David Schoen
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submitter recipient |
11
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document production |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
IG (Inspector General)
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Production submission |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission of evidence |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission involvement |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E. (Epstein)
|
Correspondents |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Unknown |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LexisNexis
|
Subscriber user |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein Case
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document custodian subject of inquiry |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigation target witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document producer |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Adversarial critical |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The IG
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sean Hannity
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigation subject provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Subject of investigation provider of documents |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between David Schoen and Lefkowitz regarding a prospective client. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-03-22 | N/A | Email sent regarding a Tea Party Pac article. | Internet | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | David Schoen conducted a LexisNexis search for legal materials regarding 'cvra and sixth amendment'. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | David Schoen performed a LexisNexis search for legal articles regarding the Crime Victims' Rights... | N/A | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | Legal research conducted by David Schoen. | N/A | View |
| 2016-06-01 | N/A | Proposed meeting between Jeffrey Epstein and David Schoen. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Publication of Law Review Article | Utah | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Publication of BYU Law Review article | Unknown | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | State v. Casey court case | Utah | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | United States v. Fortier decision | Tenth Circuit | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017614.jpg
This document is a page from a legal analysis (likely a law journal article) produced to the House Oversight Committee by David Schoen. It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and specifically analyzes case law determining that victim rights attach before formal charges are filed. It prominently cites 'Does v. United States' (the Epstein case) in the Southern District of Florida, noting that the court rejected the government's dismissal attempts and acknowledged that victims might be entitled to invalidate Epstein's nonprosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017613.jpg
This document appears to be Page 10 of a legal filing or article (Excerpt from 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59) submitted by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically citing the 'In re Dean' (BP Products) case to argue that victims have rights to confer with the government before charges are formally filed or plea deals are reached. While Epstein is not named on this page, the legal argument mirrors the controversy surrounding the failure to notify victims during Epstein's 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017611.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal journal article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing that victim rights should apply before formal charges are filed. It uses the Jeffrey Epstein case as a primary example of failure in the system, noting that federal prosecutors negotiated a secret non-prosecution agreement with Epstein that barred federal charges for sex offenses against dozens of victims without informing them. The text highlights the outrage of victims 'Jane Doe Number One' and 'Jane Doe Number Two' upon discovering their rights to object had been bargained away secretly.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017610.jpg
This document details the contentious plea negotiations involving Jeffrey Epstein, where the U.S. Attorney's Office agreed to a non-prosecution agreement without informing the victims, leading to a lawsuit under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text highlights the government's argument that CVRA rights do not attach without formal federal charges and frames the central legal issue regarding when these rights apply. It includes numerous footnotes citing media reports and legal filings related to the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017608.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or journal article submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the legislative history and intent of the Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004 (CVRA), contrasting it with the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act. It highlights the Congressional goal to ensure victims are treated with fairness, dignity, and are active participants in the legal system, citing various Senators and legal precedents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017606.jpg
This document is a page from a legal analysis or journal article (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) included in a House Oversight production, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen. It argues for the application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) during the investigation phase, before formal charges are filed, critiquing the DOJ/OLC position to the contrary. The text specifically cites the "Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case" as a primary example of why victim participation is necessary before charges are filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017605.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (Page 2 of 31) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and whether victim rights apply before formal charges are filed. It highlights a conflict between a 2010 DOJ OLC opinion, which argued rights do not attach pre-charging, and Senator Jon Kyl, who argued they do. The text specifically uses the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case in Florida as a concrete example of the controversy, noting that victims argued they should have been consulted regarding his non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017604.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2014 legal article published in the Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, co-authored by Bradley J. Edwards (a key attorney for Epstein victims). The article argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply during criminal investigations before charges are filed, explicitly referencing a 'notorious federal sex abuse case' (the Epstein case) where victims were deprived of rights due to the DOJ's narrow interpretation. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp and the name David Schoen, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017603.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis cover sheet regarding a legal search performed by attorney David Schoen on February 28, 2019. The search focused on the intersection of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the Sixth Amendment, specifically looking for secondary materials like law reviews. The resulting document found discusses applying the CVRA before criminal charges are filed. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026291.jpg
This document is an email exchange from July 4, 2018, originating from a House Oversight collection. Attorney David Schoen writes to Jeffrey Epstein, harshly criticizing the composition of Robert Mueller's special counsel team, alleging specific members like Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, and Greg Andres have a history of prosecutorial misconduct and extreme anti-Trump/pro-Clinton bias. Epstein replies briefly, questioning if Schoen's concerns are 'overblown' and drawing parallels to other prosecutors.
From Fox News...
I know it was an old piece but Fox is running it again today. [Includes text of Fox News article about Epstein lawsuit settlement]
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen informs Epstein that Fox News is re-running an old piece about his civil settlement.
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen informs Epstein that Fox News is re-running an old piece about his civil settlement.
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen shares a Fox News article about a civil settlement, criticizes the article's framing of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement), expresses a desire for 'true facts' about accusers to be published, and wishes Epstein 'Good Shabbos'.
Re: From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offen...
no worry how are you
From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit rela...
Sharing a Fox News article about the death of a federal judge involved in the Epstein lawsuit.
Re: From Fox News...
Yup
From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit rela...
Forwarded a Fox News article snippet and link about the death of a federal judge overseeing an Epstein lawsuit.
Mueller’s Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Ch...
Schoen shares a link to a 'nut site' article that alleges the recipient is a Mueller informant, noting the political contradictions involving Acosta and Trump.
Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped se...
yes, every outlet needs a sex story
Shared Article from AOL...
Discusses media coverage, Dershowitz, and Lefkowitz. Claims the article is wrong about victims being silenced.
No Subject
A short message asking 'judge jeannie?'.
No Subject
Discusses his obsession with fighting prosecutorial/FBI misconduct, mentions an article tying Jeffrey E. to #metoo and Trump, hopes Jeffrey E.'s cases are behind him, and expresses regret for not having helped.
Re: Hello
Discusses Strzok testimony, McCabe, bias, and asks 'we're on the same team'.
No Subject
The main body of text at the top of the document. David Schoen critiques Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, opines on Russian election interference, and mentions his friendship with the IG.
Re: Hello
Detailed criticism of Mueller's team (Rhee, Andres), discussion of Russia election interference, and mention of being a guest on Hannity.
Re: Hello
Asks if the situation is overblown, compares it to mob prosecutors hating Gotti, asks why Strzok is different.
N/A
Discusses obsession with prosecutorial misconduct, mentions #metoo press tying Epstein to Trump, expresses regret at not being able to help Epstein legally.
Hello (inferred from reply)
A detailed critique of the Mueller investigation team, accusing members Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, and Greg Andres of past prosecutorial misconduct, withholding evidence, and having strong political biases (pro-Clinton, anti-Trump). The author expresses his obsession with fighting FBI and prosecutorial misconduct.
Re: Hello
A reply questioning if the bias described by Schoen is 'overblown'. Compares the situation to mob prosecutors having strong feelings for their targets like Gotti and asks why 'stryok' (Peter Strzok) is considered different.
Re: Hello
A lengthy criticism of the Mueller team's composition, accusing members like Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, and Greg Andres of past misconduct, unethical behavior, and extreme political bias. The author also expresses his general obsession with fighting prosecutorial misconduct.
Re: Hello
A brief reply questioning if the criticism is 'overblown' and comparing the prosecutors to those who targeted 'gotti', asking why 'stryok' is different.
Re: Hello
A lengthy criticism of the Mueller team's composition, accusing members like Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, and Greg Andres of past misconduct, unethical behavior, and extreme political bias. The author also expresses his general obsession with fighting prosecutorial misconduct.
Re: Hello
A brief reply questioning if the criticism is 'overblown' and comparing the prosecutors to those who targeted 'gotti', asking why 'stryok' is different.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity