Jane Doe
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
17
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Bradley James Edwards
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Mother
|
Family |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Trump
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Plaintiff defendant |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
THEODORE J. LEOPOLD
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Father
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
DONALD J. TRUMP
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert S. Glassman
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Herman
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-07-20 | N/A | Jane Doe filed request for documents | Court | View |
| 2009-07-14 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Kellen's Motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2009-07-10 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2009-07-10 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's First Request for Admissio... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-06-12 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Motion for Default against Defendant Sarah Kellen (DE 37). | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-06-12 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Amended Memorandum of Law in Opposition (DE 36) | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2009-05-22 | N/A | Proposed new deadline for Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2009-05-22 | N/A | Plaintiff Jane Doe II filed initial Memorandum of Law in Opposition (DE 20) | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2009-03-30 | N/A | Order entered on FLSD Docket requiring counsel to confer and file reports | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2009-03-25 | N/A | Plaintiff filed a Complaint [DE 1]. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-03-24 | N/A | Summons issued for Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-03-24 | N/A | Plaintiff Jane Doe II filed a Complaint against Defendants Epstein and Kellen. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Plaintiff filed the case (Jane Doe II v. Epstein & Kellen). | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Jane Doe lawsuit filed regarding services Maxwell provided. | Unknown | View |
| 2008-09-18 | N/A | Proposed Order entered on FLSD Docket. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-08-21 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiff's Motion to Preserve Evidence. | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2008-08-21 | N/A | Receipt of an Order in the Jane Doe v. United States litigation. | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2008-08-18 | N/A | Anticipated date for Plaintiff to file motion to remand case to state court. | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2008-08-18 | N/A | Plaintiff filed a motion to remand. | Court | View |
| 2008-08-18 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Motion to Remand case to state court. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-08-18 | N/A | Plaintiff filed motion to remand | Federal Court | View |
| 2008-08-13 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time. | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2008-08-12 | N/A | Brad Edwards files civil suit (Jane Doe v. Epstein) including a RICO count. | Court | View |
| 2008-07-10 | N/A | Filing of parallel state lawsuit in Palm Beach County. | Fifteenth Judicial Circuit,... | View |
| 2008-07-09 | N/A | Government filed responsive pleading to Jane Doe's emergency petition; first public mention of th... | Court | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013337.jpg
This document page details the timeline and nature of multiple civil lawsuits filed against Jeffrey Epstein around 2008 by attorneys Brad Edwards and the firm Herman and Mermelstein. It describes complaints alleging sexual assault of minors filed in Florida and New York, including a specific suit by Ava Cordero.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013335.jpg
This legal document (page 17) details the timeline surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It describes attorney 'Edwards' filing a motion to reopen a CVRA action and notes that a victim ('Jane Doe') appeared on television to criticize the lenient plea. The document confirms that on June 30, 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to state solicitation charges in Palm Beach County and entered a federal non-prosecution agreement that acknowledged potential compensation for approximately 34 victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013333.jpg
This document details the timeline in June and July 2008 when attorney Bradley Edwards was retained by victims E.W., Jane Doe, and L.M. It highlights that AUSA Villafaña failed to disclose a negotiated plea agreement that would block federal prosecution while simultaneously confirming concrete evidence of Epstein molesting minors. It also notes the U.S. Attorney's Office refusal to share collected evidence, specifically listing items confiscated from Epstein's home such as sex toys and massage equipment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013332.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing detailing attorney Bradley J. Edwards' representation of Epstein victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe starting in April 2008. It highlights the victims' concerns that the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office were secretly arranging a plea deal with Epstein without notifying the victims, despite previous assurances in January 2008 that the investigation was ongoing and they would be consulted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013324.jpg
This document details multiple instances of sexual assault by Epstein against minor females, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, who were 13 or 14 years old at the time. It highlights Epstein's repeated invocation of the Fifth Amendment during depositions when questioned about these activities, and notes that the victims were brought to his home by another underage victim. The United States Attorney's Office recognized L.M. as a victim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013320.jpg
This document page, stamped by House Oversight, outlines specific allegations against Jeffrey Epstein regarding the sexual assault of over 40 young girls in West Palm Beach between 2002 and 2005. It references depositions from victims 'Jane Doe,' 'L.M.,' and 'E.W.,' detailing specific acts of abuse and a recruitment scheme where L.M. was paid $200 for every underage girl she brought to Epstein, totaling over 70 girls. The document also notes Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual acts with minors and cites legal precedents regarding adverse inferences in civil cases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013310.jpg
This document is a page from Brad Edwards' Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. It lists questions Epstein refused to answer regarding sexual assaults on private planes and the procuring of minors (L.M., E.W., Jane Doe) for prostitution, arguing that the court should draw adverse inferences of guilt from his silence. The document also begins a legal argument stating that 'Litigation Privilege' does not protect Epstein from claims of abuse of process and malicious prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032060.jpg
An email dated October 11, 2016, from Jeffrey E. (using jeevacation@gmail.com) to Kathy Ruemmler and Darren Indyke. The body of the email consists solely of a link to a LawNewz article regarding a lawsuit involving Donald Trump and a 'Jane Doe' represented by a former Casey Anthony attorney, followed by a standard legal confidentiality disclaimer asserting the property of 'JEE'. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013822.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book (likely 'The 4-Hour Workweek' by Tim Ferriss, based on the 'New Rich' terminology and the blog URL) included in a House Oversight investigation file. The text discusses economic theories regarding 'absolute vs relative income,' arguing that wealth should be measured by time freedom rather than just total earnings. It also distinguishes between 'distress' (negative stress) and 'eustress' (healthy, growth-promoting stress), concluding with a Q&A section on lifestyle choices.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013499.tif
This document details legal proceedings and events related to Jeffrey Epstein and Scott Rothstein. It describes Jane Doe's RICO and federal claims against Epstein, emphasizing the role of flight logs as evidence of interstate commerce to establish a 'federal nexus' for sexual assaults. It also mentions the affiant's involvement in the Rothstein Ponzi scheme as a victim and their role in reaching settlements in Epstein-related lawsuits.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013496.tif
This document details efforts to depose Ghislaine Maxwell regarding her involvement with Jeffrey Epstein's affairs, her avoidance of deposition, and her attendance at Chelsea Clinton's wedding. It also outlines allegations concerning Donald Trump's connections to Epstein, including calls to Epstein's mansion, quotes praising Epstein, Trump's alleged flight on Epstein's plane, Epstein's ban from Mar-a-Lago, and allegations involving Jane Doe No. 102 being recruited by Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013495.tif
This document is a statement or response addressing allegations related to a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein and lawsuits against Epstein. The speaker denies knowledge of Rothstein's fraudulent activities and asserts their actions in representing clients against Epstein were legitimate, uncovering evidence of Epstein's sexual molestation and the obstruction of justice by Epstein and his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013494.tif
This affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards details his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008, including the filing of state and federal lawsuits. It highlights his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña regarding Epstein's plea agreement and concerns that information about the federal prosecution implications of the state plea was not fully disclosed to his clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013491.tif
This document discusses the significance of a taped conversation between George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting its uniqueness as evidence against Epstein's molestation claims and his perjury. It also lists several high-profile individuals as Epstein's acquaintances and notes Epstein's intention to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights at trial, making the tape critical for plaintiffs like Jane Doe. The document details the difficulties in obtaining discovery from Epstein due to his legal tactics.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013489.tif
This affidavit, authored by Bradley James Edwards, details his role as lead attorney for 'Jane Doe' in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the federal government, his invocation of the Fifth Amendment in response to allegations, and his attempts to discredit Jane Doe's testimony. The document also mentions the existence of Epstein's co-conspirators who allegedly facilitated his crimes and were deposed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029896.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2009, between paralegal Jessica Cadwell (Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman) and the office of attorney Bradley Edwards. The correspondence concerns discovery in a case involving a 'Jane Doe.' Cadwell requests a HIPAA release signature from Jane Doe to access records from the Milton Center (a Department of Juvenile Justice facility) and asks for an extension on responding to 'Net Wirth ROGS' (interrogatories regarding net worth).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029894.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 2009 between paralegal Jessica Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding the 'Jane Doe' case. The emails discuss the legal service of a subpoena on Ghislaine Maxwell and note that her deposition has been rescheduled to September 23. Notably, the correspondence explicitly states that Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029893.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2009, involving Jeffrey Epstein, paralegal Jessica Cadwell, and Jacquie Johnson. The visible conversation centers on a legal inquiry regarding whether 'service on Maxwell' has been achieved, to which Johnson replies they are still trying to get details. The specific content of Epstein's direct communication with Cadwell is redacted as privileged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029892.jpg
This document is an email thread from August 2009 involving paralegal Jessica Cadwell and attorney Bradley Edwards. Cadwell requests a signed HIPAA release from Jane Doe to obtain records from the Milton Center (a Department of Juvenile Justice facility) and asks for an extension on 'Net Wirth ROGS' (interrogatories). A brief reply notes that Edwards is out of the office until the afternoon.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029891.jpg
This document is a printout of an email chain between Jacquie Johnson and paralegal Jessica Cadwell from August 2009 regarding a 'Jane Doe' case. The correspondence focuses on scheduling depositions, specifically explicitly requesting a date for the deposition of 'Mr. Epstein' and inquiring about the status of a deposition for a redacted individual. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029890.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 2009 between paralegals discussing the scheduling of depositions for a 'Jane Doe' case. The emails confirm that Ms. Maxwell's deposition was rescheduled to September 23, 2009, and explicitly state that 'Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009.' The conversation also touches on the difficulties of serving a subpoena to Maxwell and mentions an emergency protective order.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.jpg
An email chain from August 11, 2009, involving paralegal Jessica Cadwell forwarding correspondence to Jeffrey Epstein and his attorneys (Critton and Goldberger). The underlying conversation is between Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding scheduling updates for a matter titled 'Jane Doe.' A specific update notes that 'Trump has been moved to Sept. 24.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029888.jpg
This document is an email from paralegal Jessica Cadwell (of Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman) to an attorney named Brad regarding the 'Jane Doe' case. Cadwell requests a signed HIPAA release to obtain Jane Doe's records from the Department of Juvenile Justice regarding her time at the Milton Center for girls. She also requests a one-week extension for responses to 'Net Wirth ROGS' (likely Net Worth Interrogatories). The email footer contains a disclaimer stating the communication is the 'property of Jeffrey Epstein' and lists the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029887.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2009, between paralegals Jacquie Johnson and Jessica Cadwell regarding the 'Jane Doe' case. The correspondence focuses on scheduling a deposition for Jeffrey Epstein and confirming the signing of 'Stays.' Attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Robert D. Critton Jr. are included in the correspondence loop.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029886.jpg
This email chain from August 2009 between legal professionals Jacquie Johnson and Jessica Cadwell discusses the scheduling of depositions for the 'Jane Doe' case. The correspondence confirms that Ms. Maxwell's deposition was rescheduled to September 23, while Mr. Trump's deposition was set for August 18, 2009. The emails also mention the filing of an emergency protective order which likely delayed a deposition for a redacted individual.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Plaintiff was enticed by "promises of money" to... | View |
| N/A | Received | employer | Jane Doe | $100,000.00 | Hypothetical salary for absolute income example | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Epstein chose to settle the case before trial. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Cash payments | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Mention of intent to give massage for monetary ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | monetary com[pensation] for a massage (implied ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Promise of payment for a massage (pretense for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Defendant intended to pay cash in exchange for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for massage mentioned in complaint | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $200.00 | Fee paid on each occasion after Epstein ejacula... | View |
| 2017-10-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $2,500,000.00 | Settlement payment. | View |
| 2016-06-20 | Paid | Jane Doe | U.S. District Cou... | $400.00 | Filing Fee for Complaint (Receipt Number 0208-1... | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for 'massage' (sexual acts). | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
No Subject
Plaintiff believes she communicated with Kelly Bovino Umekubo.
Criticism of Plea Bargain
Jane Doe exercised First Amendment rights to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
N/A
Phone records showing calls made by Indyke to Jane Doe
Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A
A written declaration by the plaintiff, submitted as Exhibit A in the case.
Money and modeling career
Plaintiff was enticed with promises of money and a modeling career to attend parties.
Instructions
Told her to remove her clothes; later told her to write down her name and phone number.
Massage Request
Epstein called Doe over the telephone requesting a massage for payment, which was a fraudulent pretense for sexual acts.
Defense
Questions suggesting Jane Doe is fabricating allegations.
Silence
Threatened that she would disappear like a specific 12-year-old female if she spoke out.
Criticism of plea bargain
Criticism of the unduly lenient plea bargain Epstein received.
Investigation Interview
Jane Doe met with Pagan approximately 10-12 times regarding the case.
Criticism of Epstein plea bargain
A victim appeared on TV to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
Police Report
Witness admits to lying to police about who was in the car with her when she went to Epstein's house.
Victim Statement
A statement read by Ms. Moe describing Maxwell's manipulation and role in Epstein's abuse.
Victim Statement
Written statement read aloud by Ms. Moe describing abuse by Maxwell and Epstein.
Victim impact statement regarding Jeffrey Epstein
Jane Doe provides a statement to the court detailing her sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein in 2004 at Zorro Ranch when she was 15 years old. She describes the psychological manipulation and trauma she endured.
Threats
Short threatening calls (approx 20 seconds) received after filing the initial complaint.
Investigators at their homes
Investigators were knocking on their doors trying to talk about Jane Doe.
Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum Alfredo...
Plaintiff's request to secure Alfredo Rodriguez for testimony.
Deposition Preparation
Met 'this morning' to prepare for deposition.
Solicitation
Scheduling times for Plaintiff to appear at Epstein's home for 'massages' or sexual services.
No Subject
Threatening call stating Jane Doe owed Decedent $10,000 for rent paid on her apartment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity