David Schoen
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submitter recipient |
11
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document production |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
IG (Inspector General)
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Production submission |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission of evidence |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission involvement |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E. (Epstein)
|
Correspondents |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Unknown |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LexisNexis
|
Subscriber user |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein Case
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document custodian subject of inquiry |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigation target witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document producer |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Adversarial critical |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The IG
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sean Hannity
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigation subject provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Subject of investigation provider of documents |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between David Schoen and Lefkowitz regarding a prospective client. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-03-22 | N/A | Email sent regarding a Tea Party Pac article. | Internet | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | David Schoen conducted a LexisNexis search for legal materials regarding 'cvra and sixth amendment'. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | David Schoen performed a LexisNexis search for legal articles regarding the Crime Victims' Rights... | N/A | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | Legal research conducted by David Schoen. | N/A | View |
| 2016-06-01 | N/A | Proposed meeting between Jeffrey Epstein and David Schoen. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Publication of Law Review Article | Utah | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Publication of BYU Law Review article | Unknown | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | State v. Casey court case | Utah | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | United States v. Fortier decision | Tenth Circuit | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017672.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or memorandum submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It cites a 2007 Utah Law Review article and various case precedents (such as State v. Percy and Brady v. Maryland) to argue that criminal defendants do not have a general constitutional right to discovery, particularly regarding the private mental health records of victims. The text emphasizes that 'mere hope' of finding favorable evidence is insufficient for a subpoena.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017671.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article authored by David Schoen, who later served as an attorney for Jeffrey Epstein. The text is a legal analysis of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17, arguing for strict adherence to the 'Nixon factors' (specificity, relevancy, and admissibility) when issuing subpoenas to prevent 'fishing expeditions.' The document includes extensive legal footnotes citing various precedents and was produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation (likely regarding the handling of the Epstein case).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017670.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 35 of 78), likely authored or submitted by David Schoen, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17. The text argues against the Advisory Committee's proposed rules for defense subpoenas, claiming they insufficiently protect victims' confidential information and violate the Rules Enabling Act. It cites *United States v. Nixon* to establish the standard for subpoenas (relevancy, admissibility, specificity).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017669.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 34 of 78 in the production) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Rule 17 subpoenas. The text argues that victim privacy and dignity interests should subordinate defense strategy interests, criticizing the Advisory Committee's notes on ex parte procedures. The document bears the name David Schoen (a known attorney for Jeffrey Epstein) at the bottom and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production related to a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017668.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article found in the files of attorney David Schoen (produced for House Oversight). The text analyzes legal procedures regarding 'ex parte' subpoenas, specifically criticizing proposals that would allow defense attorneys to subpoena victim records without notice, using the Elizabeth Smart kidnapping case and Pennsylvania rape counselor statutes as examples of how third parties handle confidential victim information. It argues that current or proposed rules regarding the protection of defense 'strategy' are haphazard and often detrimental to victim privacy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017667.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 32 of 78 in the production), produced by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the legal and ethical arguments against 'ex parte' subpoenas, arguing they are unfair to victims and violate the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues that victims should have notice and the right to be heard before their confidential information is turned over to the defense, citing ABA standards and Supreme Court precedent.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017666.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely submitted as an exhibit by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses legal issues surrounding Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c), specifically criticizing the lack of notice given to victims when their confidential records (such as VA medical records) are subpoenaed by defense counsel. It cites a specific instance where a defense attorney used surprise access to psychiatric records to pressure a prosecutor, and references communications involving Rod Rosenstein regarding these procedural rules.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017665.jpg
This document is page 30 of a 78-page submission, containing an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article authored or submitted by David Schoen. It discusses legal theory regarding Rule 17 subpoenas, specifically arguing for better protection of victim privacy. The text uses the Elizabeth Smart kidnapping case as a primary example of the flaws in existing subpoena rules, detailing how defense attorneys accessed her school and medical records without the family's knowledge.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017664.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 29 of 78 in the evidence file) discussing amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding victims' rights. It specifically details proposals for Rule 17 to protect victims from abusive subpoenas of their confidential information by defense attorneys, citing the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The document bears the name 'David Schoen' and a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case (likely related to the non-prosecution agreement and victims' rights violations).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017663.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017663) submitted by attorney David Schoen (known for representing Jeffrey Epstein). The text is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and arguing that victims should have the right to attend pretrial depositions under Rule 15, drawing parallels to the rights guaranteed to criminal defendants. It cites various legal precedents to support the argument that excluding victims from such proceedings is unfair and unauthorized.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017662.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) discussing proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 12.3 and 15. The text argues for protecting victims' rights, specifically regarding witness disclosure in public-authority defenses and allowing victims to attend pre-trial depositions. The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee as part of their investigation, marked with Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017662.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017661.jpg
This document is Page 26 of a 78-page document, specifically an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article written by David Schoen. The text provides a legal argument criticizing the "Advisory Committee's" proposals regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing against rules that would force victims to disclose their addresses to defendants or participate in face-to-face meetings/depositions without due process. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017659.jpg
This document is an extract from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, page 894, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen during a House Oversight investigation. The text provides a legal argument regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.1, criticizing an Advisory Committee proposal that would allow courts to order the disclosure of a victim's address to a defendant without adequately protecting the victim's safety. It argues that current proposals violate the CVRA's mandate to protect victims from the accused.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017658.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 23 of 78 in the file) discussing Rule 12.1 and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It analyzes the legal requirements for disclosing a victim witness's address and telephone number to the defense, specifically in the context of an alibi defense, and highlights the tension between defendants' discovery rights and victims' safety/privacy. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017657.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 22 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing legal procedure rules (Rule 12.1 and 12.3) concerning the disclosure of witness information in criminal trials. It specifically focuses on the balance between a defendant's right to information and the protection of victims' addresses and telephone numbers. The document was produced by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017656.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, included in a legal filing by David Schoen (likely related to the House Oversight investigation). It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the ethical obligation of prosecutors to inform the court of a victim's objection to a plea deal, citing the 'Casey' case. It also proposes amendments to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.1 to protect victim contact information during alibi defense disclosures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017655.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Rule 11(c)(2) regarding plea agreements. It argues that prosecutors should be required to inform the court if a victim objects to a plea deal, citing Senator Feinstein and the case State v. Casey. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen (who represented Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely regarding the handling of victims' rights in the Epstein non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017654.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely by Paul Cassell) discussing Rule 11 and advocating for the inclusion of victims' views during plea negotiations. The text argues that prosecutors should be required to notify victims and consider their views on plea deals, noting that the Advisory Committee did not recommend this change at the time. The document bears the name David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of an evidentiary submission regarding the handling of victims' rights, possibly in relation to the Epstein non-prosecution agreement investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017651.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely written by Paul Cassell) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposing amendments to Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to explicitly include fairness to victims. It critiques the Advisory Committee's refusal to adopt these amendments. The document bears the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' and a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production related to an investigation, likely involving Epstein's plea deal and victims' rights violations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017650.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article authored by David Schoen (who later served as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney). The text critiques the Advisory Committee's failure to include 'victim representatives' in Proposed Rule 60, arguing it contradicts the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The document is stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee, likely relevant to the investigation into the handling of victims' rights in the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017649.jpg
This document is page 14 of a 78-page excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely authored by Paul Cassell, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 1 and Rule 11) to align with the CVRA, quoting Senators Feinstein and Kyl on the Act's intent to reform the legal culture surrounding victims' rights. The document bears a footer for attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case (where the CVRA was a central legal issue).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017648.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, produced as part of a House Oversight investigation (likely related to the Epstein case given David Schoen's name at the footer). The text analyzes the history of the Advisory Committee's amendments to Federal Criminal Rules and critiques the lack of support for crime victims' rights, specifically the failure to appoint counsel for indigent victims or clarify their role in plea processes under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It highlights the disparity between defendants, who are guaranteed counsel, and victims, who are not.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017645.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 874) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critically analyzes the 'Advisory Committee's' narrow interpretation of the Act, contrasting it with the broad legislative intent expressed by Senators Kyl and Feinstein to ensure victims are treated with fairness and due process. The document appears to be part of a production to the House Oversight Committee from the files of David Schoen, a lawyer known for representing Jeffrey Epstein, likely relevant to arguments regarding the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017644.jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal text (excerpted from the 2007 Utah Law Review) arguing for the substantive rights of crime victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critiques the Advisory Committee for failing to fully implement congressional intent regarding fairness for victims and lists eight specific rights granted by the CVRA. The document bears a footer for 'David Schoen' and a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as evidence or background material in a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017643.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely written by Paul Cassell, though he is referred to in the third person in one section) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critiques the Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules for acting 'timidly' by not expanding victim rights beyond the strict statutory language of the CVRA. The document contains a footer indicating it was produced by attorney David Schoen (who represented Jeffrey Epstein) to the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of an investigation into the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen informs Epstein that Fox News is re-running an old piece about his civil settlement.
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen shares a Fox News article about a civil settlement, criticizes the article's framing of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement), expresses a desire for 'true facts' about accusers to be published, and wishes Epstein 'Good Shabbos'.
From Fox News...
I know it was an old piece but Fox is running it again today. [Includes text of Fox News article about Epstein lawsuit settlement]
Re: From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offen...
no worry how are you
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen informs Epstein that Fox News is re-running an old piece about his civil settlement.
From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit rela...
Forwarded a Fox News article snippet and link about the death of a federal judge overseeing an Epstein lawsuit.
From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit rela...
Sharing a Fox News article about the death of a federal judge involved in the Epstein lawsuit.
Re: From Fox News...
Yup
Mueller’s Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Ch...
Schoen shares a link to a 'nut site' article that alleges the recipient is a Mueller informant, noting the political contradictions involving Acosta and Trump.
Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped se...
yes, every outlet needs a sex story
Shared Article from AOL...
Discusses media coverage, Dershowitz, and Lefkowitz. Claims the article is wrong about victims being silenced.
No Subject
The main body of text at the top of the document. David Schoen critiques Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, opines on Russian election interference, and mentions his friendship with the IG.
Re: Hello
Detailed criticism of Mueller's team (Rhee, Andres), discussion of Russia election interference, and mention of being a guest on Hannity.
Re: Hello
Asks if the situation is overblown, compares it to mob prosecutors hating Gotti, asks why Strzok is different.
N/A
Discusses obsession with prosecutorial misconduct, mentions #metoo press tying Epstein to Trump, expresses regret at not being able to help Epstein legally.
Re: Hello
Discusses Strzok testimony, McCabe, bias, and asks 'we're on the same team'.
Re: Hello
Asks if something is 'overblown' and questions why 'stryok' is treated differently than mob prosecutors who despised targets like Gotti.
No Subject
Discusses his obsession with fighting prosecutorial/FBI misconduct, mentions an article tying Jeffrey E. to #metoo and Trump, hopes Jeffrey E.'s cases are behind him, and expresses regret for not having helped.
No Subject
A short message asking 'judge jeannie?'.
No Subject
The main body of text at the top of the document. David Schoen critiques Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, opines on Russian election interference, and mentions his friendship with the IG.
Re: Hello
Asks if something is 'overblown' and questions why 'stryok' is treated differently than mob prosecutors who despised targets like Gotti.
No Subject
Discusses his obsession with fighting prosecutorial/FBI misconduct, mentions an article tying Jeffrey E. to #metoo and Trump, hopes Jeffrey E.'s cases are behind him, and expresses regret for not having helped.
No Subject
A short message asking 'judge jeannie?'.
Hello (inferred from reply)
A detailed critique of the Mueller investigation team, accusing members Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, and Greg Andres of past prosecutorial misconduct, withholding evidence, and having strong political biases (pro-Clinton, anti-Trump). The author expresses his obsession with fighting FBI and prosecutorial misconduct.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity