FBI
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
OIG
|
Inter agency cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
CBP
|
Professional operational |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FinCEN
|
Inter agency cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Cooperative investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
OIG SA [Redacted]
|
Cooperation information sharing |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
DOJ
|
Joint investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
GA
|
Coordination |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein victims
|
Financial |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional operational |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI Boston (SSRA)
|
Internal cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Professional tension |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Source investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY
|
Investigative team |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Reiter
|
Informant source |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional lack of oversight |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Metro PCS
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Sprint
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
JetBlue
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Subject of deposition |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
NYPD
|
Interagency cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Investigative reporting |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional cooperation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | OPR working with FBI Palm Beach Office, including case agents and Victim Witness Specialist, to o... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI search of Automated Case Support system and documentation of victim notification system. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Meeting | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation began, contemporaneous with news reports of Epstein's arrest. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims provided OPR with information regarding their contacts with the FBI and USAO. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein's firm was raided. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI produced a criminal complaint related to Alfredo Rodriguez. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell ('green lighting ab arrest'). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Launch of counterintelligence investigation into Trump campaign | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense counsel review of nude images | FBI | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI interview of a victim pursuant to a federal investigation regarding the sexual exploitation o... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transfer of evidence | New York Office (NYO) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal Investigation / Agency Interviews | MCC New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search of Epstein's island | Little St. James | View |
| N/A | N/A | Seizure of images from Jeffrey Epstein's residences pursuant to search warrants. | New York and Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned Arrest upon return to US | Unspecified Airport | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closure of federal investigations by FBI and U.S. Attorney | Federal jurisdiction | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Raid / Evidence Collection | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Identification of new victims | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government interviews with accusers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Referral of case to FBI | Palm Beach | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014481.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the summation (closing argument) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that Maxwell is innocent and that the prosecution's case relies on stories manipulated by personal injury lawyers and motivated by money. She asserts that the government successfully proved Jeffrey Epstein was a manipulator and abuser, but failed to connect those actions to Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00014440.jpg
This document is a page from the summation transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), delivered by prosecutor Ms. Moe. It details corroborating testimony from witnesses Janice Swain and David Mulligan (Annie's high school boyfriend) regarding what the victim, Annie, told them in the 1990s about a trip to New Mexico involving Maxwell and Epstein. The text highlights that Annie consistently described Maxwell buying her cowboy boots and sexually abusing her during a massage, a story she also told the FBI in 2006.
DOJ-OGR-00005290.jpg
This document is page 14 (marked -13- internally) of a Juror Questionnaire filed on October 22, 2021, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains screening questions regarding the potential jurors' past experiences with grand jury investigations, being a victim of a crime, or having legal disputes with government agencies like the FBI or NYPD. The document features strikethroughs indicating a renumbering of the questions (e.g., changing question 23 to 24).
DOJ-OGR-00002875.jpg
This legal document, dated March 29, 2021, is a filing from the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It clarifies the role of the FBI New York Office in an investigation conducted by the FBI Florida Office, stating that the New York office provided only 'ancillary support' by interviewing four witnesses between 2007 and 2008. The document asserts that this assistance did not make the New York office part of the prosecution team and that such inter-office cooperation is common.
DOJ-OGR-00002725.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, is a request for the production of documents related to defense motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It seeks all communications concerning the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, including those between various government agencies and Epstein's lawyers. The request also demands communications from meetings in 2016 and 2018 where attorneys for Epstein's victims urged the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to launch a criminal investigation into both Epstein and Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00033129.jpg
This document is an index page (Page 141, Bates DOJ-OGR-00033129) from a legal transcript produced by Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists alphabetical keywords from 'Duval' to 'final' with their corresponding page and line numbers in the main transcript. Significant entries include 'Epstein' (heavily referenced), 'FBI' (indicating federal investigation discussions), 'Figueroa', 'e-mail', and 'fifty-million-d...' (suggesting a large financial sum or settlement was discussed).
DOJ-OGR-00023231.jpg
This document page (193) details the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) legal interpretation that rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) formally commence upon the filing of a complaint, as that establishes a 'Federal offense.' It also outlines the 2005 Attorney General Guidelines, which assigned the responsibility of identifying and notifying victims during the 'investigation stage' to the FBI Special Agent in Charge.
DOJ-OGR-00023228.jpg
This document is a timeline graphic from a Department of Justice report detailing key events surrounding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) analysis in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It tracks internal DOJ communications, victim notifications, and court actions from 2006 to 2008, with an additional sidebar covering legal developments up to 2020. Key events include the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), the deferral of victim notification regarding the plea deal, and subsequent court rulings finding that the U.S. violated the CVRA.
DOJ-OGR-00002706.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, is an argument from the defense demanding the immediate production of unredacted reports from the government. The defense contends these reports, held by the FBI, contain exculpatory 'Brady material' and that the government cannot fulfill its disclosure obligations by providing redacted versions. The argument is supported by citations to legal precedents, including Kyles v. Whitley, and a prior ruling from the court on the timing of such disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00025265.jpg
In a letter dated August 12, 2019, Lamine N'Diaye, the Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, responds to an inquiry from District Judge Richard M. Berman. The Warden confirms that the ongoing FBI and OIG investigations into an August 10, 2019 incident involving inmate Jeffrey Epstein will also encompass a prior incident from July 23, 2019. Due to the active investigations, the Warden states he is unable to release any information regarding the previously completed internal inquiry into the July incident.
DOJ-OGR-00017590.jpg
A court transcript excerpt from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a discussion about witness 'Jane'. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger raises a concern about a potential undisclosed statement from May 2019. Prosecutor Ms. Comey clarifies that the witness was approached by the FBI in May 2019 but declined to speak, and her first substantive interview did not occur until September 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00017584.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named 'Jane'. The witness clarifies that her first interview with the FBI regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell occurred in May 2019, not September 2019. She also confirms that she subsequently filed a lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00014528.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney argues that a witness named Carolyn did not mention Maxwell in her original 2007 statements to the FBI or in her 2008 civil lawsuits. The text details Carolyn's interactions with Epstein, Roberts, and Sarah Kellen, specifically noting that Roberts instructed the massage and engaged in sex acts with Epstein, while Kellen took photos and arranged logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00014527.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) containing the defense summation by Ms. Menninger. The attorney challenges the credibility of a witness named Kate using property records and discusses another witness, Carolyn, who was interviewed by FBI agents in 2007. The text highlights that Carolyn told the FBI she was recruited by Virginia Roberts, who discussed money with her and brought her inside a property where she saw a woman with an unknown accent.
DOJ-OGR-00014513.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The attorney attacks the credibility of a witness (likely 'Jane' or Carolyn) by highlighting inconsistencies in her statements to the FBI regarding her housing (Bear Lake Estates), her age when moving to Interlochen, and the timeline of meeting Donald Trump in a green car owned by Epstein. The defense argues the witness fabricated Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement at the suggestion of her personal injury lawyer, Mr. Glassman.
DOJ-OGR-00014504.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a defense summation by Ms. Menninger in a criminal trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney argues that a witness's testimony is unreliable due to significant memory lapses and inconsistencies, specifically highlighting contradictory accounts given to the FBI versus in court regarding the location and circumstances of the first instance of sexual abuse involving Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014486.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically the summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. She argues that the government failed to record interviews with accusers, questions the credibility of witnesses who added Maxwell to their stories only after hiring personal injury lawyers, and points out discrepancies between testimony and flight logs regarding travel.
DOJ-OGR-00011666.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021. The trial took place in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019810.jpg
This document appears to be page 322 from the notes section of a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the footer). It contains endnotes for Chapter 18, citing various news articles and interviews regarding intelligence agencies (NSA, CIA), Russian espionage, and Edward Snowden. The document has a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger document production for a congressional committee. Despite the filename containing 'Epst', the content relates to the author Edward Jay Epstein, not Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019807.jpg
This document appears to be a page of endnotes (page 319) from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, bearing a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp. The text details sources and citations regarding Edward Snowden's flight from the US, the revocation of his passport by the State Department in June 2013, and various interviews conducted by the author with intelligence officials and journalists. The document references whistleblowers, the FBI, the NSA, and Russian President Vladimir Putin's involvement in the Snowden affair. While the prompt requests 'Epstein-related' data, this specific page concerns Edward Snowden; the 'Epstein' connection is likely the author of the book, Edward Jay Epstein, rather than Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019795.jpg
This document is a page of endnotes (page 307) from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, produced to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019795). The notes relate to a prologue about Edward Snowden in Hong Kong (2014), citing interviews the author conducted with figures like General Keith Alexander and Keith Bradsher, as well as various books and articles. While part of a House Oversight production potentially related to investigations involving the author (who had connections to Jeffrey Epstein), the content specifically details sources regarding the NSA and Snowden.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019789.jpg
This document is a scanned page (301) from the Epilogue of a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. The text analyzes the impact of Edward Snowden's leaks, crediting him with prompting Congress to modify the Patriot Act regarding domestic privacy while simultaneously criticizing him for damaging long-standing US intelligence methods used against foreign adversaries. It details the mechanics of NSA call chaining and the shift in how billing records are stored.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019786.jpg
This document appears to be page 298 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename 'Epst_...'). It details the operational fallout of the Edward Snowden leaks, specifically how terrorist targets using platforms like Xbox Live, Twitter, and Facebook ceased using these methods ('went dark') after the PRISM program was revealed in June 2013. The text cites NSA officials Richard Ledgett and Admiral Rogers confirming that the leaks resulted in a loss of surveillance capabilities against groups planning attacks in Europe and the US.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019769.jpg
This document appears to be a page (281) from a book manuscript, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (inferred from the filename 'Epst' and ISBN 9780451494566), bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. The text analyzes Edward Snowden's motivations, arguing that he sought fame rather than just whistleblower status, as evidenced by his refusal to remain anonymous despite offers from editors and his specific request for Laura Poitras to film him. It details the timeline of his communications with journalists Gellman, Greenwald, and Poitras in 2013.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019758.jpg
This document is a page from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, produced as part of a House Oversight investigation (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019758). The text details an interview between the author and Snowden's Russian lawyer, Kucherena, discussing Snowden's potential possession of CIA files, the division of labor between his legal teams (Kucherena in Russia, Ben Wizner/ACLU in the US), and Snowden's financial state upon arriving in Russia. The document clarifies that media access to Snowden was controlled by Ben Wizner.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity