University of Utah
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Witness (A)
|
Professional affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS (Deponent)
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker A
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Professional pro bono |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell
|
Employment |
5
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021863.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021863). It involves questioning by Mr. Simpson regarding the timeline of a written agreement relative to December 30, 2014, and references a 'motion for joinder' (Exhibit 2) that concerns 'other minors' in addition to Virginia Roberts. The text lists several legal entities involved in Virginia Roberts' representation, including Boies Schiller, Bradley J. Edwards, and the Utah Attorney General's office.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021844.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from the House Oversight Committee investigation (indicated by Bates stamp). A witness, who is a law professor at the University of Utah, explains a clerical error regarding a missing footnote in a legal filing ('Exhibit 2'). The witness clarifies that the Dean of the law school did not order a correction after the fact, but rather had previously suggested using such footnotes, and the omission was a simple word processing or copy-paste error that the witness voluntarily corrected upon discovery.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021843.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript (House Oversight Committee). A witness, likely a law professor at the University of Utah, explains that faculty members express personal views rather than university endorsements, specifically regarding 'crime victim rights.' The witness details a conversation with the law school Dean who suggested adding a footnote to legal pleadings to clarify this distinction and avoid misunderstanding.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021842.jpg
This document is page 19 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness explains a technical word processing error that caused a 'star footnote' to disappear from a legal filing (a joinder motion) near the University of Utah signature block. The questioner presses the witness on whether this error made it appear as though the University of Utah was endorsing the pleading, to which the witness begins to disagree.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021841.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or interview, likely conducted by the House Oversight Committee. A witness, who is a legal counsel affiliated with the University of Utah College of Law, is being questioned about why a specific footnote—clarifying that their use of the university address did not imply institutional endorsement—was included in one exhibit (Exhibit 1) but omitted from a previous pleading (Exhibit 2). The witness confirms they vouched for the document completely.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021828.jpg
This document is page 5 of a rough draft transcript from a deposition or hearing bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. A former judge is being questioned about their current pro bono work through the University of Utah and their admission *pro hac vice* in the Southern District of Florida. The questioning focuses on the witness's past judicial conduct, specifically whether they ever struck pleadings for being impertinent or scandalous; the witness recalls referring attorneys to the Bar in two such instances rather than striking pleadings immediately.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021827.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition, likely part of a House Oversight investigation. A witness (a former judge from 2002-2007 and University of Utah professor) testifies about their professional background and current affiliation as special counsel with the law firm Hatch James and Dodge. The testimony pivots to the witness's involvement in the 'underlying CVRA case' (Crime Victims' Rights Act), with the witness clarifying that this specific case is not being handled through their law firm.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014120.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3) of a legal filing bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014120. It lists the counsel of record, including attorneys from Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP (Sigrid McCawley, Meredith Schultz, David Boies), Bradley J. Edwards' firm, and Paul G. Cassell from the University of Utah (representing privately). Contact information is provided for each attorney, with some contact details (likely phone/email) redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022458.jpg
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022458', is a compilation of positive feedback and testimonials for the 'Inference: International Review of Science', a publication known to be funded by Jeffrey Epstein. It features quotes from several prominent academics and writers praising the journal, its editorial work, and accepting invitations to contribute. The document appears to have been used to showcase the legitimacy and academic standing of the publication.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity