| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
20
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
12
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Jessica Lonergan
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional subordinate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANALISA TORRES
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor vs defendant |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jessica Lonergan
|
Subordinate superior |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional subordinate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Adversarial defendant prosecutor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional hierarchical |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Testimony/deposition | The deponent is questioned about their awareness of Mr. Epstein's sexual activities with others a... | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-05 | N/A | Date subpoena was issued/signed | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-08-12 | N/A | Transmission of discovery materials to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn. | MDC Brooklyn | View |
| 2021-07-07 | N/A | Subpoena issued by Audrey Strauss. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-07-01 | Legal filing | The United States Attorney's office filed Document 309 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-05-21 | Legal filing | The U.S. Attorney's office submitted the conclusion of a legal motion arguing that the court shou... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-05-20 | N/A | Signing of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-04-15 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed this letter with the court. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-04-09 | N/A | Discussion regarding Main Justice FOIA response and potential document production reconsideration. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2021-04-06 | Court filing | Document 196 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-03-29 | N/A | Letter sent regarding discovery materials for Minor Victim-4 in US v. Maxwell | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-03-29 | N/A | Filing of Document 187 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN | United States District Court | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Internal USANYS correspondence regarding issuing a subpoena. | New York (implied SDNY office) | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Approval of friendly subpoena issuance | View | |
| 2021-02-10 | N/A | Law360 article published regarding potential replacements for SDNY U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss. | New York | View |
| 2020-12-18 | Legal filing | Document 100 was filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-18 | Legal filing | Document 100 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-17 | N/A | Transmission of discovery materials to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn via Federal Express. | New York, NY to Brooklyn, NY | View |
| 2020-12-16 | Legal filing | Submission of a legal document arguing for the denial of a defendant's Renewed Bail Motion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | Legal filing | The U.S. Attorney's office filed a document arguing that a defendant's 'Renewed Bail Motion' shou... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | Legal document creation | The conclusion of a legal motion arguing for the denial of a Renewed Bail Motion was dated. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-12-03 | N/A | Transmission of discovery materials to MDC for Ghislaine Maxwell | New York, NY to Brooklyn, NY | View |
| 2020-11-23 | N/A | Filing of Document 74 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Submission of OPR's final report on the Jeffrey Epstein matter to USANYS. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2020-11-05 | N/A | DAG Meeting Case Overview | Unknown | View |
This is a subpoena from the US District Court (SDNY) issued on October 5, 2021, to The Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. It demands the production of employment records regarding a redacted individual for the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The appearance/production date is set for November 29, 2021.
This document is a joint letter from the prosecution and defense to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The Government argues that a written response from MDC legal counsel is sufficient to address concerns, while the Defense argues that Warden Heriberto Tellez should appear in person to explain 'onerous' conditions such as 15-minute flashlight checks and body scans. Judge Nathan added a handwritten order at the end requiring MDC legal counsel to submit a letter by December 4, 2020, before determining if further action is needed.
This document is a letter dated November 18, 2020, from Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss to the Legal Counsel of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. It details the provision of a specifically modified laptop to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center to allow her to review discovery materials for her case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The letter certifies that the laptop's recording (mic/camera) and communication (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/Ethernet) capabilities have been disabled.
This document is an email chain ending on September 1, 2020, forwarding internal correspondence from July 1, 2020, involving Audrey Strauss (USANYS) and redacted colleagues. The discussion concerns the drafting and editing of press remarks regarding Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'), specifically focusing on making the language 'natural' and ensuring it aligns with the details of the indictment.
This document is a Deferred Prosecution Agreement for Michael Thomas, a Bureau of Prisons guard charged in connection with the events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. Thomas admits to willfully falsifying 'count and round slips' at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 9 and 10, 2019. In exchange for deferring prosecution for six months, Thomas agrees to 100 hours of community service, cooperation with federal investigators (FBI, DOJ-OIG), and good behavior.
This document is a Deferred Prosecution Agreement for Tova Noel, a defendant charged with falsifying records at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 9-10, 2019, the dates surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. Noel admits to willfully creating false count and round slips in the Special Housing Unit. The agreement defers prosecution for six months contingent on good behavior, 100 hours of community service, and cooperation with the DOJ-OIG and FBI regarding her employment at the BOP.
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of an arraignment and bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, held via teleconference on July 14, 2020. The case, United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, was heard in the Southern District of New York before District Judge Alison J. Nathan. The page lists the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, and the defense, represented by attorneys from the law firms Cohen & Gresser, LLP and Haddon Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
A legal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government consents to defense requests to redact the identities of proposed bail cosigners to protect their privacy but objects to holding a sealed 'in camera' hearing for the bail application, citing the public's and victims' right to observe proceedings.
This court order, dated December 2, 2020, addresses the individualized detention conditions of Ms. Maxwell, noting concerns about the lack of redress for serious conditions. It directs Warden Tellez to provide a first-hand accounting to the Court and counsel regarding these conditions. Additionally, MDC legal counsel is ordered to submit a letter to the Court by December 4, 2020, for review to determine if further information is needed.
This document is the second page of a filing from the United States Attorney's Office regarding the conditions of confinement for a defendant (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on the case number) at the MDC. It details the schedule for legal calls, discovery review, and isolation, asserting that the defendant has more access than other inmates and that the Government is actively communicating with defense counsel regarding any concerns.
This legal document is a filing by the U.S. Government in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, requesting an extension for producing approximately 1.2 million documents seized from Epstein's residences. The Government asks to move the deadline to November 23, 2020, and to extend the motions schedule. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants the request in an order dated November 9, 2020, setting new deadlines for motions into early 2021.
This legal document is an affidavit filed on November 6, 2020, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Comey certifies that the government attempted to negotiate in good faith with Maxwell's defense counsel for a two-week extension (from November 9 to November 23, 2020) for the production of documents seized from Jeffrey Epstein, but the parties were unable to reach an agreement. The extension was requested to allow an outside vendor to complete bates stamping and downloading of the electronic evidence.
This document is the final page of a Government filing (dated Oct 30, 2020) regarding the detention conditions and discovery process for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government argues against the need for a court order regarding MDC issues, citing that protocols are already in place for passing papers, COVID-19 safety (Plexiglas barriers), and laptop viewing. The filing asserts that the defendant has access to discovery materials for approximately 13 hours a day—more than any other inmate—and details technical efforts to resolve file viewing issues mentioned in a footnote.
This document is the conclusion page (page 8) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated October 7, 2020. Submitted by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz to Judge Alison J. Nathan, the text affirms the Government's commitment to its disclosure obligations following representations made at an initial conference.
This document is page 3 of a legal filing submitted on October 7, 2020, by the Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Government argues against the premature disclosure of witness identities and sensitive materials to the defense, citing risks to the ongoing investigation and the potential to deter other victims from coming forward. They request the Court to approve a delay in disclosing these materials pursuant to Rule 16(d).
This document is the final page (Page 3) of a legal filing (Document 60) submitted on October 6, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Government, represented by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz, requests a delay in disclosing witness identities and sensitive materials to the defense to prevent jeopardizing the ongoing investigation and to encourage victims to come forward. The filing cites Rule 16(d) as the legal basis for this protective measure.
This document is the final page of a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020. The Government respectfully requests that the Court schedule a date approximately 180 days in the future for them to provide an update on their position regarding the sealing of documents in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The filing is submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and her assistants Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
This is the final page (page 5) of a legal filing by the US Attorney's Office in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government argues that the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials in separate civil cases should be denied because the materials are irrelevant to the civil litigation and the request attempts to bypass a protective order. The Government asserts the defendant is attempting to use these materials merely to attack the Government in a forum where it cannot respond.
This document is a "Notice of Appearance" filed on August 20, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz, on behalf of Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, formally notifies the court of her appearance in the case and requests to be added as a Filing User for electronic notifications.
This legal document, filed on August 13, 2020, is a response from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to a defendant's requests regarding housing and access to discovery. The prosecution argues that the defendant's application is moot because the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has already granted the defendant extensive daily access to discovery materials from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The document concludes by requesting that the defendant's application be denied.
This document is an Affidavit of Certification filed on July 28, 2020, in the criminal case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller affirms that the prosecution and defense have conferred on a proposed protective order but have been unable to resolve two areas of dispute. The first point of contention involves the defense's objection to the government's proposal regarding the referencing of witness and victim identities.
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the U.S. Government's response to a defendant's motion in a criminal case. The Government argues against the defendant's attempt to restrict its use of gathered materials and to impose restrictions on third parties, calling the request unprecedented and without legal basis. The filing, submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss to Judge Alison J. Nathan, urges the court to deny the defendant's motion and implement the Government's own proposed protective order.
This document is a letter filed on July 27, 2020, by the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests time to respond to a defense motion for a protective order, noting that discussions on the matter were ongoing as of the previous evening. At the bottom of the document, Judge Nathan orders a schedule for the response (due July 28) and reply (due July 29), and mandates the parties meet and confer by phone.
This legal document is a letter dated July 27, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution requests an opportunity to respond to a motion for a protective order filed that morning by the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter notes that the defense's filing was a surprise, as the Government believed discussions to jointly propose a protective order were still ongoing.
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing that recent public statements by the government have been prejudicial to her right to a fair trial. It specifically cites a press conference held by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss on July 2, 2020, following Maxwell's arrest, quoting her statements from the New York Law Journal and the Washington Post as evidence of improper commentary on Maxwell's credibility and guilt.
Explanation of enhanced security schedule and flashlight checks.
Requesting approval to send a subpoena to an attorney interviewed in Florida to obtain a 2009 settlement agreement between a victim and Epstein.
Requesting permission to send a friendly subpoena to an attorney to obtain a settlement agreement between a victim and Epstein from a 2009 civil suit.
Approved
Approved
Requesting approval to send a 'friendly subpoena' to an attorney to obtain a 2009 settlement agreement between a victim and Epstein. The attorney is willing but needs the subpoena. The document is relevant to the Maxwell investigation.
Attorney Lombardino informs US Attorney Strauss that his client (former FBI/Lt. Col) at Clinton Correctional Facility possesses important information regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and requests an interview.
Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss held a press conference immediately following Ms. Maxwell's arrest, commenting on her credibility and alleged guilt, which this document argues was prejudicial.
Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss held a press conference immediately following Ms. Maxwell's arrest, where she commented on Maxwell's credibility and alleged guilt, which this document argues was prejudicial.
Discussing editing the remarks to be shorter and more natural while comporting with the indictment.
Sending edits on draft remarks geared toward simplifying language.
Many thanks.
Submitting draft remarks and Q&A for a potential press conference regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
Sender informs Audrey they have put together draft remarks and a Q&A for a potential press conference next week regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. Mentions working with the press office on a visual.
Asking if they have the transcript because [Redacted] is asking for it.
Confirming they will send it and are ready to do updates.
Instructing to send transcript now so she can pass it along, then will call.
Sending the attached transcript (J8RpEPSf.pdf).
Automatic reply stating the sender is on trial before Judge Ronnie Abrams and providing alternative contacts for United States v. Epstein case matters.
Audrey – Attached is a revised (and shortened) memo for ODAG.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity