witnesses
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The jury
|
Professional judicial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defense lawyers
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Government lawyers
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jury
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. government
|
Protective |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged tampering |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
lawyers (government, defense, personal)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
each party
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Influential |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jurors
|
Evaluation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jurors
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawyers
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witnesses
|
Collusion alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional testimony |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
UN
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victims
|
Confidants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Associational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Victim Compensation Fund
|
Financial |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Cooperation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Trial | The document describes the procedural steps of a criminal trial, including opening statements, pr... | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal trial where witnesses testified and were cross-examined. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Palm Beach investigation | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination and cross-examination of witnesses | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conduct witness interviews and serve target letters. | New York, NY | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial Testimony (Trial Tr. at 2518–22) | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proffer Sessions | Lawyers' offices/Unknown rooms | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell trial proceedings, including peremptory challenges, preliminary instructions, a... | Main courtroom: 40 Foley, c... | View |
| 2025-11-01 | N/A | FBI interviews potential witnesses and victims. | Florida, New York, New Mexico | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Legal arguments are being made regarding a defendant's active participation in offenses, the suff... | court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A summation by Ms. Moe in the trial of Maxwell, arguing for her guilt. | Courtroom (implied Southern... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Opening statement | Ms. Sternheim delivers an opening statement in a legal case against Ms. Maxwell, discussing the g... | court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Trial | Court | View |
| 2022-04-29 | N/A | Criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell where witnesses testified. | Court | View |
| 2021-12-18 | Legal proceeding | Filing of Document 563, a jury instruction on witness credibility, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening statements in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | 40 Foley, Courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (implied 'morning' after Nov 28) | 40 Foley, courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | 40 Foley, courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (implied date based on 'will open in the morn... | 40 Foley, courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Opening statements and peremptory challenges for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | 40 Foley, courtroom 318, Ne... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Trial Testimony | Open Court | View |
| 2021-08-29 | N/A | Estimated Witness Departure | New York | View |
| 2021-08-24 | N/A | Estimated Witness Arrival | New York | View |
| 2021-07-24 | N/A | Trial prep with testifying witnesses | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016129.jpg
This document is page 19 of 106 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains standard jury instructions delivered by the judge, explaining that statements by lawyers, objections, and excluded testimony do not constitute evidence. The judge instructs the jury to rely on their common sense and life experience when evaluating testimony and exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00016128.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022. In it, the presiding judge instructs the jury on their fundamental duties, emphasizing that the judge decides the law while the jury are the 'triers of fact.' The judge defines what constitutes legal evidence—such as witness testimony and admitted documents—and begins to list items that must not be considered evidence, like lawyers' arguments, to ensure a fair verdict based only on the facts presented.
DOJ-OGR-00002242(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on December 30, 2020, outlines a court's reasoning for denying bail to a defendant. The court finds the government's case, supported by witness testimony and evidence linking the defendant to Epstein, to be strong, creating a flight risk. This risk is further substantiated by the defendant's substantial international ties, foreign property, and significant financial resources, leading the court to conclude that detention is warranted.
DOJ-OGR-00002174(1).jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the prosecution's argument against the defense. It states that three victims are prepared to testify in detail about the defendant's role in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal scheme to sexually abuse minors. The prosecution asserts that the victims' accounts are consistent and corroborate each other, describing specific techniques of grooming and manipulation used by the defendant, thereby strengthening the government's case.
DOJ-OGR-00019539.jpg
This page documents a protective order regarding discovery procedures in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It defines 'Confidential Information' as materials containing personal details of victims and witnesses, while explicitly excluding those who have publicly identified themselves on the record. It also establishes a mechanism for Defense Counsel to challenge the Government's confidentiality designations.
DOJ-OGR-00019538.jpg
This document is page 5 of a court order filed on July 30, 2020, for case 1:20-gp-00330-AJN. The order prohibits the defense team (including the Defendant, Counsel, Staff, Experts, and Witnesses) from publicly disclosing or filing the identities of victims or witnesses referenced in the Discovery process. An exception is made for individuals who have already spoken on the public record, or if the disclosure is authorized in writing by the Government or by an order from the Court, in which case the filing must be made under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00019527.jpg
This is a page from a legal document, likely a protective order from case 20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on July 28, 2020. It defines how materials produced by the Government during discovery are to be designated and handled as "Confidential Information," particularly to protect the identities of victims and witnesses. The document also outlines the process for Defense Counsel to challenge these confidentiality designations.
DOJ-OGR-00019526.jpg
This is page 5 of a Court Order (Protective Order) filed on July 28, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines strict protocols for handling Discovery materials, specifically prohibiting the Defense team and Potential Defense Witnesses from publicly disclosing the identities of victims or witnesses who have not already spoken publicly. It mandates that any court filings containing such identities must be filed under seal unless authorized by the Government or the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00019508.jpg
This document is page 7 (labeled page 6 internally) of a court filing from July 2, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines the protocols for handling 'Confidential Information' during discovery, specifically defining what constitutes confidential material and establishing protections for the personal identification of victims and witnesses. It also sets the procedure for Defense Counsel to challenge confidential designations.
DOJ-OGR-00019308.jpg
Page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, related to Ghislaine Maxwell) detailing the protocol for handling 'Confidential Information' during discovery. It defines such information as including the identities of victims and witnesses, while noting that publicly self-identified victims are not confidential. It also establishes a mechanism for Defense Counsel to challenge the Government's confidentiality designations.
DOJ-OGR-00017207.jpg
This document contains jury instructions from a legal proceeding, clarifying what constitutes evidence and outlining strict rules for juror conduct during deliberations. The judge instructs the jury that only witness answers, exhibits, and stipulations are evidence, and prohibits them from communicating about the case or using electronic devices and social media for any related discussions.
DOJ-OGR-00017206.jpg
This document is a transcript of a judge's charge to a jury, filed on August 10, 2022. The judge instructs the jury that they must follow the law as provided by the court, and that their exclusive role is to determine the facts by weighing evidence and witness credibility. The judge explicitly clarifies that statements made by lawyers during the trial are not to be considered evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00016987.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding dated August 10, 2022, detailing arguments concerning a defendant's involvement in offenses. The discussion revolves around the prosecution's theory of the defendant as an 'active participant' and the appropriateness of a 'conscious avoidance theory' instruction for the jury, particularly given the case involves children. Mr. Rohrbach presents counter-arguments, asserting that conviction remains possible based on the defendant's facilitation of offenses and the conscious avoidance theory.
DOJ-OGR-00008927.jpg
This document is page 3 (marked 'ii') of a legal filing (Document 600) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 11, 2022. It is a table of contents page listing sections on Phone Records, Property Records, Deceased Witnesses, and a motion for a Judgment of Acquittal based on the Government's alleged failure to prove the charges.
DOJ-OGR-00017265.jpg
This document is page 244 of the jury charge in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Instruction No. 55, advising jurors that witness preparation by lawyers is standard procedure and not improper, and begins Instruction No. 56 regarding redacted documents submitted as evidence. The page emphasizes that jurors should not speculate why other persons are not on trial.
DOJ-OGR-00017256.jpg
This document is page 235 of 257 from a court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text contains jury instructions ('Charge') regarding the evaluation of witness credibility. It specifically instructs the jury on how to handle witnesses who may have lied under oath, provided contradictory testimony, or who have a personal interest in the outcome of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00017255.jpg
This document is page 234 of the jury charge filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains specific legal instructions to the jury, warning them not to infer guilt solely based on Maxwell's association with wrongdoers. It also introduces Instruction No. 44, guiding the jury on how to evaluate the credibility, honesty, and demeanor of witnesses using their common sense.
DOJ-OGR-00017197.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features a rebuttal argument by Ms. Comey, arguing that witness testimony against Ghislaine Maxwell predating 2019 could not be a 'frame-job' because Jeffrey Epstein was still alive and considered the primary target ('big fish') at that time. The page argues that accusations made years prior invalidate the defense theory of a fabricated narrative against Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00014644.jpg
This document is a transcript of a judge's charge to a jury, specifically Instructions No. 55 and 56, from a case filed on August 10, 2022. The judge instructs the jury not to speculate about individuals not on trial, clarifies that it is normal and proper for witnesses to prepare with lawyers before testifying, and gives the jury full discretion in weighing such testimony. The judge also notes that some evidentiary documents have been redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00014637.jpg
This document is page 237 of a court transcript (filed 08/10/22) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions delivered by the judge, specifically addressing the use of pseudonyms for witness privacy due to media attention, and 'Instruction No. 45' regarding the credibility of witnesses and impeachment by prior inconsistent statements. The judge instructs the jury that prior inconsistent statements should be used to evaluate credibility, not as affirmative evidence of Maxwell's guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00014634.jpg
This document is page 234 of a court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions regarding the burden of proof, specifically noting that guilt cannot be inferred solely from association with wrongdoers. It also begins 'Instruction No. 44,' detailing how jurors should evaluate the credibility, demeanor, and honesty of witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00014589.jpg
This document is page 189 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, containing jury instructions (Instruction No. 5: Improper considerations) for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text instructs the jury to base their verdict solely on evidence and explicitly prohibits discrimination or bias based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or economic circumstances regarding Ms. Maxwell or any witnesses. It also defines and warns against the influence of unconscious bias and public opinion.
DOJ-OGR-00014586.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, containing a judge's instructions to a jury. The judge clarifies that only witness answers and admitted exhibits constitute evidence, not lawyers' questions or the judge's own rulings. The document also contains "Instruction No. 3," which strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone using any electronic devices or social media platforms during their deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00014585.jpg
This document is a jury charge from a legal proceeding, specifically Instruction No. 2 regarding the role of the jury. The judge instructs the jury that they are the exclusive judges of the facts and must base their verdict solely on the evidence presented, while also being bound to follow the law exactly as the judge provides it. The document clarifies that statements, arguments, and questions from lawyers do not constitute evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00011769.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the Judge ('The Court') and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding the logistics of providing physical evidence binders to jurors while maintaining witness anonymity. The Judge emphasizes that while jurors will know witness names, those names must not be published to the general courtroom.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Epstein Victim Co... | witnesses | $0.00 | Witnesses receiving 'a lot of money' for claims... | View |
Epstein investigation
More than 60 interviews conducted with FBI case agents, their supervisors, FBI administrative personnel, current and former USAO staff/attorneys, current and former Department attorneys/senior managers, and former State Attorney/Assistant State Attorney.
Testimony regarding Maxwell's conduct
Descriptions of the 'playbook', grooming, and specific incidents of abuse.
Preparation of Witnesses
Discussion of facts of the case and testimony prior to court appearance.
Cross-examination
Defense questioning witnesses about inconsistencies in their stories regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
Responses to solicitation
Responses received by Edwards from the solicitation letters.
Statements from witnesses interviewed during the investig...
The Government produced statements for all witnesses interviewed during the investigation and notes that Giglio material may exist in notes of witness statements.
Witness Conduct
Instructions that witnesses should not talk to other witnesses and their memory should be their own.
Witness interviews
Meetings between the government/FBI and witnesses where defense alleged manipulation occurred.
Unknown
Contact resulting in witnesses stopping cooperation in a civil case.
N/A
Defense claims Epstein did not use internet, email, chatrooms, or phone to induce witnesses.
Experiences with the defendant and Epstein
Prior consistent statements about abuse, made well over a decade ago.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity