witnesses
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The jury
|
Professional judicial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defense lawyers
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Government lawyers
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jury
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. government
|
Protective |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged tampering |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
lawyers (government, defense, personal)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
each party
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Influential |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jurors
|
Evaluation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jurors
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawyers
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witnesses
|
Collusion alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional testimony |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
UN
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victims
|
Confidants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Associational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Victim Compensation Fund
|
Financial |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Cooperation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Experiment | A study was conducted where participants viewed a simulated accident and were questioned about th... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, where this summation was delivered. | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| N/A | Search warrant execution and evidence collection | Search of Jeffrey Epstein's residence where a notepad, high school transcript, Joy Jelly (sexual ... | Jeffrey Epstein's residence... | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A habeas corpus hearing where the trial court viewed and heard witnesses and their testimonies re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal event | Witness testimony will provide details regarding specifics of abuse and interactions, focusing on... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interviews | OPR conducted more than 60 interviews of witnesses, including FBI agents, USAO staff, and Departm... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial during which these instructions are given to the jury. The document outlines the ru... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial is in progress, during which these instructions are given to the jury. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | The overall legal proceeding during which information about Ms. Conrad was or was not available. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interaction | Witnesses talked to their family members and saw the media, leading to 'contamination of memory'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal proceeding where testimony is given, evidence is admitted, and rulings are made. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial is in progress, for which these instructions are being given to the jury. | Court | View |
| N/A | Witness preparation | Witnesses met with government, defense, and their own lawyers to discuss case facts and testimony... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The Government's investigation during which witnesses were interviewed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A civil case was proceeding against the Defendant (Mr. Epstein). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury instruction | A judge provides instructions to the jury regarding the evaluation of witness credibility, specif... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | The document discusses preparations and rules for an upcoming trial. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Meetings between witnesses and the government/FBI where the defense alleges manipulation occurred. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal discovery | A period of discovery in a case against Mr. Epstein, involving depositions and interviews with pr... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The legal proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) for which jurors are being selected. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | The legal proceeding for which this pre-trial motion's table of contents is prepared. | The Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A trial occurred where testimony supplied legitimate explanations for the Government's delay in i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial is taking place, during which these instructions are given. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Grand jury proceedings related to the Epstein and Maxwell case, the transcripts of which are bein... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury instruction | A judge is instructing the jury on the proper method for evaluating witness testimony, including ... | courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00011724.jpg
This document is page 59 of a court transcript (filed 08/10/22) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the government is applying 'hindsight bias' to lawful conduct like shopping or movies, relabeling it as 'grooming.' She further argues that prosecution witnesses are financially motivated, claiming they receive money from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund and enhance their payouts by cooperating with the government.
DOJ-OGR-00005413.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Doc 380) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. The Government argues for the admissibility of 'prior consistent statements' made by Minor Victims to other witnesses regarding sexual abuse by the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s. The text asserts these statements, made over a decade ago, refute potential defense claims of recent fabrication or improper influence.
DOJ-OGR-00005396.jpg
This legal document is a preliminary statement from the Government, filed on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government submits nine motions in limine to the Court, seeking to set the rules for an upcoming trial. The motions aim to protect victims' privacy, admit certain statements, and preclude the defense from introducing what the Government considers irrelevant, confusing, or improper evidence and arguments, such as questioning law enforcement decisions or attempting to garner sympathy for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00005395.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The motion, presumably from the prosecution, outlines a series of requests to the court to limit the defense's ability to introduce certain evidence and arguments during the upcoming trial. Key issues addressed include protecting witness identities, the admissibility of minor victims' statements, precluding discussion of prior investigations, and preventing arguments related to jury nullification or the defendant's status in a past civil case.
DOJ-OGR-00005360.jpg
This document is a page of jury instructions from a court case filed on October 22, 2021. It outlines the defendant's rights, including the presumption of innocence and the right not to testify, and clarifies that the government holds the burden of proof. The instructions strictly forbid jurors from consuming any media, conducting independent research (including on the internet), or discussing the case with anyone—including family, colleagues, and fellow jurors—until deliberations officially begin.
DOJ-OGR-00005313.jpg
This document is page 37 of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It is a questionnaire for potential jurors designed to assess their knowledge of trial participants and relevant locations, and to gather information about their prior jury or grand jury service. The document contains placeholders for specific names and locations to be supplied during the jury selection process.
DOJ-OGR-00002712.jpg
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Document 148) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. It details the defense's motion requesting the Court to order the government to disclose Jencks Act material (witness statements, notes, emails, texts) by March 12, 2021, citing the complexity of the case and the global pandemic. The page also begins a section (VI) requesting a list of government witnesses intended for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00002711.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Document 148) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 4, 2021. The text constitutes 'Section V. Motion for Accelerated Disclosure of Witness Statements,' where the defense argues they need early access to Jencks Act material to prepare for trial. They cite the age of the allegations (25 years), the lack of electronic records from that era, the location of witnesses in foreign countries, and the logistical difficulties posed by the COVID-19 pandemic as reasons for the request.
DOJ-OGR-00008713.jpg
This document is a legal instruction, specifically "Instruction No. 2: Role of the Jury," from a trial filed on December 19, 2021. The judge outlines the jury's responsibilities as the exclusive finders of fact, who must weigh evidence, determine witness credibility, and make decisions based solely on the evidence presented. The instruction explicitly distinguishes what constitutes evidence (witness answers, exhibits, stipulations) from what does not (lawyers' statements, questions, and the judge's own comments or rulings).
DOJ-OGR-00008711.jpg
This document is page 5 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 19, 2021. It serves as a Table of Contents listing Jury Instructions 49 through 59 and Concluding Remarks. Topics covered include the defendant's right not to testify, handling of witnesses, electronic communications, and jury conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00008695.jpg
This document is a page from the jury instructions (Instruction No. 55) filed on December 18, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The instruction advises the jury that it is standard practice for witnesses to meet with lawyers (both Government and Defense) to prepare before testifying and that such preparation is not improper, though the jury may weigh it when assessing credibility. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00008695.
DOJ-OGR-00011689.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a judge provides preliminary instructions to the jury, emphasizing their duty not to discuss the case with anyone and explaining that all parties and counsel are forbidden from interacting with them. The judge also details the courtroom's specific COVID-19 safety protocols, which require witnesses and lawyers to use a Plexiglas enclosure with a HEPA filter when speaking.
DOJ-OGR-00011681.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, likely a judge's instructions to a jury. It outlines the sequence of a criminal trial, clarifying that only testimony from witnesses and exhibits constitute evidence, not the lawyers' opening or closing statements. The text emphasizes the defendant's presumption of innocence, stating she is not required to offer proof, and concludes by noting that jury deliberations are secret.
DOJ-OGR-00011634.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge and attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the logistics of maintaining witness anonymity in the courtroom. Specifically, they discuss preventing the public from seeing identifying information on counsel's screens while ensuring the government and jurors have access to necessary documents.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Epstein Victim Co... | witnesses | $0.00 | Witnesses receiving 'a lot of money' for claims... | View |
Statements from witnesses interviewed during the investig...
The Government produced statements for all witnesses interviewed during the investigation and notes that Giglio material may exist in notes of witness statements.
Preparation of Witnesses
Discussion of facts of the case and testimony prior to court appearance.
Responses to solicitation
Responses received by Edwards from the solicitation letters.
Epstein investigation
More than 60 interviews conducted with FBI case agents, their supervisors, FBI administrative personnel, current and former USAO staff/attorneys, current and former Department attorneys/senior managers, and former State Attorney/Assistant State Attorney.
Testimony regarding Maxwell's conduct
Descriptions of the 'playbook', grooming, and specific incidents of abuse.
Witness Conduct
Instructions that witnesses should not talk to other witnesses and their memory should be their own.
Witness interviews
Meetings between the government/FBI and witnesses where defense alleged manipulation occurred.
Cross-examination
Defense questioning witnesses about inconsistencies in their stories regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
Unknown
Contact resulting in witnesses stopping cooperation in a civil case.
N/A
Defense claims Epstein did not use internet, email, chatrooms, or phone to induce witnesses.
Experiences with the defendant and Epstein
Prior consistent statements about abuse, made well over a decade ago.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity