Jane
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jane's mother
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Matt
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Glassman
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's father
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michelle
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Association |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Incident | Witness saw Ghislaine without a top on for the first time. | by the pool | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Jane talked to Kate's lawyers. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Jane talked to Brad Edwards. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Alleged incident | The witness claims she, Epstein, and Ghislaine went upstairs to a room where fondling occurred. | a room | View |
| 2025-11-09 | Meeting | The witness's very first meeting with agents and prosecutors. | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Abuse | Jane was forced to do things she didn't want to do, which involved massage, by Jeffrey Epstein an... | a house | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Flight assistance | The Defendant helped Jane get on a commercial flight when she had trouble with identification by ... | unspecified airport | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Trip | Jane began traveling from Palm Beach to New York with the Defendant and Epstein. | Between Palm Beach and New ... | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Trip | Jane stayed at Mr. Epstein's eight-story mansion in New York when she was 14 years old. The mansi... | Mr. Epstein's eight-story m... | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Trip | Jane traveled with the defendant and Epstein to Epstein's townhouse in New York City and his ranc... | New York City and New Mexico | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Sexual abuse | Epstein sexually abused Jane on some occasions while the Defendant was present. | New York | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Sexual abuse | The defendant and Epstein began sexually abusing Jane when she was 14, and the abuse continued fo... | Palm Beach, Florida; New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Jane regarding past trips and a document labeled J-6. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Redirect examination of witness Jane, where she explains her reasons for speaking to a reporter. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A portion of a court proceeding involving the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The dial... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Redirect examination of witness Jane in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A court hearing, specifically the cross-examination of a witness named Jane, where procedural iss... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Jane regarding a discrepancy in her testimony about a trip to New Yo... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of a witness named Jane regarding exhibits, including her signature, photograph... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | Direct examination of witness Jane, as recorded in a court transcript filed on this date. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of a witness named Jane as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The examination focu... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Jane. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct examination of a witness named "Jane" in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, during which Government E... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of Mr. Rodgers regarding his observations on flights for Mr. Epstein, specifica... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | A witness named Jane is under direct examination. She confirms she is testifying under a pseudony... | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017549.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named 'Jane' by an attorney, 'Ms. Moe'. Jane testifies that 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell) was present during unspecified incidents that occurred when Jane was 14 and 16 years old. Jane also confirms that she began traveling with both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at the age of 14.
DOJ-OGR-00017547.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Jane. She testifies about group sessions or incidents where other females, older than herself, were present. Jane states that vibrators were used on girls' vaginas during these events and is asked if a person named Epstein requested any particular acts.
DOJ-OGR-00017540.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness named Jane provides testimony under direct examination. She describes being led by a man (contextually Epstein) to a pool house where he sexually assaulted her by masturbating on her. Jane explains her reaction was to freeze in fear and that she did not tell anyone because she was terrified and ashamed, but confirms she continued spending time with Maxwell and Epstein in Palm Beach after the incident.
DOJ-OGR-00017536.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Jane. Jane testifies that an unnamed male (implied to be Epstein) provided financial support to her and her mother, paying for items like voice lessons and clothes. She also recounts a disturbing conversation with Maxwell, who advised her that once she had a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, they were 'grandfathered in,' implying she could always resume it.
DOJ-OGR-00017521.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a trial on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness testifying under the pseudonym "Jane". The witness identifies Government Exhibit 12 as her birth certificate. Following a request from attorney Ms. Moe and with no objection from attorney Ms. Menninger, the judge permits the jury to view the sealed exhibit.
DOJ-OGR-00017518.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Mr. Visoski. Visoski denies having any significant past interactions with a person named Jane, including meeting her at camp, driving her from school, or meeting her family. He does, however, confirm receiving a replica Cobra vehicle from a Mr. Epstein around the year 2000.
DOJ-OGR-00017463.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Visoski regarding flights on Epstein's planes. The witness admits to not always meeting passengers and being unable to confirm if a specific person named 'Jane' was on certain flights. The questioning concludes with the witness confirming that Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, did fly on Epstein's planes.
DOJ-OGR-00017455.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski by Mr. Everdell. The questioning centers on three flights from 1996, 1997, and 1998, and Visoski's inability to confirm whether a woman referred to as 'Jane' was on them. The witness states they cannot distinguish between individuals with the same first name from over 20 years ago, especially without last names, and acknowledges there were other people in 'Epstein's world' with that same first name.
DOJ-OGR-00017451.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning establishes that Jeffrey Epstein had a home and office in Columbus, Ohio, near Les Wexner's home. The witness confirms being questioned by the government about a woman referred to by the pseudonym 'Jane', whom the witness recalls seeing on Epstein's plane on one occasion in the 1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00014534.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, specifically a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for the defense of Ghislaine Maxwell. The summation argues against the prosecution's case by citing testimony from pilots who saw no underage activity, a FedEx custodian who found no packages sent to accusers, and law enforcement specialists whose search of a residence and 40,000 photos yielded no incriminating evidence. The defense's narrative aims to demonstrate a lack of evidence for the grooming and sexual activity allegations presented by the government.
DOJ-OGR-00014512.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal summation by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022, arguing that a witness named Jane has an unreliable and 'contaminated' memory. The speaker presents evidence, including testimony from other witnesses (Annie, Larry Visoski) and a flight log, to contradict Jane's account of events involving Epstein's Santa Fe property. The summation alleges that Jane deliberately altered her timeline to make herself seem younger and that her memory was influenced by news reports and conversations with family.
DOJ-OGR-00014511.jpg
This document is a page from a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely in a trial related to Epstein. The speaker challenges a witness's testimony about Epstein's New York house by pointing out she failed to recall a major 1994 renovation mentioned by Larry Visoski. The speaker also argues that no government staff corroborated the witness's story or confirmed anything unusual, and introduces testimony from Cim Espinosa, who worked for Epstein and booked guests like "Jane" and her mother into his apartments.
DOJ-OGR-00014509.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. Menninger argues against the government's claim that a woman named Michelle is a random person, citing testimony from witnesses Jane and Michelle herself to establish that she is a specific individual who was friends with another person named Emmy. The summation aims to prove that Jane is not fabricating connections but identifying real people she encountered in 'Epstein's world'.
DOJ-OGR-00011698.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case, filed on August 10, 2022. Pomerantz alleges that an unnamed female defendant knowingly assisted Epstein in luring young girls by providing a 'cover of respectability.' The statement introduces the case of 'Jane,' who was 14 when she met the pair in 1994 and was subsequently invited to Epstein's Palm Beach home under the false pretense of mentorship and scholarships.
DOJ-OGR-00011567.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 22, 2022, is a transcript of a judge's explanation for calculating sentencing guidelines in a criminal case involving five victims: Jane, Annie, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa. The judge uses the 2003 Guidelines manual to establish a base offense level and applies various enhancements based on the victims' ages and circumstances, resulting in a final offense level of 27 for Jane and Carolyn, and 25 for Annie, Virginia, and Melissa.
DOJ-OGR-00011528.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 22, 2022, details a judge's decision to overrule objections made by the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The judge cites trial testimony from witnesses named Annie, Jane, Virginia, and Carolyn as evidence supporting the characterization that Maxwell and Epstein isolated minor girls and developed a multi-level recruitment scheme. The scheme allegedly began with Maxwell recruiting Virginia, who then recruited Carolyn, who in turn recruited others.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025668.jpg
A Goldman Sachs presentation slide, produced as document HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025668, detailing the potential applications of blockchain technology. The document outlines two main areas: financial market transactions (specifically reducing settlement times from T+2 to T+0) and identity validation/security (linking identity to payment credentials for anti-money laundering compliance). It concludes with a forecast predicting limited adoption in the next 2-5 years and broader acceptance after 5-10 years.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021653.jpg
An FBI FD-350 form containing a Palm Beach Post article from April 10, 2009. The article details a new civil lawsuit (the 12th) filed by attorney Robert Josefsberg on behalf of 'Jane Doe 101' against Jeffrey Epstein, alleging sexual abuse of a minor. It also discusses ongoing discovery disputes lead by attorney Adam Horowitz and notes Epstein's incarceration status at the Palm Beach County Stockade.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014092.jpg
This document page outlines the factual background for a motion to compel production of documents in the case Bradley Edwards vs. Dershowitz. It details Jane Doe No. 3's attempts to join a case regarding Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, her allegations of being trafficked to Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz, and Dershowitz's subsequent alleged defamatory media statements against attorneys Edwards and Cassell.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane | $200.00 | Payment for her time visiting his mansion while... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Jane | $0.00 | Settlement award discussed in the context of cr... | View |
| N/A | Received | defendants | Jane | $0.00 | Discussion of a plan to 'get more money from th... | View |
Unknown content
The content of this communication is the subject of the legal debate; Menninger wants to exclude the specific content while allowing the witness to state how she felt.
Benefit of testifying
Communication that testifying would benefit her in the criminal case.
Receiving financial help from Jeffrey Epstein
Jane told the witness that she had received financial help from Jeffrey Epstein. The exact timing and details of the conversation are not fully specified in this excerpt.
Request to take extra classes
The questioner refers to a letter the witness (Jane) had submitted asking to take extra classes the next summer.
Potential abuse in New Mexico
The document describes how the government repeatedly questioned Jane about abuse in New Mexico, despite her initial statements of having no memory of such events.
No Subject
A photograph was sent to Epstein with a note saying 'Thanks for rocking my world'.
Trip to New Mexico and sexual abuse
Jane previously told the FBI about a trip to New Mexico but denied being sexually abused there.
Initial meeting with Epstein
The witness, Jane, was questioned about a conversation with her younger brother where she allegedly told him she only met Epstein.
Initial meeting with Epstein
The witness, Jane, confirmed giving an interview to a news source about her initial meeting with Epstein, where she stated she was approached by him.
Names of participants in group massages
The witness confirms that she previously told the government the names of other women who participated in the group massages.
A document shown to Jane on the witness stand.
Jane communicated with Brian about a document she had been shown while on the witness stand. Ms. Menninger wants to know the full extent of this communication.
Question regarding testimony
The government communicated a question to Jane through her attorney.
Timeline of 'The Lion King'
The government communicated to Jane through her attorney that 'The Lion King' Broadway show did not come out until 1997.
Information for the government
Jane communicated information to Mr. Glassman with the knowledge that he intended to share it with the government.
Photographs from soap opera
Jane, a soap opera star, sent photographs of herself and other cast members in an envelope to her fan, Ms. Espinosa.
Legal Strategy
Communications regarding the impact of criminal testimony on the civil case.
Confirming Maxwell's identity
After Matt learned that Maxwell had been arrested, he called Jane to ask if she was the woman Jane had told him about years ago. Jane confirmed that she was.
Harassment
People calling and harassing Jane.
Jane's family living in her house
The witness is questioned about telling Matt that her family was living in her house.
A woman making her feel comfortable
Jane told her boyfriend from a decade ago, Matt, about the woman who would make her feel comfortable in the room.
Advice about boyfriends
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Abuse suffered in New Mexico
Maxwell received notes from Jane's interview, which recorded the abuse she suffered in New Mexico, over three weeks before her trial.
Making arrangements
The questioner alleges that the witness, Jane, previously told the government she recalled Emmy calling her home phone in Florida between the ages of 14 and 16 to make arrangements. The witness denies ever making this statement.
Involvement in sexualized massages
Jane testified to the government that she was involved in sexualized massages with multiple people and provided their first names.
The case
The speaker states, 'You heard that Jane and Annie gave some interviews themselves...'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity