UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CABRANES
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
WESLEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
LOHIER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-27 | Court ruling | The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion f... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Court ruling | The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion f... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice | Issuance of a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' regarding the submitted 'Notice of Appearance as Addit... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice | The Court issued a Notice of Defective Filing for the motion for bail. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice issuance | Issuance of a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second C... | Thurgood Marshall U.S. Cour... | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The court dismissed the appeal of Defendant-Appellant Maxwell and denied the motion to consolidat... | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-28 | Court order | The court granted the appellant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) motion to file three documents under seal: ... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2019-08-05 | Legal notice | The Court issued a Notice of Defective Filing because the submitted document was not text-searcha... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021692.jpg
This page is from a 2023 legal filing (likely the government's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal) arguing against claims of retroactive application of the statute of limitations. It asserts that because the criminal conduct (conspiracy and sex trafficking involving Victim-4) continued through 2004, it post-dated the 2003 amendment to Section 3283.
DOJ-OGR-00021661.jpg
This document is the first page of a legal brief filed by the United States of America in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The brief is in response to an appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted on June 29, 2022, in the Southern District of New York after a jury trial presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document outlines the charges from the March 29, 2021 superseding indictment, beginning with conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sex acts.
DOJ-OGR-00021654.jpg
This document appears to be page 'vi' (Table of Authorities) from a legal filing, specifically Case 22-1426 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell appeal), filed on June 29, 2023. It lists various legal precedents involving the United States government against various defendants (Annabi, Archer, Ashraf, etc.) primarily in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The document serves as an index for case law citations found later in the full brief.
DOJ-OGR-00021653.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' (page 'v') from a legal filing (Case 22-1426, Document 79), dated June 29, 2023. It lists various legal precedents and case citations used in the main document, including Supreme Court and Circuit Court cases. The document bears a DOJ-OGR (Office of General Review) footer, indicating it was likely released via FOIA or a similar transparency process.
DOJ-OGR-00021559.jpg
This legal document is a transcript from a court proceeding where a judge is ruling on objections from the defense. The judge overrules objections to the inclusion of testimony from a victim named Carolyn regarding a sexual assault by Epstein, stating that her testimony is credible. The judge also overrules objections to considering information about the defendant's severed perjury charges for sentencing, concluding that the defendant's 2016 sworn testimony denying knowledge of Epstein's scheme is reliable information for the court to consider.
DOJ-OGR-00021431.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically Volume II of a Supplemental Appendix, in the appeal case of Ghislaine Maxwell versus the United States of America. The case, docket number 22-1426, is before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and was filed on June 29, 2023. The filing was submitted by Damian Williams, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of the government.
DOJ-OGR-00021173.jpg
This is the cover page for Volume I of the Supplemental Appendix filed on June 29, 2023, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It lists the parties involved, specifically the United States as Appellee and Ghislaine Maxwell as Defendant-Appellant, and identifies Damian Williams as the US Attorney representing the government.
DOJ-OGR-00021172.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 7, 2023, from Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Rohrbach of the Southern District of New York to Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, the Clerk of Court for the Second Circuit. Rohrbach formally notifies the court that he is leaving his position at the U.S. Attorney's Office and requests to be removed as counsel of record for the prosecution in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426-cr).
DOJ-OGR-00021171.jpg
A court order from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated April 28, 2023, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. granted the Government's motion to file an oversized opposition brief (up to 20,000 words) and set a new briefing schedule with deadlines in June and July 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00021164.jpg
This legal document is an affirmation filed on April 26, 2023, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew A. Rohrbach in the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell. The U.S. Government is requesting permission from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to file an oversized brief of up to 20,000 words to adequately respond to Maxwell's brief. The government also requests a 30-day extension for this filing, moving the deadline from May 30, 2023, to June 29, 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00021163.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 26, 2023, by the U.S. government in the appeal of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). The government requests permission to file an oversized brief of up to 20,000 words and a 30-day extension of time to file it, proposing a new deadline of June 29, 2023. This would consequently extend the deadline for Ghislaine Maxwell's reply brief to July 27, 2023. The motion is noted as being unopposed by Maxwell's counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00021162.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated March 14, 2023, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No: 22-1426). The order, signed by Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, mandates that the Appellee, the United States of America, must file its brief on or before May 30, 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00021161.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to the Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The letter, dated March 13, 2023, concerns the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, advising the court that the government intends to file its appeal brief by May 30, 2023, and also requests permission to file a supplemental appendix.
DOJ-OGR-00021137.jpg
This legal document, dated February 28, 2023, is a page from a court filing discussing a legal argument related to a criminal case. It outlines the requirements for a "constructive amendment claim," citing the precedent set in *United States v. D'Amelio*. The context is an appeal or motion by a defendant named Maxwell, who was charged under Count Four with transporting a person named Jane across state lines for sexual activity in violation of New York Penal Law.
DOJ-OGR-00019614.jpg
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States of America in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). The brief's preliminary statement outlines that Maxwell is appealing a September 2, 2020 order from the Southern District of New York which denied her motion to modify a protective order. It also summarizes the superseding indictment filed on July 8, 2020, which charges Maxwell with assisting Jeffrey Epstein in the sexual exploitation of minors between 1994 and 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00019601.jpg
Page 10 of a legal filing (Document 69) dated September 28, 2020, in Case 20-3061. The text argues for the validity of an interlocutory appeal under collateral order jurisdiction, countering the government's claim that issues have not been finally resolved. It discusses the government's use of subpoenas to obtain evidence for a criminal case and Maxwell's challenge to the legitimacy of those methods within the context of a civil appeal.
DOJ-OGR-00019592.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing from September 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061) before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to dismiss her appeal, submitted by her attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. The appeal originates from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00019591.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 28, 2020, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court grants the motion filed by the appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell, to file three specific legal documents under seal. The order was issued by Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00019586.jpg
This is a court filing from September 24, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061). Ghislaine Maxwell, through her attorneys Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., submits an unopposed motion to file three specific documents under seal: her unredacted opening brief, Appendix Volume 2, and an unredacted response to a government opposition motion. The document originates from an appeal of the case in the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00019585.jpg
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on September 24, 2020, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Adam Mueller, is requesting permission to file several documents under seal, including an unredacted brief and Appendix Volume 2, arguing they contain confidential material. The motion states that the opposing counsel for the United States, Maurene Comey, does not oppose this request.
DOJ-OGR-00019580.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on September 3, 2020, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is appealing the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York's decision from September 2, 2020, which denied her motion to modify a protective order. The notice cites several legal precedents to argue that the denial is immediately appealable.
DOJ-OGR-00019400.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief filed on September 24, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061). It appeals a decision from the Southern District of New York (Case 20-CR-330) involving the United States of America. The document lists her legal representation as Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the Denver-based firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00019392.jpg
A Notice of Defective Filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket 20-3061). The notice indicates that a letter submitted on behalf of the Appellant on September 23, 2020, did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules, though the specific reason is not checked on this page. The document lists Judge Nathan as the District Court Judge.
DOJ-OGR-00019390.jpg
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 16, 2020. It addresses two separate appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell: a civil case with Virginia Giuffre (20-2413) and a criminal case with the United States of America (20-3061). The order notes that on September 10, 2020, Maxwell filed a motion to consolidate the two appeals, and this document begins the court's ruling on that motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019382.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 20-3061) argues that an order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to amend a Protective Order is not subject to interlocutory appeal. The text cites various legal precedents (Nelson, Midland Asphalt, Punn) to support the argument that her rights to a fair trial can be vindicated after a final judgment or during the criminal trial itself. It addresses Maxwell's concern that unsealing documents in civil cases might prejudice her criminal trial, asserting she can raise those issues in the criminal case if they arise.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity