Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Court

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
New York State Court
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Harvey Weinstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008623.jpg

This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.

Court filing (table of contents for jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009579.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$555,318,320.00
97 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$555,318,320.00
97 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Fine for Counts 3, 4, 6 related to conspiracy t... View
N/A Received Esposito Court $9,800,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received defendant Court $500.00 Mention of fine for misdemeanors. View
N/A Received Karni Court $7,500,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Khashoggi Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Dreier Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Sadr Court $32,600,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Narrator Court $100.00 Fine for possession of magic mushrooms (negotia... View
N/A Received Ms. Maxwell Court $0.00 Judge intends to impose a fine. View
N/A Received Madoff Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
2022-07-07 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $505.00 Filing fee for Notice of Appeal (Receipt number... View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Criminal Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $300.00 Special Assessment due immediately View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2021-03-26 Received Boies Schiller Fl... Court $200.00 Filing fee for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (R... View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal 173. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-23 Received Maxwell/Sureties Court $10,000,000.00 Proposed 'eight-figure bond secured by real pro... View
2021-03-16 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $28,500,000.00 Proposed bond package. View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
455
Total
509

Def. Mem. at 35-36

From: defense
To: Court

Argument that Juror 50 repeatedly lied.

Legal memorandum
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mot. at 11

From: defense
To: Court

Defense motion arguing that the plea agreement should be universally binding.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Juror 50 repeatedly made clear that he could be fair and impartial.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Renewed motion for release on bail

From: defendant
To: Court

Defendant filed a renewed motion for release; Government opposes.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: defendants
To: Court

A motion filed by defendants that prompted the government to realize the significance of the note.

Motion
N/A
Communication Source

List of witnesses and victims

From: Government officials
To: Court

A list noting which witnesses testified at trial and which victims are still alive.

Sealed submission
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing arguments

From: David Parse
To: Court

Parse claimed he gave no investment advice and trades were executed by his assistant.

Sentencing memorandum
N/A
Communication Source

Count 4 / NY Penal Law

From: Jury
To: Court

Evidence of jury's misunderstanding regarding sexual activity in New Mexico violating NY law.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Motion to vacate/Rule 29

From: defendant
To: Court

Arguments regarding prejudice due to absent witnesses and pre-indictment delay.

Briefing/reply brief
N/A
Communication Source

Support/Character

From: Various unnamed girls
To: Court

Letters indicating the Defendant has significant ties to family and friends abroad.

Letters
N/A
Communication Source

Maxwell Br. at 29

From: Defense (Maxwell)
To: Court

Arguments regarding what deceased witnesses could have established.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Motions to Dismiss

From: defendants
To: Court

Approx 100 defendants moved to dismiss claims based on FSIA, lack of jurisdiction, or failure to state a claim.

Legal motions
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mem. at 44

From: defense
To: Court

Argument regarding probing Juror 50.

Legal memorandum
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Juror 50 answered 'No' to questions 25, 48, and 49 incorrectly.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Explanation of questionnaire answers

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Juror admitted answers should have been 'Yes' but claimed he 'flew through' the form and was distracted.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Agreement with Cosby

From: Bruce Castor
To: Court

Testified there was no agreement or quid pro quo.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Civil Litigation

From: Cosby
To: Court

Cosby sat for a civil deposition relying on overtures by Castor.

Civil deposition
N/A
Communication Source

Voir Dire Question 48

From: Court
To: Juror 50

Have you or a friend or family member ever been the victim of sexual harassment, sexual abuse, or sexual assault?

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Clarification on Count Four

From: Jury
To: Court

Inquiry regarding the second element of Count Four and the relevance of New Mexico testimony.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Maxwell Reply

From: Maxwell Defense
To: Court

Legal arguments regarding the jury note and the absence of a comma.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Gov. Br.

From: Government officials
To: Court

Government brief relying on trial transcript.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Evidence of fabrication

From: ALAN DERSHOWITZ
To: Court

Dershowitz filed documents regarding a reporter who believes Giuffre fabricated evidence.

Affidavit and transcript filing
N/A
Communication Source

Reply Brief

From: Government officials
To: Court

Contains allegations that the client is a flight risk and has been hiding out.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mot. at 13

From: defense
To: Court

Argument that the jury improperly based conviction on New Mexico abuse.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Waiver of extradition rights

From: defense
To: Court

Defense relies on two legal opinions (Def. Ex. U; Def. Ex. V) to claim defendant can irrevocably waive extradition rights.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search