| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Client |
21
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
Legal representative |
21
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Judicial |
21
Very Strong
|
66 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Prosecutor defendant |
20
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Financial |
20
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Defendant judge |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Travel companions |
19
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Pagliuca
|
Client |
16
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Romantic |
16
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
Lawrence Vogelman
|
Client |
15
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co travelers |
15
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Defendant judge |
15
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Client |
15
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Association |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
14 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Epstein continuing and her responsibilitie... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Jeffrey Epstein's involvement in managing the lives of people, specifically maki... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell began looking for real estate for her dad and Epstein asked for help finding an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Family businesses were lost after Ghislaine Maxwell's father's passing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked Ghislaine Maxwell to continue helping him (find a house, etc.) after her father's d... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell states no one from the government had spoken to her about her case or Mr. Epste... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Reid (potentially Reid Hoffman) being a 'Silicon Valley guy' and how Ghislaine M... | San Francisco (mentioned) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about her relationship with Mr. Epstein being separate from her oth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about whether Mr. Epstein had a relationship with Reid Hoffman. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about observing Reid Hoffman flying with her or Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell introducing a masseuse (DOJ REDACTION) to Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's efforts to find masseuses for Jeffrey Epstein, including visiting legitimate ... | Massage spas, Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lack of knowledge about law enforcement interest in her. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Ghislaine Maxwell and Ms. Mills, after President Clinton left office. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Social parties hosted by Mr. Epstein where young women, characterized as masseuses, were guests o... | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell attending weddings of famous people with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conversation between Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche regarding past events, specifically massa... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Mr. Epstein's non-prosecution deal made by the U.S. Attorney in Florida. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the S1 superseding... | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returned a second (S2) superseding indictment. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Business meetings on a plane involving Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wexner, attended by Ghislaine Maxw... | on the plane | View |
| N/A | N/A | Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell discusses finding a house for rent for someone in New York, which she initially... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein's financial success and how he accumulated his money. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein's past as a math teacher at Dalton and his work at Bear Stearns. | N/A | View |
A legal filing (Sur-Reply) by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys arguing that Plaintiff Bradley Edwards must produce solicitation letters sent to former Epstein employees and their responses. The defense argues Edwards waived work-product privilege by failing to produce a privilege log and that the letters sent to third parties do not constitute work product.
A letter motion filed on March 14, 2017, by attorney Paul G. Cassell to Judge Robert W. Sweet in the case Giuffre v. Maxwell. Cassell requests a one-week continuance for a hearing regarding a Motion to Quash a subpoena served on his client, Bradley J. Edwards, citing a scheduled medical procedure preventing him from traveling to New York. The opposing counsel is noted as having agreed to reschedule the hearing to March 23, 2017.
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards in support of his motion to quash a subpoena served on him by Ghislaine Maxwell. Edwards argues that Maxwell's requests for his communications with 'prospective witnesses' are overbroad, unduly burdensome, and seek protected attorney work-product. The filing notably alleges that Maxwell has failed to explain her presence on 23 flights with a teenaged Virginia Giuffre or the message pads documenting underage girls calling Epstein's mansion for 'massages'.
A legal motion filed on March 13, 2017, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS). Attorney Paul G. Cassell requests admission Pro Hac Vice to represent Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards in his lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. Cassell attests to his good standing with the Utah Bar and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
This document is a legal declaration filed on March 13, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Paul G. Cassell submits this declaration to support his application for admission Pro Hac Vice to represent the plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, in his case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Cassell attests to his clean legal record, stating he has no felony convictions or disciplinary actions against him and is a member in good standing of the Utah bar.
A court order filed on March 3, 2017, by Judge Robert W. Sweet in the case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document sets a schedule for hearing various motions throughout March 2017 and establishes a deadline for objections to deposition designations in April 2017. It also references a related motion to quash in the case of Bradley v. Maxwell.
This document is a Civil Docket Report for Case No. 0:16-mc-61262-JG, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 13, 2016. The case involves Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards filing a motion to quash a subpoena against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The docket records various motions, including requests to seal exhibits and appear Pro Hac Vice, culminating in an order on December 22, 2016, to transfer the motion to the Southern District of New York to be handled as part of the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433-RWS). The case was terminated in the Florida court on December 23, 2016.
This document is a legal notice filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys on December 16, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida regarding a subpoena served on Bradley J. Edwards. Maxwell argues that rulings made by the Southern District of New York on a similar subpoena served on Paul Cassell (another attorney for Virginia Giuffre) should be binding (res judicata) on the Edwards subpoena. The filing includes a table comparing the requests in both subpoenas and the corresponding rulings from the SDNY court, asking the Florida court to issue a consistent order requiring production of certain documents and granting the motion to quash for others.
This document is a formal notice filed on December 16, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida, by attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. It informs the court and opposing counsel (specifically Bradley J. Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola) that 'Exhibit B' related to a subpoena status notice has been filed under seal. The underlying case referenced is Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York.
This document is a motion filed on December 16, 2016, by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests permission to file 'Exhibit B' under seal, noting that the exhibit is a sealed order from the Southern District of New York in the underlying 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' case. The document lists legal counsel for Maxwell and for Bradley J. Edwards, who is the subject of a subpoena in this miscellaneous action.
This document is a Motion to Seal filed on July 7, 2016, by attorney Jack Scarola on behalf of Bradley J. Edwards in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Edwards seeks to seal exhibits attached to his Motion to Quash a subpoena, specifically referencing confidential depositions of Ghislaine Maxwell and Rinaldo Rizzo, as well as documents related to Alan Dershowitz, which are already under seal in the Southern District of New York. The motion argues that sealing is necessary to comply with protective orders from the underlying case.
This is a court order from the Southern District of Florida filed on July 7, 2016. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman granted a request by Bradley J. Edwards to seal his reply regarding a Motion to Quash Subpoena (or for a Protective Order) in relation to the underlying civil case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is a reply filed by Bradley J. Edwards in support of his motion to quash a subpoena served on him by Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. Edwards argues that the subpoena imposes an undue burden on him as a non-party and opposing counsel, seeking information that is already in Maxwell's possession, privileged, irrelevant, or available from other sources. The brief details the history of related litigation, including the CVRA case and a defamation suit against Alan Dershowitz, to support the argument that the subpoena is harassing and unnecessary.
This document is a motion filed on July 7, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida by attorney Jack Scarola on behalf of Bradley J. Edwards. Edwards requests permission to file a reply exceeding the standard page limit (up to 25 pages) in support of his motion to quash a subpoena served by Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion explains that the extra length is necessary to address allegations made by Maxwell regarding Edwards' prior filings and alleged discovery withholding by his client, Virginia Giuffre.
This document is a proposed court order filed on July 7, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. It grants a motion by Bradley J. Edwards to file a reply exceeding the standard page limit (up to 25 pages) in support of his motion to quash a subpoena related to the underlying civil case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
Declaration by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 30, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. The document lists 18 exhibits (A-R) supporting Maxwell's opposition to Bradley J. Edwards' motion to quash a subpoena. Several exhibits are filed under seal, while others include procedural documents from related cases (Cassell v. Dershowitz, Epstein v. Rothstein, Jane Doe v. US) and communications regarding discovery and subpoenas.
This document is a transcript of a court hearing on April 21, 2016, in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. The hearing addresses motions to admit Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell as counsel for the plaintiff, which the defense opposes citing conflicts with other litigation (Florida cases) and their status as potential witnesses. The judge also rules on various discovery disputes, including the production of Giuffre's medical records (limited to 1999-2002), tax returns (15 years ordered), and statements made to law enforcement (to be reviewed in camera).
This document is Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's second amended supplemental response to discovery requests from Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 29, 2016. It details Giuffre's legal representation history from 2009 to 2016, listing specific attorneys and cases including actions against Jeffrey Epstein, the US Government, and Alan Dershowitz. The document also contains objections to requests for financial records regarding payments from Epstein or media organizations, asserting attorney-client privilege and irrelevance.
This document is a 'Notice of Filing' submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 29, 2016. It serves to notify the court and opposing counsel that Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell has filed Exhibits A, G, H, I, and N under seal. These exhibits are attached to a declaration by her attorney, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, in support of her opposition to Bradley J. Edwards' motion to quash a subpoena.
This document is a motion filed on June 29, 2016, by attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests permission to file specific exhibits (A, G, H, I, and N) under seal because they were designated as confidential in the underlying case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) in the Southern District of New York. The document includes a certificate of service indicating the motion was served electronically to attorney Jack Scarola representing Bradley J. Edwards.
This document is a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed on June 29, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. Attorney Denise D. Riley requests that attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of the Colorado firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman be admitted to represent Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in matters related to a subpoena issued to Bradley J. Edwards. The document includes contact information for the attorneys involved and a certificate of service to opposing counsel Jack Scarola.
This document is a proposed court order filed on June 29, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida, granting attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca permission to appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The order relates to a subpoena issued to Bradley J. Edwards in connection with the underlying case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It also establishes electronic filing notifications for Pagliuca and his legal assistant, Nicole Simmons, at the firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
This document is a formal certification filed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 29, 2016. It pertains to a subpoena issued to Bradley J. Edwards in relation to the underlying case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca certifies his compliance with local rules and his good standing with the Colorado bar.
This document outlines Ghislaine Maxwell's formal objections and responses to Virginia Giuffre's second request for production of documents in the 2015 civil case. Maxwell's counsel objects to numerous requests on grounds of privilege, relevance, and burden, specifically refusing to produce financial documents (tax returns, bank statements, asset lists) pending a motion for a protective order. The document also addresses requests for Joint Defense Agreements with Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, communications regarding sexual abuse allegations, and funding sources for the TerraMar Project, including any from the Clinton Foundation.
This document is a subpoena issued by the US District Court (SDNY) on behalf of Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell to attorney Bradley J. Edwards in May 2016. It demands the production of various documents, including those related to previous litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, communications with journalist Sharon Churcher, and records regarding the organization 'Victims Refuse Silence, Inc.' A check for $45.00 payable to Edwards is included, likely as a witness fee.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Trust/Spouse | $0.00 | Transfers characterized by government as 'funne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Annie | $0.00 | Purchase of cowboy boots during shopping trip | View |
| N/A | Received | Trust Fund | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $80,000.00 | Annual income from trust fund | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Finances received by Maxwell for participating ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $30,000,000.00 | Total amount Maxwell received from Epstein acco... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of huge black helicopter. | View |
| N/A | Received | buyer | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Proceeds from the sale of Ms. Maxwell's London ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $0.00 | Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Clerk of the Cour... | $300.00 | Lump sum payment of criminal monetary penalties. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of a large townhouse for Ms. Maxwell. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Airline/Travel pr... | $0.00 | Flew to France at her own expense to help mother. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of helicopter, homes in NY and London,... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $750,000.00 | Fine imposed by District Court | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $300.00 | Mandatory special assessment | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | The Terramar Project | $0.00 | Ghislaine devoted her own financial resources t... | View |
| N/A | Received | A. Farmer | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Witness filed a civil lawsuit seeking damages a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Buying a helicopter and paying for flight lessons. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Trust/Spouse | $0.00 | Transfers to a trust/spouse characterized by go... | View |
| N/A | Received | Lender (implied) | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Significant loans procured on the basis of a ne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Purchase of a helicopter, homes in NY and Londo... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Court | $0.00 | Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Henri Bendel | $0.00 | Purchases made at the store which led to the de... | View |
| N/A | Paid | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
My experience of Jeffrey, is of a thoughtful, kind, generous loving man, with a keen sense of humor and a ready smile...
Discussion regarding whether Epstein committed suicide or was killed, and the cost of violence in prison.
Maxwell states that no one from the government had spoken to her since the inception of the case (early 2000s) until her indictment. She claims her attorneys informed the government of her willingness to meet and answer questions, but it wasn't happening.
Discussion regarding whether Epstein was murdered by outside forces to silence him.
Ghislaine Maxwell discusses an institute in New Mexico and then details her father's involvement in scientific publishing, his service in WWII including winning a military cross, his intelligence work interrogating German scientists and POWs, and his subsequent transition into business. Todd Blanche acknowledges with 'Okay'.
A discussion about an agreement providing protection and immunity, with exceptions for false statements. Participants include Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche. The FBI and Agent Horn are mentioned.
Ghislaine Maxwell discusses Epstein's investment strategies, payment from Wexner, and whether he was a business partner. She mentions Epstein told her he would take a flat percentage if he saved someone $5 billion.
Todd Blanche asks Ghislaine Maxwell about when her relationship with Epstein changed post-2000 and if Epstein met members of the Royal Family. Maxwell confirms he did, but states she has forgotten the exact timing, and mentions Epstein knew high society people in London, including Princess Diana's best friend, Rosa Monckton, and her husband, Dominic Lawson.
Ghislaine Maxwell emailed 'him' for details, especially when there was legal drama or serious press attention.
David Markus asks Ghislaine Maxwell if she ever saw 'these people with underage women'. Ghislaine Maxwell responds 'No -- no.'
Ghislaine Maxwell had phone calls with 'him' on occasion.
Discussion revolves around perceptions of Mr. Epstein, claims of sexual assault by many women (juveniles and adults), and his preference for younger women.
A meeting/interview where a proffer agreement is discussed before going on record. Todd Blanche explains the terms of the meeting to Ghislaine Maxwell.
Weekly in-person legal visits cancelled due to quarantine period.
Request was denied
Asked if she had fun; told Kate she was a 'good girl'.
Called to set up massage appointments with Epstein.
Talked about home life, said she was too young to travel and her mother wouldn't let her go on trips.
Described herself and Epstein as a couple for eleven years, rarely apart, and best of friends.
Todd Blanche asks Ghislaine Maxwell if she was part of an investigation, if law enforcement (feds, FBI, state law enforcement) ever talked to her, or if she received a subpoena or phone call. Ghislaine Maxwell denies all.
Ghislaine Maxwell states she 'never even received a phone call' regarding the investigation.
Discussion about an estate being converted into houses, profits, funds lent by an unnamed 'he', and how a financial investigator would view accounts versus conversations. Also mentions specific car transactions.
Todd Blanche questions Ghislaine Maxwell about the nature of 'help' provided, her husband's financial role, and allegations of blackmail and fraud.
Ghislaine Maxwell describes a hypothetical situation where El Chapo launders and steals money from the Sinaloa Cartel. The Sinaloa Cartel then asks Epstein to track down billion dollars stolen by another cartel. Epstein would find the money, take a portion as a fee, and return the rest. Todd Blanche acknowledges the description.
Discussion about seeing 'him' (unnamed) on a massage, masturbation, Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement in massages, foot rubbing, and who paid masseuses in Palm Beach and New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity