Laura Menninger
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
39
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
R
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-01 | N/A | Attorney Laura Menninger appeared for oral argument on MAXWELL's behalf. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-24 | N/A | Notice of Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell served via email. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2018-11-07 | N/A | Court hearing where Laura Menninger mentioned Dershowitz as a 'third party'. | Court | View |
| 2016-06-06 | N/A | Deadline for production of documents | Ft. Lauderdale, FL | View |
| 2016-04-21 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding Pro Hac Vice motions and discovery disputes. | SDNY Courtroom | View |
| 2016-02-25 | Legal document transmission | Plaintiff's proposed Protective Order (Exhibit 4) was sent to Laura Menninger. | N/A | View |
| 0007-11-01 | N/A | Hearing where Maxwell's lawyer mentioned Dershowitz's name. | Court | View |
EFTA00010016.pdf
An email dated November 9, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to provide a courtesy copy of an ECF filing ('Reply_to_Dkt_423.pdf') related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330) and to update recipients on Sternheim's new office address, which is redacted in the document.
EFTA00009985.pdf
An email dated November 9, 2021, from defense attorney Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) providing a Rule 16 Disclosure. The email includes attachments referencing AT&T certifications, FedEx records/invoices, Interlochen records, a release regarding A. Farmer, and the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
EFTA00009981.pdf
An email chain from November 2021 concerning the *US v. Maxwell* trial. Defense attorney Laura Menninger flagged missing witness materials (designated 3521-003). USANYS staff identified an indexing error where files were mislabeled during production. The prosecution team corrected the stamps on the documents and arranged to deliver a thumb drive with the supplemental 3500 material (witness statements) to the judge's chambers.
EFTA00009980.pdf
An email dated November 8, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the U.S. v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email serves as a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (referenced as 'fling') related to an attachment titled 'Suggestion_to_Dkt_404.pdf' and provides notice of Sternheim's new office address. Recipients include co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00009895.pdf
An email dated April 20, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves filing notice for a letter regarding redactions to the defense's reply briefs in the case US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00018362.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a stipulation agreed upon by the prosecution and defense regarding the testimony of Sergeant Michael Dawson to avoid recalling him to the stand. Defense attorney Christian Everdell reads the stipulation into the record, which concerns a cardboard box (Government Exhibit 294) recovered during a search.
DOJ-OGR-00014878.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a pretrial conference in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. Counsel for the government and for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, state their appearances for the record. The judge outlines the case schedule, noting that jury selection began on November 4th and the trial is set to commence on November 29th, and sets the agenda to address the defendant's motions to exclude evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00008246.jpg
This document is a transcript from a pretrial conference held on December 8, 2021, for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan presides over the session, with legal teams for both the government (led by Maurene Comey) and the defense (led by Bobbi C. Sternheim) introducing themselves. The primary purpose of the conference is to discuss the logistics of jury selection (voir dire) and review lists of prospective jurors based on questionnaires administered in November.
DOJ-OGR-00001875.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal letter dated December 7, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. The letter requests the immediate elimination of 'onerous' and 'restrictive' detention conditions for her client, Ms. Maxwell. Copies of the letter were sent via email to four other attorneys involved in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001006.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, for a hearing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Nathan. The transcript records the appearances of the legal counsel for both the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the U.S. government. The government's counsel also requests permission for staff from the U.S. Attorney's office to be dialed into the hearing due to technical issues with an overflow line from Connecticut.
DOJ-OGR-00020930.jpg
This document is page 16 of a juror questionnaire (Juror ID: 50) filed on March 9, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The juror confirms they have no personal or familial relationships with the defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The document contains handwritten 'X' marks indicating negative responses to questions regarding potential conflicts of interest.
DOJ-OGR-00020881.jpg
This document is a news article from DailyMail.Online detailing an interview with 'Scotty,' a juror from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Scotty discusses the jury's deliberations, their negative reaction to the defense's aggressive tactics towards victims, and the overwhelming complexity of the 80-page jury instructions. A sidebar article reports on a separate legal issue, describing a 'brutal' court hearing for Prince Andrew in New York for a sexual abuse lawsuit, where a judge appeared unreceptive to his lawyers' arguments to dismiss the case.
DOJ-OGR-00020708.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log detailing proceedings in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell between December 27, 2021, and January 5, 2022. It records the conclusion of the jury trial, the guilty verdict on multiple counts, and subsequent orders regarding post-trial motions and scheduling. Additionally, it notes correspondence regarding juror issues and a request for a vaccine booster for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00020707.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 19, 2021, to December 22, 2021. It details various motions, orders regarding public access to trial exhibits and closing arguments, and minute entries for the jury trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020706.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell between December 17 and 19, 2021. It details daily minute entries for the jury trial, orders regarding jury charges and verdict sheets, and various letters filed by both the defense and prosecution concerning jury instructions, testimony preclusion (specifically regarding Alexander Hamilton), and closing logistics. The document highlights specific judicial edits to legal definitions, such as defining a 'minor' as an individual under the age of 18.
DOJ-OGR-00020705.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing events from December 15 to December 17, 2021. It records minute entries for the jury trial held on December 16, 2021, listing all present attorneys for the defense and prosecution. The document also details various court orders regarding the admissibility of witness testimony (specifically mentioning Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton) and procedural disputes over prior inconsistent statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020704.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings between December 11 and December 15, 2021. It details various filings including letters regarding witness orders, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as a significant Memorandum Opinion denying a defense motion to allow witnesses to testify anonymously. The document lists the legal teams for both the prosecution (USA) and the defense, along with Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings during this trial period.
DOJ-OGR-00020703.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering entries from December 9 and 10, 2021. It details legal arguments over the admission of Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52), involving witness Juan Alessi, where Judge Nathan overruled defense objections. It also records minute entries for the jury trial proceedings on those dates and the filing of transcripts.
DOJ-OGR-00020702.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 6 to December 8, 2021. It details minute entries for the jury trial proceedings, identifying the attorneys present for both the defense (Sternheim, Pagliuca, Everdell, Menninger) and the prosecution (Pomerantz, Comey, Moe, Rohrbach). The document also includes an order regarding the reimbursement of transportation costs for Juror Number 70 and notes the filing of a transcript for a conference held on November 15, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020701.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY court case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 2, 2021, to December 5, 2021. It records minute entries for jury trial proceedings, orders regarding witness anonymity and juror transportation, and various correspondence regarding witnesses 'Jane', 'Michael Dawson', and 'Witness-3'. The document tracks the legal motions and daily trial activities involving the prosecution team, defense team, and Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020700.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the SDNY regarding US v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events on November 29 and 30, 2021. It details the beginning of the jury trial, orders regarding the production of materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program, and the handling of witness privacy and pseudonyms. It lists the legal teams for both the defense and prosecution present during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020692.jpg
This document is a court docket report (SDNY) covering November 15-17, 2021, detailing pretrial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the filing of transcripts for prior conferences, a memo endorsement ordering the government to use FedEx for disclosures due to mail delays at the MDC, and minute entries for a pretrial conference, voir dire, and the beginning of jury selection. The document lists the full legal teams for both the defense and the prosecution present during these proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020687.jpg
This document is a court docket entry from February 28, 2023, for Case 22-1426, primarily concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It details court orders and filings from November 2021, including COVID-19 protocols for courthouse access, scheduling revisions for motions in limine, and a pretrial conference. The entries highlight communications between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys) regarding trial logistics and a ruling on witness testimony, all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020682.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from November 1-3, 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present and remanded, as well as various filings including motions for reconsideration regarding bond and juror disclosure. The Judge also issued orders regarding voir dire instructions and scheduled a hearing for November 10, 2021, to discuss evidentiary rules (Rule 412 and 702/Daubert).
DOJ-OGR-00020677.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the SDNY regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell appeared via telephone and sets forth a comprehensive order regarding jury selection protocols, including the use of questionnaires, anonymized juror numbers, and schedules for voir dire in November 2021. The Judge explicitly denied a request to seal the proposed jury questionnaires, citing the First Amendment right to public access despite the case's significant media attention.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Clarifies that the provided spreadsheet only indexes physical evidence produced in discovery, not all items in custody. Mentions August 20, 2020 production of search warrant returns.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Proposes 1:30 p.m. ET / 11:30 a.m. MST for a call tomorrow and asks for an alternative if not suitable.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Sending copy of index of physical items from FBI-Miami office produced Aug 21, 2020, and referencing scans within Bates range SDNY_GM_00172218-SDNY_GM_00173007.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Objections...
Submitting a letter setting forth Ms. Maxwell's objections to government redactions to their Omnibus Response and Exhibit 5.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Asks if the provided index is the only one available for physical evidence.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Asking if the provided index is the only one available.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Asking if the attached index is the only index of physical evidence available.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Sending index of physical items in FBI custody (Miami) produced on Aug 21, 2020. Mentions Bates range SDNY_GM_00172218-SDNY_GM_00173007.
US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view eviden...
Counsel - Please see attached correspondence. -Laura
US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view eviden...
Submission of attached correspondence regarding evidence viewing.
US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view eviden...
Initial request with attached correspondence.
US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view eviden...
Counsel – Please see attached correspondence.
US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view eviden...
Sending attached correspondence.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Attaches correspondence.
US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view eviden...
Cover email for an attached letter regarding a request to view evidence.
US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view eviden...
Initial request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, and scenes.
Protective Order
Detailed negotiation regarding a Protective Order, defining 'Confidential', removing 'Highly Confidential', and requesting a laptop for the client to review discovery in jail.
No Subject
An email correspondence from Defendant's counsel, Laura Menninger, to Plaintiff's counsel, Sigrid McCawley. The content is not detailed but the email is attached as Exhibit 3.
Response in case
Claimed Roberts fabricated stories for money.
Response in Maxwell case
Claimed Roberts fabricated abuse stories for money.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity