| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional separation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OFF
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's attorneys
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] AUSA
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Efrain Reyes
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Oath Keepers
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Investigation subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Investigation (2018R01618)
|
Investigating authority |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional dispute |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell by the Southern District of New York | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers were in touch with the Southern District of New York. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-10 | N/A | UMB received a request/subpoena regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. | UMB (Kansas City, MO) | View |
| 2019-07-17 | N/A | Filing of detention submission document for JE (Jeffrey Epstein). | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Miami Herald filed federal court motion seeking access to sealed documents. | Southern District of New York | View |
This document is an email exchange dated November 9, 2021, involving an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The attorney requests a scan of a proffer agreement for a specific redacted individual, noting it should have been updated as of September 2021. The respondent attaches the document, locating it in a 'Witnesses & Cooperators folder' associated with a female subject ('her').
An email dated November 9, 2021, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email transmits an attached legal motion ('Motion_to_preclude_-_ECF.pdf') concerning 'Dietz and Loftus,' likely referring to expert witnesses (Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus) relevant to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial proceedings occurring around that time.
This document is an email chain from September 27, 2021, between an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) and a contractor regarding the preparation of a binder of FBI 302 reports for a witness. The emails discuss trial preparation, specifically a mock cross-examination scheduled for that week. The text mentions that the witness has a married name different from her former name, which affects how documents are titled, though the specific names are redacted.
An email dated September 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York documenting a call with a redacted individual. The notes mention a female subject who admitted to destroying her notes and described a signature she recognized as 'just a scroll'.
An email dated September 21, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to a contractor. The email instructs the recipient to file an attached email and call notes into a '3500 folder' (likely referring to Jencks Act material for witness statements). The attachments include a file explicitly named '[EXTERNAL]_Subpoena_Re_Ghislane_Maxwell_case.msg', directly linking this administrative task to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is an email chain from December 19, 2019, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). An Assistant U.S. Attorney reports on a call with counsel for the Epstein estate trustees, who are requesting a meeting with senior SDNY leadership to discuss resolving civil forfeiture claims and a proposed victim compensation fund. The trustees acknowledge the 'line assistants' cannot negotiate and wish to 'elevate' the discussion to reach a resolution.
This document is a forwarded email chain dated December 10, 2020, originating from the Counsel to the Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The email shares a news article (link redacted) that describes comments made by an unnamed individual. The document is heavily redacted, obscuring the identities of all participants and the specific subject matter of the news article, though it appears to be part of internal media monitoring or case-related discussion within the SDNY office handling Epstein/Maxwell matters.
This document contains a series of internal emails between SDNY prosecutors from November to December 2020, outlining a 'to-do' list and agenda for the upcoming trial (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's). The tasks include reviewing 'GM emails' in Relativity, identifying witnesses from Interlochen and the Professional Children's School, coordinating with the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) regarding evidence from the Palm Beach house search, and scheduling interviews with various witnesses, including Jo Jo Fontanella and individuals who were on flights. The document also references a discussion about 'superseder timing,' implying a superseding indictment was being considered.
This document is an email dated December 4, 2020, sent by a Deputy Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The subject is 'short form update' and it includes an attachment titled 'PC_Unit_--_Short_Form_Update.12.4.20.docx'. The recipient and sender names are redacted.
An internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York dated September 13, 2021. The email attaches a discovery letter related to the Maxwell case and discusses procedural etiquette regarding whose name should appear in the signature block of such letters.
An email dated August 2, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to attorneys Sigrid McCawley and 'David'. The email serves to notify them of an order by Judge Nathan regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, emphasizing that it applies to attorneys associated with cases, including those representing witnesses.
This document is a redacted email dated August 26, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email, sent regarding an attachment titled '[Redacted]_Cross_Ideas.docx' (likely referring to cross-examination ideas for an upcoming trial, possibly Ghislaine Maxwell's), simply states 'I'll print also.' The sender's name and contact information are redacted.
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and likely US Marshals regarding the logistics of transporting Ghislaine Maxwell to the courthouse at 500 Pearl Street. The purpose of the transport was to allow Maxwell and her defense team to review physical evidence held by the FBI over a period of four days (April 13-16, 2021). The emails confirm the schedule, arrival times (9:15 AM), and parking arrangements for the attorneys involved.
An email dated April 5, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The sender requests the recipient to create a 'potential testifying witness folder' for a redacted individual and include attached items, which include a transcript dated 06-10-16 and an embedded message referencing an SDNY investigation and Epstein.
An email dated April 1, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email concerns a 'Maxwell bail briefing' and includes four attachments related to Ghislaine Maxwell's legal proceedings, including bail motions, denial orders, and arraignment records spanning from July 2020 to April 2021.
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding a victim's willingness to testify in an upcoming trial (scheduled for July 12, 2021, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The correspondence focuses on the logistics of the witness's testimony, specifically her requirement that her husband and three minor children accompany her to New York. The AUSA confirms that the government (SDNY/FBI Victim Services) will fund the travel and hotel accommodations for the entire family to secure her testimony.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated July 7, 2020. The email discusses a breakthrough in securing a meeting with a female individual (name redacted) who had previously been difficult to engage. The meeting is being coordinated through an intermediary and 'Scarola' (likely attorney Jack Scarola), with the parties located in West Palm, Florida.
This document is a chain of emails from March 9-10, 2020, between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) from the Southern District of New York. The AUSA is seeking to interview a woman (name redacted) regarding an investigation. Scarola indicates that his own attempts to contact the woman have been ignored and provides her phone number to the AUSA, stating he has no objection to them contacting her directly.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to an FBI agent dated July 23, 2019. The email discusses a renewed attempt to interview a female witness/victim whose lawyer has given permission for direct contact and provided her phone number, despite noting she is 'not great at following up.'
This document is a discovery production letter from the DOJ to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 5, 2021. It lists materials being turned over, including files recovered from discs seized at Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence, images from his electronic devices, Missouri records, a JPMorgan Chase return, and a 1995 Oxford letter. The letter also clarifies confidentiality designations under the Protective Order.
An email dated April 12, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding Steve Bannon's iPhone 7. The email informs the recipient that text messages between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein were found on the device but notes that they are not responsive to the specific warrant being executed.
This document is an internal email chain from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated August 6-7, 2019, discussing Jeffrey Epstein's historical state plea transcript. An Assistant U.S. Attorney highlights specific quotes from the plea hearing where the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida was detailed, explicitly noting that federal prosecutors agreed not to prosecute Epstein federally in SDFL if he completed probation. The email also notes that SDFL representatives were present in court during the plea.
This document is an email chain from August 6-8, 2019 (days before Epstein's death) between Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of New York. They are finalizing a letter in response to preservation requests made by Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel. The discussion involves incorporating edits, adhering to a discovery motion schedule, and ensuring a specific redacted individual reviews the response before it is sent.
An email chain from April 22, 2021, among officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Public Corruption Unit). The discussion concerns a substantive trial adjournment letter filed by Ghislaine Maxwell earlier that day and the government's impending response due at 5 PM. The emails coordinate the language regarding the trial team's availability and mention a request to file under seal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity