Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Counsel

Person
Mentions
172
Relationships
34
Events
237
Documents
81
Also known as:
Plaintiffs' Counsel Plaintiffs' counsel (Edwards and Cassell) Special Counsel Jeffrey Epstein's Counsel Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein All Counsel Counsel General (South African) Counsel General Nine victims who had previously retained counsel legal counsel at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) Government and Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) legal counsel Counsel (Comey and Sternheim)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
34 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jury
Professional
5
1
View
person Loftus
Legal representative
5
1
View
person The Defendant
Client
5
1
View
person Recipient of Information
Legal representative
5
1
View
person The President
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Legal representative
1
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
1
1
View
person The Court (Judge)
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Legal visits characterized by uncomfortable conditions, lack of privacy, and surveillance MDC Legal Visiting Rooms View
N/A N/A Meeting between Court and Counsel at 8:45 AM. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Trial sessions planned for Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday before Christmas and New Year's. Courtroom View
N/A N/A 10-minute break (Recess) Courtroom View
N/A N/A 9 a.m. conference regarding the jury charge. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Charging Conference (Trial Tr. at 2758–61) Court View
N/A N/A Jury Charge / Instructions phase of the trial. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Scheduled oral argument in both cases. Court View
N/A N/A Side bar conferences Courtroom View
N/A N/A Government Exhibit 10 is admitted into evidence. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Potential firing of the Special Counsel or Attorney General by the President. Washington D.C. (Implied) View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberation Scheduling Discussion Courtroom View
N/A N/A Reading of Jury Note regarding Count Four Courtroom View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberation/Recess Courtroom View
N/A Legal proceeding The Hearing N/A View
N/A N/A Protracted discussion regarding a jury note Courtroom View
N/A N/A Potential Evidentiary Hearing Court View
N/A N/A Guards setting up a tripod/camera focused on Maxwell during legal conferences. MDC View
N/A N/A Closing arguments in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Courtroom View
N/A N/A Counsel Meeting Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal conferences where Maxwell is separated by a cloudy plastic shield, cannot handle documents,... MDC Visiting Room View
N/A Trial A trial in which the jury is being instructed on how to evaluate witness testimony. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The Court and the Defendant's counsel discussed a note received from the deliberating jury. Court View
N/A Meeting A daily meeting scheduled for 8:30 a.m. beginning 'tomorrow' to prepare for voir dire. courtroom, 518 View
N/A Court proceeding The court is in session to discuss a note from the jury regarding their deliberation schedule aro... Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00011668.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. An unnamed speaker, likely the judge, details the logistical plan for the final phase of jury selection, explaining how 58 remaining jurors will be questioned for bias via a live feed and how counsel will then exercise peremptory strikes on a smaller pool of 40 jurors.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011537.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a court hearing on July 22, 2022, discussing factual objections and the calculation of sentencing guidelines. The Court, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Moe participate in the discussion, with the Court adopting PSR recitations and outlining the process for guideline calculation. The defense contends a guideline calculation of 51 to 63 months' imprisonment, while the government's contention is cut off.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017415.jpg

This document page, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, appears to be a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz) detailing legal work during the Apartheid era. It begins with a quote from 'Woody' (likely Allen) about blacklisting, then recounts the narrator's denied visa to South Africa, collaboration with Irwin Cotler, and secret negotiations with an East German lawyer to exchange client Anatoly Sharansky and potentially Nelson Mandela. It notes Mandela's refusal to be part of a spy swap.

Manuscript draft / legal exhibit
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012149.jpg

This document is page 8 of a legal memorandum from Kirkland & Ellis LLP defending Jeffrey Epstein against federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The text argues that the prosecution lacks evidence of 'inducement' or 'enticement' occurring over the phone or internet, noting that communications were often handled by secretaries and did not contain explicit content. The defense claims the women involved ('masseuses') were 'friends of friends' who visited Epstein's home voluntarily, often without direct prior contact with Epstein himself.

Legal memorandum / defense filing
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030263.jpg

The document appears to be a narrative report or excerpt from a book concerning the Mueller Investigation, produced to the House Oversight Committee. It details the Special Counsel's concerns regarding the President's absolute pardon power, specifically regarding a potential pardon for Michael Flynn in early June. It outlines the legal strategy the Mueller team prepared to argue that pardoning a witness to protect oneself constitutes a corrupt act and obstruction of justice, despite the broad constitutional authority of the pardon power. Note: This document pertains to the Trump/Mueller investigation and does not contain text related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Investigative narrative / document produced to house oversight committee
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446.jpg

This document is page 51 of a legal transcript, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Tein regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to a question, stating it has been asked multiple times and is harassing the witness, while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein defend their line of questioning.

Legal transcript
2025-11-17
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Plaintiffs Counsel $0.00 Obligation to pay counsel a reasonable fee for ... View
0001-07-01 Received Attorney General ... Counsel $0.00 Hypothetical refusal of the Special Counsel's b... View
As Sender
33
As Recipient
75
Total
108

United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Acting United States A...
To: Counsel

Discovery letter providing an index of materials provided to the defense.

Letter
2020-08-05
Communication Source

Briefing Schedule

From: Judge Alison J. Nathan
To: Counsel

Sets deadlines for Defense response (July 10) and Government reply (July 13). Orders defense counsel to file notices of appearance.

Order/memo
2020-07-08
Communication Source

Video conference access information

From: Chambers
To: Counsel

Instructions on how to access the video conference for the July 14 hearing.

Email
2020-07-07
Communication Source

Scheduling Order

From: Judge Alison J. Nathan
To: Counsel

Orders counsel to meet and confer regarding scheduling an initial proceeding, potentially remotely due to COVID-19.

Order
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Response to May 6 email

From: Counsel
To: Defense counsel

Responded at 5:41 PM, 35 minutes before filing letters, suggesting an impasse.

Email
2020-05-07
Communication Source

Confirmation on judicial intervention

From: Matthew J. Aaronson (D...
To: Counsel

Seeking confirmation that neither side would seek judicial intervention at this time in light of continued communications.

Email
2020-05-06
Communication Source

Discovery issues

From: Co-Executors
To: Counsel

Reiteration that Co-Executors would supplement responses.

Conversation
2020-05-05
Communication Source

Discovery issues

From: Co-Executors
To: Counsel

Advised that Co-Executors would be supplementing interrogatory responses.

Conversation
2020-04-27
Communication Source

Pre-motion conference

From: Court
To: Counsel

Transcript referenced where Judge Schofield advised against filing motion to dismiss.

Meeting
2020-04-16
Communication Source

Accepted: Call with [REDACTED] counsel

From: Unknown (Redacted)
To: Counsel

Scheduled call for 30 minutes. Class: X-PERSONAL.

Call
2020-02-20
Communication Source

Trial Preparation

From: Counsel
To: defendant

The document discusses the difficulties counsel faces communicating with defendants during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Legal correspondence
2020-01-01
Communication Source

Bail/Release Conditions Hearing

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Judge explains that while the parties agreed on release terms, the Court has final say. Discusses firearms policy of pretrial services.

Meeting
2019-12-16
Communication Source

Case Called / Introductions

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

The court calls the case, provides housekeeping instructions regarding the podium, and asks counsel to introduce themselves.

Meeting
2019-09-03
Communication Source

Legal Hold Notice

From: Counsel
To: Agency Employees

Legal hold distributed by counsel regarding INMATE DEATH litigation

Notice
2019-08-14
Communication Source

Trial Scheduling and Motions

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Judge discusses Speedy Trial Act exclusions, sets oral argument date, and tentative trial date.

Hearing
2019-08-06
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: Counsel
To: Counsel

Lawyers conferred prior to the hearing to agree on a proposed schedule.

Meeting
2019-07-31
Communication Source

Accepted: [REDACTED] counsel call

From: [REDACTED]
To: Counsel

Scheduled call for 30 minutes (14:00 - 14:30 +0000)

Call
2019-07-09
Communication Source

RE: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490

From: Pretrial Technician
To: Counsel

Confirming Officer [Redacted] has been informed.

Email
2019-07-08
Communication Source

RE: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490

From: Pretrial Technician
To: Counsel

Arresting agents have been informed.

Email
2019-07-08
Communication Source

Service of Court Document

From: Jack Scarola
To: Counsel

Certification that the response was sent to all counsel.

E-serve
2015-11-23
Communication Source

Sex trafficking information

From: Randall Roberts
To: Counsel

Roberts provided information discussing her sex trafficking by Epstein.

Information exchange
2014-12-01
Communication Source

Request for documents

From: Counsel
To: Mr. Dershowitz

Document request that went unanswered.

Document request
2013-01-01
Communication Source

Order Granting Motion to Exceed Page Limitation

From: United States District...
To: Counsel

Courtesy copies sent to all counsel regarding the order granting defendant's motion to exceed page limitation.

Court filing
2010-03-25
Communication Source

Conferral regarding motion

From: Counsel
To: Defendant's Counsel

Undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Defendant... Defendant opposes this motion.

Conference
2009-05-29
Communication Source

Victim Notification

From: Villafaña
To: Counsel

A letter sent on July 9 and 10 informing victims of Epstein's state court plea and the deferral of federal prosecution, and outlining their rights under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.

Letter
2008-07-09
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search