| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional witness |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Meder
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller
|
Non agency |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed defendant
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant, our client
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
civilian third party
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Boies Schiller
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror prosecution |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
federal prosecutor
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial prosecution defense |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Witness investigator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant/client
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Chief Judge McMahon
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Adversarial defendant vs prosecutor |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
court
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Professional separate agencies |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Adversarial litigant |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court accepts Government's representations that it has disclosed all Brady and Giglio Material. | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument that defendants should be able to rely on government promises in written agreements and ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Broader investigation into Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, covering periods beyond the Indictment. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's review of 'Materials' (documents and photographs) related to Epstein's sexual abuse ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ex parte proceeding where government allegedly misled Chief Judge McMahon to obtain a subpoena. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Client's arrest and detention despite voluntary surrender. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of discovery timeline, with the government requesting until November. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government initiated a massive OPR investigation into the execution of the NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court agrees that some of Maxwell's concerns are overstated but acknowledges defamation action re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) not disclosed to victims | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search warrants executed at properties of Jeffrey Epstein. | New York and Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz argued that the government was not required to notify victims under the § 2255 provisio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Depositions taken as a result of government-supported civil suits against the speaker. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Indictment of Thomas | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of Grand Jury Investigation | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentencing hearing regarding fines, restitution, and guideline calculations. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned resolution of pending redaction issues | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims' lawsuit against the government | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ex parte modification of the protective order by Judge McMahon. | Court | View |
This document is a court transcript from a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022. In it, the presiding judge instructs the jury on their fundamental duties, emphasizing that the judge decides the law while the jury are the 'triers of fact.' The judge defines what constitutes legal evidence—such as witness testimony and admitted documents—and begins to list items that must not be considered evidence, like lawyers' arguments, to ensure a fair verdict based only on the facts presented.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion between the judge, Ms. Sternheim, and Ms. Comey. The parties are establishing the order for alternating peremptory strikes during jury selection. The judge decides that the defense will start and outlines the sequence of strikes, a method agreed upon by both the defense and the government.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge and an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The judge outlines concerns and procedures for displaying electronic evidence to a witness who is testifying under a pseudonym, emphasizing the need to prevent accidental identification and ensure the government can see exactly what is being presented. The judge agrees to the electronic method on the condition that paper backups are available and the record is clear, which Mr. Everdell accepts.
A photograph designated as Government Exhibit 935-R (Case 20 Cr. 330) showing a built-in bookshelf and cabinet. The shelves contain an eclectic mix of books on physics (Quantum Gravity), art, biographies (Murdoch, Madonna), and crime. The middle shelf displays a framed photo of a helicopter and features a large digital redaction obscuring an item. The lower cabinet is open, revealing clear plastic bins filled with numerous computer hard drives (some labeled 'PATA 100') and other electronic media.
This is an evidentiary photograph showing the contents of an open drawer. The drawer contains a framed document titled 'DIPLOMA' featuring handwritten mathematical equations related to genotype and phenotype, a box of optical discs in colorful sleeves, and two loose discs labeled 'A/V SHOOT 8/12' and 'Nu Photos,' both of which have DOJ redactions applied to them. The image is labeled as Government Exhibit 926 from the case S2 20 Cr. 330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
A photograph submitted as Government Exhibit 911-R in case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The image depicts an opulent interior room featuring a grand staircase, a marble fireplace with gold trim, a painting of a face, ornate mirrors, white armchairs, and a chess set. There is a specific redaction on a side table.
This document is an image labeled as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 910' from a legal case identified as 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. It depicts an interior space featuring a grand wooden staircase with an ornate metal railing, several upholstered chairs, a table with decorative items including what appears to be a chess set, and various sculptures. The document also includes a unique identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00016100', suggesting its origin from the Department of Justice, Office of Government Relations.
This document is a photograph of a building entrance, identified as Government Exhibit 909 in a legal case (S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)). The image shows a grand wooden door, stone facade, and features such as video surveillance, fire lane warnings, and a standpipe/sprinkler system connection. The document is marked with a DOJ-OGR identifier.
This document is a photograph presented as Government Exhibit 904-R in the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image shows what appears to be a massage or treatment room, with a massage table in the center, though several areas of the photograph have been redacted. The document is marked with the Department of Justice identifier DOJ-OGR-00016098.
This document is a Personnel Action Notice from The Mar-a-Lago Club regarding an employee named Sky Roberts. It records his hiring on April 11, 2000, for a maintenance position at a rate of $12.00. The document includes signatures from Human Resources and the Managing Director, with personal identifying information (SSN, address, phone) redacted.
This document is a photograph introduced as Government Exhibit 705 in the trial S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It depicts the exterior of a large, multi-story residential building with classic architecture, identified in court records as Jeffrey Epstein's apartment building at 22 Avenue Foch in Paris, France.
This document is a government evidence photograph, Exhibit 51-A, from case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). It displays the underside of a portable massage table, identified as an Earthlite 'Spirit' model, which was manufactured in Vista, California on April 27, 2000. The image is cataloged by the Department of Justice with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00015684.
This document is a 'Help Wanted' advertisement seeking a massage therapist to work in a private home in Palm Beach, primarily on weekends. The ad promises 'excellent pay' and provides a phone number (351-1000) for applicants to call and leave a message. The document is marked as 'Government Exhibit 421' for a legal case.
This document displays the metadata properties of a Microsoft Word file titled 'Palm Beach House Workers'. The file was created and last saved by a user identified as 'gmax' on January 29, 2002, using software from a Dell Computer Corporation machine. The document is marked as Government Exhibit 418-B for a legal case.
This document is a photograph labeled as Government Exhibit 334 from a legal case (S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)), identified by the document number DOJ-OGR-00015652. The photograph depicts two women smiling in the foreground, with other individuals visible in the background, in what appears to be an indoor social setting. Its significance lies in its use as evidence in a legal proceeding.
This document is a photograph submitted as Government Exhibit 308 in a criminal case (S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)), bearing the Department of Justice identifier DOJ-OGR-00015634. The image provides an aerial view of a large, luxurious coastal estate on a tropical island, showing multiple buildings, beaches, and landscaped grounds.
This is an evidence photograph (Government Exhibit 267) depicting a desk area with a black countertop and black-and-white checkered flooring. The desk contains office supplies including a white phone, a cup of pens, a label maker, and a tape dispenser. Prominently displayed is a spiral-bound message logbook covered by a white notepad personalized with the printed name 'Jeffrey E. Epstein'. The document footer bears the ID DOJ-OGR-00015602.
This document is a photograph of a kitchen interior, labeled as Government Exhibit 266. It is associated with a criminal case, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), and bears the Department of Justice document identifier DOJ-OGR-00015601, indicating its use in legal proceedings.
This image is a U.S. Department of Justice photograph, labeled as Government Exhibit 256 from the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). It depicts a desk laden with office equipment and papers, including several notepads personalized with the name "Jeffrey E. Epstein," strongly suggesting the desk belongs to him. The contents provide a glimpse into an office environment, but most of the documents are illegible.
This document is a photograph entered as Government Exhibit 244-R in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). It depicts a bookshelf holding several visible books (including titles by Susan Hill, Schank, and Simon Schama) and three framed photographs. The content of all three photographs is fully redacted with black boxes. The image bears a DOJ Bates stamp.
This document is a photograph entered as Government Exhibit 235 in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). The image depicts the interior of a residence, specifically a hallway containing a spiral staircase, a table heavily laden with books, and seating. The document bears the Department of Justice bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00015576.
This document is an image displaying multiple framed photographs on a wooden table, with some content within the photos redacted. It is identified as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 223-R' pertaining to criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) and includes the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00015564. The image serves as an exhibit in a legal proceeding.
This document is a photograph marked as 'Government Exhibit 203' for a legal case, '52 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. The image shows the exterior of a modern house with a large driveway where two black SUVs are parked, surrounded by lush, tropical vegetation including palm trees. A Department of Justice (DOJ) identifier, 'DOJ-OGR-00015544', is visible at the bottom.
This document is a photograph of a property entrance, featuring the house number '358' on a pillar adorned with a gargoyle statue. It is labeled as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 201' with a case number 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)' and a Department of Justice document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00015542', indicating its use as evidence in a legal or investigative proceeding.
This document is a government exhibit (Exhibit 113) from the case S2 20 Cr. 330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a photograph of a female subject with blonde hair, largely obscured by a DOJ redaction box, set against a background that appears to be water. The document includes a Bates stamp number DOJ-OGR-00015534.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity