Court

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
New York State Court

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Harvey Weinstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008623.jpg

This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.

Court filing (table of contents for jury instructions)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009579.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Total Received
$555,318,320.00
97 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$555,318,320.00
97 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Fine for Counts 3, 4, 6 related to conspiracy t... View
N/A Received Esposito Court $9,800,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received defendant Court $500.00 Mention of fine for misdemeanors. View
N/A Received Karni Court $7,500,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Khashoggi Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Dreier Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Sadr Court $32,600,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Narrator Court $100.00 Fine for possession of magic mushrooms (negotia... View
N/A Received Ms. Maxwell Court $0.00 Judge intends to impose a fine. View
N/A Received Madoff Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
2022-07-07 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $505.00 Filing fee for Notice of Appeal (Receipt number... View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Criminal Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $300.00 Special Assessment due immediately View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2021-03-26 Received Boies Schiller Fl... Court $200.00 Filing fee for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (R... View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal 173. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-23 Received Maxwell/Sureties Court $10,000,000.00 Proposed 'eight-figure bond secured by real pro... View
2021-03-16 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $28,500,000.00 Proposed bond package. View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
455
Total
509

Deliberations

From: Jury
To: Court

46 jury notes submitted during deliberations.

Jury notes
2011-01-01

Service of Process

From: Thomas Marsigliano
To: Court

Stated he knocked on the door of 9 East 71st St on Oct 8, 2010, and a white male named Mark accepted papers.

Affidavit
2010-11-05

Motion for Leave/Protective Order to Redact Portions of T...

From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Court

Defendant's request to redact tax records.

Legal motion
2010-06-30

Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum Alfredo...

From: Jane Doe
To: Court

Plaintiff's request to secure Alfredo Rodriguez for testimony.

Legal motion
2010-06-29

Resolution of issue

From: Defendant's Counsel
To: Court

Representation that the issue regarding the motion has been resolved and C.L. has agreed to a continuance.

Representation (likely verbal or informal)
2010-06-15

Reply

From: Defendant (Epstein)
To: Court

Defendant's reply to Plaintiff's response.

Legal filing
2010-06-14

Response in opposition

From: Doe No. 2
To: Court

Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's appeal.

Legal filing
2010-05-27

Consolidated Rule 4 Review and Appeal of Magistrate's Orders

From: Defendant (Epstein)
To: Court

Appeal of orders dated Feb 4 and April 1, 2010.

Legal filing
2010-05-12

United States v. Tartaglione

From: Tartaglione's defense ...
To: Court

Letter regarding potential penalty phase. (Note: Date in document says 2010, likely typo for 2020 given context of other letters).

Letter
2010-01-13

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time

From: Defendant (Jeffrey Eps...
To: Court

Request to extend deadline for responsive pleading

Motion
2009-10-29

Court Appearance

From: William Berger
To: Court

Attorney William Berger appeared by speaker phone.

Call
2009-09-04

Court Appearance

From: Past Attorney
To: Court

Past Attorney appeared by speaker phone.

Call
2009-09-04

Motion to Compel

From: JANE DOE NO. 2
To: Court

Motion to compel production of various materials.

Motion
2009-07-20

Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence and ...

From: Plaintiffs Jane Doe No...
To: Court

Request for preservation of evidence

Motion
2009-05-26

Deposition/Prior Testimony

From: CAROLYN
To: Court

Reference to prior testimony given under oath in 2009.

Testimony
2009-01-01

Motion to Stay

From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Court

Epstein filed a motion to stay the civil proceedings (DE 12).

Legal filing
2008-06-20

Motion for Protective Order

From: Theodore Leopold
To: Court

A motion filed by a non-party attorney.

Motion
2008-02-05

Lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen

From: CAROLYN
To: Court

A 290-paragraph lawsuit that allegedly did not mention Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal filing
2008-01-01

Complaints against Epstein

From: Edwards
To: Court

First filing of complaints containing allegations against Epstein.

Legal filing
2008-01-01

Motion to Supplement Record

From: Plaintiffs
To: Court

Plaintiffs sought to add the 1998 article to the record against Prince Salman and Naif. The motion was denied.

Court motion
2005-01-01

Plea Agreement Terms

From: prosecutor
To: Court

Representation that the only agreement was that the Government would move to dismiss the two open remaining counts at sentencing.

Court representation
1982-01-01

Allegations against Dershowitz

From: Deponent (implied)
To: Court

Pleading indicating understanding that Dershowitz abused Virginia Roberts and other minors.

Legal pleading
0030-12-01

Jury Selection / Voir Dire

From: Court
To: juror

Reference to previous questioning that occurred on November 16 regarding bias.

Meeting
0016-11-01

Closing arguments in Bajwa vs Emirates NBD

From: Ruemmler and Isaacson
To: Court

Summaries of closing arguments; Isaacson appealed to patriotism ('USA! USA!'), Ruemmler focused on factual flaws in the plaintiff's case.

Closing arguments
0010-08-01

REDACTED Ltr. Motn Reply ISO Modification of PO

From: Defts
To: Court

Reply in support of modification of Protective Order

Letter
0009-01-01

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity