| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Sessions
|
Leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell (Author)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Traveler]
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A.
|
Investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
D. JOHN SAUER
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SSA [Redacted]
|
Liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's office
|
Limits plea agreements to |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Ashcroft
|
Leadership |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Collaboration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)
|
Non involvement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Professional liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lyeson Daniel
|
Employment alleged |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William Barr
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of New York
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Traveler
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-05-01 | N/A | Publication of the latest edition of Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance. | US | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Department of Justice revised the 2005 Guidelines. | Department of Justice | View |
| 2011-01-01 | Guideline revision | The Department of Justice revised the 2005 Guidelines, adding language about victim consultation ... | N/A | View |
| 2010-01-01 | Guideline update process | The Department of Justice began an effort to update its 2005 Guidelines for the CVRA, which invol... | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Legal review | The Department of Justice reviewed the NPA on several occasions and confirmed the appropriateness... | Florida | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between DOJ and Epstein. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Execution of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Signing of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Department of Justice, through the USAO-SDFL, entered into a Nonprosecution Agreement (NPA) with ... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-01 | N/A | Nonprosecution agreement concluded with Epstein (referenced as 'more than three months' after Jun... | US | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Negotiation | Start of negotiations for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), which lasted for eight months. | N/A | View |
| 2006-05-01 | N/A | Launch of Project Safe Childhood. | Nationwide | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Department updated its Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance to include t... | USA | View |
This document is a Palm Beach Police dispatch log from February 2, 2005. It details a police response to a burglary/intrusion panic alarm at 358 El Brillo Way (Jeffrey Epstein's residence), initiated by a caller named David Benham (likely an alarm operator). Officer Donald Auteri responded to the scene, and the incident was closed with a disposition of 'Human Error' approximately 15 minutes after the initial call.
This document is a police dispatch log dated March 26, 2005, regarding an 'Open Door' incident at Jeffrey Epstein's residence at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach. The log notes that the house was supposed to be out of service/vacant (10.7), but a door to the guest house was open. A caretaker (identified as a Black Male) met the police at the scene, and the interior was cleared with no issues found.
This document is page 7 of a defense motion filed on July 10, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense argues that Maxwell is not a danger to the community (unlike Epstein), that COVID-19 poses a severe health risk in detention hindering her defense, and that she is not a flight risk due to her U.S. citizenship and lack of criminal record. It asserts she stayed in the U.S. and maintained contact with the government after Epstein's arrest rather than fleeing.
This document is the 'Table of Authorities' (page ii) from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), originally filed on July 10, 2020. It lists various legal precedents (case law) cited within the main brief, including cases such as Hung v. United States, United States v. Boustani, and United States v. Dreier. The page bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00019877).
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing for the detention of the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines her flight risk due to her 'extensive international ties,' noting she holds citizenship and passports for the US, UK, and France. It cites CBP records showing frequent travel, including 15 international flights in the prior three years to locations like Japan and Qatar.
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) detailing proceedings in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between July 30, 2020, and August 18, 2020. It includes a detailed ruling by Judge Alison J. Nathan rejecting a defense request regarding protective orders and privacy of witnesses, citing it as 'unprecedented' and 'too broad.' The docket entries list various filings, including motions for discovery disclosure by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and opposition responses from the Government (Alex Rossmiller).
This document appears to be page 3 of a court filing (Case 21-58, Document 23) dated March 29, 2021. It lists pending criminal counts against a defendant (unnamed on this specific page, but the charges align with the Ghislaine Maxwell/Epstein proceedings), including conspiracy to entice minors, coercion, transportation of minors for illegal sex acts, and perjury before a Grand Jury. The document categorizes the highest offense level as a Felony.
This is a page from the docket of a court case involving the USA and defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from August 20, 2020, to September 8, 2020. It lists various legal actions including attorney appearances, sealed documents, letter motions regarding protective orders and redactions, and two Memorandum Opinions and Orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying certain requests by the defendant. The document also notes a Notice of Appeal filed by Maxwell regarding one of the Memorandum Opinions.
This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from July 30, 2020, to August 18, 2020. It details legal arguments regarding a protective order for discovery materials, specifically concerning witness privacy and the defense's ability to reference individuals. The log tracks the filing of motions, affidavits, and responses by defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the government (Rossmiller), as well as orders issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
This document is a court docket page from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58). It details legal maneuvers regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders between July and August 2020, including a ruling by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying a defense request deemed 'unprecedented' and 'too broad' regarding witness privacy. The docket lists filings by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and opposition by Assistant US Attorney Alex Rossmiller.
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) covering entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions for a renewed bail application to protect the privacy interests of third parties, notices of transcript filings, and the entry of appearance by attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the government. The document also lists the filing of a Memorandum of Law in support of bail accompanied by numerous exhibits (A through X).
This document is a page from a legal docket (Case 21-58, dated Jan 12, 2021) listing specific federal criminal charges and their corresponding US Code citations. The charges include conspiracy to entice minors, coercion or enticement of minors, transportation of minors for criminal sexual activity, and perjury (false declarations before a Grand Jury). The list includes both original counts and superseding counts (denoted with 's').
This document is page 3 of a Second Circuit Court of Appeals order dated November 9, 2020, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. The court dismisses Maxwell's appeal regarding a protective order due to lack of jurisdiction, denies her petition for a writ of mandamus, and denies her motion to consolidate her criminal appeal with the civil case *Guiffre v. Maxwell*. The court cites various precedents to establish that the protective order does not fall under the 'collateral order exception' and that Maxwell failed to prove exceptional circumstances.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus discusses the funding for their scientific research, citing support from the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Mental Health. They also state that they have consulted for numerous U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Justice, CIA, FBI, Secret Service, and IRS.
Court document filed on August 10, 2022, notifying parties that an official transcript for a conference held on December 9, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell has been filed. The document outlines the deadlines and procedures for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers before the transcript becomes publicly available.
This document is page 10 of a legal filing from June 25, 2022, related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the court has broad discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3661 to hear from individuals during sentencing, even if they do not strictly meet the definition of a 'victim' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It cites various legal precedents to support the admission of statements from 'affected individuals,' specifically mentioning 'Sarah' at the very end of the page.
This document is the final page of a court filing (Document 674 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on June 24, 2022. It contains a single black-and-white photograph of a person's heavily bandaged feet in a hospital bed, likely submitted as evidence. Text visible in the photo suggests the medical facility is the 'Institut de la Salut', and a Bates number at the bottom indicates the document is part of a Department of Justice record.
This document is page 22 of a court filing (Document 674) from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on June 24, 2022. It contains a single black-and-white photograph of an unidentified person in a hospital bed, intubated and connected to medical equipment, suggesting a critical medical condition. The page is marked with a Department of Justice identifier.
This document is page 56 of 68 from a court filing, specifically Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on June 24, 2022. The page content is entirely black, indicating it is either blank or fully redacted, but it contains a Department of Justice Bates number (DOJ-OGR-00010647) at the bottom.
This document is page 53 of 68 from a legal filing, identified as Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on June 24, 2022. The page is entirely blank except for the header containing the case information and a footer with a Department of Justice document identifier (DOJ-OGR-00010644).
This page represents page 47 of a 68-page court filing (Document 672) from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 24, 2022. The entire content of the page has been fully redacted, revealing no information other than the court header and a Department of Justice reference number in the footer.
This document is page 38 of 68 from Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 24, 2022. The entire content of the page is completely redacted, leaving only the court header and the DOJ bates stamp visible.
This document is page 36 of 68 from a legal filing, Document 672, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document was filed on June 24, 2022, and is marked with the Department of Justice Bates number DOJ-OGR-00010627. The page itself is blank aside from the header and footer information.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity