Jack Goldberger

Person
Mentions
421
Relationships
39
Events
74
Documents
194

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
39 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Client
49 Very Strong
99
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
9
View
person Epstein
Client
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Lilly Sanchez
Business associate
7
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Unknown
7
1
View
person Kirsty Mackenzie
Correspondents
6
1
View
person Mr. Epstein
Client
6
1
View
person Jennifer Martinez
Interviewer witness
6
1
View
person jeffrey E.
Correspondent
6
1
View
person Krischer
Professional
6
2
View
person Jose Lambiet
Source journalist
6
1
View
person ASA Weiss
Conflict of interest
5
1
View
person Barry Krischer
Business associate
5
1
View
person Assistant State Attorney
Professional conflict of interest
5
1
View
person Epstein
Professional
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Herman
Professional
5
1
View
person Belohlavek
Business associate
5
1
View
person MR. EPSTEIN
Professional
5
1
View
person Belohlavek
Indirect professional conflict
5
1
View
person Barry Krischer
Friend
5
1
View
person Daliah Weiss
Conflict of interest
5
1
View
person Roy Black
Co counsel
4
4
View
person Assistant U.S. Attorney
Legal representative
4
4
View
person Roy Black
Business associate
3
3
View
person My K
Communicated with caller recipient
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Villafaña and her supervisor engaged in phone and email exchanges with Krischer and Epstein's cou... N/A View
N/A N/A State Attorney Krischer informed USAO's West Palm Beach manager that a resolution for Epstein's c... West Palm Beach (USAO) View
N/A N/A Epstein's lawyers sign a letter disputing a Times editorial. Unknown View
N/A N/A Letter signed by Epstein's legal team responding to a Times editorial. Unknown View
N/A N/A Epstein passed a polygraph test regarding knowledge of victims' ages. Unknown View
N/A Legal investigation A state investigation into allegations that Epstein coerced girls into sexual activity, leading h... Florida View
N/A N/A Signing of a letter by Epstein's legal team refuting sex trafficking offenses Unknown View
N/A N/A Epstein entered a plea deal, pleading guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring... Palm Beach, Florida View
N/A N/A Taking of a voluntary, sworn statement from a witness named Jennifer. Florida View
N/A N/A Taking of a sworn statement from a witness named Jennifer regarding an investigation into Jeffrey... Palm Beach County, Florida ... View
2022-06-28 N/A Sentencing Hearing Unknown View
2021-08-26 N/A Telephone Conference Remote/Telephone View
2020-10-11 N/A Privilege review of Epstein search warrant database identified emails from attorney Jack Goldberger. N/A View
2019-03-14 N/A Circulation of negative press regarding Epstein's prosecution team among his legal defense team. Email View
2019-03-05 N/A Article published in print New York Times View
2016-11-02 N/A Jeffrey E. sent an email to Jack Goldberger and Darren Indyke containing a link to a Guardian new... N/A View
2016-04-28 N/A Reuters inquiry regarding a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein initiates an email chain among his le... N/A View
2012-06-14 N/A Deposition of Scott Rothstein Ft. Lauderdale, Florida (Vi... View
2011-03-07 N/A The BBC's Today programme, via Kirsty Mackenzie, requested an interview with Jeffrey Epstein to a... N/A View
2011-03-07 N/A The BBC's Today programme, via Kirsty Mackenzie, formally requested an interview with Jeffrey Eps... UK View
2011-03-07 N/A The BBC's Today Programme, via Interviews Editor Kirsty Mackenzie, requested an interview with Je... UK View
2011-03-07 N/A Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC's Today Programme sent an email requesting an interview with Jeffrey ... N/A View
2010-01-05 N/A Proposed golf outing at Trump course. Palm Beach (Trump Course) View
2010-01-01 N/A Golf at Trump course Palm Beach View
2009-10-16 N/A Agreed Order signed by Judge Jeffrey Colbath deleting the 'mandatory public service' condition du... West Palm Beach, Florida View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017513.jpg

These transcript pages document the testimony of Scott Rothstein, who admits to using the Jeffrey Epstein case to further his Ponzi scheme when he needed an influx of money. Rothstein states he learned of Epstein's billionaire status through his partner Russ Adler and internet research. The testimony also covers administrative details of the RRA law firm, specifically how travel expenses were approved for various attorneys.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017491.jpg

This document is a four-page excerpt (pages 2-5) of a deposition transcript for witness Scott Rothstein. The transcript lists appearances by attorneys including Jack Goldberger (representing Jeffrey Epstein) and Jack Scarola (representing Brad Edwards). Notably, Darryn Indyke is present and identified as Epstein's in-house counsel. The questioning begins regarding a 'scheme' at Rothstein's firm that allegedly started in 2005 or 2006.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018021.jpg

This document is a court exhibit containing a printout of a New York Times 'Letter to the Editor' published on March 5, 2019, written by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (including Ken Starr). The attorneys argue that the number of women involved in the investigation was exaggerated, deny the existence of an international sex-trafficking operation or sex parties at his home, and assert that Epstein is entitled to 'finality' regarding his plea deal. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.

Court filing exhibit (newspaper opinion/letter to editor)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010542.jpg

This document is a page from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich'), marked as evidence by the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp 010542). It details the extremely lenient work release conditions granted to Jeffrey Epstein by Sheriff Ric Bradshaw, allowing Epstein 16 hours of freedom daily to visit his lawyer, his foundation, or his home on El Brillo Way. The text notes that associates Nadia Marcinkova and Jean-Luc Brunel were staying at the El Brillo Way property during this time, and Sheriff Bradshaw confirms that deputies entered the home.

Book excerpt / evidence exhibit
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010521.jpg

This document appears to be a page from James Patterson's book regarding the Epstein case, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the trauma experienced by a victim named Mary, who was harassed by private investigators from Miami and treated hostilely by prosecutors during a grand jury appearance on June 28. The text also lists Epstein's high-profile legal defense team, including Jack Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Gerald Lefcourt.

Book excerpt / evidence file (likely james patterson's 'filthy rich')
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010516.jpg

This document contains pages 174 and 175 from a narrative book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight records. It details events in May 2006 regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focused on State Attorney Barry Krischer refusing to recuse himself and the removal of Assistant State Attorney Daliah Weiss from the case. The text highlights conflicts of interest, noting that Epstein's new lawyer, Jack Goldberger, was friends with Krischer and that an associate of Goldberger was married to Weiss.

Book excerpt / legal narrative (likely 'filthy rich' by james patterson included in house oversight records)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028970.jpg

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by a Reuters reporter asking attorney Martin Weinberg about a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. The email is forwarded by Weinberg to Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger. The content of the attorneys' discussions is redacted under attorney-client privilege.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028968.jpg

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, among Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz, Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg) regarding a media inquiry from Reuters. David Ingram of Reuters contacted Martin Weinberg seeking comment on a newly filed federal lawsuit in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The legal team's internal discussions regarding the response are redacted as privileged.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023049.jpg

This article from The Virgin Islands Daily News details the 'unusual level of collaboration' between federal prosecutors (including Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafana) and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team during the negotiation of his non-prosecution agreement. It highlights the exclusion of victims from the process, the 'VIP treatment' Epstein received in jail (including work release authorized by Sheriff Ric Bradshaw), and subsequent legal battles by victims like 'Jane Doe No. 1' (Wild) and Jena-Lisa Jones to invalidate the agreement. The document also reveals that in 2011, the NY District Attorney's office under Cyrus Vance argued on Epstein's behalf to reduce his sex offender status, a move that shocked the presiding judge.

Newspaper article (the virgin islands daily news)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011928.jpg

This document, authored by Conchita Sarnoff and bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp, summarizes reporting by The Daily Beast regarding the special legal treatment Jeffrey Epstein received. It details his lenient plea deal, the submission of a private psychological report by Dr. Stephen Alexander, and a $1 million payment to Jean Luc Brunel, whose agency MC2 allegedly recruited girls transported on Epstein's jets. It also includes a denial of ongoing investigations by Epstein's lawyer, Jack Goldberger.

Article / investigative report excerpt (likely from a congressional file)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013433.jpg

This document is a news article from September 20, 2009, detailing various aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's legal situation and the reactions of his attorney and victims. It covers his jail time, probation, the sealing of documents, ongoing lawsuits, and the police investigation that led to charges of soliciting prostitution instead of more serious offenses.

News article
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013423.jpg

A New York Post article from October 2009 reporting that Ghislaine Maxwell was served with a subpoena regarding civil suits filed by 24 underage girls against Jeffrey Epstein. The subpoena was served while she attended the Clinton Global Initiatives Conference. The article also notes subpoenas and depositions involving Epstein's brother Mark Epstein and associate Nadia Marcinkova, and mentions Epstein's ownership of the MC2 modeling agency.

News article (web printout)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013421.jpg

This document is a LexisNexis reprint of a June 25, 2009, Palm Beach Daily News article regarding an upcoming judicial ruling on whether to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's federal non-prosecution agreement. The article notes Epstein's imminent release date from the Palm Beach County Stockade (July 22, 2009) and details the legal battle between his attorney, Jack Goldberger, who wants the records sealed to protect third parties, and victims' attorney Brad Edwards, who seeks to use the documents in depositions.

News article / database printout (lexisnexis)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013417.jpg

A printed webpage from The Palm Beach Post (dated 2011, article from 2009) detailing the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. The article highlights the tension between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, citing a 2006 letter where Reiter called the prosecutor's handling of the case 'highly unusual.' It also quotes attorneys discussing how Epstein's wealth allowed him to avoid federal prosecution through a 'back-room deal' involving high-profile lawyers like Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr.

News article / webpage printout
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031994.jpg

This document is an email chain from January 2015 in which attorney Tonja Haddad Coleman forwards a high-priority media inquiry from the National Enquirer to Epstein associates Darren Indyke and Jack Goldberger. The National Enquirer is requesting comment on an upcoming story alleging that Bill Clinton traveled with Jeffrey Epstein on Epstein's Boeing 727 to Brunei in May 2002 to dine with the Sultan, amidst allegations of sex trafficking ('white slavery') regarding the Sultan and Epstein's entourage. The email also notes a concurrent $1-5 million donation from Brunei to the Clinton Presidential Library.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.jpg

An email chain from August 11, 2009, involving paralegal Jessica Cadwell forwarding correspondence to Jeffrey Epstein and his attorneys (Critton and Goldberger). The underlying conversation is between Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding scheduling updates for a matter titled 'Jane Doe.' A specific update notes that 'Trump has been moved to Sept. 24.'

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029860.jpg

A 2017 Palm Beach Post article reveals that Jeffrey Epstein paid a total of $5.5 million to settle lawsuits with three young women (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) represented by attorney Bradley Edwards. The specific settlement amounts ($1M, $2M, and $2.5M) were disclosed in court documents after Epstein's attorneys compelled Edwards to answer questions in a related lawsuit. The document is stamped as part of a House Oversight Committee release.

News article / web printout (the palm beach post)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029835.jpg

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram contacting attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California federal court. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwards this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwards it to his legal team (Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger). Portions of the attorney communications are redacted as privileged.

Email thread
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029833.jpg

This document is a printed email chain from April 28, 2016, originating from a Reuters journalist, David Ingram, seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email chain shows this inquiry being forwarded rapidly from Weinberg to Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com), and then from Epstein to his legal team (Dershowitz, Black, Goldberger), with subsequent legal discussions redacted for privilege.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029831.jpg

This document is an email chain dated April 28, 2016, originating from a Reuters journalist, David Ingram, seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email chain shows the inquiry being forwarded from Weinberg to Epstein (at jeevacation@gmail.com), and subsequently discussed by attorneys Jack Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Roy Black, though the specific legal advice is redacted as privileged.

Email thread
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029771.jpg

This document, stamped by the House Oversight Committee, contains the text of a Daily Beast investigative report detailing ongoing federal scrutiny of Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Jean Luc Brunel. It highlights the FBI's investigation into potential sex trafficking, Brunel's role in sourcing girls via the MC2 agency, and the $1 million payment from Epstein to Brunel. The text also criticizes the leniency of Epstein's 2007 plea deal, noting irregular privileges such as the use of a private psychologist for evaluation.

News article / investigative report (house oversight document)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029627.jpg

This document is a printout combining an excerpt from a news article (likely The Daily Beast) with an online forum comment. The text highlights allegations of abuse involving underage girls (mostly 16 or younger) at Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, a $1 million payment to Jean Luc Brunel, and the recruitment of girls via the MC2 agency. It concludes with a forum post by user 'bruce' and a standard legal disclaimer associated with Jeffrey Epstein's email address (jeevacation@gmail.com).

Email / web forum printout
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029255.jpg

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit (Katie Johnson v. Trump) alleging rape by Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in 1994. Weinberg forwarded this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwarded it to his legal defense team, including Alan Dershowitz and Roy Black. The document includes a 'Privileged - Redacted' stamp, indicating sensitive attorney-client communication was removed.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025790.jpg

This document is an email chain from January 2015 in which attorney Tonja Haddad Coleman forwards a media inquiry from the National Enquirer to Darren Indyke and Jack Goldberger. The National Enquirer was seeking comment on a story alleging that Bill Clinton traveled to Brunei on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet in May 2002, accompanied by Epstein and two alleged 'madams.' The email claims Clinton dined with the Sultan of Brunei, who donated millions to the Clinton Library, despite allegations against the Sultan regarding human trafficking.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022211.jpg

This article from The Virgin Islands Daily News (reprinted from the Miami Herald) details how federal prosecutors admitted in 2013 to bowing to pressure from Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, led by Kenneth Starr, regarding the non-prosecution agreement and victim notifications. It highlights the disparity between Epstein's lenient treatment—including work release and a private jail section—and the severity of his crimes involving dozens of underage girls. The document also references the 2008 sentencing hearing, the FBI's unfiled 2007 indictment, and the frustrations of local law enforcement officers like Detective Joseph Recarey.

Newspaper article
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
42
As Recipient
17
Total
59

Epstein's Compliance

From: Jack Goldberger
To: The Daily Beast

Stated Epstein fully complied with requirements and there are no pending investigations.

Statement
N/A

Allegations and confidentiality

From: Jack Goldberger
To: Unknown

Statement regarding allegations made many years ago and agreement to remain confidential to protect collateral third parties.

Statement
N/A

Status of investigations into Jeffrey Epstein

From: Jack Goldberger
To: The Daily Beast

Stated that Epstein had fully complied with his non-prosecution agreement and there should be no pending investigations.

Statement to media
N/A

Status of investigations into Jeffrey Epstein

From: Jack Goldberger
To: The Daily Beast

Stated that Epstein had fully complied with his non-prosecution agreement and there should be no pending investigations.

Statement to media
N/A

Status of investigations into Jeffrey Epstein

From: Jack Goldberger
To: The Daily Beast

Stated that Epstein had fully complied with his non-prosecution agreement and there should be no pending investigations.

Statement to media
N/A

Epstein's defense

From: Jack Goldberger
To: The Palm Beach Post

He's never denied girls came to the house.

Statement
N/A

Release of sealed agreement

From: Jack Goldberger
To: Public/Press

Defended fighting the release to protect third parties; stated Epstein abided by terms.

Statement
2025-11-21

Case timeline

From: Jack Goldberger
To: Jose Lambiet

Statement that 'This case is absolutely going to end without a trial within the next two months.'

Interview/statement
2025-11-01

Case resolution prediction

From: Jack Goldberger
To: Jose Lambiet

Goldberger predicted the case would end without a trial within two months.

Interview
2025-11-01

Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein

From: Jack Goldberger
To: jeffrey E.

Privileged - Redacted

Email
2016-04-28

Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein

From: jeffrey E.
To: Jack Goldberger

j

Email
2016-04-28

[None]

From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Jack Goldberger

donald attnny?

Email
2011-03-25

Re:

From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Jack Goldberger

was it Rampell.

Email
2011-03-25

Re:

From: Jack Goldberger
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Looking for his name. haven't located yet

Email
2011-03-25

[None]

From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Jack Goldberger

donald attnny?

Email
2011-03-25

Re:

From: Jack Goldberger
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Looking for his name. haven't located yet

Email
2011-03-25

Re:

From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Jack Goldberger

was it Rampell.

Email
2011-03-25

RE: Please forward

From: Kirsty Mackenzie
To: Jack Goldberger

Kirsty Mackenzie from the BBC's Today programme writes to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request he forward a message to Epstein. The message is a pitch for an interview with Epstein regarding circulating stories about him and Prince Andrew.

Email
2011-03-07

RE: Please forward

From: Kirsty Mackenzie
To: Jack Goldberger

Kirsty Mackenzie from the BBC's Today programme wrote to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request an interview with Epstein. The purpose was to discuss stories circulating about Epstein and Prince Andrew, allowing Epstein to provide his side and better scrutinize what she calls 'speculative reporting'.

Email
2011-03-07

RE: Please forward

From: Kirsty Mackenzie
To: Jack Goldberger

Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC's Today Programme writes to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request an interview with Epstein regarding circulating stories about him and Prince Andrew.

Email
2011-03-07

FW: Please forward

From: Jack Goldberger
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Jack Goldberger forwards an email from Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC to Jeffrey Epstein. The original email contains an interview request.

Email
2011-03-07

RE: Please forward

From: Kirsty Mackenzie
To: Jack Goldberger

Kirsty Mackenzie from the BBC's Today programme wrote to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request an interview with Epstein. The purpose was to discuss stories circulating about Epstein and Prince Andrew, allowing Epstein to provide his side and better scrutinize what she calls 'speculative reporting'.

Email
2011-03-07

RE: Please forward

From: Kirsty Mackenzie
To: Jack Goldberger

Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC's Today Programme writes to Jack Goldberger, identified as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to request an interview with Epstein regarding circulating stories about him and Prince Andrew.

Email
2011-03-07

FW: Please forward

From: Jack Goldberger
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Jack Goldberger forwards an email from Kirsty Mackenzie of the BBC to Jeffrey Epstein. The original email contains an interview request.

Email
2011-03-07

RE: Please forward

From: Kirsty Mackenzie
To: Jack Goldberger

An interview request for Jeffrey Epstein from the BBC's Today Programme. The request is regarding circulating stories about Epstein and Prince Andrew, and the BBC wants to give Epstein a chance to respond firsthand to the 'speculative reporting' in the UK press. Mackenzie pitches the prominence and global reach of the Today programme.

Email
2011-03-07

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity