| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Post
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal filing | The defendant's counsel made a public filing in a civil case referring to sealed materials from t... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3 | Offices of Boies, Schiller ... | View |
| 2021-03-25 | Meeting | BSF met and conferred with the Defendant's counsel regarding redactions. | N/A | View |
| 2010-06-15 | N/A | C.L. agreed to a continuance of the deposition. | Unknown | View |
| 2009-03-25 | N/A | Meeting between Plaintiffs' and Defendant's counsel | Unknown | View |
Service of subpoena for deposition, allegedly characterized as harassment.
Representation that the issue regarding the motion has been resolved and C.L. has agreed to a continuance.
Counsel communicated by email in good faith effort to resolve issues prior to filing.
Discussed scheduling a 2-3 hour mediation on short notice.
Counsel conferred regarding the relief requested but reached no agreement.
Plaintiffs' counsel conferred with Defendant's counsel regarding the request for enlargement of time; there were no objections.
Plaintiff's counsel conferred with Defendant's counsel regarding the request for enlargement of time and was advised Defendant does not oppose.
Undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Defendant... Defendant opposes this motion.
Pursuant to communication by telephone, Plaintiff's counsel has no objection to the request to exceed 20 pages herein.
Detailed numerous sources of relevant evidence in the matter and requested confirmation of duty to preserve.
Detailed numerous sources of relevant evidence to be preserved. Defendant's counsel did not respond.
Undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Defendant to resolve issues; Defendant opposes the motion.
Request for communications between counsel regarding abuse/recruitment; Maxwell objects as cumulative/duplicative.
Request for communications; Maxwell withholds based on privilege.
Conferred regarding the motion; Defendant's counsel advised they do not oppose the relief requested.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity