UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CABRANES
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
WESLEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
LOHIER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-27 | Court ruling | The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion f... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Court ruling | The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion f... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice | Issuance of a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' regarding the submitted 'Notice of Appearance as Addit... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice | The Court issued a Notice of Defective Filing for the motion for bail. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice issuance | Issuance of a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second C... | Thurgood Marshall U.S. Cour... | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The court dismissed the appeal of Defendant-Appellant Maxwell and denied the motion to consolidat... | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-28 | Court order | The court granted the appellant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) motion to file three documents under seal: ... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2019-08-05 | Legal notice | The Court issued a Notice of Defective Filing because the submitted document was not text-searcha... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002833.jpg
This document is page 12 of a court filing (Document 859) dated March 24, 2021, from a criminal case involving a defendant named Schulte (likely Joshua Schulte, though found in a DOJ release). The text outlines the court's rejection of the defendant's arguments regarding venue impropriety, affirming that it is constitutional to indict in one courthouse (White Plains) and try in another (Manhattan) within the same district. The court cites the COVID-19 pandemic delays in Summer 2020 as further justification for the procedural flexibility.
DOJ-OGR-00005599.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, involving Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on October 29, 2021. The defense argues that the government is evading a court order to identify specific co-conspirator statements by instead providing massive 'document dumps.' The text cites Federal Rules of Evidence and case law (Tracy, Daly, Tellier) regarding the admissibility of hearsay and the requirements for proving a conspiracy exists.
DOJ-OGR-00005576.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed by the Government on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government asks the Court to establish the conditions under which it can introduce prior consistent statements from its witnesses, particularly if the defense attacks their credibility in opening statements or cross-examination. The motion cites Rule 801(d)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the precedent set in United States v. Purcell to support its arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00020384.jpg
This document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on June 7, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, thereby denying Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The mandate also notes that any concerns Maxwell has about being deprived of sleep while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00020383.jpg
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated June 2, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, issued by Circuit Judges Leval, Lohier Jr., and Sullivan, denies the appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed request for pretrial release. It also denies her alternative request for the court to remand the matter to a district court for a hearing on her confinement conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00020371.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Case 21-58, Document 92) dated May 27, 2021. It outlines the 'Applicable Law' regarding pretrial detention, specifically citing 18 U.S.C. § 3142. The text argues that for offenses involving minor victims (18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 or 2423), there is a statutory presumption that no conditions will assure the defendant's appearance, placing a burden of production on the defendant to prove they are not a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00020339.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's Appendix to her Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release, filed on May 17, 2021, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It lists the legal counsel representing Maxwell (Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus) and references the underlying case in the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00020326.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing dated May 17, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It is a 'Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release' filed by Maxwell's attorneys, Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus, to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motion is an appeal of a decision from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00020325.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on May 17, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney David Oscar Markus, on behalf of his client Ghislaine Maxwell, is submitting a 'Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release' or alternatively requesting a remand for an evidentiary hearing. The motion is opposed by the U.S. government, represented by AUSA Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00020324.jpg
This document is a ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated April 27, 2021. The court affirmed previous District Court orders denying bail for Ghislaine Maxwell and denied her motion for temporary pretrial release. The court also noted complaints regarding Maxwell's sleep deprivation while incarcerated, directing her counsel to address those specific conditions with the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00020323.jpg
This is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's orders from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, thereby denying Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The order also notes that any requests for relief regarding her sleeping conditions while incarcerated should be directed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00020322.jpg
This is a 'Notice of Case Manager Change' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 27, 2021, regarding the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Case 21-58cr). The document lists Debra Ann Livingston as Chief Judge and Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe as Clerk of Court, and references the lower court proceedings in the SDNY under Judge Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020321.jpg
A court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated April 27, 2021. Judge Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. granted a motion by attorney Christian R. Everdell to withdraw as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell because she retained new appellate counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00002802.jpg
This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by David Oscar Markus, is appealing the court's March 22, 2021 'Order on Third Motion for Release on Bail' to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The document confirms Maxwell's status as committed (incarcerated) and lists the Assistant U.S. Attorneys prosecuting the case.
DOJ-OGR-00002784.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Doc 171) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 23, 2021. It argues procedural points regarding jurisdiction and bail appeals, and substantively argues that Maxwell's offer to renounce her French citizenship is a valid condition for release. The defense contests the US government's reliance on a French Ministry of Justice letter regarding extradition, citing a counter-opinion by French counsel William Julié.
DOJ-OGR-00008799.jpg
This document is page 2 of a government filing dated January 5, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The Government requests that the Court schedule a hearing/inquiry regarding a juror's recent public statements about sexual abuse and honesty during voir dire, citing specific legal precedents. The document notes that defense counsel was contacted but had not yet responded, and it includes a link to a Reuters article about the juror's admission.
DOJ-OGR-00002696.jpg
This document is page 'ii' (Table of Authorities) from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 4, 2021. It lists legal precedents cited in the main brief, focusing heavily on cases related to discovery, exculpatory evidence, and due process (e.g., Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v. United States, Kyles v. Whitley). The page includes a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00002696).
DOJ-OGR-00020359.jpg
This document is an affirmation by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, filed on May 27, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing formally opposes the renewed motion for pretrial release by defendant-appellant Ghislaine Maxwell. It references a previous court order from April 27, 2021, which had already denied Maxwell's request for bail and upheld the District Court's decision.
DOJ-OGR-00020350.jpg
This is a formal order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated April 27, 2021. The court affirmed previous District Court orders denying bail for Ghislaine Maxwell and denied her motion for temporary pretrial release. The document also notes that Maxwell's counsel raised concerns about sleep deprivation during incarceration, but the appellate court directed those specific concerns back to the District Court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity