Epstein
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Prosecutor defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
location
Palm Beach residence
|
Ownership |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Police called regarding massage parlor girls at Epstein's house. | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's 18-month sentence, resulting in 13 months actual incarceration. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil litigation stemming from Epstein's conduct. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sarah Ferguson calling Epstein and arranging something with 'Lynn'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deputy Attorney General Filip stated he had never heard of Epstein before receiving Starr's letter. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña reacted to the resolution of Epstein's case by writing to her supervisor, expressing di... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | USAO investigation into Epstein, which ran for more than a year. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Decision-making process regarding a state-based resolution and a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Federal investigation of Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Krischer informed USAO's West Palm Beach manager that a resolution for Epstein's c... | West Palm Beach (USAO) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein traveled to London without the speaker (Ghislaine Maxwell). | London | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 'big event' in London that Epstein attended. There are photographs and news coverage of it. | London | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell discusses going to Epstein's houses in Palm Beach and Ohio. She mentions helpin... | Palm Beach, Ohio | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell states that when she and Epstein traveled together, they stayed in the same bed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell states that Epstein told her he had a heart condition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's agreement to plead guilty and provide compensation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's deposition where he invoked the Fifth Amendment repeatedly. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein receiving massages seven days a week, sometimes multiple times a day, with women present.... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell stating she 'saw Epstein with women'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's state court pleas and sentencing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plea hearing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein serving time in jail and registering as a sexual offender | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial considerations for Epstein case, including victim trauma and evidentiary challenges | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein facing substantial sentence under federal sentencing guidelines, estimated by Villafaña a... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019076.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' knowledge of individuals associated with Jeffrey Epstein, including his friends Henry Drecky and Marvin Minsky, and a decorator named Alberto Pinto. The witness confirms knowing these individuals' connections to Epstein but denies awareness of Drecky's or Minsky's alleged academic positions at Yale and MIT, respectively.
DOJ-OGR-00019062.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The questioning establishes that 'Jane' is an alias for a woman whose real name the witness knows. The key point of the testimony is the witness's recollection of seeing this woman, 'Jane', on Epstein's plane.
DOJ-OGR-00017195.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a rebuttal argument delivered by Ms. Comey on August 10, 2022. Comey refutes the defense's theory that witnesses (Kate, Carolyn, Annie, Jane) were manipulated by greedy lawyers to fabricate a story about Maxwell for financial gain from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. She argues there is no evidence for this conspiracy and highlights that one witness's lawyer worked pro bono, which contradicts the alleged financial motive.
DOJ-OGR-00017192.jpg
This document is a legal rebuttal arguing for the credibility of a witness named Jane, asserting that her memory of meeting Maxwell and Epstein and the onset of abuse at age 14 is accurate. It counters defense attempts to discredit her timeline by referencing Interlochen and flight records from 1994 and 1996, which place Jane, Maxwell, Epstein, and the defendant together at key times and locations, including flights to New York. The speaker emphasizes that Jane's memory of the abuse is more significant than minor discrepancies in dating events by public figures' birthdays.
DOJ-OGR-00017189.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a rebuttal by Ms. Comey in a criminal case. She argues against the defense's claim that four women (Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie) are misremembering their experiences, asserting that their core memories of trauma involving the defendant (Maxwell) and Epstein are solid and reliable. The prosecutor highlights specific, vivid memories of the victims to counter the defense's theory of a 'massive false memory event'.
DOJ-OGR-00017176.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Menninger. She argues that the jury should hesitate to convict due to a lack of credible evidence, pointing to inconsistencies in testimonies, the timing of changed stories relative to the opening of a victims' compensation fund, and the absence of physical proof like photographs or financial records. The speaker repeatedly uses the phrase 'That should make you hesitate' to emphasize her points about the weakness of the prosecution's case.
DOJ-OGR-00017172.jpg
This document is a transcript of a defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorney argues for Maxwell's acquittal by claiming a lack of concrete evidence, such as phone records, and emphasizing that mere presence at a location or knowledge of a plan without participation is insufficient for a conviction. She reminds the jury that suspicion is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt and that Maxwell is presumed innocent.
DOJ-OGR-00017171.jpg
This document is a summation by Ms. Menninger in a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Menninger argues for reasonable doubt regarding Carolyn's involvement in Count Six, suggesting Carolyn added Ghislaine Maxwell to her story after financial difficulties. The summation also addresses the government's conspiracy theory involving Epstein and Maxwell arranging for underage females to travel to New York for sex acts, clarifying that Carolyn did not travel to New York and Annie Farmer's travel was independent of Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00017163.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript featuring the summation by Ms. Menninger, likely in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text focuses on discrediting the testimony of Juan Alessi regarding the household hierarchy involving Epstein and Ghislaine, as well as questioning the validity of evidence concerning a household manual and a black address book.
DOJ-OGR-00017158.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker challenges the prosecution's portrayal of Virginia Roberts as a victim, questioning why she did not testify and presenting evidence that she was an 18-year-old masseuse at Mar-a-Lago. The summation concludes by attempting to shift blame, arguing that it was Virginia Roberts, not Ghislaine Maxwell, who introduced another young woman, Carolyn, to Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017153.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is arguing against the credibility of a witness named Carolyn. Menninger asserts there is no physical evidence, such as phone or FedEx records, to support Carolyn's claim of being contacted by Ghislaine Maxwell. She further uses the testimony of Carolyn's boyfriend, Shawn, to contradict Carolyn's story regarding timelines, drug use, and who was calling their shared phone.
DOJ-OGR-00017150.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney. Menninger argues that a witness is not credible because she had multiple opportunities in the past, including a deposition in 2009, to name Ghislaine Maxwell as an accomplice but failed to do so. The speaker also points to evidence, such as message pads, that will be given to the jury and allegedly show no incriminating messages for Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00017139.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues for Maxwell's innocence by highlighting inconsistencies in a victim's testimony to a compensation fund and claiming Maxwell had no role in planning the trip where the alleged abuse occurred. The attorney also describes a victim receiving $1.5 million from the fund for her story about being abused by Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017138.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a lawyer. The speaker is challenging the credibility of a witness's testimony by highlighting inconsistencies in her statements to the government over time (2006 vs. 2020 vs. current testimony) regarding a trip to New Mexico and interactions with Ghislaine and Epstein, including the purpose of the trip and the nature of massages she received.
DOJ-OGR-00017134.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is attempting to discredit an unnamed female witness or victim. Menninger argues the woman's story is full of inconsistencies, citing discrepancies in her statements to the FBI about her housing, the timeline of meeting Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump, and her description of her family life. The speaker ultimately alleges that the woman is fabricating details, specifically inserting Ghislaine into her narrative under the influence of her personal injury lawyer, Mr. Glassman, to strengthen her case.
DOJ-OGR-00017133.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, arguing that a witness named Jane has an unreliable and deliberately altered memory concerning her time with Epstein. The speaker highlights inconsistencies in Jane's testimony about a property in Santa Fe, contrasting her account with testimony from other witnesses (Annie, Larry Visoski) and a flight log entry. The summation posits that Jane's memory was contaminated by news reports and conversations with family, and that she intentionally falsified her timeline to appear younger.
DOJ-OGR-00017130.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney. Menninger argues against the government's attempt to identify her client, Michelle, as a random person from an address book, asserting she is a specific individual who was friends with another woman, Emmy. She attacks the credibility of a key witness, Jane, accusing her of a pattern of fabricating accusations by picking names of people she knew from "Epstein's world."
DOJ-OGR-00017128.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, specifically the summation by Ms. Menninger, likely the defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger attacks the credibility of a witness's testimony, highlighting the witness's uncertainty about how many times Maxwell was present during alleged "orgies" orchestrated by Epstein. The summation also points out that other women allegedly present at these events, which involved a 14-year-old girl, did not report them to the police.
DOJ-OGR-00017118.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is attempting to undermine the credibility of a witness referred to as 'Jane'. Menninger highlights inconsistencies in the witness's statements, such as failing to identify Ghislaine and others in a sworn interrogatory, and contrasts her claims of extreme poverty with evidence that she and her brothers applied to an expensive arts camp costing $12,000 per year.
DOJ-OGR-00017115.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for the defense. She challenges the prosecution's case by questioning the credibility of an alleged victim named Jane and disputing the government's proposed motive for Ghislaine's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein. Menninger portrays Epstein as a manipulator who deceived those around him, including Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00017112.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger. She attempts to discredit the prosecution's case by questioning the logic of Epstein's alleged actions with a girl named Jane on flight logs and by highlighting the prosecution's failure to produce promised witnesses from Palm Beach to testify about a 'culture of silence'. She specifically attacks the credibility of one witness, Juan Alessi, calling him a burglar with a 'deeply flawed memory'.
DOJ-OGR-00017111.jpg
This document is a transcript of a defense summation by Ms. Menninger in a criminal case. Menninger argues that the government failed to deliver on its opening promises by not providing corroborating testimony from the relatives of accusers Jane, Kate, and Carolyn, or evidence of phone calls. She contrasts this with the testimony of pilot Larry Visoski, who she claims contradicted the prosecution's narrative by stating he never saw a woman under 20 on a plane.
DOJ-OGR-00017093.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor, to a jury. She argues that the defense has deliberately misled the jury by taking a witness's (Jane's) statements and a legal document out of context. Ms. Moe highlights a specific portion of that document which states the defendant, Maxwell, facilitated and was present for the sexual abuse of Jane, a part she claims the defense intentionally omitted.
DOJ-OGR-00017087.jpg
This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's, Ms. Moe's, summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Ms. Moe argues that the case is fundamentally about how Maxwell and her partner, Jeffrey Epstein, used manipulation, money, and their privileged status to groom and exploit vulnerable young girls from struggling families. She contrasts the small amounts of money paid to victims, like Carolyn, with the millions Maxwell received from Epstein to underscore the theme of exploitation.
DOJ-OGR-00017084.jpg
This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's (Ms. Moe) summation in a criminal trial, filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor outlines the evidence for Count Five, a sex trafficking conspiracy charge spanning 2000-2004, detailing how the defendant (identified as Maxwell) and co-conspirator Epstein recruited and trafficked victims Carolyn and Virginia Roberts. The prosecutor explains to the jury that they only need to find one instance of agreement and one step taken to carry out the conspiracy to find the defendant guilty.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
No Subject
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Future contact for work
Epstein told ML to leave her telephone number with his assistant so she could be contacted for work again.
Instruction to write down contact information
After the alleged assault, Epstein told Jane Doe to write down her name and phone number.
FOIA Request Notice
Notice to be provided if the US receives a FOIA request for this agreement.
Civil Case
Complaint styled 'Jane Doe 102 versus Epstein'.
No Subject
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Unknown
Epstein was on the phone at the beginning of the massage session with ML.
No Subject
A photograph was sent to Epstein with a note saying 'Thanks for rocking my world'.
Freedom of Information Act Notice
United States will provide notice to Epstein before disclosing agreement under FOIA.
Annie's trip
Discussion regarding Annie's trip to New Mexico
Resignation/Leaving
Narrator told Epstein she wasn't coming back because she had fallen in love.
Second Amended Complaint
Allegations that Edwards 'should have known' about the Ponzi scheme.
Discovery/Deposition Questions
Questions regarding allegations Epstein contends Edwards 'ginned up' or 'fabricated'.
Disclosure of Agreement
Notice to be provided if a FOIA request or compulsory process commands disclosure of the agreement.
Phone records / Thank you notes
The speaker notes the absence of these records as evidence
No Subject
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Bitcoin
Update on rapid Bitcoin price swings
Recruitment
Epstein told Dobbs 'You can bring girls.'
No Subject
Email communication regarding Eva being in Paris and flying back, suggesting a close relationship with Epstein.
Important Message
A message from 'Epstein' for Vanessa Grigoriadis of NY Magazine, to be delivered at 5:10 P.M. The message itself is simply 'Epstein'.
Socializing
Copperfield called Epstein frequently and left messages indicating they socialized together.
Second thoughts about public figure status
Epstein called Carter to say he was having second thoughts about being a public figure.
Ongoing communication
The witness, Kate, describes her communications with Epstein during her twenties and early thirties as having a 'friendly' tone. She continued communicating because she did not want to admit what had happened to her and was fearful of disengaging.
Unwanted touching
During the second massage, JS told Epstein she didn't want to be touched after he attempted to touch her breasts.
No Subject
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity