UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CABRANES
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
WESLEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
LOHIER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-27 | Court ruling | The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion f... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Court ruling | The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion f... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice | Issuance of a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' regarding the submitted 'Notice of Appearance as Addit... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice | The Court issued a Notice of Defective Filing for the motion for bail. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice issuance | Issuance of a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second C... | Thurgood Marshall U.S. Cour... | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The court dismissed the appeal of Defendant-Appellant Maxwell and denied the motion to consolidat... | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-28 | Court order | The court granted the appellant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) motion to file three documents under seal: ... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2019-08-05 | Legal notice | The Court issued a Notice of Defective Filing because the submitted document was not text-searcha... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014851.jpg
This document is the cover page for a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding case number 22-1426-cr, United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The case was argued on March 12, 2024, and decided on September 17, 2024, by Circuit Judges Cabranes, Wesley, and Lohier. The appeal originates from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00014850.jpg
This legal document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed and issued on December 2, 2024. The court, after hearing the appeal, affirms the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00014791.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (filed August 22, 2022). The judge establishes factual findings for sentencing enhancements, noting that Maxwell partially owned the jet, directed pilots (Visoski, Alessi, Rodgers) to transport victims, and acted as 'Epstein's number one' by managing his households and staff. The text explicitly mentions Sarah Kellen as Maxwell's personal assistant and applies sentencing guidelines based on Maxwell's leadership role in the conspiracy between 1994 and 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00008451.jpg
This legal document, page 4 of a court filing from December 21, 2021, details a joint proposal by the prosecution ('the Government') and the defense regarding public access to trial exhibits. They propose releasing slides after closing arguments to balance the public's right to access with the defendant's right to a fair trial and victim privacy, citing the 'United States v. Graham' case. A footnote describes an alternative government proposal to provide redacted slides beforehand, which the defense opposes.
DOJ-OGR-00008394.jpg
This legal document is the second page of a filing by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 17, 2021. The prosecution cites several legal precedents to counter the defense's anticipated arguments regarding the government's motives and the thoroughness of the investigation. The document concludes by stating that the government is not seeking any specific relief at this time.
DOJ-OGR-00008274.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 533) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 9, 2021. It presents legal arguments under Section I 'Applicable Law' to support the admission of Government Exhibit 52, citing various Second Circuit precedents to establish that the bar for authenticating evidence is 'not particularly high.' The text argues that challenges to reliability should go to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility.
DOJ-OGR-00001769.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated September 3, 2020, it formally notifies the court of her intent to appeal the district court's September 2, 2020 decision, which denied her motion to modify a protective order. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00001466.jpg
This document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on June 7, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the District Court's previous orders denying Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The mandate also notes that any concerns regarding Maxwell's sleeping conditions while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001465.jpg
This is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated June 2, 2021. The court denied Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for pretrial release and her alternative request for an evidentiary hearing regarding the conditions of her confinement. The order was issued by Judges Leval, Lohier, and Sullivan.
DOJ-OGR-00001441.jpg
This document is the first page of an Affirmation in Opposition filed by Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey on May 27, 2021. It argues against Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for pretrial release, citing a previous court order from April 27, 2021, that denied bail. The document establishes the legal venue in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and identifies the key legal representatives involved.
DOJ-OGR-00001432.jpg
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, and denies Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The order also notes that Maxwell's complaints about sleep deprivation while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001425.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, to deny Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The order also notes that concerns raised by Maxwell's counsel regarding sleep deprivation during incarceration should be addressed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001421.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's Appendix to her Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release filed on May 17, 2021, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It lists the case numbers (21-770 & 21-58) and identifies her legal counsel, Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00001421.
DOJ-OGR-00001408.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for pretrial release, filed on May 17, 2021, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case Nos. 21-770 & 21-58). It lists the legal parties involved—the United States of America as Appellee and Maxwell as Appellant—and identifies her legal representation as Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus.
DOJ-OGR-00001406.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, to deny Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The order also notes that Maxwell's complaints about sleep deprivation during incarceration should be directed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001405.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the District Court's previous orders from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, and denies Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The order also notes that any requests regarding Maxwell's sleeping conditions while incarcerated should be directed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001404.jpg
This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770). The document formally announces that the case manager assigned to the matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001403.jpg
A court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated April 27, 2021. Judge Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. granted a motion allowing attorney Christian R. Everdell to withdraw as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell because she had retained new appellate counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00001373.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing dated April 19, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It is a reply brief submitted by attorney David Oscar Markus on behalf of appellant Ghislaine Maxwell in support of her motion for pretrial release. The document references the lower court case in the Southern District of New York (20-CR-330).
DOJ-OGR-00001370.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on April 15, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 21-770/21-58). It certifies that a 'Notice of Motion and Affirmation' was electronically served to four Assistant United States Attorneys: Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, Thomas McKay, and Won Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00001368.jpg
This legal document is an affirmation filed on April 15, 2021, by attorney Christian R. Everdell of the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. Everdell is seeking to be relieved as counsel for the defendant-appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in her case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The affirmation notes that Maxwell has retained new counsel, David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC, who filed a notice of appearance on April 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00001367.jpg
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 15, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP is requesting to withdraw as counsel of record for Ghislaine Maxwell because she has retained new counsel, David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC, for her appeal. The motion is unopposed by the United States, represented by AUSA Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00001365.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 13, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order grants a motion by the appellee (United States of America) to file a supporting exhibit under seal. This exhibit is in opposition to the appellant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) motion for bail.
DOJ-OGR-00001335.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal brief filed by the Government on April 12, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770). The text argues against Maxwell's appeal regarding her bail denial, asserting that she poses a flight risk due to foreign ties and wealth, and defending the lower court's use of 'proffers' (evidence summaries) rather than full evidentiary hearings for bail determinations, citing Second Circuit precedents.
DOJ-OGR-00001334.jpg
This document represents page 17 of a legal brief filed on April 12, 2021, arguing against the release of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text asserts that Judge Nathan did not err in denying bail, citing Maxwell as a flight risk and noting the strength of the Government's evidence, which includes multiple victims and documentary corroboration. It discusses legal standards for temporary release under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) and cites relevant case law.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity