Ms. Comey
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
15
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
13
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Parkinson
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Mr. Parkinson
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
38 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Meder
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
37 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
155 | |
|
person
Mr. Visoski
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Recess pending verdict | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Shawn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of David Rodgers | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski by Ms. Comey | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Michael Dawson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Gregory Parkinson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 2 for identification. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Juan Patricio Alessi | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013545.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing procedural discussions in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Counsel, including Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger, address the court regarding the placement of exhibits for the jury and the arrangements for the upcoming testimony of witness Annie Farmer. It is established that Farmer will not testify anonymously but a counsel screen will be used for her protection.
DOJ-OGR-00013540.jpg
This document is an index of examination from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the direct, cross, and redirect examinations of witnesses Janine Gill Velez, Shawn, Nicole Hesse, and David Rodgers by various attorneys, providing the corresponding page numbers in the full transcript. The document also includes a list of government exhibits that were received into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00013532.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot), who testifies to meeting a specific person in September 2003 and a 'Jane' in November 1996, referencing his flight logbook for verification. The witness confirms he recalls no one else with that first name on Jeffrey Epstein's planes, after which he is excused, and the court adjourns for the day.
DOJ-OGR-00013531.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' recollection of being shown two defense photographs (LV3A and LV3B) and a person in them who shares a first name with someone named Jane. Rodgers confirms they met Jane before meeting the person in the photographs.
DOJ-OGR-00013529.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Mr. Rodgers denies that his daughter ever massaged Jeffrey Epstein and denies ever receiving $18.3 million from Epstein. He is also questioned about his knowledge of Epstein's properties in New York and Florida, estimating that the New York residence was acquired around 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00013524.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning confirms that Rodgers' flight logs were previously subpoenaed and turned over to both the FBI and plaintiffs' lawyers as part of a past civil litigation, a task handled by his attorney. The name "Epstein" is mentioned briefly at the beginning of the excerpt in relation to an unnamed female.
DOJ-OGR-00013509.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The witness confirms a passenger named 'Emmy' flew on Epstein's planes but testifies that, according to his memory and flight logs, 'Annie Farmer' was never a passenger. The defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, then moves to show the jury documents marked LV4 and LV5, which are admitted under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00013505.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the case number). The questioning focuses on the witness's knowledge of Eva Dubin, her marriage to Glenn Dubin, and flights taken with her children, Selena and Jordan. Notably, the testimony confirms that Jeffrey Epstein was Selena Dubin's godfather.
DOJ-OGR-00013484.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a portion of a trial. A lawyer, Mr. Everdell, is cross-examining a witness, Mr. Rodgers, and requests that both the witness and the jury view evidence labeled LV3A and LV3B, which are photos. Mr. Everdell specifically instructs the witness that he knows the person's name in the photos but should not say it aloud in court.
DOJ-OGR-00013472.jpg
This document is page 194 from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. The testimony initially covers legal liability regarding aircraft ownership, during which prosecutor Ms. Comey successfully objects multiple times. The questioning then shifts to specific flights and the witness's familiarity with Interlochen, described as a summer arts camp for musicians and singers.
DOJ-OGR-00013470.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony establishes that helicopters were owned by 'Air Ghislaine, Inc.' and purchased by Jeffrey Epstein from Sikorsky. The questioning attorney attempts to establish that Epstein controlled the companies owning the aircraft, and questions the witness's employment history prior to working for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00013447.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on whether Rodgers, a pilot, ever saw females who appeared to be under the age of 18 or 19 on flights he piloted for Epstein between 1994 and 2004, and also after 2004. Rodgers denies seeing any such individuals and confirms his recollection that a woman referred to as "Jane" appeared to be at least 18 when he met her.
DOJ-OGR-00013438.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. Attorney Ms. Comey requests that the jury be directed to Government Exhibit 14, specifically to a child's name and date of birth entry. After receiving no objection from opposing counsel Mr. Everdell and approval from the court, Ms. Comey concludes her direct examination of the witness, Rodgers.
DOJ-OGR-00013437.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely pilot David Rodgers). The testimony confirms specific flight log entries from July 2001, establishing that Virginia Roberts flew with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell from Santa Fe to Teterboro on July 16, and later flew alone with Epstein from St. Thomas to Palm Beach on July 28.
DOJ-OGR-00013424.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Virginia Roberts were all passengers on flight 1444 from Teterboro, NJ to Palm Beach, FL on January 26, 2001. The transcript also establishes a subsequent flight, 1445, from Palm Beach to St. Thomas, USVI on January 29, 2001.
DOJ-OGR-00013423.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of witness Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony confirms the contents of flight logs (Government Exhibit 662) regarding Flight 1434 on December 14, 2000, from Teterboro, NJ to St. Thomas. The witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Virginia Roberts were all passengers on this specific flight.
DOJ-OGR-00013416.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition or trial transcript. It discusses a flight on May 9th, 1997, from Teterboro, New Jersey, to Santa Fe, New Mexico, and questions whether Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jane were passengers on that flight.
DOJ-OGR-00013413.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers. Rodgers testifies that he first met a passenger, referred to as 'Jane', on a flight on November 11, 1996, and saw her a total of four times on Jeffrey Epstein's planes. He also states that Jane flew with both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00013412.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of Mr. Rodgers by Ms. Comey. The questioning focuses on identifying a specific female passenger on Jeffrey Epstein's planes who is known to have attended Interlochen. The witness confirms the identity of this passenger by referencing Government Exhibit 12 without stating the name aloud.
DOJ-OGR-00013411.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge confirms with attorneys Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell that there are no outstanding matters before instructing for the jury to be brought in and for the witness, Mr. Rodgers, to take the stand.
DOJ-OGR-00013409.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It details a discussion between the Judge, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding a specific jury instruction for a witness named Rodgers. The Judge agrees to instruct the jury that alleged physical contact between the witness, Epstein, and Maxwell in New Mexico was not 'illegal sexual activity,' and the parties agree to discuss a separate 'Rule 412' issue at sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00013408.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the afternoon session of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell requests edits to a limiting instruction for the jury regarding an upcoming witness, specifically changing the phrase 'sexual conduct' to 'physical contact' regarding interactions with Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense confer and agree on the language before the judge approves it.
DOJ-OGR-00013407.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Defense Attorney Pagliuca, and Prosecutor Comey regarding the admissibility of evidence connected to the testimony of Mr. Alessi and an anticipated witness. The discussion concludes with the court taking a recess.
DOJ-OGR-00013406.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the Judge ('The Court') and Ms. Comey regarding 'Government Exhibit 52' and whether the defense had an opportunity to cross-examine a witness named Mr. Alessi. The Judge notes a potential misunderstanding about the defense's opportunity to cross-examine, while Ms. Comey asserts that extensive examination and voir dire of Mr. Alessi occurred.
Identification of Government Exhibit 52
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Mr. Alessi, about a physical exhibit (GX-52), which he identifies as a directory belonging to Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein.
Rebuttal to defense's claim of witness manipulation by th...
Ms. Comey argues that there is no evidence to support the defense's claim that the FBI manipulated witnesses. She states that all witnesses testified they were only asked to tell the truth and that for the defendant to be innocent, multiple witnesses must have lied.
Cross-examination of Mr. Alessi
Ms. Comey responds to the Court, stating she didn't understand the defense's point about lacking an opportunity to cross-examine Mr. Alessi, as she recalls there was an extensive examination.
Argument regarding paragraph 39 of a complaint
Ms. Comey argues that a witness's testimony is consistent with the complaint's timeframe and that it was not legally necessary for the complaint to include every detail of alleged sex acts beyond 'fondling and masturbation'.
Government Exhibit 296
Ms. Comey questions Gregory Parkinson about the contents of Government Exhibit 296, a CD. Parkinson identifies it and describes its contents as video of a search warrant execution.
Request to seal discussion of witness's family details
Ms. Comey requests that if Mr. Pagliuca is going to discuss the details of Carolyn's family, the discussion should be held at side bar and under seal.
Closing Argument
Argument for guilty verdict based on evidence and Judge's instructions.
Government's rebuttal argument in the trial of Ghislaine ...
Ms. Comey begins the government's rebuttal by focusing the jury's attention on the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and her alleged crimes of abusing children, specifically mentioning Jane, Carolyn, and Annie. She characterizes the defense's arguments as distractions and reaffirms that while the government has the burden of proof, it is appropriate to respond to the defense's theories.
Identification of individuals in photographs from the Eps...
Ms. Comey questions a witness who identifies Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in two photographs (Exhibits 307 and 320), which are subsequently admitted into evidence by the court. The witness states the photos came from a CD reviewed during the investigation.
Objection to characterization of testimony
Ms. Comey objects to Mr. Pagliuca's attempt to read testimony into the record, stating she does not believe it is inconsistent with prior testimony.
Motivation of witnesses testifying against Ghislaine Maxwell
Ms. Comey argues that the four witnesses against Ghislaine Maxwell testified for justice, not for financial gain. She posits that since they had already received large financial payouts, they had no monetary incentive to risk perjuring themselves in a federal trial.
Female passenger on Mr. Epstein's plane
Ms. Comey questions witness Mr. Rodgers about a female passenger on Mr. Epstein's plane who he understood attended Interlochen. She directs him to identify the passenger's name using Government Exhibit 12 without saying it aloud.
Carolyn's age and introduction to Jeffrey Epstein
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Carolyn, about her initial interactions with someone named Shawn. Carolyn states she told Shawn she was 17 but he learned she was turning 14 by attending her birthday party. Carolyn also testifies that Shawn led her to meet Jeffrey Epstein via his friends, Virginia Roberts and Tony Figueroa.
Introduction of prior consistent statements
Ms. Comey informs the court of her intention to question a witness about 'Jane's' prior consistent statements.
Massagers in Mr. Epstein's room
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Alessi, about the types, appearance, frequency of discovery, and location of massagers found in Mr. Epstein's room.
Identification of Evidence
Questioning regarding the identification of people in Government Exhibit 347.
Direction to review Government Exhibit 14
Ms. Comey asks the Court to direct the jury to turn to Government Exhibit 14, specifically to a child's name and birth date entry.
Rebuttal Evidence
Discussing timing for introducing brief rebuttal evidence and custodian witnesses.
Cleaning procedures after Mr. Epstein's massages.
Ms. Comey questions Mr. Alessi about what he cleaned up after Mr. Epstein's massages. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the time frame. Mr. Alessi explains that whether he cleaned up towels depended on if the massage therapist was a repeat visitor or a new person.
Relevance of a photograph as evidence
Ms. Comey argues that a disturbing photograph displayed outside Mr. Epstein's bedroom contradicts the defense's argument that the defendant was unaware of Epstein's attraction to underage females due to a 'halo effect'.
Witness's relationship with Virginia Roberts and her conn...
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Shawn, about their acquaintance with Virginia Roberts. The testimony establishes they were schoolmates, met in 2001, and socialized with Roberts and her boyfriend, Tony Figueroa. It is also stated that an unnamed female met Jeffrey Epstein through Virginia Roberts.
Objection to document C4
Ms. Comey objects to the inclusion of document C4, arguing it was crafted by lawyers, not the witness, and would confuse the issues for the jury.
Identification of Government Exhibits 932 and 704
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Mr. Visoski, to identify two exhibits as photos of Mr. Epstein's New York residence and offers them into evidence.
Stipulation regarding authenticity of Government Exhibits...
Ms. Comey stipulates on the record that Government Exhibits 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 are true and correct copies of birth certificates from various state and county agencies.
Request for briefing schedule regarding cross-examination...
Ms. Comey informed the court that the government and defense counsel disagree on the propriety of certain cross-examination topics for government witnesses. She requested to submit a written briefing to avoid discussing sensitive information, such as past criminal convictions or identifying details of anonymized witnesses, on the public record.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity