GOVERNMENT
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
62 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
55 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
THOMAS
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Thomas
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Minor Victims
|
Protective |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein's counsel
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court accepts Government's representations that it has disclosed all Brady and Giglio Material. | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument that defendants should be able to rely on government promises in written agreements and ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Broader investigation into Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, covering periods beyond the Indictment. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's review of 'Materials' (documents and photographs) related to Epstein's sexual abuse ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ex parte proceeding where government allegedly misled Chief Judge McMahon to obtain a subpoena. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Client's arrest and detention despite voluntary surrender. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of discovery timeline, with the government requesting until November. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government initiated a massive OPR investigation into the execution of the NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court agrees that some of Maxwell's concerns are overstated but acknowledges defamation action re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) not disclosed to victims | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search warrants executed at properties of Jeffrey Epstein. | New York and Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz argued that the government was not required to notify victims under the § 2255 provisio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Depositions taken as a result of government-supported civil suits against the speaker. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Indictment of Thomas | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of Grand Jury Investigation | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentencing hearing regarding fines, restitution, and guideline calculations. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned resolution of pending redaction issues | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims' lawsuit against the government | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ex parte modification of the protective order by Judge McMahon. | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00011671.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The judge outlines the protocol for showing electronic evidence to a witness who is testifying under a pseudonym, expressing concern that the material could inadvertently reveal the witness's identity to the gallery. The judge agrees to the proposed method of using limited screens, provided the government is kept fully aware and paper copies are available as a backup.
DOJ-OGR-00011664.jpg
This is the final page (43) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The proceedings conclude with the Judge instructing Ms. Comey (Government) and Ms. Sternheim (Defense) to confer regarding rebuttal witnesses and submit a letter by Saturday if there is a disagreement. The court adjourns for the Thanksgiving holiday.
DOJ-OGR-00011661.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion during a final pretrial conference. The judge inquires about the exclusion of witnesses, and the government's counsel, Ms. Comey, clarifies that victims have a right to be present after testifying but other witnesses will be excluded. Another attorney, Ms. Menninger, then raises a related issue about the admissibility of accusers' prior inconsistent statements.
DOJ-OGR-00011657.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between Mr. Rohrbach and the presiding judge. The conversation centers on the legal definition of 'illegal sexual activity' within an indictment, specifically whether events in New Mexico and the intent for activity in New York satisfy the requirements of the Mann Act for conspiracy charges against 'minor Victim 2'. The judge expresses concern about potential jury confusion over the complex legal points being argued.
DOJ-OGR-00011655.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between the government (represented by Mr. Rohrbach) and the judge. The discussion centers on whether the potential illegality of sexual conduct in New Mexico can be used as evidence for an enticement charge under New York law. The judge expresses skepticism about the government's approach, pointing out that the charges were not filed under New Mexico law and cautioning against confusing the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00011643.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a discussion between the judge, Ms. Menninger, and Mr. Rohrbach regarding the rules for disclosing expert testimony and the scope of evidence contained on several hard drives marked as exhibits. The attorneys debate the government's representations about which documents will be used, and Mr. Rohrbach clarifies that a witness, Mr. Kelso, will testify on the general principles of document creation.
DOJ-OGR-00011642.jpg
This document is a partial court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, discussing the anticipated testimony of Mr. Flatley. His testimony concerns the retrieval of metadata from devices seized from Epstein's home, and the possibility of Mr. Kelso serving as a rebuttal witness. The government and defense are preparing for this testimony and related disclosures, with Mr. Flatley having given similar testimony in other cases.
DOJ-OGR-00011613.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022, in which a judge discusses sentencing factors for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The judge acknowledges that conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) have been extremely difficult for all inmates due to the pandemic, and that Ms. Maxwell faced additional surveillance as a high-profile defendant. However, the judge explicitly rejects the defense's argument that Ms. Maxwell was singled out for uniquely harsh and punishing treatment.
DOJ-OGR-00011556.jpg
This legal document is a transcript from a court proceeding concerning the sentencing of a defendant named Guerrero for a sex-trafficking conspiracy. The judge is determining whether the 2003 or the harsher 2004 sentencing guidelines apply, which hinges on whether the crime continued after November 1, 2004. This determination relies heavily on the testimony of a victim named Carolyn, whom the judge and jury found to be a credible witness.
DOJ-OGR-00011537.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a court hearing on July 22, 2022, discussing factual objections and the calculation of sentencing guidelines. The Court, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Moe participate in the discussion, with the Court adopting PSR recitations and outlining the process for guideline calculation. The defense contends a guideline calculation of 51 to 63 months' imprisonment, while the government's contention is cut off.
DOJ-OGR-00011529.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022. In it, the judge makes findings of fact, stating it is probable the defendant paid Carolyn and Virginia for bringing and recruiting other girls. The judge then overrules two objections: one regarding the inclusion of a person named Kate, and another concerning the characterization of the defendant having groomed a person named Jane.
DOJ-OGR-00002880.jpg
This document is a legal letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against a subpoena issued by the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) to the law firm BSF. The author argues that requests for materials related to the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program (EVCP) and communications between BSF and the U.S. Attorney are irrelevant to the charges, protected by work-product privilege, and constitute a 'fishing expedition' intended to support a false narrative of collusion. The document specifically details Requests 1, 3-5, 8, and 12.
DOJ-OGR-00002816.jpg
This legal document, dated March 22, 2021, is a filing in a criminal case arguing against the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) discovery requests. The filing contends that requests for communications about co-conspirator Jean Luc Brunel, fee agreements with victims Annie and Maria Farmer, Annie Farmer's complete teenage journal, and materials from the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program are irrelevant and improper 'fishing expeditions' for impeachment material. The document cites case law to assert that the Defendant has failed to demonstrate the relevance and admissibility of the requested evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00002815.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing arguing against a defendant's subpoena requests, asserting they fail to meet the Nixon standard for admissibility and relevance. The text specifically challenges requests for materials from the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program and communications between the firm BSF and the U.S. Attorney, characterizing them as fishing expeditions or irrelevant work product.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019594.jpg
This document appears to be page 106 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the file name 'Epst'), stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. It details Edward Snowden's time in Hong Kong, asserting he did not contact the governments of Iceland or Ecuador directly, and argues that logistical constraints meant he could only safely fly to China, North Korea, or Russia to avoid US extradition. The text highlights that Snowden's only confirmed contact was with Russia, citing a statement by Vladimir Putin describing Snowden as an 'agent of special services.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019227.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal memorandum dated May 19, 2008, addressed to Honorable Mark Filip. It argues against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, asserting that his conduct was 'purely local,' 'consensual,' and did not meet the thresholds for federal statutes regarding human trafficking (§ 1591), internet predation (§ 2422), or sex tourism (§ 2423). The text critiques a CEOS review and U.S. Attorney Acosta's potential use of discretion, claiming that federal involvement would be an unprecedented overreach into state jurisdiction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020658.jpg
This document, stamped with Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020658, is a biographical list titled 'International Associates' found in the 'About the Participants' section of a larger report. It details the academic and diplomatic credentials of ten individuals, predominantly experts in Asian, Chinese, and European foreign relations, affiliated with institutions such as the Hoover Institution, Oxford, and the Woodrow Wilson Center.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020508.jpg
This document appears to be page 49 of a House Oversight report detailing censorship and surveillance tactics employed by the People's Republic of China (PRC) against American scholars and academic institutions. It outlines specific restrictions including the vetting of conference materials, internet restrictions, physical surveillance by security services, and the censorship of digital archives like CNKI. It notes that American universities pay significant fees for these now-censored databases and that research into regions like Tibet and Xinjiang is effectively blocked. While the prompt references Epstein, this specific page focuses entirely on Sino-US academic relations and censorship.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017076.jpg
This document is a page from a participant directory for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists high-profile individuals from various sectors including finance (Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, UniCredit), media (Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters), academia (Harvard, MIT, Oxford), and government. The document contains a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017076' stamp, indicating it is part of a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to inquiries regarding Jeffrey Epstein's associations, though Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027016.jpg
This document appears to be a slide or page from a speech/briefing by an outgoing official discussing geopolitical threats in the Middle East. The text highlights a nuclear Iran, radical Islamist terror, and missile proliferation as key dangers, while noting a political transition ('interregnum') in Israel with a new Netanyahu government incoming. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026743.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a speech or essay advocating for scientists to engage in public policy and address long-term existential risks ('low probability/high consequence' threats). The author argues for 'techno-optimism' regarding AI, biotech, and nanotech while warning against the 'precautionary principle.' The text concludes by quoting H.G. Wells on the fragility of humanity and the potential for future growth. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017907.jpg
This document is a page from a Westlaw legal research printout regarding the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539). The page lists legal headnotes defining the standards for personal jurisdiction, conspiracy pleading requirements under New York law, and specific federal jurisdiction rulings concerning Saudi Arabian officials accused of funding terrorism through humanitarian channels. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017907' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017465.jpg
This document appears to be a draft page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the document source context) recounting a historical meeting. It describes Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau invoking the War Measures Act in response to Quebec separatism and convening a group of experts, including the author (the only non-Canadian present) and Irwin Cotler, at an isolated resort to discuss the law's implementation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027887.jpg
This document is page 39 of a book or memoir (likely by Ehud Barak, given the Mishmar Hasharon reference often associated with him) contained within House Oversight files. It details the history of the 1956 Suez Crisis (Sinai War), discussing the military actions of Battalion 890, the political miscalculations of Ben-Gurion regarding British and French power, and the intervention of the US and Soviet Union. It concludes with a personal reflection from the author about how the war touched them directly at Mishmar Hasharon.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027874.jpg
This document is page 26 of a memoir (likely Ehud Barak's, given the age and context) contained within a House Oversight evidence file (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027874). The text recounts the author's childhood memories in 1947 Palestine, specifically observing the training of the Palmach militia and listening to the radio broadcast of the UN debate regarding the partition of Palestine and the establishment of a Jewish state. It details the political tension, the proposed borders, and the stance of leaders like Ben-Gurion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity