FBI
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
OIG
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Collaboration |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pro-PRC organizations
|
Surveillance adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Maheu
|
Informant operative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Jurisdictional investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
STEPHEN FLATLEY
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
paul krassner
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Source
|
Informant service provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Operational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
James A. Baker
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wild
|
Investigative law enforcement victim witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Subject of investigation evidence collection |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Professional collaboration |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
NSA
|
Inter agency communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Requester agency |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney’s Office
|
Inter agency |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CIA
|
Withholding information |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's Victims
|
Investigator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michelle Licata
|
Identified victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Female]
|
Witness informant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. ROBERT
|
Litigation foia requester |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | OPR working with FBI Palm Beach Office, including case agents and Victim Witness Specialist, to o... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI search of Automated Case Support system and documentation of victim notification system. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Meeting | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation began, contemporaneous with news reports of Epstein's arrest. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims provided OPR with information regarding their contacts with the FBI and USAO. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein's firm was raided. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI produced a criminal complaint related to Alfredo Rodriguez. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell ('green lighting ab arrest'). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Launch of counterintelligence investigation into Trump campaign | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense counsel review of nude images | FBI | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI interview of a victim pursuant to a federal investigation regarding the sexual exploitation o... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transfer of evidence | New York Office (NYO) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal Investigation / Agency Interviews | MCC New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search of Epstein's island | Little St. James | View |
| N/A | N/A | Seizure of images from Jeffrey Epstein's residences pursuant to search warrants. | New York and Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned Arrest upon return to US | Unspecified Airport | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closure of federal investigations by FBI and U.S. Attorney | Federal jurisdiction | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Raid / Evidence Collection | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Identification of new victims | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government interviews with accusers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Referral of case to FBI | Palm Beach | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016286.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). She testifies about the psychological impact of wearing specific boots to reclaim a 'dark memory' of being taken advantage of by Maxwell and Epstein. She also details her history of speaking with the FBI (2006/2007) and the media (2016 off-record, 2019 on-record), confirming she was not paid for these interviews.
DOJ-OGR-00016285.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. The witness confirms speaking to the media in 2002 and being interviewed by the FBI in late 2006 or early 2007 regarding her experiences. She testifies that she told the FBI that Ghislaine Maxwell gave her a massage and that Jeffrey Epstein got into bed with her.
DOJ-OGR-00016217.jpg
Cover page for a court transcript of the jury trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 10, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). Law enforcement representatives from the FBI and NYPD were also noted as present.
DOJ-OGR-00016177.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement, likely from a defense attorney named Ms. Sternheim. She argues that an accuser, Carolyn, fabricated her story about Ghislaine's involvement, noting that Carolyn's initial lawsuits and FBI interview only mentioned Epstein and his assistant, Sarah Kellen. The attorney suggests that Carolyn's story changed to include Ghislaine only after Epstein's death, motivated by a multi-million dollar payment from a victim's fund.
DOJ-OGR-00016111.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00015149.jpg
This legal document describes the process of two separate grand jury proceedings related to indictments against an individual named Maxwell. It details that on June 29, 2020, and March 29, 2021, grand juries heard testimony from an FBI agent and an NYPD detective, respectively, who presented hearsay evidence summarizing the government's investigation. The document outlines the exhibits presented and the subsequent indictments returned by the juries.
DOJ-OGR-00015147.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal filing dated August 11, 2025, discussing the Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell based on 'special circumstances' and public interest in the Epstein investigation. It references a July 6, 2025 Memorandum regarding the Government's review of the investigation and notes that a separate court in the Southern District of Florida recently denied a similar motion on July 23, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00002540.jpg
This legal document outlines the scope and methodology of an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Prompted by a February 21, 2019, court ruling that the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) violated victims' rights, the OPR's review examined government conduct, collected extensive records, and conducted over 60 interviews. The investigation identified five subjects, including former U.S. Attorney Acosta, for their roles in the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) and related decisions.
DOJ-OGR-00002537.jpg
This document serves as a historical summary of legal proceedings regarding Jeffrey Epstein between 2008 and 2018. It details his controversial work release program via the 'Florida Science Foundation,' the eventual unsealing of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the subsequent civil litigation under the CVRA. It also covers Alexander Acosta's 2017 confirmation as Labor Secretary and the 2018 Miami Herald investigation exposing the lenient plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00002290.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on January 25, 2021. The defense argues that Perjury Counts should not be joined with Mann Act Counts because the alleged false statements occurred during 2016 civil depositions regarding a defamation suit (involving Virginia Giuffre) and were not made to the FBI or a grand jury to thwart an existing investigation. The text references a purported conspiracy between Maxwell and Epstein from 1999-2002.
DOJ-OGR-00002290(1).jpg
This document is page 12 of a defense filing (Document 120) from January 2021 in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues against the 'joinder' (combining) of Perjury Counts with Mann Act Counts, stating that Maxwell's alleged false statements in 2016 civil depositions were tangential to the defamation case and not part of a 'common scheme' to obstruct the Mann Act investigation. The defense distinguishes this case from legal precedent (Potamitis), emphasizing that Maxwell did not lie to the FBI or a Grand Jury to derail an investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00002186.jpg
This document is a page from a Government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) opposing bail for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). It details her evasion of FBI agents during her arrest, including fleeing and wrapping a phone in tin foil, and argues she prioritized private security over law enforcement. Additionally, it asserts she was deceptive with Pretrial Services regarding her finances, possessing 'vast resources' far exceeding the $3.8 million she initially disclosed.
DOJ-OGR-00002186(1).jpg
This legal document argues for the defendant's detention by highlighting her deceptive behavior and flight risk. It cites her knowing disobedience of FBI directives when she fled, her attempts to evade law enforcement by wrapping a phone in tin foil, and her significant dishonesty regarding her financial assets, which are believed to be far greater than the $3.8 million she disclosed to Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00002185(1).jpg
This document is page 24 of a Government filing (Document 100) in the case US v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330), filed on December 18, 2020. It argues against bail by highlighting the defendant's evasion of law enforcement, noting that her counsel never disclosed her location despite being in contact with the Government. It details that during her arrest, Maxwell ignored FBI directives and ran away from agents who were clearly identified.
DOJ-OGR-00002072.jpg
This document is a statement from a forensic accountant and private investigator detailing their professional qualifications and extensive experience. The individual outlines their education, a 25-year career as a Special Agent with the IRS-CID from 1973 to 1998, and their work on complex financial fraud investigations in collaboration with the U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI, and NYPD. The statement serves to establish the author's expertise and credibility in financial investigations.
DOJ-OGR-00002025.jpg
This legal document is a declaration from an unnamed individual defending Ghislaine against public accusations and media reports. The author attests that Ghislaine was not a fugitive but was forced into hiding due to a dangerous media frenzy, which included a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun newspaper, and threats on social media. The author asserts Ghislaine's consistent claims of innocence and her desire for a fair legal process to clear her name.
DOJ-OGR-00002002.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was not attempting to evade arrest. It explains that her retreat to a safe room was a standard security protocol initiated after her guard mistook approaching FBI agents for the press. The document further contends that she wrapped a cellphone in tin foil to prevent press access after her number was leaked, not to evade law enforcement, citing that the phone was registered to her charity and that she used another, uncovered phone as her primary device.
DOJ-OGR-00001819.jpg
This legal document, filed on November 6, 2020, is a motion from the Government detailing a delay in producing discovery evidence from 62 electronic devices seized from Epstein. The Government explains that its outside vendor will not meet the November 9 deadline and will likely complete the work by November 19. The document outlines the subsequent unsuccessful negotiations with the defense for an extension, detailing the defense's four conditions and the Government's agreement to some (extending motion deadlines, providing a laptop) but rejection of others (providing names of minor victims and Jencks Act material).
DOJ-OGR-00030480.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal letter dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. The letter argues against an aggravated assault charge in a specific case, contending that the facts do not align with the legal definition of a violent felony, as there was no suggestion of serious bodily harm or a deadly weapon. The argument is supported by legal citations, including Florida case law and the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, to demonstrate that a plea to aggravated assault would be inappropriate.
DOJ-OGR-00022167.jpg
This document is an official statement summarizing the FBI's conclusion that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 10, 2019. This finding is supported by video evidence showing no one entered his cell tier overnight and is consistent with previous findings from the NYC Chief Medical Examiner, the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the DOJ's Inspector General. The statement also provides links to the raw and enhanced video footage.
DOJ-OGR-00022086.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against a discovery request from a defendant named Thomas. The Government contends that it is not required to produce records from the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) because the BOP was not part of the prosecution team or involved in a 'joint investigation'. The document distinguishes the roles of the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI, DOJ-OIG) from the BOP, noting the Government obtained BOP records via subpoena and was not involved in the BOP's internal investigation into Epstein's suicide.
DOJ-OGR-00022085.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a brief or motion, dated April 24, 2020. It argues that the involvement of agents from a government agency in an investigation does not automatically make the entire agency part of the "prosecution team" for discovery purposes. The text cites several legal precedents (Stein, Pelullo, Locascio, Ghailani, and Middendorf) to outline the factors courts use to determine the scope of the prosecution team and its disclosure obligations under Rule 16.
DOJ-OGR-00022057.jpg
A printout of a Government Executive article dated November 19, 2019, filed as a court document. The article details testimony by BOP Director Hawk Sawyer regarding staffing shortages ('augmentation') and the fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein suicide, including the indictment of two guards for falsifying records. Sawyer agrees with Senator Ted Cruz that the event was a 'black eye' for the agency but defends the majority of the staff.
DOJ-OGR-00022053.jpg
This document, a printout of a news article dated March 31, 2020, discusses the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in the Manhattan Correctional Center, including a DOJ investigation. It details the unsealing of court records from a lawsuit by accuser Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, which contained allegations against several high-profile individuals. The article also revisits the controversial 2008 'sweetheart' plea deal Epstein received from former U.S. attorney Alex Acosta in Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00022052.jpg
A Washington Examiner article filed as a court document reporting Attorney General William Barr's announcement of a DOJ Inspector General investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The article details the timeline of Epstein being found unresponsive in the Manhattan Correctional Center's Special Housing Unit on the morning of August 10, 2019, and notes an ongoing FBI inquiry. It also references the 14-page indictment regarding Epstein's alleged sex trafficking crimes between 2002 and 2005.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity