Lara Pomerantz
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
12
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Won S. Shin
|
Co counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Appellant's counsel (filer)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Oral argument request | Request for oral argument in case 20-3061, with a preference for it only if another party also re... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court filing | The Government submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government filed its sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Filing of Government's sentencing recommendation conclusion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal document service | Christian R. Everdell served a memorandum via ECF upon four individuals. | N/A | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 661 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 660 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | Document 650 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 652 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | USA filed a MEMORANDUM in Opposition to the motion for a new trial. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-07 | N/A | Filing of Document 632 | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-07 | N/A | Filing of Document 632 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 635 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020419.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing filings and orders from April 23, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries, overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan, primarily concern letters and motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense regarding proposed redactions to documents and motions to suppress evidence. The judge grants several redaction requests from both sides, citing legal precedent to balance public access with privacy interests, and orders the redacted documents to be filed.
DOJ-OGR-00020418.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 21-22, 2021. It details legal maneuvers regarding pretrial scheduling, the severance of perjury counts from non-perjury counts, and the deferral of suppression motions. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants government requests for redactions to protect the privacy of third parties and alleged victims.
DOJ-OGR-00020417.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) detailing filings and orders between April 20 and April 21, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Key entries include Judge Nathan questioning the defense on whether they are seeking to adjourn the July 12th trial date, potentially until January 2022, and demanding a specific justification if so. The docket also covers disputes over redactions involving Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and motions to dismiss the indictment based on a Non-Prosecution Agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00020416.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering April 16-19, 2021. It details various filings including defense motions to dismiss indictments and suppress evidence (specifically mentioning 'Martindell' issues and protective orders), and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling an arraignment for the S2 Superseding Indictment. The document also notes the scheduling of separate trials for perjury and non-perjury counts.
DOJ-OGR-00020414.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 15-16, 2021. It lists several entries, including a motion by the defense to continue the trial date, an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redactions and the docketing of legal memorandums, and the Government's memorandum in opposition to twelve pre-trial motions filed by the defense. The judge also issued an order regarding the filing of reply briefs and procedures for requesting redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00020413.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between March 31, 2021, and April 14, 2021. Key events include the scheduling and rescheduling of an arraignment on a Second Superseding Indictment to April 23, 2021, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse. The document also details a denial by Judge Nathan of a defense request to allow Maxwell to possess materials in courthouse cellblocks, citing U.S. Marshal policy.
DOJ-OGR-00020412.jpg
This document is a court docket log from Case 22-1426, detailing filings and orders from late March 2021 in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment by the U.S. government, multiple letters and orders concerning redactions in court documents, motions related to subpoenas, and the payment of appeal fees. The log shows active litigation between Maxwell's defense team, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, and the prosecution, all under the supervision of Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020410.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from Case 22-1426, detailing legal filings and orders in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell between March 9 and March 24, 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's third motion for bail and several orders concerning the redaction and sealing of court documents. The docket also describes an order related to Maxwell's attempt to subpoena a law firm representing her alleged victims, outlining the legal procedure for such an action.
DOJ-OGR-00020407.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between January 25, 2021, and February 2, 2021. It details the defense filing twelve pre-trial motions, including requests for separate trials, dismissal of counts due to multiplicity and lack of specificity, and dismissal based on Sixth Amendment violations. The document also records a dispute involving the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and MDC Brooklyn regarding laptop access for the defendant, resulting in the Judge denying the BOP's request to vacate a previous order.
DOJ-OGR-00020405.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It details the denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, with Judge Alison J. Nathan citing her as a clear flight risk and affirming that pretrial detention is warranted. The document also lists specific charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice minors and sex trafficking, and outlines procedures for redactions to protect third-party privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00020400.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 detailing procedural filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It logs correspondence between the Prosecution (USA) and Defense regarding discovery deadlines, disclosure delays, and investigative files, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the USCA and the extension of discovery and motion deadlines into early 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020399.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 22-1426) detailing legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell between August 25, 2020, and October 6, 2020. It lists various filings including memorandum opinions denying defense motions, letters regarding protective orders, a notice of appeal, sealed documents, and an attorney appearance by Bobbi C. Sternheim. The entries record actions taken by Judge Alison J. Nathan, the defense, and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00018863.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 8, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and identifies the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present from agencies like the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00018599.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 7, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
DOJ-OGR-00016217.jpg
Cover page for a court transcript of the jury trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 10, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). Law enforcement representatives from the FBI and NYPD were also noted as present.
DOJ-OGR-00016111.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00015541.jpg
This legal document is a stipulation dated December 10, 2021, from a case in the Southern District of New York. It is an agreement between the U.S. Attorney's office, represented by Damian Williams, and the attorneys for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The parties agree that 'Government Exhibit 1009' can be admitted as evidence at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00015540.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. In it, both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, and the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell agree that certain government exhibits are authentic photocopies of pages from a larger exhibit. This agreement is intended to streamline the admission of evidence in court.
DOJ-OGR-00015539.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3) of a legal stipulation from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 28, 2021. It confirms an agreement between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team to admit specific Government Exhibits (1004, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16) into evidence. The document bears the signatures of Assistant US Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015537.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330 AJN). In it, both the prosecution and the defense agree to the authenticity of three government exhibits (11, 12, and 13), which are certified copies of birth certificates from the states of New York, Rhode Island, and Missouri. This agreement serves to enter these documents into evidence without the need for further authentication in court.
DOJ-OGR-00015211.jpg
This document is a signature page from a legal filing dated December 17, 2021, in New York, New York. It identifies the legal teams for a case in the Southern District of New York, listing Damian Williams as the U.S. Attorney for the prosecution and several attorneys, including Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger, as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00015210.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, agreeing to the admissibility of Palm Beach County School records. It confirms that witness Dominique Hyppolite would verify the records' authenticity and identifies specific exhibits (DH-1, DH-2, DH-3, J-2) related to a redacted individual and a witness identified as 'Jane'. The document itself is marked as Defense Exhibit DH-4.
DOJ-OGR-00015186.jpg
This document is a signature page from a legal stipulation dated December 6, 2021, in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It confirms that 'Defendant's Trial Exhibit B' is agreed to be received in evidence. The document is signed by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution team from the Southern District of New York (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach).
DOJ-OGR-00015170.jpg
This is a legal stipulation dated December 17, 2021, from a case in the Southern District of New York. The document is an agreement between the U.S. Attorney's office, representing the prosecution, and the attorneys for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, allowing a specific piece of evidence (Government Exhibit 1010) to be admitted at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00015169.jpg
This is a legal stipulation in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). Both the prosecution and defense agree that on August 17, 2021, attorney Robert Glassman told a prosecutor that he had previously advised his client, a witness known as 'Jane', to cooperate because it was 'morally right' and would 'help her case.' This document is marked as Defendant's Exhibit A-6.
Notice of Appearance
Formal notice that Lara Pomerantz is appearing as additional counsel for the Appellee.
RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order
Confirming agreement with a draft joint letter to the Court and attaching it.
Notice of Appearance
Assistant United States Attorney Lara Pomerantz files a notice to formally appear in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell and requests to be added to the electronic filing notification list.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity