Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Comey

Person
Mentions
1419
Relationships
127
Events
630
Documents
693
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
127 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
18 Very Strong
28
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
17
View
person Mr. Everdell
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
16
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
10
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Opposing counsel
12 Very Strong
10
View
organization The government
Representative
12 Very Strong
10
View
person CAROLYN
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Mr. Alessi
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Parkinson
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person CAROLYN
Professional
10 Very Strong
9
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Mr. Parkinson
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
38
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person Shawn
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Meder
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
37
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
155
View
person Mr. Visoski
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person your Honor
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person Rodgers
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Recess pending verdict Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of witness Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Shawn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of David Rodgers Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Kimberly Meder Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski by Ms. Comey Courtroom View
N/A N/A Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Carolyn Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Michael Dawson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Gregory Parkinson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 2 for identification. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Juan Patricio Alessi Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00014681.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge, defense attorney Ms. Sternheim, and prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding a request (likely from the jury) for physical copies of testimonies from witnesses identified as Jane, Juan, and Kate. The parties discuss the formatting (binders, hole punches) and confirm that Ms. Drescher is printing the transcripts with agreed-upon redactions.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014680.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between Judge Nathan and counsel (Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim) regarding a scheduling note to be sent to the deliberating jury about December 23rd. Subsequently, the jury sends a note requesting testimony transcripts for witnesses identified as Jane, Wong, and Kate.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014677.jpg

This document is the final page of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It records the judge's decision to adjourn the court proceedings until 9:00 a.m. on December 22, 2021. The transcript captures brief concluding remarks between the judge, Ms. Comey, and Ms. Sternheim.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014676.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge expresses frustration to Ms. Comey (Government) about a three-hour delay in providing requested transcripts to the jury. The Judge also instructs court staff (Ms. Williams) to contact alternate jurors to inform them that deliberations are ongoing.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014674.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Court, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Ms. Sternheim regarding responses to jury notes, dismissal times during deliberations, lunch orders for the jury, and strict COVID-19 mask protocols mandated by the Chief Judge.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014671.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorneys and a judge about a jury's question. The core issue is whether the testimony of a witness named 'Annie' can be considered for conspiracy counts, given a prior instruction that her testimony did not describe illegal sexual activity. The judge rules that the testimony is relevant and can be permissibly considered by the jury for those counts.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014670.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal discussion between a judge, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Comey. The attorneys debate the necessity and scope of a limiting instruction for the jury regarding the testimony of a witness named 'Annie' and its application to specific counts in an indictment. The judge expresses a clear opinion on the matter, while the attorneys present differing views on how to proceed.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014669.jpg

This document is a transcript page from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the Judge coordinating the dismissal of the jury for the evening and subsequently addressing 'Court Exhibit 9,' a note from the jury asking if 'Annie's testimony' can be considered as conspiracy to commit a crime in Counts One and Three. Ms. Comey argues the answer is yes, while Mr. Everdell requests a moment to confer.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014668.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves Ms. Comey, Ms. Sternheim, and the Judge discussing the jury deliberation schedule leading up to the Christmas holiday. They agree to inform the jury that they have the option to deliberate on Thursday, December 23rd, if necessary, to allow jurors time to make childcare or other personal arrangements.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014665.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a dispute between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding a response to a jury note. The jury requested an 'FBI deposition 3505-005' referenced during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The defense attempted to include testimony from Special Agent Jason Richards in the response, but the Court overruled the request, deeming it unresponsive to the jury's specific ask.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014664.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the judge and attorneys (Comey, Pagliuca, Sternheim) regarding a jury note and testimony related to Exhibit 3505-005 given by witnesses 'Carolyn' and Special Agent Jason Richards. The judge notes that copies of the notes provided to counsel must be redacted because the jury foreperson signed them.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014663.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Ms. Comey, and Mr. Pagliuca regarding how to respond to a jury question about an item labeled '3505-005'. The parties agree to send a note clarifying that 3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit but referring the jury to 'Carolyn's testimony' regarding it.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014662.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. The conversation revolves around how to respond to a jury's request for a specific document that is not formally in evidence, while testimony about the document is. The attorneys and the judge debate the precise wording of the response to avoid confusing the jury or diminishing the value of the admitted testimony.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014661.jpg

This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between attorneys Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge regarding a document used for impeachment that is not formally in evidence. They discuss how to properly handle this situation, with the judge proposing a clarifying instruction for the jury.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014660.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the judge and counsel while the jury is not present. The conversation centers on two notes from the jury requesting testimony transcripts for individuals named Jane, Annie, and Carolyn, as well as an FBI deposition of Carolyn. The counsel confirms they are finalizing redactions before sending the documents to the jury via court staff.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014584.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the final sentences of prosecutor Ms. Comey's closing argument, urging the jury to find the defendant guilty of sexual abuse of underage girls. Following this, the Court (Judge Nathan) begins reading the jury instructions (The Charge), specifically starting with Instruction No. 1 regarding the Role of the Court.

Court transcript / trial proceedings
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014582.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a rebuttal argument by Ms. Comey in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Comey argues that the four witnesses against Maxwell were motivated by a desire for justice, not money, pointing out that they had already received 'million-dollar payouts' and would not have endured a traumatic trial and cross-examination if they were lying. The core of the argument is that the witnesses' testimony was truthful and not part of a conspiracy to frame the defendant.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014580.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Rebuttal by Ms. Comey) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues that the testimonies of victims Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie are credible specifically because they did not exaggerate Maxwell's involvement (e.g., admitting she wasn't always in the room or only touched them in specific ways), contrasting this with 'better lies' they could have told if fabricating the story. The text details specific sexual acts and interactions attributed to Maxwell and Epstein.

Court transcript / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014579.jpg

This document is a transcript of a rebuttal argument by Ms. Comey in a criminal trial. The speaker argues that the witnesses—Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie—have no financial motive to lie in their testimony against the defendant, Maxwell, as their civil cases are settled and they have already received compensation. The speaker specifically addresses and dismisses a defense claim regarding a conversation between Jane's lawyer and a prosecutor, asserting it does not constitute evidence of a financial incentive for testifying.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014578.jpg

This document is a transcript of a legal rebuttal by Ms. Comey, dated August 10, 2022. She argues for the credibility of several witnesses, including Juan Alessi and the ex-boyfriends (Matt, Dave, Shawn) of female accusers, stating they have no motive to lie. Comey highlights that Alessi's testimony is corroborated by external evidence, such as flight records confirming that minors named Jane and Virginia flew on Jeffrey Epstein's planes.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014577.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring a rebuttal argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Comey refutes the defense's suggestion (attributed to Ms. Menninger) that the FBI manipulated witnesses or asked leading questions, citing the ethical testimony of Special Agent Young. She argues that the victims (Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie) did not misremember the defendant's role in their abuse and that the defense's argument relies on the jury believing all witnesses are liars.

Court transcript (rebuttal argument)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014576.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing a rebuttal by Ms. Comey. She argues against the defense's claim that their client, Maxwell, was framed by witnesses. Comey's reasoning is that before Epstein's death in 2019, he was the 'big fish' and the logical target for any fabricated stories, meaning there was no motive for witnesses to invent Maxwell's involvement years ago.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014575.jpg

This document is a transcript of a rebuttal argument by Ms. Comey in a criminal case against a defendant named Maxwell. Ms. Comey argues against the defense's theory that lawyers fabricated stories about Maxwell for financial gain. She presents evidence that three victims—Jane, Carolyn, and Annie—had reported Maxwell's involvement to friends, boyfriends, and the FBI years prior (in 2006 and 2007), long before any compensation fund or financial incentive existed, thus making the defense's theory untenable.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014574.jpg

This document is page 174 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey is delivering a rebuttal argument, refuting the defense's theory that witnesses (Kate, Carolyn, Annie, Jane) had false memories implanted by the media, the FBI, or greedy lawyers seeking money from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Comey argues there is no evidence the witnesses consumed each other's media interviews or that their lawyers conspired to fabricate stories, noting specifically that Annie's lawyer worked pro bono.

Court transcript (rebuttal argument)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014573.jpg

This document is a transcript of a legal rebuttal by Ms. Comey, filed on August 10, 2022. Comey argues that the defense is focusing on 'peripheral details' to distract the jury from the core fact that a witness, Carolyn, has consistently and without prompting identified Maxwell as a key figure involved in scheduling massages with Jeffrey Epstein, citing Carolyn's 2009 deposition. The argument aims to reinforce the credibility of Carolyn's memory against defense suggestions that it was contaminated or implanted.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
113
As Recipient
4
Total
117

Missing Jurors

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Asking if the Court has attempted to call the missing jurors.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Redactions

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Discussing the redaction of phone numbers for Carolyn and third parties.

Court dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Ending the day

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Stopping the examination because it is 4:59 PM.

Court instruction
N/A
Communication Source

Direct Examination regarding Exhibit 662

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Rodgers

Questioning regarding the columns in a logbook exhibit.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Shawn

Questioning regarding Melissa and Amanda's visits to Epstein's house.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibits

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

Clarification on how nonsealed exhibits will be shown (on screen).

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Witness testimony issue

From: Ms. Comey
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Comey requests permission to submit a letter to the court to look into the issue being discussed regarding witnesses.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Search of 358 El Brillo Way

From: Ms. Comey
To: ["Mr. Parkinson"]

Ms. Comey questions Mr. Parkinson about a search conducted on October 20, 2005, at 358 El Brillo Way. The questioning clarifies the timeline of events, distinguishing between an incident in 2003 and the 2005 search, and details the rooms Mr. Parkinson observed.

Direct examination testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Evidence exhibit 332B

From: Ms. Comey
To: MS. MENNINGER

Ms. Comey states she told Ms. Menninger 'the other day' that they were not planning to offer exhibit 332B.

Verbal communication
N/A
Communication Source

Property Layout

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Alessi

Direct examination regarding the physical layout of Epstein's Palm Beach property.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Mr. Rodgers

Questioning regarding a specific female passenger on Epstein's planes who attended Interlochen.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Video Evidence Presentation

From: Ms. Comey
To: The Court / Ms. Drescher

Discussion regarding the playback of a video on Ms. Drescher's laptop and pausing at specific timestamps.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admission of Evidence

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Requesting admission of exhibits 11-16 and 1004, and requesting jurors view sealed binders.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Request for a moment

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Ms. Comey asks for a moment, Judge grants it, counsel confers.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Photograph Identification

From: Ms. Comey
To: Parkinson

Questioning regarding a photograph of a work area containing the name Jeffrey E. Epstein.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Shawn

Questioning regarding witness background, education, and past relationships.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Transcript availability

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Not necessarily, your Honor. We're not being recorded right now and we're getting a transcript.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary Ruling

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Comey

The Court sustains a foundation objection regarding witness testimony about a book version, instructing the jury to disregard specific beliefs of the witness.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pretrial ruling on cross-examination topics

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Ms. Comey requests a ruling on whether the government needs to 'draw the sting' on direct examination regarding a witness's juvenile arrests and old misdemeanors.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Photograph (Exhibit 250)

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Argument describing a photo of Epstein and a girl, arguing its probative value because it was displayed in the house the defendant ran.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Redirect Examination

From: Rodgers
To: Ms. Comey

Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Timing of evidence release

From: Ms. Comey
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the timeline for releasing redacted photographs (by Sunday) and videos (by Tuesday) due to IT staff schedules.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: CAROLYN

Questioning regarding identification of a photograph (Exhibit 104) depicting the witness at age 14.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Identification of Government Exhibit 313

From: Ms. Comey
To: Ms. Meder

Questioning regarding a photo found on a CD (1B75) from the Epstein/Maxwell investigation.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Ms. Comey
To: Meder

Questioning regarding the identification of a photo found on a CD during the investigation.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search