Jack Goldberger
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
49
Very Strong
|
99 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Lilly Sanchez
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Kirsty Mackenzie
|
Correspondents |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jennifer Martinez
|
Interviewer witness |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Correspondent |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jose Lambiet
|
Source journalist |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ASA Weiss
|
Conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant State Attorney
|
Professional conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Herman
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Belohlavek
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Belohlavek
|
Indirect professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Daliah Weiss
|
Conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Co counsel |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
My K
|
Communicated with caller recipient |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña and her supervisor engaged in phone and email exchanges with Krischer and Epstein's cou... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Krischer informed USAO's West Palm Beach manager that a resolution for Epstein's c... | West Palm Beach (USAO) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's lawyers sign a letter disputing a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Letter signed by Epstein's legal team responding to a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein passed a polygraph test regarding knowledge of victims' ages. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Legal investigation | A state investigation into allegations that Epstein coerced girls into sexual activity, leading h... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of a letter by Epstein's legal team refuting sex trafficking offenses | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein entered a plea deal, pleading guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring... | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Taking of a voluntary, sworn statement from a witness named Jennifer. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Taking of a sworn statement from a witness named Jennifer regarding an investigation into Jeffrey... | Palm Beach County, Florida ... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing | Unknown | View |
| 2021-08-26 | N/A | Telephone Conference | Remote/Telephone | View |
| 2020-10-11 | N/A | Privilege review of Epstein search warrant database identified emails from attorney Jack Goldberger. | N/A | View |
| 2019-03-14 | N/A | Circulation of negative press regarding Epstein's prosecution team among his legal defense team. | View | |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Article published in print | New York Times | View |
| 2016-11-02 | N/A | Jeffrey E. sent an email to Jack Goldberger and Darren Indyke containing a link to a Guardian new... | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-28 | N/A | Reuters inquiry regarding a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein initiates an email chain among his le... | N/A | View |
| 2012-06-14 | N/A | Deposition of Scott Rothstein | Ft. Lauderdale, Florida (Vi... | View |
| 2011-03-07 | N/A | The BBC's Today programme, via Kirsty Mackenzie, requested an interview with Jeffrey Epstein to a... | N/A | View |
| 2011-03-07 | N/A | The BBC's Today programme, via Kirsty Mackenzie, formally requested an interview with Jeffrey Eps... | UK | View |
| 2011-03-07 | N/A | The BBC's Today Programme, via Interviews Editor Kirsty Mackenzie, requested an interview with Je... | UK | View |
| 2011-03-07 | N/A | Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC's Today Programme sent an email requesting an interview with Jeffrey ... | N/A | View |
| 2010-01-05 | N/A | Proposed golf outing at Trump course. | Palm Beach (Trump Course) | View |
| 2010-01-01 | N/A | Golf at Trump course | Palm Beach | View |
| 2009-10-16 | N/A | Agreed Order signed by Judge Jeffrey Colbath deleting the 'mandatory public service' condition du... | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
012.pdf
This document is a Motion to Transfer filed on April 1, 2010, by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 103 in the US District Court, Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff seeks to transfer her case against Jeffrey Epstein to Judge Marra's division to consolidate it with other similar pending cases, specifically 'Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein'. The document includes a service list detailing legal counsel for Epstein, co-defendant Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and plaintiffs in several related cases.
024.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on May 29, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs request leave to file their response to Epstein's motion to stay under seal because it references the confidential Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), or alternatively, to unseal the NPA. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the legal representation for Epstein (including Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger), Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and numerous other Jane Doe plaintiffs.
022.pdf
This document is a legal reply brief filed on May 29, 2009, by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs seek to proceed anonymously in their lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that revealing their identities would subject them to harassment, shame, and further trauma, particularly given their status as victims of sexual exploitation as minors. The filing also discusses the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), statutory minimum damages under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and accuses Epstein of using the threat of publicity to intimidate victims into settling.
016.pdf
This document is a Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein in May 2009. The motion requests the court to order Epstein to preserve evidence related to allegations of sexual abuse, specifically citing evidence seized during a 2005 police search and other electronic/physical records located across his six international properties. The document lists numerous attorneys involved in related cases and references Epstein's previous guilty plea in 2008.
073.pdf
This document is a Notice of Agreement filed on September 8, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida court case Jane Doe 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff's counsel notifies the court that both parties have agreed to appoint Rodney Romano of Matrix Mediation, LLC as the mediator for the case. The document includes a certificate of service and a service list detailing the contact information for the attorneys representing both the plaintiff and the defendant.
056.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on June 26, 2009, by the attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101 in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The Plaintiff argues against Epstein's motion to dismiss, specifically contesting his claim that multiple violations of sexual exploitation statutes should be merged into a single count with a single penalty. The response asserts that 18 U.S.C. § 2255 allows for separate civil remedies and damages (minimum $150,000) for each distinct violation of a predicate offense.
048.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on June 9, 2009, by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101 requesting an extension of time and page limits to respond to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss. The request is based on an upcoming court hearing scheduled for June 12, 2009, in a related case (Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein) which addresses potential breaches of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The document includes certificates of conference and service, listing legal counsel for both parties, including Bruce Reinhart as counsel for a co-defendant named Sarah.
038.pdf
This document is a Motion to Reschedule Hearing filed on May 29, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Attorney Robert C. Josefsberg, representing Plaintiffs Jane Doe 101 and 102, requests to move a hearing scheduled for June 12, 2009, because he will be attending his 50th College Reunion in Hanover, New Hampshire. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the legal teams associated with Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and various plaintiffs in related cases.
035.pdf
This document is a legal reply filed on May 29, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs argue for the right to proceed anonymously, citing fears of harassment, public humiliation, and Epstein's alleged intent to intimidate victims by exposing their identities. The document lists numerous related cases and provides a service list of attorneys representing various parties, including Bruce Reinhart representing co-defendant Sarah Kellen.
028-02.pdf
This document is a formal legal letter dated May 15, 2009, from Robert C. Josefsberg of Podhurst Orseck to Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger). The letter demands the immediate preservation of all evidence, particularly electronically stored information (ESI), relevant to pending civil actions by victims of Epstein's sexual exploitation. It specifically references the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the 2005 FBI raid, and warns that failure to preserve data could result in sanctions for spoliation.
010.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Striking Docket Entry' filed on May 4, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, case Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff's counsel, Katherine W. Ezell of Podhurst Orseck, P.A., notifies the court that a previous docket entry was filed without a signature and has been re-filed correctly. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing numerous attorneys involved in this case and related cases against Epstein, including Bruce Reinhart (defense), Jack Scarola, and Brad Edwards.
008.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 101 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 1, 2009. The plaintiff agrees to the court's order to consolidate ten separate cases filed by various Jane Does and C.M.A. against Jeffrey Epstein for the purposes of discovery. The document includes a service list detailing the contact information for attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and the defendant.
EFTA00032238.pdf
This document is a transcript of the June 30, 2008, plea conference for Jeffrey Epstein in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. During the proceedings, Epstein pleads guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution. The transcript details the terms of the plea agreement, including an 18-month jail sentence, community control conditions, sex offender registration requirements, and the existence of a non-prosecution agreement with federal authorities.
EFTA00031937.pdf
A 2009 article from PalmBeachDailyNews.com details Jeffrey Epstein's release from Palm Beach County jail to serve one year of probation at his home without electronic monitoring. The article includes reactions from victims (Jane Doe No. 3 and No. 5) and their attorneys, who express outrage at the leniency of the sentence and fear of Epstein's wealth and influence. It also lists the specific conditions of his probation, including a curfew and restrictions on contact with minors.
EFTA00027591.pdf
This document is a transcript of the plea conference held on June 30, 2008, in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida, for the case of State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein pleads guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution. The transcript details the terms of the plea agreement, which includes an 18-month jail sentence (12 months on one count, 6 consecutive on the other) followed by community control, sex offender registration, and a non-prosecution agreement with federal authorities.
EFTA00026834.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2020 regarding a privilege review of an Epstein search warrant database ('Epstein SW returns'). The legal team discusses identifying and removing privileged communications involving Epstein's attorneys (specifically Jack Goldberger and 'Marty') and private investigator Roy Black. The emails also clarify that Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback represent the estate's co-executors, Darren Indyke and a redacted individual.
EFTA00014496.pdf
This document contains an email chain between a partner at Edwards Pottinger LLC and likely federal authorities (SDNY/FBI) from late 2018/early 2019. The correspondence outlines preparations for a new investigation or prosecution, including requests for victim lists beyond those in the original Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Crucially, it provides a comprehensive list of lawyers who represented Jeffrey Epstein, his pilots, staff, and Ghislaine Maxwell, noting that Bruce Reinhart (now a magistrate judge) represented the pilots and staff.
EFTA00014491.pdf
This Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report details the surveillance of a witness/victim by private investigators hired by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team in May 2006. It includes an analysis of phone records from March 7, 2006, establishing a timeline where a subject intimidated a victim via phone and immediately communicated with Epstein's assistant and corporate headquarters (457 Madison Ave). The report lists several corporations linked to Epstein at that address, including Ghislaine Corporation and El Zorro Ranch Corporation.
EFTA00014172.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Barry Krischer discussing the confidentiality clauses of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The sender informs Krischer that Epstein's defense team (Lefkowitz, Black, Goldberger) must be notified before any disclosure, specifically regarding a request or potential lawsuit from the 'Shiny Sheet' (Palm Beach Daily News). The email also notes that the defense has failed to file the complete agreement with the Court as previously ordered.
EFTA00014139.pdf
An email thread from July 2008 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (Southern District of Florida) and Colonel Gauger (likely PBSO). The prosecutor raises serious concerns about Jeffrey Epstein's work release arrangement, noting that the 'Florida Science Foundation' Epstein claimed to work for was only recently incorporated and located inside his attorney Jack Goldberger's office suite. The AUSA argues that Epstein sitting in his lawyer's office 'web-surfing' and ordering food does not constitute proper imprisonment.
EFTA00014109.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 24-25, 2008, involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys and defense lawyers Roy Black and Jack Goldberger. The correspondence confirms the Government's stance that a binding plea agreement with Jeffrey Epstein is signed and requires no modification, while internal emails discuss a '2255 issue' and the upcoming Change of Plea (COP).
EFTA00014104.pdf
This document contains an email thread between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida regarding the specific wording of Epstein's plea agreement. The discussion focuses on ensuring the state plea agreement complies with the September 2007 federal non-prosecution agreement (NPA), specifically requesting the insertion of the word 'imprisoned' to describe Epstein's six-month sentence. Goldberger confirms the change is acceptable.
EFTA00014102.pdf
This document is an email thread between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) from June 27-28, 2008. The correspondence concerns a 'Notice of Non-Compliance' and negotiations regarding the wording of Epstein's plea agreement, specifically the insertion of the word 'imprisoned' regarding his six-month sentence. The emails confirm a telephone conference where it was agreed that the state plea agreement complied with the federal non-prosecution agreement.
EFTA00014100.pdf
This document is an email thread from June 2008 between Assistant U.S. Attorneys and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Jack Goldberger and Roy Black). The correspondence concerns the finalization of Epstein's plea agreement, specifically clarifying language about his 'imprisonment' versus 'community control' and confirming where he would serve his time (PBC Detention Center/Jail vs. Stockade). The emails reveal that prosecutors were working with '5 girls' for a Grand Jury, that there was surprise regarding a lack of press coverage, and that law enforcement officials ('The Chief') were contacting victims regarding the upcoming plea hearing.
EFTA00014075.pdf
Email exchange between Epstein's defense attorney Roy Black and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the confidentiality of the September 24, 2007 (Non-Prosecution) agreement. Black thanks the AUSA for agreeing to oppose the disclosure of this agreement in civil cases, fearing it would be publicized to attract more plaintiffs. The AUSA requests a copy of the sealed state court filing from co-counsel Jack Goldberger to ensure consistency in documents.
Allegations and confidentiality
Statement regarding allegations made many years ago and agreement to remain confidential to protect collateral third parties.
Status of investigations into Jeffrey Epstein
Stated that Epstein had fully complied with his non-prosecution agreement and there should be no pending investigations.
Epstein's defense
He's never denied girls came to the house.
Status of investigations into Jeffrey Epstein
Stated that Epstein had fully complied with his non-prosecution agreement and there should be no pending investigations.
Epstein's Compliance
Stated Epstein fully complied with requirements and there are no pending investigations.
Status of investigations into Jeffrey Epstein
Stated that Epstein had fully complied with his non-prosecution agreement and there should be no pending investigations.
Release of sealed agreement
Defended fighting the release to protect third parties; stated Epstein abided by terms.
Case resolution prediction
Goldberger predicted the case would end without a trial within two months.
Case timeline
Statement that 'This case is absolutely going to end without a trial within the next two months.'
Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
Privileged - Redacted
Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
j
Re:
Looking for his name. haven't located yet
Re:
Looking for his name. haven't located yet
[None]
donald attnny?
[None]
donald attnny?
FW: Please forward
Jack Goldberger forwards an email from Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC to Jeffrey Epstein. The original email contains an interview request.
FW: Please forward
This email forwards a message from Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC to Jeffrey Epstein.
RE: Please forward
Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC's Today Programme writes to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request an interview with Epstein regarding circulating stories about him and Prince Andrew.
RE: Please forward
Kirsty Mackenzie from the BBC's Today programme wrote to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request an interview with Epstein. The purpose was to discuss stories circulating about Epstein and Prince Andrew, allowing Epstein to provide his side and better scrutinize what she calls 'speculative reporting'.
RE: Please forward
Kirsty Mackenzie from the BBC's Today programme writes to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request he forward a message to Epstein. The message is a pitch for an interview with Epstein regarding circulating stories about him and Prince Andrew.
FW: Please forward
Jack Goldberger forwards an email from Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC to Jeffrey Epstein. The original email contains an interview request.
RE: Please forward
Kirsty Mackenzie from the BBC's Today programme wrote to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request an interview with Epstein. The purpose was to discuss stories circulating about Epstein and Prince Andrew, allowing Epstein to provide his side and better scrutinize what she calls 'speculative reporting'.
RE: Please forward
Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC's Today Programme writes to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request an interview with Epstein regarding circulating stories about him and Prince Andrew.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity