Epstein
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Prosecutor defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
location
Palm Beach residence
|
Ownership |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Provision regarding USAO's efforts to obtain Epstein's computers and the safeguarding of these co... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged sexual molestation of minor girls on a daily basis for many years, including at... | West Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Epstein continuing and her responsibilitie... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Litigation involving Epstein where his lawyers attacked the credibility of the girls. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery process blocked by Epstein and co-conspirators, leading to the need for alternative inv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell began looking for real estate for her dad and Epstein asked for help finding an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked Ghislaine Maxwell to continue helping him (find a house, etc.) after her father's d... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged criminal scheme and the defense's efforts to secure non-prosecution and immigra... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement provisions precluding criminal charges and immigration proceedings against certain indi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation resolved through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing for an 18-month incarceration, reduced from a 'non-negoti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plaintiffs' motion to deny a protective order, which seeks to exclude Epstein from depositions, i... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Minor girl (Jane Doe #5) was taken to Epstein's mansion on El Brillo Way for massages and/or sex ... | Epstein's mansion on El Bri... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein serving 12 months of house arrest at his Palm Beach home, with curfew, no unsupervised co... | Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | 11-month investigation by Palm Beach police into Epstein paying underage girls for massages and s... | El Brillo Way home | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer declined to prosecute Epstein on unlawful sex acts with minors, ins... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's state plea hearing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Menchel made substantive changes to Villafaña's draft letter concerning Epstein's plea deal, incl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea deal (non-prosecution agreement) for two prostitution charges. | state court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein served 13 months in Palm Beach County jail with work release privileges. | Palm Beach County jail | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attempt to get out of the NPA after it was signed. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00011532.jpg
This legal document is a transcript of a judge's ruling from a case filed on July 22, 2022. The judge overrules several objections from the defendant concerning the testimony of a witness named Carolyn, whom the judge finds credible. The testimony in question involves Carolyn's claims of being brought to Epstein's Palm Beach residence by Virginia at age 14, visiting over 100 times, and stopping the performance of 'sexualized massages' in 2001.
DOJ-OGR-00011531.jpg
This document is page 12 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on July 22, 2022, involving the sentencing or factual findings regarding the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The judge overrules objections to Paragraph 55, stating the record supports that the defendant recruited a minor, Virginia, for sexualized massages with Epstein and was aware of the nature of the acts. The text also details that the defendant instructed Virginia to show another minor, Carolyn, 'what to do,' and that monetary incentives were used to encourage Virginia to recruit Carolyn.
DOJ-OGR-00011530.jpg
This page from a court transcript details a judge's rulings on objections to a Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) in a criminal case. The judge overrules an objection regarding conduct involving an individual named Kate, deeming it relevant for sentencing, but agrees to modify paragraph 43 to reflect that Kate was above the age of consent. The transcript ends with the introduction of an objection regarding evidence of payment for an individual named Annie's trip to Thailand.
DOJ-OGR-00011528.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 22, 2022, details a judge's decision to overrule objections made by the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The judge cites trial testimony from witnesses named Annie, Jane, Virginia, and Carolyn as evidence supporting the characterization that Maxwell and Epstein isolated minor girls and developed a multi-level recruitment scheme. The scheme allegedly began with Maxwell recruiting Virginia, who then recruited Carolyn, who in turn recruited others.
DOJ-OGR-00011526.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing dated July 22, 2022, involving the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court overrules defense objections regarding factual assertions, specifically crediting testimony that Maxwell targeted Virginia Giuffre at Mar-a-Lago and confirming via bank statements that Epstein transferred approximately $23 million to Maxwell during their conspiracy. The Judge also confirms Maxwell's authorship of a specific essay based on computer metadata linking the file to user 'Ghislaine' and computer 'GMax'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019175.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (pages 58-59) featuring a transcript of an interview between Detective Recarey and a witness named Dobbs. Dobbs discusses the payment structure for girls, stating she heard conflicting stories about whether sexual intercourse occurred or if Epstein just 'played around.' Dobbs admits to recruiting 'a lot' of girls for Epstein after she refused to let him touch her during massages, describing this transition as being 'down-promoted' to a recruiter role.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019150.jpg
This document contains a page from a James Patterson book describing an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, highlighting the urgency to find victims visiting his house on El Brillo Way. A second section, titled "Alison: September 11," describes media dynamics and mentions a tip received by WPTV regarding prostitution at a local high school.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019149.jpg
This document contains pages 32 and 33 from the book 'Filthy Rich', stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details Detective Reiter's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, including a specific incident where Epstein called Reiter offering funds for a 'firearms simulator,' which Reiter interpreted as Epstein knowing about the investigation. The text also identifies Nadia Marcinkova as a 19-year-old living with Epstein who was described as a 'slave,' and mentions a woman named Wendy as a known procurer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019003.jpg
This incident report details multiple allegations of sexual misconduct by Jeffrey Epstein during massages, including masturbation, sexual intercourse, and the use of a vibrator. It also describes an incident where Epstein had his assistant and another individual kiss and fondle each other during a massage provided to him. The report includes investigative efforts to interview former Epstein housemen, Juan Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez, and details a rental car provided by Epstein to a redacted individual who was interviewed by the police.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018971.jpg
This incident report details an investigation involving a minor female, her parents, and a therapist. The officer coordinates interviews and retrieves a cell phone for a controlled call, noting the victim's behavioral changes. During an interview on March 30, 2005, the victim admits that Epstein used a vibrator on her while they were alone on the second floor of his residence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031406.jpg
This document appears to be the footer and signature block of an email from attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez. It contains an excerpt discussing a response by Epstein's legal team (Starr, Goldberger, Sanchez, and Weinberg) to a 'Times editorial' regarding Alexander Acosta and federal sex trafficking allegations. The document includes a link to a Miami Herald article and a strict confidentiality disclaimer noting the information is the 'property of JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and referencing the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031397.jpg
This document describes the controversy surrounding Alexander Acosta's handling of the Epstein case, noting that a 53-page indictment was shelved in favor of a lenient 2008 plea deal. It details a newly announced investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility into the matter and includes a statement from Senator Sasse emphasizing the need for justice for the victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022053.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a book by James Patterson (likely 'Filthy Rich') containing a witness statement (likely Virginia Giuffre, based on the specific biographical details of Chiang Mai and Australia). The narrator describes meeting her husband in Chiang Mai during massage training, deciding to flee Epstein's employment in late 2002, and hiding in Australia until 2013 out of fear that Epstein or his 'powerful friends' would have her killed. She also details a suspicious 2007 phone call from a man claiming to be with the FBI, whom she suspected was actually an agent for Epstein trying to locate or intimidate her.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022018.jpg
This text, likely from a memoir or legal account, defends a controversial prosecution decision regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The author argues that the plea deal was the best possible outcome given the evidence and victim reluctance at the time, ensuring jail time and sex offender registration rather than risking a failed trial. The passage also criticizes the defense's tactics, including personal investigations into prosecutors, while acknowledging frustrations with Epstein's treatment in state custody.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022005.jpg
This document contains a book excerpt, likely from a congressional oversight file, detailing journalist Vicky Ward's November 2002 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It describes her interview with a family from Phoenix, where an artist described Epstein's attempts to seduce her and her 16-year-old sister, and notes Epstein's complete denial of the allegations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016503.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal filing submitted by 'the Post' (likely a media organization) arguing against the wholesale sealing of appellate briefs in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. Citing New York Civil Rights Law and case precedents, the Post argues that the District Attorney should only be permitted to redact the names of victims to protect their identities, rather than keeping the entire record sealed. The document includes a footnote discussing the Post's inability to notify victims directly due to lack of knowledge of their identities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016500.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal filing arguing for the unsealing of appellate briefs related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text asserts a strong public interest in transparency to understand why the District Attorney's Office, led by DA Vance, argued for lenient treatment of Epstein. It cites various legal precedents regarding the presumption of openness in court records and mentions that Vance has faced criticism for favoring wealthy defendants.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016492.jpg
This document discusses the legal proceedings surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on the Manhattan District Attorney's shift in position regarding his sex offender adjudication and the sealing of appeal briefs. It highlights the public controversy and media interest in the perceived lenient handling of Epstein's prosecution in both Florida and New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016486.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page ii) from a legal filing, likely a brief or motion. It lists various legal precedents (case law) primarily focused on media, public access to court records, and sealing orders (e.g., NY Times v. US, Globe Newspaper v. Superior Court). Crucially, it cites 'People v. Epstein' (2011) as a key authority used 'passim' (throughout) the main document, suggesting the filing relates to the legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein, possibly regarding the unsealing of records. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017959.jpg
This page is from a legal complaint filed on April 16, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. It outlines allegations of libel against Alan Dershowitz, claiming he intentionally and maliciously made false statements about the plaintiff, Roberts (likely Virginia Roberts Giuffre), to destroy her credibility as a sex trafficking victim. The document asserts that Dershowitz acted on behalf of himself and Jeffrey Epstein, knowing the statements were false, and that these statements damaged Roberts's professional reputation as the president of a non-profit.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017953.jpg
This document is a page from a 2019 legal filing detailing May 2015 settlement negotiations initiated by Alan Dershowitz with Virginia Roberts' lawyers. Dershowitz attempted to argue that Roberts had confused him with Nathan Myhrvold and denied being at most of Epstein's properties, admitting only brief visits to a home and the New Mexico ranch with his family. The filing notes that investigations subsequently proved Dershowitz's representations about his whereabouts to be false.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017821.jpg
This document is a court filing (Page 4 of 6) from April 16, 2019, discussing various allegations related to Jeffrey Epstein. It details claims by 'Ransome' about being recruited as a masseuse, held against her will, and forced into sex by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, leading to a civil lawsuit. The document also describes Epstein's plea deal, which quashed an FBI investigation, and includes a photograph of Virginia Roberts with Prince Andrew, with Ghislaine Maxwell in the background, where Roberts claims she was a sex slave and had sex with the prince.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017622.jpg
This document is page 19 of a legal text (likely a law review article or legal memorandum by David Schoen) produced to the House Oversight Committee. It critiques an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memo, arguing that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply before criminal charges are filed to prevent 'secondary victimization.' The text specifically cites the 'Epstein case' (Does v. United States, S.D. Fla. 2011) as a legal precedent where the court ruled that the CVRA contemplates pre-charge application.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017614.jpg
This document is a page from a legal analysis (likely a law journal article) produced to the House Oversight Committee by David Schoen. It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and specifically analyzes case law determining that victim rights attach before formal charges are filed. It prominently cites 'Does v. United States' (the Epstein case) in the Southern District of Florida, noting that the court rejected the government's dismissal attempts and acknowledged that victims might be entitled to invalidate Epstein's nonprosecution agreement.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
Inquiry about the time
At 0445 am, the log notes that Epstein asked the time after using the bathroom and drinking water.
Request for Medication
At 7:15 AM, Epstein asked the L/T for his medication.
Request for Shower
At 7:40 AM, Epstein asked for a shower.
Psychological Evaluation
From 8:20 AM to 8:30 AM, an observer interviewed Epstein for psychology.
Request to speak with attorney
At 10:00am, Epstein asked to speak with his attorney.
Attorney
At 10:15am, Epstein was speaking with an officer about his attorney.
Legal Consultation
At 12:40pm, Epstein was taken to see his attorney. Subsequent log entries at 12:45pm and 1:00pm note he was still with the attorney.
Request to speak with attorney
At 8:23am, Inmate Epstein asked to speak with his attorney.
Request for Doctor
At 7:00am, Inmate Epstein asked for the doctor.
Attorney's arrival
At 10:16am, Epstein mentioned to the observer that a redacted person said his attorney isn't here yet.
Hunger
At 8:45am, Epstein mentioned to the observer that he is hungry.
Physical discomfort
At 8:59am, Epstein said he feels his throat is swollen.
Request for time
At 9:39am, Epstein asked for the time.
Accepted: Epstein call
Scheduled call for 30 minutes (16:00:00 to 16:30:00 +0000). Created on 2019-01-09.
Accepted: Epstein call
Scheduled call for 30 minutes (16:00 - 16:30)
Registration status
The department formally advised Epstein that he was not required to register in New Mexico for his 2008 Florida conviction.
Registration status in New Mexico
The department formally advised Epstein that he was not required to register in New Mexico for his 2008 Florida conviction.
Epstein/call in from John Roth
Scheduled call for 30 minutes
Epstein/call in from John Roth
Scheduled call event lasting 30 minutes
3:30 Epstein Conference Call
Scheduled conference call lasting one hour (20:30:00 +0000 to 21:30:00 +0000)
Invalidate the NPA
Efforts to invalidate the NPA.
Appointment with Haley and SG
A telephone message found in Epstein's trash from April 5, 2005, stated Haley and SG's name at 11:00 am, corroborating the appointment time.
Contact between Carolyn and Epstein
Carolyn called Epstein on July 30, 2004.
Contact between Carolyn and Epstein
Carolyn called Epstein on July 30, 2004.
Contact between Carolyn and Epstein
Carolyn called Epstein on July 30, 2004. This is supported by message pads entered at trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity