The Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
35 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Williams
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
196 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
228 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MR. WEINGARTEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Members of the jury
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Weinberg
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
116 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
155 | |
|
person
MR. ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MR. COHEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
136 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-28 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where Mr. Everdell presented an argument regarding the interpretation of a sen... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2023-02-28 | N/A | Court proceeding regarding Case 22-1426 (likely United States v. Maxwell appeal or related) | Southern District Court | View |
| 2023-02-28 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding juror misconduct allegations | Courtroom | View |
| 2023-02-28 | N/A | Court hearing regarding sentencing enhancements and objections (Case 22-1426). | Courtroom (likely SDNY or S... | View |
| 2023-02-28 | N/A | Court hearing/sidebar conference regarding Juror 50's impartiality. | Courtroom Sidebar | View |
| 2023-02-27 | Legal argument | The defense advanced an argument that was considered and rejected by the Court. | Courtroom | View |
| 2023-02-27 | Jury instruction | The Court referred the jury to a legal instruction in the afternoon. | Courtroom | View |
| 2023-01-18 | Legal proceeding | The Court granted the filer's request to file a brief of no more than 20,000 words. | N/A | View |
| 2023-01-17 | Legal proceeding | The Court granted the filer's motion for an enlargement of time to file the Appellant's brief. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-24 | N/A | Redirect examination of Ms. Brune regarding legal disclosures and ethics. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where victim impact statements are being delivered. The court confirms an anon... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | An attorney, Mr. Everdell, makes an argument to the court about the authoritative nature of a sen... | Southern District Court | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | Attorneys and a judge discuss evidence related to a defendant's association with Mr. Epstein. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A court hearing where victim impact statements are being presented. Ms. Ransome gives oral testim... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court proceeding | A hearing to discuss post-trial matters, including the final judgment and the end date of a crimi... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Sentencing hearing | A portion of a sentencing hearing where the defendant's ability to pay a fine is discussed, follo... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A judge overruled an objection regarding the inclusion of an asset in Ms. Maxwell's Presentence R... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court proceeding | A court hearing to discuss factual objections to a presentence report (PSR) before sentencing. | Court of the Southern District | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A court hearing where the judge confirms with the defendant and her counsel that they have review... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where Ms. Moe and The Court are discussing the timeline and evidence of a cons... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where the judge rules on objections to the calculation of the sentencing guide... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A legal argument was held regarding the timeline of an offense and the applicable sentencing manual. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A legal argument took place regarding sentencing factors, the reliability of evidence, and the ap... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where a judge overrules objections made by an attorney regarding evidence and ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court hearing | A court hearing for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE where submissions were confirmed and the government's ... | N/A | View |
EFTA00024248.pdf
This document is an email dated October 28, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to attorneys Brad Edwards and Brittany Henderson. The email serves to transmit a redacted version of a defense memorandum regarding a Federal Rule of Evidence 412 motion filed under seal. It discusses upcoming deadlines, including a November 1 response date and pretrial conference, and a tentative in-camera hearing on November 5.
EFTA00023914.pdf
This document is an email dated April 11, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in White Plains, NY, to colleagues, including one at USANYS. The sender is coordinating the retrieval of specific Bureau of Prisons (BOP) FOIA documents related to Epstein that do not have a 'translucent green watermark,' anticipating that the Court will require the production of clean copies.
EFTA00020687.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 10, 2019, discussing media efforts to unseal records in the case US v. Tartaglione (16-cr-832). Al-Amyn Sumar of the New York Times Legal Department circulated a letter sent to the Court on behalf of the NYT and reporter Ben Weiser, joining the NY Post and Daily News in opposing sealing. The context relates to Nicholas Tartaglione, who was Jeffrey Epstein's cellmate at the MCC during Epstein's first suicide attempt/assault.
EFTA00020670.pdf
This document contains an email chain from July 27, 2020, between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team in the case United States v. Maxwell. The correspondence concerns scheduling a 'meet and confer' regarding a protective order, specifically addressing the Government's concerns about the defendant potentially naming victims of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell in public filings. The Government also requests a 1 terabyte hard drive from the defense to facilitate the production of discovery materials.
EFTA00020392.pdf
This document is an email dated July 10, 2020, sent to an individual at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email attaches a scheduling order for Ghislaine Maxwell's upcoming detention/bail hearing and discusses logistics, specifically noting that the order contains dial-in information for public audio access which can be provided to victims if requested.
EFTA00020367.pdf
An email dated July 9, 2020, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to recipients addressed as 'Chris' and 'Mark' (likely defense counsel). The email regards the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell' and includes a proposed protective order as an attachment to facilitate the start of discovery productions.
EFTA00020119.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Epstein's defense lawyers (Weinberg, Miller, Weingarten) dated August 22, 2019 (shortly after Epstein's death). The email discusses a scheduled call regarding civil forfeiture and formally requests that the defense team return or certify the destruction of all discovery materials due to the expected 'nolle order' (dismissal of charges due to death). The prosecution aims to advise the Court at an upcoming Tuesday hearing that no discovery obligations remain.
EFTA00019928.pdf
This document is an email dated December 2, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Maxwell' case. The email discusses an attached order from Judge Nathan which requires the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) legal team to file a letter with the court by the following Friday. The sender requests a call to discuss the matter.
EFTA00019458.pdf
An email dated November 24, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to opposing counsel regarding a deadline for a protective order related to Rule 17(c) subpoena materials. The email includes an attachment with 'GM' in the filename, strongly suggesting the context is the Ghislaine Maxwell trial proceedings.
EFTA00018992.pdf
This document is an email thread from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated March 16, 2021. It serves as a transmittal for an unredacted Reply Memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's pending bail application, submitted to the Court and government pursuant to legal rules. The email includes Sternheim's contact information and standard confidentiality disclaimers.
EFTA00018264.pdf
An email chain between members of a legal team (likely the prosecution given the context of sharing materials *with* 'defense counsel') regarding the US v. Maxwell trial in November 2021. The correspondence focuses on the review, assignment, and sharing of juror questionnaires via the USAfx platform, with specific deadlines set for objections to juror batches. The attachment filename explicitly references 'US_v._Maxwell_Juror_Questionnaire_Review'.
EFTA00018031.pdf
An email dated August 2, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to attorney Jack Scarola. The email serves to notify Scarola of an order by Judge Nathan regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, emphasizing that the rule applies to attorneys associated with a case, including attorneys for witnesses. The document includes a Bates number EFTA00018031.
EFTA00017094.pdf
This document is an email chain dated September 10, 2019, concerning the legal case US v. Tartaglione (16-cr-832). Al-Amyn Sumar of The New York Times Company Legal Department informs recipients that the NYT and reporter Ben Weiser have sent a letter to the Court requesting the unsealing of records. An Assistant United States Attorney forwards this information, noting the NYT's involvement in the request. The document relates to Epstein tangentially, as Tartaglione was Epstein's cellmate during his first suicide attempt.
EFTA00016953.pdf
An email dated October 20, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense attorneys (Everdell, Sternheim, Pagliuca, Menninger). The email attaches a 'Draft joint proposed request to charge' related to the Maxwell trial (inferred from attachment name) and sets a deadline for comments.
EFTA00016264.pdf
An email dated October 29, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the SDNY to Robert Glassman regarding a 'Rule 412 motion' (likely related to the admissibility of evidence concerning a victim's sexual history). The email notes the motion was filed under seal, a response is due the following Monday, and a potential closed (in camera) hearing is scheduled for November 5, 2021.
EFTA00015360.pdf
This document is an email thread from April 2021 involving Audrey Strauss and other USANYS officials regarding an 'Epstein FOIA Update.' The discussion concerns a briefing and materials related to Main Justice and a FOIA response, specifically addressing whether more documents might be produced upon reconsideration based on a Court's perception. Strauss requests materials to review over the weekend.
EFTA00014884.pdf
An email dated November 24, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding the 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' case (implied by context and case number 20cr330). The email discusses the procedure for filing proposed redactions related to expert testimony and sealing specific exhibits, referencing Docket No. 495. Several attachments containing proposed redactions and responses are included.
EFTA00014695.pdf
An email dated November 22, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger. The email discusses the procedure for filing redacted versions of legal documents related to birth certificates, exhibit GX-52, and a motion to quash, referencing Docket Numbers 473, 474, and 476. The sender proposes a sequence for filing cover letters and redacted motions to the Court.
EFTA00014668.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 2021 involving attorney Brendan Quigley of Baker Botts L.L.P. Discussing scheduling for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial ('GM' in attachment). The correspondence confirms that jury selection was scheduled for the week of November 15, 2021, with the trial beginning on November 29, 2021. Quigley confirms the availability of himself and a 'Mr. Rodgers' for these proceedings.
EFTA00014664.pdf
This document contains an email chain from May 2021 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and defense counsel regarding the scheduling of the trial for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails confirm that jury selection was scheduled for the week of November 15, 2021, with the trial set to begin on November 29, 2021. The correspondence includes discussions about checking for scheduling conflicts prior to submitting a proposal to the Court.
EFTA00014649.pdf
A digital calendar entry for November 21, 2021, serving as a reminder for a legal filing deadline related to Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52) in a court case (likely US v. Maxwell). The entry quotes a court order requiring the Government to reply to a defense argument that a specific witness ('Employee-1') cannot authenticate the exhibit because a former employee (name redacted) allegedly removed the document from Epstein's property previously.
EFTA00014172.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Barry Krischer discussing the confidentiality clauses of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The sender informs Krischer that Epstein's defense team (Lefkowitz, Black, Goldberger) must be notified before any disclosure, specifically regarding a request or potential lawsuit from the 'Shiny Sheet' (Palm Beach Daily News). The email also notes that the defense has failed to file the complete agreement with the Court as previously ordered.
EFTA00014155.pdf
This document is an internal email thread between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated December 5, 2008. They discuss procedural matters in the 'Jane Does v USA/Epstein' case, specifically noting that a lawyer had filed the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) under seal and asked for it to be unsealed. The email also confirms that notifications regarding Epstein's work release were sent to the attorneys of represented victims that afternoon.
EFTA00014150.pdf
This document is an email chain dated December 5, 2008, between attorneys Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, and redacted parties. The correspondence discusses Brad Edwards filing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in the 'Jane Does v USA' case under seal and subsequently requesting it be unsealed. The sender also thanks Roy Black for a meeting that occurred the previous day.
EFTA00013302.pdf
This document is an email chain dated December 30, 2020, between Assistant US Attorney Maurene (Comey) and defense attorney Christian Everdell, with other legal team members CC'd. The correspondence concerns a recent order by Judge Nathan denying bail; the defense states they believe no redactions are necessary for the opinion, and the prosecution agrees, attaching a draft joint letter to the Court to convey this position. The document is marked with Bates stamp EFTA00013302.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity