AUDREY STRAUSS

Person
Mentions
476
Relationships
67
Events
60
Documents
236

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
67 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Prosecutor defendant
20 Very Strong
20
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
18 Very Strong
14
View
person Lara Pomerantz
Professional
12 Very Strong
15
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Business associate
12 Very Strong
11
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Professional
10 Very Strong
18
View
location UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Alison Moe
Professional
10 Very Strong
14
View
person Jessica Lonergan
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person ALISON J. NATHAN
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person ALEX ROSSMILLER
Professional
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Adversarial
7
3
View
person Alison Moe
Professional subordinate
6
2
View
person ANALISA TORRES
Professional
6
1
View
location UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Professional
6
2
View
person Honorable Alison J. Nathan
Professional
6
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Prosecutor vs defendant
6
6
View
person Jessica Lonergan
Subordinate superior
6
2
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Professional subordinate
6
2
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Lara Pomerantz
Professional subordinate
5
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Adversarial defendant prosecutor
5
1
View
person ALEX ROSSMILLER
Business associate
5
1
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Professional hierarchical
5
1
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Employment
5
1
View
person Juror 50
None
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Testimony/deposition The deponent is questioned about their awareness of Mr. Epstein's sexual activities with others a... N/A View
2021-10-05 N/A Date subpoena was issued/signed New York, New York View
2021-08-12 N/A Transmission of discovery materials to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn. MDC Brooklyn View
2021-07-07 N/A Subpoena issued by Audrey Strauss. New York, New York View
2021-07-01 Legal filing The United States Attorney's office filed Document 309 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Southern District of New York View
2021-05-21 Legal filing The U.S. Attorney's office submitted the conclusion of a legal motion arguing that the court shou... New York, New York View
2021-05-20 N/A Signing of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement New York, New York View
2021-04-15 Court filing The U.S. Government filed this letter with the court. Southern District of New York View
2021-04-09 N/A Discussion regarding Main Justice FOIA response and potential document production reconsideration. Email correspondence View
2021-04-06 Court filing Document 196 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Southern District of New York View
2021-03-29 N/A Letter sent regarding discovery materials for Minor Victim-4 in US v. Maxwell New York, NY View
2021-03-29 N/A Filing of Document 187 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN United States District Court View
2021-03-26 N/A Internal USANYS correspondence regarding issuing a subpoena. New York (implied SDNY office) View
2021-03-26 N/A Approval of friendly subpoena issuance Email View
2021-02-10 N/A Law360 article published regarding potential replacements for SDNY U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss. New York View
2020-12-18 Legal filing Document 100 was filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2020-12-18 Legal filing Document 100 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2020-12-17 N/A Transmission of discovery materials to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn via Federal Express. New York, NY to Brooklyn, NY View
2020-12-16 Legal filing Submission of a legal document arguing for the denial of a defendant's Renewed Bail Motion. New York, New York View
2020-12-16 Legal filing The U.S. Attorney's office filed a document arguing that a defendant's 'Renewed Bail Motion' shou... New York, New York View
2020-12-16 Legal document creation The conclusion of a legal motion arguing for the denial of a Renewed Bail Motion was dated. New York, New York View
2020-12-03 N/A Transmission of discovery materials to MDC for Ghislaine Maxwell New York, NY to Brooklyn, NY View
2020-11-23 N/A Filing of Document 74 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Southern District of New York View
2020-11-12 N/A Submission of OPR's final report on the Jeffrey Epstein matter to USANYS. Email correspondence View
2020-11-05 N/A DAG Meeting Case Overview Unknown View

EFTA00010243.pdf

This is a subpoena from the US District Court (SDNY) issued on October 5, 2021, to The Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. It demands the production of employment records regarding a redacted individual for the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The appearance/production date is set for November 29, 2021.

Court subpoena
2025-12-25

EFTA00010196.pdf

This document is a joint letter from the prosecution and defense to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The Government argues that a written response from MDC legal counsel is sufficient to address concerns, while the Defense argues that Warden Heriberto Tellez should appear in person to explain 'onerous' conditions such as 15-minute flashlight checks and body scans. Judge Nathan added a handwritten order at the end requiring MDC legal counsel to submit a letter by December 4, 2020, before determining if further action is needed.

Legal correspondence / court order
2025-12-25

EFTA00009927.pdf

This document is a letter dated November 18, 2020, from Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss to the Legal Counsel of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. It details the provision of a specifically modified laptop to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center to allow her to review discovery materials for her case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The letter certifies that the laptop's recording (mic/camera) and communication (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/Ethernet) capabilities have been disabled.

Legal correspondence / official letter
2025-12-25

EFTA00009863.pdf

This document is an email chain ending on September 1, 2020, forwarding internal correspondence from July 1, 2020, involving Audrey Strauss (USANYS) and redacted colleagues. The discussion concerns the drafting and editing of press remarks regarding Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM'), specifically focusing on making the language 'natural' and ensuring it aligns with the details of the indictment.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00009786.pdf

This document is a Deferred Prosecution Agreement for Michael Thomas, a Bureau of Prisons guard charged in connection with the events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. Thomas admits to willfully falsifying 'count and round slips' at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 9 and 10, 2019. In exchange for deferring prosecution for six months, Thomas agrees to 100 hours of community service, cooperation with federal investigators (FBI, DOJ-OIG), and good behavior.

Court document (deferred prosecution agreement)
2025-12-25

EFTA00009781.pdf

This document is a Deferred Prosecution Agreement for Tova Noel, a defendant charged with falsifying records at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 9-10, 2019, the dates surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. Noel admits to willfully creating false count and round slips in the Special Housing Unit. The agreement defers prosecution for six months contingent on good behavior, 100 hours of community service, and cooperation with the DOJ-OIG and FBI regarding her employment at the BOP.

Deferred prosecution agreement
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00001878.jpg

This document is the cover page for the court transcript of an arraignment and bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, held via teleconference on July 14, 2020. The case, United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, was heard in the Southern District of New York before District Judge Alison J. Nathan. The page lists the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, and the defense, represented by attorneys from the law firms Cohen & Gresser, LLP and Haddon Morgan & Foreman, P.C.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001846.jpg

A legal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government consents to defense requests to redact the identities of proposed bail cosigners to protect their privacy but objects to holding a sealed 'in camera' hearing for the bail application, citing the public's and victims' right to observe proceedings.

Legal correspondence (government letter to court)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001845.jpg

This court order, dated December 2, 2020, addresses the individualized detention conditions of Ms. Maxwell, noting concerns about the lack of redress for serious conditions. It directs Warden Tellez to provide a first-hand accounting to the Court and counsel regarding these conditions. Additionally, MDC legal counsel is ordered to submit a letter to the Court by December 4, 2020, for review to determine if further information is needed.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001836.jpg

This document is the second page of a filing from the United States Attorney's Office regarding the conditions of confinement for a defendant (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on the case number) at the MDC. It details the schedule for legal calls, discovery review, and isolation, asserting that the defendant has more access than other inmates and that the Government is actively communicating with defense counsel regarding any concerns.

Legal filing (page 2 of a court document)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001831.jpg

This legal document is a filing by the U.S. Government in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, requesting an extension for producing approximately 1.2 million documents seized from Epstein's residences. The Government asks to move the deadline to November 23, 2020, and to extend the motions schedule. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants the request in an order dated November 9, 2020, setting new deadlines for motions into early 2021.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001822.jpg

This legal document is an affidavit filed on November 6, 2020, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Comey certifies that the government attempted to negotiate in good faith with Maxwell's defense counsel for a two-week extension (from November 9 to November 23, 2020) for the production of documents seized from Jeffrey Epstein, but the parties were unable to reach an agreement. The extension was requested to allow an outside vendor to complete bates stamping and downloading of the electronic evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001815.jpg

This document is the final page of a Government filing (dated Oct 30, 2020) regarding the detention conditions and discovery process for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government argues against the need for a court order regarding MDC issues, citing that protocols are already in place for passing papers, COVID-19 safety (Plexiglas barriers), and laptop viewing. The filing asserts that the defendant has access to discovery materials for approximately 13 hours a day—more than any other inmate—and details technical efforts to resolve file viewing issues mentioned in a footnote.

Court filing / government letter (page 4 of 4)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001794.jpg

This document is the conclusion page (page 8) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated October 7, 2020. Submitted by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz to Judge Alison J. Nathan, the text affirms the Government's commitment to its disclosure obligations following representations made at an initial conference.

Legal court filing (conclusion page)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001786.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal filing submitted on October 7, 2020, by the Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Government argues against the premature disclosure of witness identities and sensitive materials to the defense, citing risks to the ongoing investigation and the potential to deter other victims from coming forward. They request the Court to approve a delay in disclosing these materials pursuant to Rule 16(d).

Legal filing (court motion/submission)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001781.jpg

This document is the final page (Page 3) of a legal filing (Document 60) submitted on October 6, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Government, represented by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz, requests a delay in disclosing witness identities and sensitive materials to the defense to prevent jeopardizing the ongoing investigation and to encourage victims to come forward. The filing cites Rule 16(d) as the legal basis for this protective measure.

Court filing (legal motion/memorandum)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001740.jpg

This document is the final page of a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020. The Government respectfully requests that the Court schedule a date approximately 180 days in the future for them to provide an update on their position regarding the sealing of documents in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The filing is submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and her assistants Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001736.jpg

This is the final page (page 5) of a legal filing by the US Attorney's Office in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government argues that the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials in separate civil cases should be denied because the materials are irrelevant to the civil litigation and the request attempts to bypass a protective order. The Government asserts the defendant is attempting to use these materials merely to attack the Government in a forum where it cannot respond.

Legal filing (government letter response)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001731.jpg

This document is a "Notice of Appearance" filed on August 20, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz, on behalf of Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, formally notifies the court of her appearance in the case and requests to be added as a Filing User for electronic notifications.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001723.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 13, 2020, is a response from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to a defendant's requests regarding housing and access to discovery. The prosecution argues that the defendant's application is moot because the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has already granted the defendant extensive daily access to discovery materials from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The document concludes by requesting that the defendant's application be denied.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001683.jpg

This document is an Affidavit of Certification filed on July 28, 2020, in the criminal case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller affirms that the prosecution and defense have conferred on a proposed protective order but have been unable to resolve two areas of dispute. The first point of contention involves the defense's objection to the government's proposal regarding the referencing of witness and victim identities.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001670.jpg

This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the U.S. Government's response to a defendant's motion in a criminal case. The Government argues against the defendant's attempt to restrict its use of gathered materials and to impose restrictions on third parties, calling the request unprecedented and without legal basis. The filing, submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss to Judge Alison J. Nathan, urges the court to deny the defendant's motion and implement the Government's own proposed protective order.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001663.jpg

This document is a letter filed on July 27, 2020, by the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests time to respond to a defense motion for a protective order, noting that discussions on the matter were ongoing as of the previous evening. At the bottom of the document, Judge Nathan orders a schedule for the response (due July 28) and reply (due July 29), and mandates the parties meet and confer by phone.

Legal correspondence / court order
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001662.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated July 27, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution requests an opportunity to respond to a motion for a protective order filed that morning by the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter notes that the defense's filing was a surprise, as the Government believed discussions to jointly propose a protective order were still ongoing.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001637.jpg

This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing that recent public statements by the government have been prejudicial to her right to a fair trial. It specifically cites a press conference held by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss on July 2, 2020, following Maxwell's arrest, quoting her statements from the New York Law Journal and the Washington Post as evidence of improper commentary on Maxwell's credibility and guilt.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
9
As Recipient
11
Total
20

Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: AUDREY STRAUSS
To: Court/Defense

Explanation of enhanced security schedule and flashlight checks.

Letter
N/A

Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney

From: [REDACTED SENDER]
To: AUDREY STRAUSS

Requesting approval to send a subpoena to an attorney interviewed in Florida to obtain a 2009 settlement agreement between a victim and Epstein.

Email
2021-03-26

Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney

From: [Redacted] (Maxwell Te...
To: AUDREY STRAUSS

Requesting permission to send a friendly subpoena to an attorney to obtain a settlement agreement between a victim and Epstein from a 2009 civil suit.

Email
2021-03-26

Re: Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney

From: AUDREY STRAUSS
To: [REDACTED SENDER]

Approved

Email
2021-03-26

Re: Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney

From: AUDREY STRAUSS
To: Alison Moe, Maurene Co...

Approved

Email
2021-03-26

Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney

From: Alison Moe, Maurene Co...
To: AUDREY STRAUSS

Requesting approval to send a 'friendly subpoena' to an attorney to obtain a 2009 settlement agreement between a victim and Epstein. The attorney is willing but needs the subpoena. The document is relevant to the Maxwell investigation.

Email
2021-03-26

Re: [Redacted] 91A1040

From: Anthony V. Lombardino
To: AUDREY STRAUSS

Attorney Lombardino informs US Attorney Strauss that his client (former FBI/Lt. Col) at Clinton Correctional Facility possesses important information regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and requests an interview.

Letter
2020-07-17

Arrest of Ms. Maxwell and announcement of charges

From: AUDREY STRAUSS
To: ["Public", "Media"]

Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss held a press conference immediately following Ms. Maxwell's arrest, commenting on her credibility and alleged guilt, which this document argues was prejudicial.

Press conference
2020-07-02

Arrest of Ms. Maxwell

From: AUDREY STRAUSS
To: ["Public", "Media"]

Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss held a press conference immediately following Ms. Maxwell's arrest, where she commented on Maxwell's credibility and alleged guilt, which this document argues was prejudicial.

Press conference
2020-07-02

FW: GM remarks - electronic copy

From: AUDREY STRAUSS
To: [REDACTED]

Discussing editing the remarks to be shorter and more natural while comporting with the indictment.

Email
2020-07-01

FW: GM Press Materials

From: [REDACTED]
To: AUDREY STRAUSS

Sending edits on draft remarks geared toward simplifying language.

Email
2020-06-28

Re: GM Press Materials

From: AUDREY STRAUSS
To: [REDACTED]

Many thanks.

Email
2020-06-27

GM Press Materials (implied)

From: [REDACTED]
To: AUDREY STRAUSS

Submitting draft remarks and Q&A for a potential press conference regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.

Email
2020-06-26

GM Press Materials

From: [REDACTED]
To: AUDREY STRAUSS

Sender informs Audrey they have put together draft remarks and a Q&A for a potential press conference next week regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. Mentions working with the press office on a visual.

Email
2020-06-26

Do we have transcript of hearing?

From: AUDREY STRAUSS
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Asking if they have the transcript because [Redacted] is asking for it.

Email
2019-08-29

Re: Do we have transcript of hearing?

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: AUDREY STRAUSS

Confirming they will send it and are ready to do updates.

Email
2019-08-29

Re: Do we have transcript of hearing?

From: AUDREY STRAUSS
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Instructing to send transcript now so she can pass it along, then will call.

Email
2019-08-29

RE: Do we have transcript of hearing?

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: AUDREY STRAUSS

Sending the attached transcript (J8RpEPSf.pdf).

Email
2019-08-29

Automatic reply: Your opening

From: [REDACTED]
To: AUDREY STRAUSS

Automatic reply stating the sender is on trial before Judge Ronnie Abrams and providing alternative contacts for United States v. Epstein case matters.

Email
2019-08-27

Epstein memo

From: Redacted Sender (Co-Ch...
To: AUDREY STRAUSS

Audrey – Attached is a revised (and shortened) memo for ODAG.

Email
2019-05-10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity