Trove
Sign In Sign Up

GOVERNMENT

Organization
Mentions
2805
Relationships
178
Events
870
Documents
1344
Also known as:
Government of Australia Government of the Republic of Cyprus United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) Office of Government Relations PRC Government US Government (The Americans) Government Exhibit Office of Government Information Services Government / USA Orban Government Palestinian government IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (IRS-TEGE) Hamas Government Saudi Arabian government Orange County, California (Government) Netanyahu government British Government American government Pakistan Government/Military Canadian Government Australian government Government of Ecuador New Zealand Government Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands Gov't (Government) Government / DOJ American Federation of Government Employees/Council of Prison Locals United States of America (Government) US Government (implied by SDNY context)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
178 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
15 Very Strong
29
View
organization Defense
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
21
View
person defendant
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
62
View
person Defense counsel
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
14
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
14
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
55
View
person Recipient
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
5
View
organization Defense
Adversarial
11 Very Strong
10
View
person MAXWELL
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
14
View
person the defendant
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person THOMAS
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
9
View
person Defense counsel
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
21
View
person the defendant
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
7
View
person defendant
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
24
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization Defense
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person MR. EPSTEIN
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Thomas
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Dr. Rocchio
Professional
7
2
View
person Minor Victims
Protective
7
2
View
person Epstein's counsel
Professional
7
2
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
7
3
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Court accepts Government's representations that it has disclosed all Brady and Giglio Material. Court proceedings View
N/A N/A Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... N/A View
N/A N/A Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... N/A View
N/A N/A Argument that defendants should be able to rely on government promises in written agreements and ... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... N/A View
N/A N/A Broader investigation into Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, covering periods beyond the Indictment. N/A View
N/A N/A Government's review of 'Materials' (documents and photographs) related to Epstein's sexual abuse ... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... N/A View
N/A N/A Ex parte proceeding where government allegedly misled Chief Judge McMahon to obtain a subpoena. Court View
N/A N/A Client's arrest and detention despite voluntary surrender. N/A View
N/A N/A Discussion of discovery timeline, with the government requesting until November. Court View
N/A N/A Government initiated a massive OPR investigation into the execution of the NPA. N/A View
N/A N/A Court agrees that some of Maxwell's concerns are overstated but acknowledges defamation action re... N/A View
N/A N/A NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) not disclosed to victims N/A View
N/A N/A Search warrants executed at properties of Jeffrey Epstein. New York and Virgin Islands View
N/A N/A Lefkowitz argued that the government was not required to notify victims under the § 2255 provisio... N/A View
N/A N/A Depositions taken as a result of government-supported civil suits against the speaker. N/A View
N/A N/A Indictment of Thomas S.D.N.Y. View
N/A N/A Opening of Grand Jury Investigation Unknown View
N/A N/A Sentencing hearing regarding fines, restitution, and guideline calculations. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Planned resolution of pending redaction issues N/A View
N/A N/A Victims' lawsuit against the government Court View
N/A N/A Ex parte modification of the protective order by Judge McMahon. Court View

DOJ-OGR-00018457.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. An attorney, Ms. Sternheim, questions Kate about her employment in the music industry and her limited knowledge of the requirements for a U visa, specifically its connection to being a victim of a crime. After the questioning concludes, another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, requests a break from the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018374.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Kate by Ms. Pomerantz regarding a visit to a townhouse in Belgravia owned by Ghislaine Maxwell. The witness describes seeing numerous silver-framed photographs of Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, noting specifically that in many photos, Maxwell was looking at Epstein while he looked at the camera.

Court transcript (trial testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016909.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. The transcript captures the conclusion of the government's case, as confirmed by Ms. Comey, and the subsequent colloquy between the judge and the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The judge formally advises Ms. Maxwell of her right to testify or not to testify, stressing that the decision is hers alone, despite any advice from her attorneys.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016903.jpg

This document is a court transcript where an unidentified speaker argues against the relevance of certain documents concerning a past lawsuit. The speaker explains that a prior litigation between the government and Mr. Epstein centered on an illegal sublet attempt and property abandonment in 1995-1996, asserting these were not material facts to the current case and thus do not warrant judicial notice.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016892.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Everdell, and the judge. Mr. Everdell discusses his intent to use newly acquired property records for Stanhope Mews to impeach a witness's deposition testimony about their residence. He argues that despite the government's objection, further factual development, and possibly an additional witness, is necessary to counter the government's claims.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016876.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a procedural discussion between the Court and counsel (Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe) regarding witness testimony. Ms. Menninger explains why the defense did not seek anonymity for a witness, while Ms. Moe argues they had other options. The Court notes that the defense has been aware since October of another individual, Kelly, who was implicated by a witness named Jane in "sexualized massages" and subsequently noticed as a defense witness.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016376.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a substantial claim submitted by the witness's attorneys to the Epstein Victims Compensation Program on June 26, 2020. This submission occurred approximately one month after the witness had spoken with the government.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016355.jpg

This court transcript page, filed on August 10, 2022, documents the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning centers on a pair of cowboy boots, marked as exhibit AF9, which Farmer confirms were collected by the FBI from her Texas home around June 29, 2022. Farmer is also questioned about the origin of the boots, with the implication that they were a gift from Mr. Epstein.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016342.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records an afternoon session where Ms. Pomerantz (Government) addresses the Court regarding the scheduling of the next witness and raises an objection to Ms. Menninger asking the current witness (A. Farmer, a psychologist testifying as a lay witness) questions about 'hindsight bias,' which Pomerantz argues is the domain of expert testimony.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016311.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger introduces defense exhibit 'AF1'—identified as a page from a journal—which the government prosecutor, Ms. Pomerantz, does not object to. The Court admits the exhibit temporarily under seal while the attorneys discuss potential redactions.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016308.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a personal journal that Farmer used to refresh their memory before a meeting with the government in September 2019. The questioner confirms this fact and notes that the government has already introduced specific pages from the journal as evidence.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016303.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a journal entry from January 7, 1996. The testimony confirms the witness returned from a week-long trip to New York on that date.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016287.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness, A. Farmer. Farmer confirms being interviewed by law enforcement in New York in 2019 and by the government five or six times since then. The witness also affirms having sued individuals named Maxwell and Epstein, stating the motivation was to seek accountability.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016238.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of a witness identified as 'A. Farmer' by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony covers the witness's personal background, including their birthplace (Missouri), childhood in Arizona, and education (University of Pennsylvania and University of Texas at Austin), culminating in their current profession as a psychologist.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016229.jpg

This document is page 13 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It records a dispute between prosecutor Ms. Moe and defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding Government Exhibit 52G; the defense successfully objects to the prosecution directing jurors specifically to entries labeled 'massage, Florida.' The court also admits Government Exhibit 1009 as a public stipulation.

Court transcript (trial proceedings)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016226.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge clarifies a procedural matter with counsel, Ms. Moe, regarding which parts of evidence marked as 'identification 52' are being entered into the record. After a brief recess, the judge confirms with both Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger that they are ready to proceed and directs that the jury be brought in.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016216.jpg

This document is an 'Index of Examination' page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the direct examination of Lawrence Visoski (Jeffrey Epstein's longtime pilot) by Ms. Comey starting on page 88. It also logs the receipt of several Government Exhibits (Nos. 112, 115, 111, 202, 212, 932, and 704) into evidence.

Court transcript index / legal record
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016203.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Visoski. The prosecutor, Ms. Comey, presents two government exhibits, which Visoski identifies as fair and accurate photos of the exterior of Mr. Epstein's brownstone at 9 East 71st Street in New York. With no objection from the opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell, the court admits the exhibits into evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016197.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Visoski by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Visoski identifies Government Exhibit 202 as a photograph of the garage and exterior of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence. Visoski also mentions having previously performed audio/video work at the home.

Court transcript (trial testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016185.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the beginning of the direct examination of the government's first witness, Lawrence Paul Visoski, Jr., conducted by Ms. Comey. After being sworn in, Visoski states his full name, his nickname (Larry), and his profession as an airline transport pilot.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016181.jpg

This document is a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the defense's argument, delivered by Ms. Sternheim, who emphasizes the government's burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and reminds the jury of the presumption of innocence. After Ms. Sternheim concludes by contrasting Maxwell's presence with Jeffrey Epstein's absence, the judge calls for a 10-minute break before the government presents its first witness.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016180.jpg

This document is a transcript of a defense attorney's, Ms. Sternheim's, opening statement in a criminal case. She argues that the government's case is weak, lacks corroborating evidence, and relies on the thin stories of four accusers. Sternheim urges the jury to question the accusers' credibility, suggesting they have been influenced by lawyers, the media, and the prospect of significant financial rewards from the 'Epstein fund'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016172.jpg

This document is a court transcript of an opening statement by an attorney, Ms. Sternheim. She argues that a key witness, an actress named Annie, fabricated or embellished her story against the defendant, Ghislaine, only after Epstein's death and for financial gain, having received $5 million from the Epstein compensation fund. The attorney urges the jury to critically examine the witness's testimony, suggesting it is inconsistent and motivated by money.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016169.jpg

This document is a partial transcript of an opening statement delivered by Ms. Sternheim on August 10, 2022, in a case against Ms. Maxwell. Ms. Sternheim argues that the government is mischaracterizing lawful conduct as 'grooming' and highlights that witnesses testifying for the government have received substantial payments from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, suggesting a potential motive for their testimony.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016131.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, in which a judge is instructing the jury on their conduct. The judge strictly prohibits jurors from discussing the case with anyone, including each other, until deliberations, and forbids the use of any electronic devices or social media for communication or research related to the case. The instructions emphasize the need to keep an open mind and base their verdict solely on the evidence presented in court.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search