Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Comey

Person
Mentions
1419
Relationships
127
Events
630
Documents
693
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
127 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
18 Very Strong
28
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
17
View
person Mr. Everdell
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
16
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
10
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Opposing counsel
12 Very Strong
10
View
organization The government
Representative
12 Very Strong
10
View
person CAROLYN
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Mr. Alessi
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Parkinson
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person CAROLYN
Professional
10 Very Strong
9
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Mr. Parkinson
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
38
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person Shawn
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Meder
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
37
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
155
View
person Mr. Visoski
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person your Honor
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person Rodgers
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Recess pending verdict Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of witness Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Shawn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of David Rodgers Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski by Ms. Comey Courtroom View
N/A N/A Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Michael Dawson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Gregory Parkinson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 2 for identification. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Juan Patricio Alessi Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00017374.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Visoski (likely a pilot). Visoski testifies about knowing Sarah Kellen since the late 1990s and mentions another woman named Kimberly. The prosecution introduces Government Exhibits 327 and 310, which Visoski identifies as photos showing Sarah Kellen, himself at the front of an aircraft, and Jeffrey Epstein.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017372.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the beginning of a court session where the direct examination of a witness, Lawrence Visoski, is resumed by an attorney, Ms. Comey. The questioning is focused on continuing a discussion from the previous day about Mr. Epstein's office and his employees.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017364.jpg

This document is page 121 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell while the jury is not present. They discuss the placement of folders containing documents under chairs and the Judge's intention to interview a juror regarding a planned trip to ensure it does not conflict with the trial.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014503.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (summation) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues that a key witness ('she') has a poor and inconsistent memory, noting the absence of her name in flight logs alongside 'famous people.' Menninger highlights discrepancies between the witness's testimony and her statements in December 2019 and February 2020, where she claimed lack of recollection.

Court transcript (summation)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014475.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. After the jury is dismissed for lunch, an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, raises an objection to the judge concerning a statement made by opposing counsel, Ms. Moe. Ms. Sternheim argues that Ms. Moe's assertion during closing arguments—that a massage table originating from California affects interstate commerce—is legally inaccurate and unsupported by evidence presented in the trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005262.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal filing dated October 18, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues they have received voluminous discovery materials (over 14,000 pages) from the government very recently (Oct 11-12), leaving insufficient time to review them before filing motions in limine. The document details the logistics of the hard drive deliveries to counsel in New York and Colorado, and to Ms. Maxwell at the MDC, while noting that some materials provided to Maxwell were incomplete.

Legal filing / court document (letter motion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017608.jpg

This document is an index page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines the examination of witnesses Lawrence Visoski (Epstein's pilot) and a witness identified only as 'Jane', along with a list of government exhibits received into evidence.

Court transcript index (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017599.jpg

This document is a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion between a judge and several attorneys (Ms. Comey, Ms. Menninger, Ms. Moe). The main topics are setting a 9:00 p.m. deadline for both the government and defense to submit letters regarding a dispute over Rule 16, and initiating a discussion on how to handle witness identifying information.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017598.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Comey are discussing legal obligations under Rule 16 regarding the disclosure of impeachment evidence (specifically photographs) prior to cross-examination. The text mentions a witness who testified about the appearance of a home and notes that this witness worked for Jeffrey Epstein until 2019.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017597.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, involving a legal dispute over the admissibility of impeachment evidence. Ms. Menninger (Defense) argues that she was not required to produce impeachment photographs to the government prior to trial, while Ms. Comey (Government) requests to brief the issue. The discussion specifically references photographs of the 'Epstein home' taken recently (2021/last year) being used to discuss past events.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017596.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between Ms. Menninger (Defense) and Ms. Comey (Prosecution) regarding Federal Rule 16 and the disclosure of impeachment evidence. The Defense argues that documents used for impeachment (bias, motive, memory) do not need to be produced to the government beforehand, while the Prosecution contests this interpretation.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017595.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a legal debate over the admissibility of evidence. Attorney Ms. Menninger attempts to impeach a witness's claim of being homeless by showing a document of their current residence, but opposing counsel Ms. Comey objects, citing evidence rules. The judge sustains the objection, agreeing the evidence is not proper for impeachment under the circumstances.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017594.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a trial, case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. The transcript captures a legal debate between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Ms. Menninger, in front of the judge regarding the admissibility of defendants' Exhibit J36. Ms. Comey argues the exhibit is a violation of Rule 16 as it was not produced by the court-ordered deadline, while Ms. Menninger contends it is impeachment material and thus exempt from the rule, a point which Ms. Comey then disputes.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017590.jpg

A court transcript excerpt from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a discussion about witness 'Jane'. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger raises a concern about a potential undisclosed statement from May 2019. Prosecutor Ms. Comey clarifies that the witness was approached by the FBI in May 2019 but declined to speak, and her first substantive interview did not occur until September 2019.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017517.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Visoski. The witness confirms meeting an individual known by the pseudonym 'Jane' in the 1990s and another person, depicted in defense exhibits, in the 2000s. The witness's memory of the second person is specifically linked to seeing them on a Boeing aircraft.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017516.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of a redirect examination of a witness named Mr. Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski denies letting his 14-year-old daughters give Mr. Epstein a massage and is questioned about two different individuals named Jane. He distinguishes between them by recalling meeting one on Mr. Epstein's smaller aircraft in the 1990s and the other on Epstein's Boeing aircraft sometime in 2000 or later.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017515.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the testimony of a witness named Visoski. Under questioning by defense attorney Mr. Everdell, Visoski denies seeing any hint of inappropriate sexual activity or underage girls during roughly 30 years of working for Jeffrey Epstein, stating he would have reported it and quit if he had. The cross-examination concludes, and prosecutor Ms. Comey begins her redirect examination.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017502.jpg

This document is a single page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It shows the court going into recess after a cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. Two individuals, Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell, confirm to the judge that they have no matters to address before the break.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017465.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell introduces exhibits LV4 and LV5 under seal to protect witness identities (pseudonyms), which is accepted by Prosecutor Ms. Comey and the Judge. The jury is instructed to view the documents in their folders without showing them to the gallery.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017462.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. During the questioning, Visoski confirms that he knew an unnamed woman shown in photographs, had spoken with her frequently enough to have her phone number, and that she frequently traveled on Mr. Epstein's planes. The proceeding involves handling sealed evidence (photos marked LV3A and LV3B) carefully to prevent its display to the gallery.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017461.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, questions the witness about two photographs (Exhibits LV3A and LV3B) depicting a woman who shares a first name with 'Jane's true first name.' The exhibits are admitted into evidence under seal to protect the privacy of the individual, consistent with a prior court ruling regarding pseudonyms.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017458.jpg

This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Comey. They agree on a method for presenting exhibits to the jury using paper copies to protect the anonymity of witnesses who may testify under pseudonyms. The exhibits in question are to be offered under seal by the defense.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017457.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell. They discuss the scheduling of the proceedings, including the timing for a lunch break set for 12:30 and the decision to take an immediate five-minute recess for the jury. The judge instructs a Ms. Williams to escort the jury during the break.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017456.jpg

This is page 94 of a court transcript (Document 743, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The witness, Visoski, confirms during cross-examination that Epstein had an assistant with a specific name and that he had met her. The proceedings are interrupted by attorneys Everdell and Comey to discuss a 'choreography issue' regarding an exhibit that must be submitted under seal rather than displayed on screens.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017450.jpg

This page is a transcript from the cross-examination of a pilot named Visoski during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony establishes that Visoski flew Jeffrey Epstein multiple times to Columbus, Ohio, the home of billionaire Les Wexner. The witness confirms Wexner's ownership of The Limited (parent company of Victoria's Secret and Abercrombie & Fitch) and states that Epstein considered Wexner both a friend and a client.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
113
As Recipient
4
Total
117

Missing Jurors

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Asking if the Court has attempted to call the missing jurors.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Redactions

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Discussing the redaction of phone numbers for Carolyn and third parties.

Court dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Ending the day

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Stopping the examination because it is 4:59 PM.

Court instruction
N/A
Communication Source

Direct Examination regarding Exhibit 662

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Rodgers

Questioning regarding the columns in a logbook exhibit.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Shawn

Questioning regarding Melissa and Amanda's visits to Epstein's house.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibits

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Clarification on how nonsealed exhibits will be shown (on screen).

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Witness testimony issue

From: Ms. Comey
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Comey requests permission to submit a letter to the court to look into the issue being discussed regarding witnesses.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Search of 358 El Brillo Way

From: Ms. Comey
To: ["Mr. Parkinson"]

Ms. Comey questions Mr. Parkinson about a search conducted on October 20, 2005, at 358 El Brillo Way. The questioning clarifies the timeline of events, distinguishing between an incident in 2003 and the 2005 search, and details the rooms Mr. Parkinson observed.

Direct examination testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Evidence exhibit 332B

From: Ms. Comey
To: MS. MENNINGER

Ms. Comey states she told Ms. Menninger 'the other day' that they were not planning to offer exhibit 332B.

Verbal communication
N/A
Communication Source

Property Layout

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Alessi

Direct examination regarding the physical layout of Epstein's Palm Beach property.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Rodgers

Questioning regarding a specific female passenger on Epstein's planes who attended Interlochen.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Video Evidence Presentation

From: Ms. Comey
To: The Court / Ms. Drescher

Discussion regarding the playback of a video on Ms. Drescher's laptop and pausing at specific timestamps.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admission of Evidence

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Requesting admission of exhibits 11-16 and 1004, and requesting jurors view sealed binders.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Request for a moment

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Ms. Comey asks for a moment, Judge grants it, counsel confers.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Photograph Identification

From: Ms. Comey
To: Parkinson

Questioning regarding a photograph of a work area containing the name Jeffrey E. Epstein.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Shawn

Questioning regarding witness background, education, and past relationships.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Transcript availability

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Not necessarily, your Honor. We're not being recorded right now and we're getting a transcript.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary Ruling

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

The Court sustains a foundation objection regarding witness testimony about a book version, instructing the jury to disregard specific beliefs of the witness.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pretrial ruling on cross-examination topics

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Ms. Comey requests a ruling on whether the government needs to 'draw the sting' on direct examination regarding a witness's juvenile arrests and old misdemeanors.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Photograph (Exhibit 250)

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Argument describing a photo of Epstein and a girl, arguing its probative value because it was displayed in the house the defendant ran.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Redirect Examination

From: Rodgers
To: Ms. Comey

Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Timing of evidence release

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the timeline for releasing redacted photographs (by Sunday) and videos (by Tuesday) due to IT staff schedules.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: CAROLYN

Questioning regarding identification of a photograph (Exhibit 104) depicting the witness at age 14.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Identification of Government Exhibit 313

From: Ms. Comey
To: Ms. Meder

Questioning regarding a photo found on a CD (1B75) from the Epstein/Maxwell investigation.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Meder

Questioning regarding the identification of a photo found on a CD during the investigation.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search