SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00016512.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the use of digital equipment to simulate a whiteboard for a 'demonstrative' presentation to the jury, necessitated by COVID-19 restrictions. Sternheim asks if a photo should be taken for the record, and the Court clarifies that demonstratives (like whiteboards) are generally not entered into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00016504.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The discussion involves a Prosecutor (Mr. Rohrbach) and the Judge regarding the logistical handling of a witness who has tested positive for COVID-19. The government indicates they will not contest the witness's unavailability under Rule 15 if a positive test exists.
DOJ-OGR-00016502.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, generally associated with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The proceedings cover rulings on the testimony of Dr. Loftus regarding suggestive questioning and Agent Young. The court then addresses a motion to preclude the testimony of a witness named Alexander Hamilton, leading to a joke by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim about Broadway tickets and a counter-quote by the Judge referencing Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78.
DOJ-OGR-00016484.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 16, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman; Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00016478.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves attorneys (Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim) and the Judge discussing the trial schedule, specifically focusing on jury deliberations, avoiding delays, and a charging conference scheduled for the 18th. The Court emphasizes the need for efficiency and being respectful of the jurors' time while preparing for closing arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00016466.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The Judge schedules a charging conference for 'Saturday the 18th' and ensures Maxwell's presence. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell then raises a concern that potential defense witnesses are requesting to testify anonymously or using pseudonyms due to safety or privacy concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00016452.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a sidebar conference where the Judge confirms that the Government has rested its case and that the Defense (represented by Mr. Everdell and Ms. Sternheim) intends to present a case next. The Judge also schedules the hearing of a Rule 29 motion (motion for acquittal).
DOJ-OGR-00016427.jpg
This document is page 211 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Witness Mulligan testifies under direct examination about conversations with a person named Annie during their high school years. Mulligan confirms Annie told her that Ghislaine Maxwell touched her breasts during a massage, causing Annie to feel 'fearful and awkward and helpless.' Defense attorney Ms. Menninger raises objections during the questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00016424.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mulligan. Mulligan testifies about dating a woman named Annie in high school around the fall/winter of 1996. The testimony focuses on conversations they had regarding a trip Annie took to New Mexico, noting that these discussions often arose when they were becoming physically affectionate.
DOJ-OGR-00016417.jpg
This document is page 201 of 267 from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a brief moment during the redirect examination of witness A. Farmer where the judge announces a 10-minute recess for the jury. The page contains the DOJ bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00016417.
DOJ-OGR-00016416.jpg
This document is page 200 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a brief procedural exchange between the Court and Ms. Sternheim regarding a scheduled break at 3:30 PM during the redirect examination of witness A. Farmer. The page contains very little dialogue and notes that the proceedings continue on the next page.
DOJ-OGR-00016408.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer. In the testimony, Farmer affirms she has not coordinated her testimony with other witnesses or been told what to say. She states her purpose for testifying is to hold Ghislaine Maxwell accountable for harm caused. The questioning then pivots to Farmer's application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.
DOJ-OGR-00016406.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Redirect examination of Annie Farmer) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness regarding a statement made to the FBI in 2006 concerning a massage given to her by Maxwell. The witness describes Maxwell asking her to undress and lay on a table under sheets, and then rubbing her body and pulling back the sheet, before the defense attorney objects.
DOJ-OGR-00016401.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the testimony of Annie Farmer. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about her desire to prosecute Jeffrey Epstein in 2006, followed by a redirect examination by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz asking about the impact of Farmer's experiences with Maxwell and Epstein. The page concludes with Farmer beginning to describe her experiences as 'upsetting and confusing'.
DOJ-OGR-00016398.jpg
This document is a court transcript page (sidebar conference) from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, attempts to question witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) regarding her motivation and whether she asked the FBI to prosecute Epstein, citing a 2017 declaration by FBI Agent Kuyrkendall that victims interviewed between 2006-2008 did not want prosecution. The prosecutor, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to the relevance, and the Court sustains the objection.
DOJ-OGR-00016390.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on the financial gains of the witness's lawyers in representing Epstein accusers and establishes that the witness shared legal representation with Virginia Roberts. The defense also questions the witness about preparing to testify in a previous civil case around 2016 or 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00016369.jpg
This document is page 153 of a court transcript from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) regarding her memory of a massage where she was undressed. The defense questions inconsistencies in her recollection regarding whether she was wearing underwear, while Farmer confirms that Ghislaine Maxwell massaged her chest and upper breast.
DOJ-OGR-00013287.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim discusses two exhibits (823 and 824) with the Judge. Exhibit 823 concerns the employment start date of Sky Roberts around the year 2000, while Exhibit 824 is an insurance document listing Sky Roberts' dependents, specifically naming his daughter, Virginia Roberts. The defense argues these are not proper business records as the employee Ms. Gill, who might testify to them, did not start employment until 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00013279.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), held on December 8, 2021, in the Southern District of New York before Judge Alison J. Nathan. It lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Damian Williams) and the defense team (representing Maxwell), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00013278.jpg
This is a legal notice filed on August 10, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330). The document announces that an official transcript of a conference held on December 7, 2021, has been filed by the court reporter. It also informs the parties of their right to request redactions of personal data from the transcript within seven days of this notice.
DOJ-OGR-00013275.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022, covering proceedings that adjourned to December 8, 2021. The Judge admonishes the legal teams regarding proper objection protocols, specifically forbidding 'speaking objections' meant to communicate with the jury or witnesses. The session concludes with both the government (Ms. Moe) and defense (Ms. Menninger) confirming they have no further briefings for the evening.
DOJ-OGR-00013272.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The discussion involves logistics regarding witnesses identified as Jane, Matt, and Brian. The government (Ms. Moe) seeks confirmation that the defense will not recall Jane so she can be released, noting that Matt has testified and Brian will not be testifying.
DOJ-OGR-00013248.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn, who explicitly denies ever having sexual intercourse with Mr. Epstein. The witness also corrects the record regarding a previous statement, clarifying that 'he did four times' rather than 'I did four times'.
DOJ-OGR-00013246.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. During cross-examination by Mr. Pagliuca, a witness named Carolyn is confronted with prior testimony where she denied having sexual intercourse with Mr. Epstein. Carolyn clarifies to the court that she answered 'no' previously because she was not a willing participant, explicitly stating, 'He had intercourse with me and I stopped it.'
DOJ-OGR-00013237.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding her past use of Xanax, alcohol, and alleged cocaine use between 2000 and 2005. The witness admits to Xanax use for anxiety at age 13 and alcohol use in 2005, but denies the document's claim regarding the frequency of alcohol use starting in 2000 and adamantly denies using cocaine or crack in 2002-2003.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity