| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Harvey Weinstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.
This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.
This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.
This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $750,000.00 | Fine for Counts 3, 4, 6 related to conspiracy t... | View |
| N/A | Received | Esposito | Court | $9,800,000.00 | Comparative bond amount. | View |
| N/A | Received | defendant | Court | $500.00 | Mention of fine for misdemeanors. | View |
| N/A | Received | Karni | Court | $7,500,000.00 | Comparative bond amount. | View |
| N/A | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $0.00 | Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... | View |
| N/A | Received | Khashoggi | Court | $10,000,000.00 | Comparative bond amount. | View |
| N/A | Received | Dreier | Court | $10,000,000.00 | Comparative bond amount. | View |
| N/A | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $0.00 | Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... | View |
| N/A | Received | Sadr | Court | $32,600,000.00 | Comparative bond amount. | View |
| N/A | Received | Narrator | Court | $100.00 | Fine for possession of magic mushrooms (negotia... | View |
| N/A | Received | Ms. Maxwell | Court | $0.00 | Judge intends to impose a fine. | View |
| N/A | Received | Madoff | Court | $10,000,000.00 | Comparative bond amount. | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $505.00 | Filing fee for Notice of Appeal (Receipt number... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $750,000.00 | Criminal Fine imposed at sentencing | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $300.00 | Special Assessment due immediately | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Received | Boies Schiller Fl... | Court | $200.00 | Filing fee for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (R... | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | Court | $505.00 | Appeal Fee Due | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | Court | $505.00 | Appeal Fee Due | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | Court | $505.00 | Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal. | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | Court | $505.00 | Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal 173. | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | Court | $505.00 | Appeal Fee Due | View |
| 2021-03-23 | Received | Maxwell/Sureties | Court | $10,000,000.00 | Proposed 'eight-figure bond secured by real pro... | View |
| 2021-03-16 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | Court | $28,500,000.00 | Proposed bond package. | View |
46 jury notes submitted during deliberations.
Stated he knocked on the door of 9 East 71st St on Oct 8, 2010, and a white male named Mark accepted papers.
Defendant's request to redact tax records.
Plaintiff's request to secure Alfredo Rodriguez for testimony.
Representation that the issue regarding the motion has been resolved and C.L. has agreed to a continuance.
Defendant's reply to Plaintiff's response.
Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's appeal.
Appeal of orders dated Feb 4 and April 1, 2010.
Letter regarding potential penalty phase. (Note: Date in document says 2010, likely typo for 2020 given context of other letters).
Request to extend deadline for responsive pleading
Attorney William Berger appeared by speaker phone.
Past Attorney appeared by speaker phone.
Motion to compel production of various materials.
Request for preservation of evidence
Reference to prior testimony given under oath in 2009.
Epstein filed a motion to stay the civil proceedings (DE 12).
A motion filed by a non-party attorney.
A 290-paragraph lawsuit that allegedly did not mention Ghislaine Maxwell.
First filing of complaints containing allegations against Epstein.
Plaintiffs sought to add the 1998 article to the record against Prince Salman and Naif. The motion was denied.
Representation that the only agreement was that the Government would move to dismiss the two open remaining counts at sentencing.
Pleading indicating understanding that Dershowitz abused Virginia Roberts and other minors.
Reference to previous questioning that occurred on November 16 regarding bias.
Summaries of closing arguments; Isaacson appealed to patriotism ('USA! USA!'), Ruemmler focused on factual flaws in the plaintiff's case.
Reply in support of modification of Protective Order
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity