| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Source of anger disagreement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Hillary Clinton
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Hillary Clinton
|
Visited residence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
President Clinton
|
Visited residence |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
JPMorgan Private Bank
|
Account holder bank |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
He (unnamed individual)
|
Subject of discussion recipient of deal |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
him
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
him
|
Past frequent communication then stopped infrequent |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
him
|
Antagonistic disinterested |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed ex-wife of Ghislaine Maxwell's ex-husband
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirator in sexual abuse of minors |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Epstein continuing and her responsibilitie... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Jeffrey Epstein's involvement in managing the lives of people, specifically maki... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell began looking for real estate for her dad and Epstein asked for help finding an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Family businesses were lost after Ghislaine Maxwell's father's passing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked Ghislaine Maxwell to continue helping him (find a house, etc.) after her father's d... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell states no one from the government had spoken to her about her case or Mr. Epste... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Reid (potentially Reid Hoffman) being a 'Silicon Valley guy' and how Ghislaine M... | San Francisco (mentioned) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about her relationship with Mr. Epstein being separate from her oth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about whether Mr. Epstein had a relationship with Reid Hoffman. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about observing Reid Hoffman flying with her or Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell introducing a masseuse (DOJ REDACTION) to Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's efforts to find masseuses for Jeffrey Epstein, including visiting legitimate ... | Massage spas, Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lack of knowledge about law enforcement interest in her. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Ghislaine Maxwell and Ms. Mills, after President Clinton left office. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Social parties hosted by Mr. Epstein where young women, characterized as masseuses, were guests o... | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell attending weddings of famous people with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conversation between Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche regarding past events, specifically massa... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Mr. Epstein's non-prosecution deal made by the U.S. Attorney in Florida. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the S1 superseding... | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returned a second (S2) superseding indictment. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Business meetings on a plane involving Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wexner, attended by Ghislaine Maxw... | on the plane | View |
| N/A | N/A | Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell discusses finding a house for rent for someone in New York, which she initially... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein's financial success and how he accumulated his money. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein's past as a math teacher at Dalton and his work at Bear Stearns. | N/A | View |
This document is a legal brief filed on March 29, 2021, by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. The brief argues against designating Ghislaine Maxwell's lawsuit for legal fee indemnification as 'complex' litigation and opposes consolidating it with a separate government 'CICO action' (Case No. ST-2020-CV-00014). The Executors contend that Maxwell's case is a simple single-issue dispute, whereas the CICO action involves complex allegations of a multi-decade criminal enterprise.
A 'Notice of Entry of Order' filed on March 17, 2021, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands (Case ST-2020-CV-00155). The document notifies attorneys Kyle R. Waldner, Christopher A. Kroblin, and Ariel M. Smith that an order was entered in the debt case between Plaintiff Ghislaine Maxwell and the Defendants, the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein.
A 'Notice of Entry of an Order' filed on February 11, 2021, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands for Case No. ST-2020-CV-00155. The case involves Ghislaine Maxwell (Plaintiff) suing the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (Defendant) in an action regarding 'Debt'. The document notifies attorney Kyle R. Waldner and Judge Harold W.L. Willocks that an order was entered on that date.
This is a Reply Brief filed by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in response to a lawsuit by Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is suing the Estate and NES, LLC for indemnification (payment of her legal fees) related to her criminal and civil cases in New York. The Co-Executors argue the case should be dismissed because: 1) The claim is 'unripe' as her underlying guilt or innocence hasn't been established; 2) Public policy forbids indemnifying criminal conduct; 3) The NES Operating Agreement explicitly allows the company to decline indemnification; and 4) The Statute of Frauds bars claims based on alleged oral promises.
This document is a Reply Brief filed by the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands supporting its motion to intervene in Ghislaine Maxwell's lawsuit against the Epstein Estate. The Government argues it must intervene to prevent the dissipation of Estate assets, which Maxwell seeks for her legal defense, because those assets are needed to satisfy potential judgments in the Government's separate 'CICO' (racketeering) enforcement action against the Estate. The brief reveals that the Estate is actively paying legal fees for other associates, including an immigration attorney suspected of obtaining visas for trafficking victims.
This document is a 'Notice of Entry' from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, dated August 3, 2020. It notifies attorneys Kyle R. Waldner and Denise George that two orders were entered on that date regarding Case Number ST-2020-CV-00155, a debt action filed by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein.
This document is a legal stipulation filed on July 30, 2020, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands (Case ST-20-CV-155). It represents an agreement between Ghislaine Maxwell (Plaintiff) and the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands (Proposed Intervenor) to extend the deadline for Maxwell to respond to the Government's Motion to Intervene until August 17, 2020. The document lists the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and his executors, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as defendants.
This document is a Motion to Intervene filed by the Government of the US Virgin Islands in a civil case brought by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The Government seeks to intervene to prevent Maxwell from using the Estate's assets to pay for her legal defense (indemnification), arguing that those assets should be preserved to satisfy a potential judgment in the Government's separate CICO (racketeering) lawsuit against the Estate. The document details Maxwell's evasion of subpoenas prior to her arrest, the Government's interest in the Estate's assets for victim restitution and penalties, and the allegation that Maxwell and the Estate are colluding rather than being true adversaries. While flight logs are mentioned as existing evidence of trafficking, no specific flight records are contained within this specific motion.
A 'Notice of Entry of Order' filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands on May 11, 2020. The document notifies attorneys Kyle R. Waldner and Christopher A. Kroblin that an order was entered on May 9, 2020, in the debt case (ST-2020-CV-00155) where Ghislaine Maxwell is suing the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein.
A court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated May 9, 2020, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell vs. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Judge Michael C. Dunston orders the plaintiff to respond to a Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Indykes and Kahn by June 1, 2020, with a subsequent reply deadline for the defendants set for June 15, 2020.
A docketing letter from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated March 24, 2020, informing attorney Kyle R. Waldner that Ghislaine Maxwell's debt petition against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein has been filed. The case is assigned number ST-2020-CV-00155 and presided over by Judge Michael C. Dunston.
This document is a civil complaint filed on March 12, 2020, by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and its executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, as well as NES, LLC. Maxwell seeks indemnification for legal fees, security costs, and safe accommodation expenses she has incurred due to her prior employment with Epstein. The complaint alleges that Epstein repeatedly promised, both verbally and in writing (specifically in a 2004 letter), to support Maxwell financially and indemnify her, a practice he reportedly maintained during previous lawsuits in 2009 and 2017.
This affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards details difficulties in discovery for a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 10-81111). It alleges that key witnesses Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. Crucially, it lists specific individuals for whom Epstein paid legal fees to prevent them from testifying against him, explicitly labeling Sarah Kellen as a 'procurer of girls' and Nadia Marcinkova as a 'live-in sex slave', while also identifying his personal pilots and household staff.
This document is a Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of Process. The plaintiff, M.J., argues that service was properly effected on October 8, 2010, when a private investigator handed the papers to an employee named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York mansion. The filing accuses Epstein and his associate Richard Barnett of fraud and perjury for submitting an affidavit claiming service never occurred, and details a pattern of obstruction by Epstein and his associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel) in similar civil cases.
Affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards in Case 10-81111 detailing obstruction tactics by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. The document asserts that Jean Luc Brunel visited Epstein 67 times in jail and that both Brunel and Ghislaine Maxwell evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. It explicitly lists Epstein's inner circle (including pilots and household staff like Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova) and notes that Epstein paid for their legal counsel to control their testimony.
This document contains a Motion for Protective Order filed by Igor Zinoview and Jeffrey Epstein to limit the scope of depositions in a civil case. Zinoview asserts via affidavit that he only began working for Epstein in November 2005, after the alleged events, and thus has no relevant knowledge. The filing also includes excerpts from the depositions of Epstein's pilots, Larry Visoski and Larry Eugene Morrison, where they are questioned about their personal beliefs regarding the sexual abuse allegations and whether they would trust Epstein with their own daughters. Flight logs and passenger manifests are referenced in the deposition indexes ('PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 FLIGHT LOG BOOK' and 'JEGE, Inc., Passenger Manifest') but the actual log content is not present in these specific pages.
This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm, to Judge Debra Freeman, requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Epstein's lawyer and accountant) to produce discovery documents and respond to interrogatories. The letter details Defendants' failure to comply with discovery obligations, including not producing any documents and improperly limiting the relevant time period for discovery, despite allegations that Jeffrey Epstein operated a decades-long sex-trafficking scheme and sexually assaulted the Plaintiff in 2002.
This document is a legal complaint filed by Teresa Helm against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, alleging sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein and his co-conspirators. The complaint details Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network, previous legal proceedings, and his personal statements regarding his actions, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
This document is the formal Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) in response to a civil complaint by Annie Farmer. The executors generally deny knowledge of the specific allegations of abuse but admit to certain procedural facts, such as Epstein's arrest date (July 6, 2019), death date (August 10, 2019), and property ownership in NY, NM, USVI, FL, and France. They assert ten affirmative defenses, including failure to state a claim, contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and statute of limitations arguments challenging the New York Child Victims' Act.
This is an amended complaint filed by Maria Farmer against the executors of Jeffrey Edward Epstein's estate. Farmer alleges that Epstein sexually assaulted and trafficked her, and that his actions were part of a larger sex trafficking network. The complaint details Epstein's history of sexual abuse, his lenient 2008 plea deal, and the intimidation tactics used to silence victims.
This document is a letter from Maria Farmer's legal counsel to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald opposing Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene in the case *Farmer v. Indyke et al.*. Dershowitz sought to intervene to strike Paragraph 39 of Farmer's complaint, which alleges that Farmer, while working at Epstein's NY mansion, saw Dershowitz go upstairs while young girls were present. The letter argues that Dershowitz has no right to intervene, that the allegations are relevant to the sex-trafficking conspiracy and Farmer's silence, and that the motion to strike is meritless.
This document is a letter from Alan Dershowitz's legal counsel to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald requesting a pre-motion conference to intervene in the civil case 'Maria Farmer v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein'. Dershowitz seeks to strike paragraph 39 of Farmer's complaint, which alleges she saw him at Epstein's New York mansion going upstairs with young girls brought by Ghislaine Maxwell. Dershowitz argues this allegation is demonstrably false based on chronology (claiming he didn't meet Epstein until after Farmer left) and is legally irrelevant to the estate case, serving only to defame him.
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 5, 2017, and filed on June 6, 2017. Judge Robert W. Sweet orders the termination of the case (17 Mc. 25) between Bradley J. Edwards and Ghislaine Maxwell following the resolution of a motion to quash a subpoena via a sealed opinion dated April 4, 2017.
This court document from April 7, 2017, details a 'Notice of Submission of Witness Solicitation Materials' filed in the case of Bradley J. Edwards v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre submitted witness solicitation materials for in camera review as per a March 23, 2017, court ruling. The document also includes a certificate of service, confirming electronic filing and service to attorneys Laura A. Menninger and Jeffrey S. Pagliuca.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Trust/Spouse | $0.00 | Transfers characterized by government as 'funne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Annie | $0.00 | Purchase of cowboy boots during shopping trip | View |
| N/A | Received | Trust Fund | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $80,000.00 | Annual income from trust fund | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Finances received by Maxwell for participating ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $30,000,000.00 | Total amount Maxwell received from Epstein acco... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of huge black helicopter. | View |
| N/A | Received | buyer | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Proceeds from the sale of Ms. Maxwell's London ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $0.00 | Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Clerk of the Cour... | $300.00 | Lump sum payment of criminal monetary penalties. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of a large townhouse for Ms. Maxwell. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Airline/Travel pr... | $0.00 | Flew to France at her own expense to help mother. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of helicopter, homes in NY and London,... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $750,000.00 | Fine imposed by District Court | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $300.00 | Mandatory special assessment | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | The Terramar Project | $0.00 | Ghislaine devoted her own financial resources t... | View |
| N/A | Received | A. Farmer | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Witness filed a civil lawsuit seeking damages a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Buying a helicopter and paying for flight lessons. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Trust/Spouse | $0.00 | Transfers to a trust/spouse characterized by go... | View |
| N/A | Received | Lender (implied) | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Significant loans procured on the basis of a ne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of a helicopter, homes in NY and Londo... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $0.00 | Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Henri Bendel | $0.00 | Purchases made at the store which led to the de... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
My experience of Jeffrey, is of a thoughtful, kind, generous loving man, with a keen sense of humor and a ready smile...
Discussion regarding whether Epstein committed suicide or was killed, and the cost of violence in prison.
Maxwell states that no one from the government had spoken to her since the inception of the case (early 2000s) until her indictment. She claims her attorneys informed the government of her willingness to meet and answer questions, but it wasn't happening.
Discussion regarding whether Epstein was murdered by outside forces to silence him.
Ghislaine Maxwell discusses an institute in New Mexico and then details her father's involvement in scientific publishing, his service in WWII including winning a military cross, his intelligence work interrogating German scientists and POWs, and his subsequent transition into business. Todd Blanche acknowledges with 'Okay'.
A discussion about an agreement providing protection and immunity, with exceptions for false statements. Participants include Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche. The FBI and Agent Horn are mentioned.
Ghislaine Maxwell discusses Epstein's investment strategies, payment from Wexner, and whether he was a business partner. She mentions Epstein told her he would take a flat percentage if he saved someone $5 billion.
Todd Blanche asks Ghislaine Maxwell about when her relationship with Epstein changed post-2000 and if Epstein met members of the Royal Family. Maxwell confirms he did, but states she has forgotten the exact timing, and mentions Epstein knew high society people in London, including Princess Diana's best friend, Rosa Monckton, and her husband, Dominic Lawson.
Ghislaine Maxwell emailed 'him' for details, especially when there was legal drama or serious press attention.
David Markus asks Ghislaine Maxwell if she ever saw 'these people with underage women'. Ghislaine Maxwell responds 'No -- no.'
Ghislaine Maxwell had phone calls with 'him' on occasion.
Discussion revolves around perceptions of Mr. Epstein, claims of sexual assault by many women (juveniles and adults), and his preference for younger women.
A meeting/interview where a proffer agreement is discussed before going on record. Todd Blanche explains the terms of the meeting to Ghislaine Maxwell.
Weekly in-person legal visits cancelled due to quarantine period.
Request was denied
Asked if she had fun; told Kate she was a 'good girl'.
Called to set up massage appointments with Epstein.
Talked about home life, said she was too young to travel and her mother wouldn't let her go on trips.
Described herself and Epstein as a couple for eleven years, rarely apart, and best of friends.
Todd Blanche asks Ghislaine Maxwell if she was part of an investigation, if law enforcement (feds, FBI, state law enforcement) ever talked to her, or if she received a subpoena or phone call. Ghislaine Maxwell denies all.
Ghislaine Maxwell states she 'never even received a phone call' regarding the investigation.
Discussion about an estate being converted into houses, profits, funds lent by an unnamed 'he', and how a financial investigator would view accounts versus conversations. Also mentions specific car transactions.
Todd Blanche questions Ghislaine Maxwell about the nature of 'help' provided, her husband's financial role, and allegations of blackmail and fraud.
Ghislaine Maxwell describes a hypothetical situation where El Chapo launders and steals money from the Sinaloa Cartel. The Sinaloa Cartel then asks Epstein to track down billion dollars stolen by another cartel. Epstein would find the money, take a portion as a fee, and return the rest. Todd Blanche acknowledges the description.
Discussion about seeing 'him' (unnamed) on a massage, masturbation, Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement in massages, foot rubbing, and who paid masseuses in Palm Beach and New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity