Trove
Sign In Sign Up

GOVERNMENT

Organization
Mentions
2805
Relationships
178
Events
870
Documents
1344
Also known as:
Government of Australia Government of the Republic of Cyprus United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) Office of Government Relations PRC Government US Government (The Americans) Government Exhibit Office of Government Information Services Government / USA Orban Government Palestinian government IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (IRS-TEGE) Hamas Government Saudi Arabian government Orange County, California (Government) Netanyahu government British Government American government Pakistan Government/Military Canadian Government Australian government Government of Ecuador New Zealand Government Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands Gov't (Government) Government / DOJ American Federation of Government Employees/Council of Prison Locals United States of America (Government) US Government (implied by SDNY context)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
178 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
15 Very Strong
29
View
organization Defense
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
21
View
person defendant
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
62
View
person Defense counsel
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
14
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
14
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
55
View
person Recipient
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
5
View
organization Defense
Adversarial
11 Very Strong
10
View
person MAXWELL
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
14
View
person the defendant
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person THOMAS
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
9
View
person Defense counsel
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
21
View
person the defendant
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
7
View
person defendant
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
24
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization Defense
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person MR. EPSTEIN
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Thomas
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Dr. Rocchio
Professional
7
2
View
person Minor Victims
Protective
7
2
View
person Epstein's counsel
Professional
7
2
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
7
3
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Court accepts Government's representations that it has disclosed all Brady and Giglio Material. Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... N/A View
N/A N/A Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... N/A View
N/A N/A Argument that defendants should be able to rely on government promises in written agreements and ... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... N/A View
N/A N/A Broader investigation into Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, covering periods beyond the Indictment. N/A View
N/A N/A Government's review of 'Materials' (documents and photographs) related to Epstein's sexual abuse ... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... N/A View
N/A N/A Ex parte proceeding where government allegedly misled Chief Judge McMahon to obtain a subpoena. Court View
N/A N/A Client's arrest and detention despite voluntary surrender. N/A View
N/A N/A Discussion of discovery timeline, with the government requesting until November. Court View
N/A N/A Government initiated a massive OPR investigation into the execution of the NPA. N/A View
N/A N/A Court agrees that some of Maxwell's concerns are overstated but acknowledges defamation action re... N/A View
N/A N/A NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) not disclosed to victims N/A View
N/A N/A Search warrants executed at properties of Jeffrey Epstein. New York and Virgin Islands View
N/A N/A Lefkowitz argued that the government was not required to notify victims under the § 2255 provisio... N/A View
N/A N/A Depositions taken as a result of government-supported civil suits against the speaker. N/A View
N/A N/A Indictment of Thomas S.D.N.Y. View
N/A N/A Opening of Grand Jury Investigation Unknown View
N/A N/A Sentencing hearing regarding fines, restitution, and guideline calculations. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Planned resolution of pending redaction issues N/A View
N/A N/A Victims' lawsuit against the government Court View
N/A N/A Ex parte modification of the protective order by Judge McMahon. Court View

DOJ-OGR-00018928.jpg

This page is a transcript of the direct examination of Mrs. Hesse, a former employee of Epstein and Maxwell. She testifies about the protocol for taking phone messages when Epstein and Maxwell were away, specifically describing a blue spiral notebook kept in the kitchen for this purpose. The prosecutor, Ms. Moe, then introduces Government Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 to the witness.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018925.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the beginning of the direct examination of a witness, Nicole Hesse, who has been called by the Government. After being sworn in, Ms. Hesse states and spells her name for the record and answers preliminary questions from an attorney, Ms. Moe, about her birthplace (West Palm Beach, Florida) and where she grew up (North Palm Beach).

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018916.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, where a witness named Shawn is under direct examination. Shawn identifies Government Exhibit 105 as a photograph from Melissa's 16th birthday, which he attended, and names Carolyn, Melissa, and Candace as being in the picture. Following a request from attorney Ms. Comey to protect privacy, the court admits the exhibit into evidence under seal.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018896.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the transition between witnesses in a trial. The court excuses a witness, Ms. Gill, and the government's attorney, Ms. Comey, calls the next witness, "Shawn." The judge explains that Shawn is testifying under a pseudonym to protect a prior witness's identity and instructs courtroom sketch artists not to draw Shawn's likeness before Ms. Comey begins her direct examination.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018892.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Gill Velez. The testimony concerns the authentication of Government Exhibit 823, which is identified as a personnel action notice regarding the original hiring of Sky Roberts at Mar-a-Lago. The exhibit is admitted into evidence over an objection by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018889.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the beginning of court proceedings for the day, where the government's attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, calls witness Janine Gill Velez to the stand. The transcript records the witness being sworn in and the start of the direct examination.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018877.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Rohrbach, and the Judge regarding the admission of exhibits 823 and 824, followed by a recess due to a juror's train delay. The Judge cites the case 'United States v. Lieberman' in relation to arguments about insurance cards and employer verification of employee information.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018867.jpg

This is page 5 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The defense (Mr. Rohrbach) argues that the recall of witness 'Jane' should be limited to a prior consistent statement. The prosecution (Ms. Menninger) argues that Jane's potential contact with her subpoenaed younger brother violates a sequestration order and should be open for questioning. The Court discusses a lack of a specific order prohibiting witnesses from speaking to each other and references a text message from June 15th.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018842.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examining a witness named Carolyn. The questioning centers on Carolyn's meetings with the government in 2020, which she attended with Mr. Scarola and other lawyers, and their potential connection to her submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Carolyn consistently responds that she cannot recall the details of these meetings.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018806.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, presided over by a judge. The discussion centers on whether a witness's testimony about the frequency of an act (up to four times a week) is inconsistent with a complaint stating it occurred twice a month. The attorneys debate the significance of the time frame and the conflicting frequencies mentioned in the testimony versus the complaint.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018759.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between the judge and attorneys Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Menninger regarding trial procedure. The key topics are the timing of an objection to a potential witness's testimony and the estimated length of the cross-examination for the current witness, Carolyn, with the judge emphasizing the need for efficiency to not waste the jury's time.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018700.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, where a witness named Carolyn is being questioned. She states that she provided multiple phone numbers (her own cell, her mom's cell, and Shawn's home phone) to a person named Maxwell so that he and Sarah could contact her for massage appointments. Carolyn explains she gave extra numbers to ensure she was reachable, remembers her mom's number, but claims to have 'blocked out' the others due to the passage of time.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018698.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn, who identifies a photograph of herself (Government Exhibit 104) taken when she was 14 years old, confirming it depicts how she looked when she visited Jeffrey Epstein's house. The court admits the photograph under seal to protect the witness's anonymity.

Court transcript / trial testimony
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018688.jpg

This page is a transcript from the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Carolyn testifies about meeting a neighbor named Shawn in West Palm Beach and dating him when she was 13 and he was 17. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) introduces Government Exhibit 20 containing Shawn's full name, which is admitted under seal to protect his identity.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018681.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The court excuses a witness, Mr. Flatley, after his recross-examination. After a brief exchange with government counsel, Ms. Pomerantz, the court announces a recess.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018679.jpg

This is a transcript page from the trial USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz questions witness Mr. Flatley confirming that all emails in 'Government Exhibit 54' came from the account 'gmax1@mindspring.com'. Subsequently, Defense attorney Ms. Menninger begins recross-examination, asking technical questions about how email clients (like Outlook) automatically refresh data from servers when connected to the internet.

Court transcript (redirect and recross examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018676.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on technical forensic details, specifically regarding computer clones, passwords, metadata, and the creation date of a specific Word document (Government Exhibit 418) which was established as January 29, 2002. The witness confirms they did not verify the physical location of any person on that specific date based on the metadata.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018664.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the metadata (creation, save, and print dates in September 2002) and titles of specific evidence documents. The documents discussed are titled 'PB New Shampoo and Massage Products' (Exhibit 420) and 'Palm Beach House Workers' (Exhibit 418R), linking the evidence to operations at a Palm Beach residence.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018661.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by attorney Ms. Pomerantz regarding Government Exhibits 420B, 421B, and 422B. After the witness affirms their accuracy, the exhibits are admitted into evidence by the court without objection from opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018659.jpg

This document is page 61 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz regarding the review of evidence using forensic software. During the proceedings, Government Exhibit 418B is admitted without objection from Ms. Menninger, and Exhibits 420, 421, and 422 are presented for identification.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018657.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Ms. Pomerantz conducting a direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley. Mr. Flatley identifies Government Exhibits 418 and 418R, confirming they are accurate copies of a document he reviewed. Subsequently, Ms. Pomerantz offers the exhibits into evidence to the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018653.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz, focusing on the authentication and admission of Government Exhibit 424, which is described as an email. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, offers no objection, and the Judge admits the exhibit into evidence.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018638.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Meder. The questioning centers on whether Meder knew the specific locations within a house where certain CDs were found, particularly a closet on the third floor. Meder confirms he did work for the government related to the CDs but repeatedly states that while he knows the CDs were found in the house, he does not recall the exact locations.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018637.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Meder. Meder testifies about preparing a location report for the government concerning evidence, specifically CDs, found at Mr. Epstein's home. The witness confirms they were personally present during two searches of the property and compared the evidence item numbers to their locations within the house.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018634.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Meder. The witness identifies Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph, referred to as Government Exhibit 313, which originated from a CD reviewed during the investigation into both individuals. The government attorney, Ms. Comey, then requests that the exhibit be placed under seal to protect a party's privacy, to which there are no objections.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search