the logistics of discovery production, including the shipment of hard drives containing witness materials to counsel in Colorado and to Maxwell at the MDC, as well as clarifications regarding Bates numbering errors. The emails provide specific FedEx tracking numbers for the shipments.
EFTA00014650.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 20, 2021, accompanying a production of discovery materials. The production includes Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as statements from individuals the government does not currently plan to call. The letter also clarifies labeling protocols for confidential documents under the Protective Order to avoid confusion with classified material.
EFTA00014647.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between defense attorney Christian Everdell and an Assistant United States Attorney for the SDNY. They are negotiating the specific wording of a legal stipulation regarding a partial transcript of a witness's trial testimony given on a February 26th. The names of several other attorneys (Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca) appear in the CC line.
EFTA00014595.pdf
A 'Notice of Docket Activity' email from the Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, regarding the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (20-2413). The document confirms the filing of a 'Notice of Hearing Date Acknowledgment' on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell on October 9, 2020, and lists the attorneys served electronically with the notice.
EFTA00014496.pdf
This document contains an email chain between a partner at Edwards Pottinger LLC and likely federal authorities (SDNY/FBI) from late 2018/early 2019. The correspondence outlines preparations for a new investigation or prosecution, including requests for victim lists beyond those in the original Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Crucially, it provides a comprehensive list of lawyers who represented Jeffrey Epstein, his pilots, staff, and Ghislaine Maxwell, noting that Bruce Reinhart (now a magistrate judge) represented the pilots and staff.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Discussing logistics for Bronx view on April 12; raising issues about specific items (boxes, framed photo) that need to be moved to 500 Pearl; questioning 'missing items' and electronic surveillance formats.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Discussing logistics for Bronx view. Raising issues about 'Highly Confidential' vs 'bulky' items, specific Florida evidence items, and electronic surveillance files.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Discussing logistics for Bronx warehouse view and 500 Pearl view. Raising issues about 'highly confidential' vs 'bulky' items, photography rights, and electronic surveillance files.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Providing revised spreadsheets for mini-VHS tapes. Confirming Marshals will bring Maxwell to MDC by 4:30pm, setting review times at 500 Pearl from 9:30am-4:30pm starting April 13th.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming Maxwell's transport to 500 Pearl on April 13. Discussing annotated evidence spreadsheets, mini-VHS tapes, and items at FBI headquarters (shredded paper).
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Raising issues about spreadsheets: items marked for Bronx that need to be at 500 Pearl (highly confidential but not bulky); questions about photographing bulky photos; questions about electronic surveillance files.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Addressing logistics: FBI inspections at Bronx warehouse, designation of 'Confidential' vs 'Highly Confidential' photos, witness statements, use of proffer rooms at 500 Pearl, and bringing 2,100 electronic images to 500 Pearl.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Discussing logistics for Bronx warehouse visit; 'Confidential' vs 'Highly Confidential' photo rules; witness statements.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to government proposal; demanding access to photograph items at Bronx warehouse; refusing massage tables.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Accepting proposal with modifications regarding photography of items at Bronx warehouse and protocols for electronic media.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Accepting proposal with modifications. Requesting access to inspect 'excluded' items at Bronx warehouse. Discussing equipment for playing media and space requirements.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to defense requests; refusing to transport all physical evidence; discussing 'bulky' items like massage tables and plaster busts.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Response regarding logistics for physical evidence review. Refusing to move massage tables/bulky items to Pearl St. Explaining image categories.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response regarding physical evidence. Refusing to bring massage tables, cash, and bulky items (plaster busts, stuffed dog) to 500 Pearl. Discussing playback equipment for tapes.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Response to defense requests. Refusing to move massage tables, electronic devices that can't be turned on, and bulky items like plaster busts/stuffed dog to 500 Pearl. Agreeing to move 15-20 boxes of physical evidence.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to defense requests; refusing to move all physical evidence to 500 Pearl; agreeing to exclude massage tables and cash from transport; discussing 2,100 highly confidential images.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Response regarding physical evidence. Refusing to bring massage tables, framed pictures, and plaster busts to 500 Pearl. Discussing playback equipment for recordings.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Stating the proposal is inadequate for defense. demanding laptops be allowed, all physical evidence be brought to 500 Pearl (except massage tables), and questioning why 2,100 'highly confidential' images were not shared earlier.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Complaint that current proposal prevents meaningful defense; requesting all physical evidence be moved to 500 Pearl.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Detailed response regarding deficiencies in prosecution's proposal for evidence review. Requests transport of evidence to 500 Pearl St, permission for laptops, and segregation of 'highly confidential' items.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Stating the Gov proposal is inadequate. Demanding laptops/devices be allowed, and questioning why 2,100 highly confidential images were not previously shared.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Rejecting proposal as inadequate; insisting on laptops/devices during review; demanding physical evidence be brought to 500 Pearl; questioning missing highly confidential images.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Stating previous proposal was inadequate; demanding physical evidence be moved to 500 Pearl; requesting laptops/devices be allowed; asking about 2,100+7 highly confidential images not previously shared.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Detailed explanation of 'Highly Confidential' nude images (2,100 from devices, 3,400 from discs, 7 hard copies). Explaining constraints on reviewing obscene material. Detailing rules for Bronx warehouse review.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Providing spreadsheets of physical evidence. Detailing 2,100 electronic images seized from Epstein's devices (highly confidential/nude), 3,400 images from discs, and 7 hard copy nude images.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity