| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional separation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OFF
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's attorneys
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] AUSA
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Efrain Reyes
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Oath Keepers
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Investigation subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Investigation (2018R01618)
|
Investigating authority |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional dispute |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell by the Southern District of New York | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers were in touch with the Southern District of New York. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-10 | N/A | UMB received a request/subpoena regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. | UMB (Kansas City, MO) | View |
| 2019-07-17 | N/A | Filing of detention submission document for JE (Jeffrey Epstein). | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Miami Herald filed federal court motion seeking access to sealed documents. | Southern District of New York | View |
An email from an Assistant US Attorney to Judge Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email updates the court on victim attendance for an upcoming arraignment, noting that Victim-2 will attend via phone while her attorneys David Boies and Sigrid McCawley will attend in person, whereas Victims 1, 3, and 4 will not attend.
An email dated August 14, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Mr. Foy. The email confirms a previous phone conversation establishing that Mr. Foy represents Tova Noel and is authorized to accept a subpoena on her behalf, which is attached to the email. This document likely pertains to the investigation following Jeffrey Epstein's death, involving one of the guards on duty.
This document is an email chain dated August 12, 2019, circulating a high-importance letter from Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case (19 cr 490). The correspondence involves the United States Marshal Service for the Southern District of New York, though specific names of the senders and recipients are redacted.
An email dated February 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the drafting of an 'Opposition to Motion to Suppress'. The sender discusses incorporating edits from 'the chiefs' and coordinates a final review with their team before submitting the document back to supervisors. The document number is EFTA00027081.
This document is an email dated February 6, 2020, from Assistant US Attorney Maurene [Redacted] of the Southern District of New York to Jeff (likely Jeff Jocks) at sondeeracine.com. The email serves a subpoena to the Interlochen Center for the Arts seeking information and donor records regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender explicitly requests that Interlochen keep the request confidential.
This document is an email chain from January 31 to February 4, 2020, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The primary subject is the approval of a 'Sweden travel memo' related to the Epstein case. The text indicates that the memo required approval from the Office of International Affairs (OIA) and final DOJ approval. The emails also detail the logistical coordination of a meeting between the sender and a redacted recipient, with one participant mentioning being 'tied up with Geoff'.
This document is an internal email dated January 31, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to a redacted recipient. The sender requests verification of a claim made by a woman in a Fox Wilmington news article that she had been previously interviewed by the FBI. The sender asks for the '302' (FBI interview form) if the claim is true. The linked article discusses Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is an email chain from January 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The correspondence concerns the submission of evidence from a witness represented by McCawley, specifically photographs and journal entries from 1995 and 1996. The witness's journal entries detail a trip to New York, visiting Jeffrey Epstein's house, and going to the movies with him.
An email dated January 5, 2021, from a Counsel to the Acting U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding an Epstein FOIA question. The body discusses an investigative reason for redacting SHU (Special Housing Unit) staff names in MCC (Metropolitan Correctional Center) records dating back to August 4th.
This document is an email sent on April 13, 2021, between employees of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The sender, an Assistant United States Attorney whose name is redacted, is transmitting a document titled '2021.04.12 [Redacted] Memo.docx' to another redacted recipient. The specific subject matter of the memo is obscured by redactions.
This document is an email chain from March and April 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and legal counsel for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Marc Weinstein and Andy Tomback). The correspondence discusses scheduling a conference call and clarifies the Estate's assertion of attorney-client privilege. Specifically, the SDNY asks if the Estate asserts privilege over a computer originally seized by the Palm Beach Police Department in 2005 (now in FBI possession), to which Weinstein confirms the Estate does assert privilege.
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between an Assistant United States Attorney (Maurene) from the SDNY and attorney Jeff Jocks representing the Interlochen Center for the Arts. The correspondence concerns the service of two subpoenas to Interlochen seeking information regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The second email includes a Non-Disclosure Order (NDO) and an attachment filename suggesting a request for student records.
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between attorneys at the Southern District of New York (USANYS) discussing a recent opinion by Judge Nathan in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The team arranges a weekend conference call to discuss the Judge's order requiring the government to confirm its position on evidence supporting Maxwell's interpretation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). One email also references a previous letter regarding discovery materials obtained from the Southern District of Florida (SDFL).
An email dated October 9, 2020, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email forwards several draft non-prosecution and plea agreements dated January and February 2020 related to 'JE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein case files). The sender notes the files were in their AUSA folder and might not be obvious otherwise.
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 8, 2020. The government asserts it has met its discovery obligations despite technical issues at the MDC, detailing efforts to reformat files and provide IT support. The letter also addresses Maxwell's conditions of confinement, confirming she must sleep in an isolation cell and undergo weekly body scans, while noting she has access to commissary food, mail, and 13 hours of discovery review time per day. It mentions the FBI possesses 43,500 images from Epstein's residences (3,500 containing nudity) which will be made available for review via a secure laptop brought to the MDC.
This document contains an email chain from February 2020 between Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Epstein investigation.' The correspondence coordinates a meeting scheduled for March 4, 2020, in New York between the prosecutors, McCawley, and a female client/witness (name redacted). One participant notes they will miss the meeting due to a conflict in White Plains.
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between Jill Greenfield, a partner at the UK law firm Fieldfisher, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are negotiating the terms for an interview with Greenfield's client, a former employee of Ghislaine Maxwell and potential victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence covers logistics, the client's request for anonymity, the presence of a US lawyer friend, and the U.S. government's assurance that the client is considered a witness/victim rather than a suspect. The U.S. Attorney explains the FBI interview process (Form 302) and offers to travel to London for the meeting.
This document is an email dated February 24, 2020, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to attorney Sigrid McCawley. The prosecutor is following up on a phone call to schedule an in-person meeting in New York with McCawley and her client, referred to as 'Ms. [Redacted],' regarding the Epstein investigation.
This document is an email thread from July 6-13, 2019, between Miami attorney Joe Nascimento and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the SDNY. It details the immediate legal response after a female client was served with a grand jury subpoena related to the Jeffrey Epstein case on July 6, 2019. Nascimento, acting as the inventory attorney for his deceased partner Alan Ross (who previously represented the client), coordinated a phone call and a subsequent in-person meeting with prosecutors at the Hilton in West Palm Beach on July 12, 2019. The correspondence mentions a 'proffer letter' and discusses 'recent filing and media reports' likely concerning Epstein's arrest.
This document is an email thread between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and staff at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) regarding the protocol for delivering a hard drive containing discovery materials to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell. The conversation, spanning August 5-13, 2020, covers the requirements for mailing the drive (etching, authorization memo, password protection) and confirms the delivery of the package via FedEx.
This document is an email chain from August 2020 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and staff at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The correspondence coordinates the delivery of discovery materials (hard drives) to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails discuss protocols for mailing hard drives, including etching requirements, authorization memos, and password protection policies.
This document is an email dated October 11, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The email contains a draft of a '12.2 letter' attached as '2021.10.XX_GM_12.2_letter_to_defense.docx', likely relating to the Ghislaine Maxwell (GM) legal proceedings, specifically possibly referencing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2 regarding notice of an insanity defense or expert testimony on mental condition.
An email chain from July 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Roberta Kaplan's legal team regarding the 'U.S. v. Epstein' case. The Assistant U.S. Attorney reaches out to inform victims' counsel of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard during upcoming bail proceedings. Roberta Kaplan responds requesting a discussion.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and attorney Roberta Kaplan (along with her team). The AUSA contacts Kaplan regarding 'U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490' to inform her of her client's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard during upcoming bail proceedings. Kaplan responds briefly asking to talk.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity