UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CABRANES
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
WESLEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
LOHIER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-27 | Court ruling | The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion f... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Court ruling | The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion f... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice | Issuance of a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' regarding the submitted 'Notice of Appearance as Addit... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice | The Court issued a Notice of Defective Filing for the motion for bail. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Legal notice issuance | Issuance of a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second C... | Thurgood Marshall U.S. Cour... | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The court dismissed the appeal of Defendant-Appellant Maxwell and denied the motion to consolidat... | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-28 | Court order | The court granted the appellant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) motion to file three documents under seal: ... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2019-08-05 | Legal notice | The Court issued a Notice of Defective Filing because the submitted document was not text-searcha... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019359.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal filing (dated September 16, 2020) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061). The text argues that the court order denying Maxwell's motion to amend a Protective Order is not eligible for interlocutory appeal. It addresses Maxwell's concern that her inability to use criminal discovery in civil litigation might lead to the unsealing of civil documents, potentially prejudicing her criminal trial, by stating she can raise these prejudice issues during the criminal trial itself.
DOJ-OGR-00019344.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court filing (Affirmation) dated September 16, 2020, submitted by Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. It supports the Government's motion to dismiss Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding a protective order in her criminal case (S1 20 Cr. 330). The document establishes Comey's credentials and outlines the procedural history regarding the District Court's September 2, 2020 order.
DOJ-OGR-00019343.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on September 16, 2020, by the United States of America in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). The motion, submitted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, seeks to dismiss Maxwell's appeal on the grounds of a lack of jurisdiction. The document identifies the legal representatives for both parties and confirms that the opposing counsel, Adam Mueller, has been notified and intends to file a response.
DOJ-OGR-00019342.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated September 16, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order confirms that Maxwell's legal counsel has set a date of October 22, 2020, to file their brief and explicitly orders that this deadline be met under threat of potential financial sanctions.
DOJ-OGR-00019340.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated September 15, 2020, from attorney Adam Mueller of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., to Gerard Whidbee at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Mueller, representing Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, formally selects October 22, 2020, as the due date for filing her opening brief in the case of United States v. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00019339.jpg
This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 15, 2020, regarding the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 20-3061). The document officially announces that the case manager assigned to the matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00019295.jpg
This document is page 8 (filed as Page 9 of 15 in Document 17) of a legal filing dated September 10, 2020. It argues for the consolidation of two appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell: one regarding the unsealing of deposition material in her civil case (Judge Preska) and another regarding a protective order in her criminal case (Judge Nathan). The text asserts that consolidation is required for efficiency and fairness.
DOJ-OGR-00019288.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion to Consolidate Appeals," submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on September 10, 2020. The motion concerns two separate appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell as the Defendant-Appellant: one from a civil case (15-CV-7433) brought by Virginia L. Giuffre, and another from a criminal case (20-CR-330) brought by the United States of America, both originating from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00019282.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on September 10, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061, United States v. Maxwell). Attorney Adam Mueller, representing Ghislaine Maxwell, is requesting leave to file an unredacted motion to consolidate under seal. The document indicates that opposing counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, does not oppose the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019239.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed by Ghislaine Maxwell on September 3, 2020 (received September 4, 2020) in the Southern District of New York. Maxwell is appealing a September 2, 2020 court order that denied her motion to modify a protective order. The filing cites legal precedents (Pichler v. UNITE, Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., and Brown v. Maxwell) to establish jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine.
DOJ-OGR-00010531.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 21, 2022. The defense argues that the sentencing hearing should not be an 'open forum' for alleged victims who were not part of the trial record, specifically naming Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein as individuals who should not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA for this specific case. The letter distinguishes Maxwell's case from the abatement of the Epstein case and requests advance notice of who will be permitted to speak at sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00009224.jpg
This document is the cover page for Volume XVI of a legal appendix filed on February 24, 2014, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The case, docket number 13-1388-cr, is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant David Parse and others against the United States of America, originating from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The page identifies the parties involved, their legal roles (Appellee, Defendants, Defendant-Appellant), and their respective legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00009152.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing by the U.S. Government, likely a motion or memorandum. It cites various legal precedents to establish the standards for conducting a post-verdict inquiry into potential juror misconduct. The Government argues that these standards have been met with respect to 'Juror 50' due to an inconsistency between his public statements about being a victim of sexual abuse and his answer on a juror questionnaire, and therefore consents to a hearing to determine if the juror lied.
DOJ-OGR-00019860.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's Appendix to the Motion for Pretrial Release', dated April 1, 2021. The filing is part of an appeal (No. 21-770 & 21-58) in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, originating from a case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The parties are the United States of America (Appellee) and Ghislaine Maxwell (Appellant), who is represented by attorney David Oscar Markus of MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.
DOJ-OGR-00019829.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 1, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 21-770/21-58). Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorney David Oscar Markus, is appealing a decision by Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York, requesting reasonable bail or an evidentiary hearing. The motion is opposed by the United States of America, represented by AUSA Won S. Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00019827.jpg
This document is a "Notice of Defective Filing" issued on April 1, 2021, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell. The notice informs the appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell, that her motion for bail was rejected because the submitted PDF document was not text-searchable, which violates local court rules. The document identifies the case docket numbers and the relevant court officials, including Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and DC Judge Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019824.jpg
This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 1, 2021, regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 21-58). The court clerk notified the appellant that a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell was rejected because the PDF file was not text-searchable, violating Local Rules 25.1 and 25.2. The document lists Judge Nathan as the District Court judge and references the underlying SDNY docket number 1:20-cr-330-1.
DOJ-OGR-00019822.jpg
This document is a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. It addresses a 'Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel' submitted on March 30, 2021, on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that the filing does not comply with federal and local court rules. The notice lists numerous specific reasons for the defect, ranging from missing acknowledgments and supporting papers to formatting issues like incorrect pagination and font.
DOJ-OGR-00019796.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-00330-AJN). The appeal is directed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and challenges the District Court's order from March 22, 2021, which denied her third motion for release on bail. The document lists Maxwell's counsel as David Oscar Markus and the Assistant U.S. Attorneys as Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00019770.jpg
This is a formal court notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated March 29, 2021. It confirms that the 'Record on Appeal - Electronic Index' has been filed in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket #: 21-770), originating from the SDNY under Judge Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019746.jpg
This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by David Oscar Markus, is appealing the 'Order on Third Motion for Release on Bail' entered on March 22, 2021. The document lists the legal counsel for both the defense and the prosecution (Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz) and notes that Maxwell's bail disposition is 'Committed'.
DOJ-OGR-00019744.jpg
This is a docketing notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated March 29, 2021, for the case of "United States of America v. Maxwell". The notice confirms that an appeal has been filed and assigned the docket number 21-770. It instructs the parties' counsel on the procedures for filing a Notice of Appearance and for maintaining correct contact information with the court.
DOJ-OGR-00019715.jpg
This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated January 12, 2021, for the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 21-58). The document confirms that the "Record on Appeal - Electronic Index" has been officially filed with the court. The notice is issued under the authority of Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00019694.jpg
This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal (Form A) filed on January 11, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 1:20-CR-00330). Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP, is appealing the 'Order Denying Defendant's Renewed Motion for Release on Bail' which was entered on December 28, 2020. The document indicates Maxwell's bail disposition is 'Committed' (incarcerated) and lists Maurene Comey as the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00019692.jpg
This is a docketing notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated January 12, 2021, concerning the case of "United States of America v. Maxwell" (Docket # 21-58). The document officially notifies the parties that an appeal has been filed and outlines the procedural requirements for counsel, such as filing a Notice of Appearance and ensuring contact information is kept current with the court. It specifies that case documents are available via PACER for counseled cases.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity