Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Court

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
New York State Court
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Harvey Weinstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008623.jpg

This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.

Court filing (table of contents for jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009579.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$555,318,320.00
97 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$555,318,320.00
97 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Fine for Counts 3, 4, 6 related to conspiracy t... View
N/A Received Esposito Court $9,800,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received defendant Court $500.00 Mention of fine for misdemeanors. View
N/A Received Karni Court $7,500,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Khashoggi Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Dreier Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Sadr Court $32,600,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Narrator Court $100.00 Fine for possession of magic mushrooms (negotia... View
N/A Received Ms. Maxwell Court $0.00 Judge intends to impose a fine. View
N/A Received Madoff Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
2022-07-07 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $505.00 Filing fee for Notice of Appeal (Receipt number... View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Criminal Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $300.00 Special Assessment due immediately View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2021-03-26 Received Boies Schiller Fl... Court $200.00 Filing fee for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (R... View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal 173. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-23 Received Maxwell/Sureties Court $10,000,000.00 Proposed 'eight-figure bond secured by real pro... View
2021-03-16 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $28,500,000.00 Proposed bond package. View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
455
Total
509

Unknown legal matter

From: Defense Team (Brune/Tr...
To: Court

A brief that allegedly omitted material facts regarding a suspension opinion.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Question 48

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Answer regarding history of sexual abuse.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Gov. Mem.

From: Government officials
To: Court

Government memorandum cited by defense (Gov. Mem. at 4-5) regarding potential sentence length.

Legal memorandum
N/A
Communication Source

Knowledge of victim statements

From: DETECTIVE RECAREY
To: Court

Hypothetical testimony regarding lack of knowledge of what victims told USAO-SDNY.

Testimony (hypothetical)
N/A
Communication Source

Response to Motion to Strike

From: Witness's Legal Team (...
To: Court

Reference to a response filed opposing Dershowitz's motion.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Proffers

From: Government officials
To: Court

Oral and written proffers explaining allegations in the Indictment.

Written submission
N/A
Communication Source

Mot. at 3

From: Maxwell Defense
To: Court

Maxwell complains she has been in solitary confinement.

Motion
N/A
Communication Source

Complaints about pretrial detention

From: Defense counsel
To: Court

Focused on a series of complaints about Ms. Maxwell's pretrial detention.

Written submission
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing arguments

From: Defense counsel
To: Court

Referenced by the judge as distinct from the written submission.

Oral statement
N/A
Communication Source

Response regarding Government Exhibit 52 and co-conspirat...

From: defense
To: Court

Briefing due tonight.

Legal briefing
N/A
Communication Source

Court Exhibit #15

From: Court
To: Jury/Counsel

Contains the text: '... the flight to New Mexico where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity ...'

Court exhibit
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Ms. Brune's firm
To: Court

A legal brief discussed in testimony containing phrases that could be 'read differently' regarding the timing of a Google search.

Brief
N/A
Communication Source

Mot., Dkt. No. 390

From: defense
To: Court

Challenge to authenticity of Exhibit 52

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Letter, Dkt. No. 490

From: defense
To: Court

Reference regarding seizure of book

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Jane Doe Motion

From: Victims (Jane Does)
To: Court

Stating victims relied on U.S. Attorney's Office representatives to their detriment and would have objected to the plea agreement if they knew the facts.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Renewed motion for release on bail

From: Defendant (Maxwell)
To: Court

Request for bail with proposed larger package

Motion
N/A
Communication Source

Motion to Strike

From: Professor Dershowitz
To: Court

Reference to a motion filed by Dershowitz.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein

From: Robert Josephsberg
To: Court

Complaint detailing abuse of Jane Doe 102.

Legal complaint
N/A
Communication Source

Communications with the Court

From: Jury/Foreperson
To: Court

Instruction No. 59 outlines procedures for communications with the Court.

Court communication
N/A
Communication Source

Recollection of Bill Clinton

From: Virginia Giuffre
To: Court

Stated recollection of witnessing Bill Clinton on Epstein's island.

Affidavit
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection

From: Court
To: Juror 50

Question 48 regarding personal history of sexual abuse.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Post-trial hearing

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Sworn testimony regarding lack of bias and reasons for inaccurate questionnaire response.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Maxwell Reply

From: Maxwell (Defense)
To: Court

Arguments regarding the interpretation of the jury note and the absence of a comma.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Gov. Br.

From: Government officials
To: Court

Government brief relying on trial transcript.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Jane Doe 102 complaint

From: Bob Josefsburg (implie...
To: Court

Alleged that academicians sexually abused Jane Doe 3.

Legal complaint
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search