Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Court

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
New York State Court
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Harvey Weinstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008623.jpg

This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.

Court filing (table of contents for jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009579.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$555,318,320.00
97 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$555,318,320.00
97 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Fine for Counts 3, 4, 6 related to conspiracy t... View
N/A Received Esposito Court $9,800,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received defendant Court $500.00 Mention of fine for misdemeanors. View
N/A Received Karni Court $7,500,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Khashoggi Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Dreier Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Sadr Court $32,600,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Narrator Court $100.00 Fine for possession of magic mushrooms (negotia... View
N/A Received Ms. Maxwell Court $0.00 Judge intends to impose a fine. View
N/A Received Madoff Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
2022-07-07 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $505.00 Filing fee for Notice of Appeal (Receipt number... View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Criminal Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $300.00 Special Assessment due immediately View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2021-03-26 Received Boies Schiller Fl... Court $200.00 Filing fee for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (R... View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal 173. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-23 Received Maxwell/Sureties Court $10,000,000.00 Proposed 'eight-figure bond secured by real pro... View
2021-03-16 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $28,500,000.00 Proposed bond package. View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
455
Total
509

Protective Order Arguments

From: Government officials
To: Court

Discussing exceptions for investigative purposes and balancing interests.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Renewed motion for release on bail

From: Ghislaine Maxwell (Def...
To: Court

Proposed a larger bail package and attempted to respond to previous denial reasons.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Testimony regarding abuse

From: JANE
To: Court

Jane testified that Ms. Maxwell cultivated a friendship, took her shopping/movies, and instructed her on sexual acts.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Opposition Brief

From: Government officials
To: Court

Gov’t Opp. Br. at 20

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Reply Brief

From: Schulte
To: Court

Schulte Reply at 6–7

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Arguments regarding Jane's testimony

From: defense
To: Court

Cited as 'Def. Letter at 2' and 'Def. Letter at 3'.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Statement of age

From: Jane's attorney
To: Court

Filing stating Jane was 13.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Government Memorandum

From: Government officials
To: Court

Cited as 'Gov. Mem. at 5', arguing Maxwell faces decades in prison.

Legal document
N/A
Communication Source

Inquiries regarding case 20-3061

From: Inquirer
To: Court

The document provides the phone number 212-857-8514 for inquiries regarding the case.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Government Brief, 08 Civ. 80736 (KAM)

From: Government officials
To: Court

A government brief cited as quoting the United States Attorney's Manual regarding multi-district agreements.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Brief regarding Epstein's NPA

From: USAO-SDFL
To: Court

A brief from the USAO-SDFL that is stated to contradict the defendant's allegation about the scope of Epstein's NPA.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Defendant's Motion (Def. Mot. 1)

From: defendant
To: Court

A motion filed by the defendant arguing that Epstein's NPA should preclude prosecution of co-conspirators in other districts.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Juror 50's answers to the questionnaire.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Motion to compel

From: Thomas (Defendant)
To: Court

Motion seeking disclosure of evidence in BOP possession.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Incident on April 24, 2021

From: Defense Counsel and MD...
To: Court

Exchange of letters regarding allegations that lawyers violated BOP rules by providing Maxwell materials during a visit.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Request for modification of protective order

From: defendant
To: Court

The Defendant filed a request to modify the protective order to use discovery documents for purposes other than the current criminal case.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire

From: potential juror
To: Court

The document refers to a previously filled-out questionnaire where the potential juror stated they had no unmovable commitments during the trial dates.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Renewed Bail Motion

From: defendant's defense
To: Court

A motion filed by the defense to secure bail for the defendant, which included letters and documentation.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Answer Brief in Giuffre v. Maxwell

From: Government employees
To: Court

The government's answer brief ('Ans.Br.') is cited as offering a 'halfhearted defense' and 'no explanation' for its inconsistent legal positions.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Sarah Kellen's actions

From: CAROLYN
To: Court

Carolyn testified that Sarah Kellen scheduled massage appointments for her and took nude pictures of her at the Palm Beach residence.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Sarah Kellen's and her own employment

From: Cimberly Espinosa
To: Court

Cimberly Espinosa testified that Sarah Kellen was hired between 2000-2002 as Epstein's assistant, and that she (Espinosa) was Ms. Maxwell's assistant from 1996 to 2002.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Sarah Kellen's role

From: LARRY VISOSKI
To: Court

Larry Visoski initially testified he thought Sarah Kellen was Ms. Maxwell's assistant but later clarified on cross-examination that he "didn't know what her exact job" was.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

An issue being raised for the first time.

From: Ms. Trzaskoma
To: Court

On May 15th, Ms. Trzaskoma handled a telephone conference with the Court where an issue was first raised. The witness, Brune, was out of the country at the time.

Telephone conference
N/A
Communication Source

Question about Count Four

From: Jury
To: Court

A jury note asked specifically about Count Four, suggesting the jury was focused on Annie Farmer's testimony regarding the Mann Act conspiracy counts.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Proposed Protective Order

From: defendant
To: Court

The Defendant submitted a Proposed Protective Order (Dkt. No. 29) which included a provision restricting the use of discovery to the defense of the criminal action.

Court filing
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search