David Schoen
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submitter recipient |
11
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document production |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
IG (Inspector General)
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Production submission |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission of evidence |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission involvement |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E. (Epstein)
|
Correspondents |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Unknown |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LexisNexis
|
Subscriber user |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein Case
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document custodian subject of inquiry |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigation target witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document producer |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Adversarial critical |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The IG
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sean Hannity
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigation subject provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Subject of investigation provider of documents |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between David Schoen and Lefkowitz regarding a prospective client. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-03-22 | N/A | Email sent regarding a Tea Party Pac article. | Internet | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | David Schoen conducted a LexisNexis search for legal materials regarding 'cvra and sixth amendment'. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | David Schoen performed a LexisNexis search for legal articles regarding the Crime Victims' Rights... | N/A | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | Legal research conducted by David Schoen. | N/A | View |
| 2016-06-01 | N/A | Proposed meeting between Jeffrey Epstein and David Schoen. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Publication of Law Review Article | Utah | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Publication of BYU Law Review article | Unknown | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | State v. Casey court case | Utah | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | United States v. Fortier decision | Tenth Circuit | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017733.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 Brigham Young University Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Rule 11. It argues for a rule change requiring prosecutors to notify victims of plea negotiations and for courts to consider victims' views before accepting plea agreements. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of an investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement, which was criticized for violating these exact principles of victim notification.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017730.jpg
This page from a legal document argues that prosecutors are best situated to notify crime victims of proceedings due to their working relationship and the victims' lack of familiarity with the legal system. It references the 2000 Attorney General Guidelines requiring notification of specific events and provides extensive footnotes citing state statutes that follow this approach.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017729.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically regarding the government's obligation to notify victims of case events. It outlines specific rights such as notification of release, plea agreements, and sentencing, and includes a rationale section quoting Senator Feinstein. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a production related to the investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, particularly the failure to notify victims under the CVRA.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017728.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 14 of 52 in the specific filing) discussing proposals to amend legal rules to incorporate the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Rule 2 to ensure fairness to victims and adding a Rule 10.1 regarding notice of proceedings. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as part of a legal argument or evidence file regarding victim rights and notification procedures in the Epstein investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017727.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article included in a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017727), bearing the name of attorney David Schoen. The text analyzes the legal definition of a "Victim" under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposes amending Rule 1 to align with the CVRA's broad definition. It cites various case laws (Hughey, Follet, Moore) and legislative acts (MVRA, VWPA) to support the rationale that the definition of a victim should be standardized and broadly interpreted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016548.jpg
This document is a page of footnotes from the Minnesota Law Review, citing various legal cases, statutes, and news reports regarding police misconduct, officer-involved shootings, and criminal justice policies. It references specific incidents like the shootings of Philando Castile and Walter Scott, as well as legislative acts like the Death in Custody Reporting Act.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016509.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis search log generated by attorney David Schoen on February 28, 2019. It details a search for legal secondary materials (law reviews) using the terms 'cvra' (Crime Victims' Rights Act) and 'sixth amendment,' specifically locating an article in the Minnesota Law Review concerning the oversight of decisions not to prosecute. The document is stamped with Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016509.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017725.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 11 of 52) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the necessity of amending Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 11) to ensure victims' rights are not ignored during plea hearings. It cites the Oklahoma City bombing case as an example where victims were excluded due to rigid adherence to evidence rules. The document bears the footer 'DAVID SCHOEN' and a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was likely part of the materials reviewed during the congressional oversight of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding the non-prosecution agreement and the failure to notify victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017724.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), detailing specific rights afforded to victims, such as the right to be heard and the right to restitution, and argues that the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure must be amended to reflect these statutory rights. The text cites Senators Kyl and Feinstein and references the Oklahoma City bombing case as a catalyst for the legislation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017723.jpg
This document details the legislative history shift from pursuing a constitutional amendment for victims' rights to enacting the Crime Victims' Rights Act due to the lack of super-majority support. It outlines the first three specific rights granted to victims under the Act, including protection, notice of proceedings, and the right not to be excluded from court. Footnotes provide citations to legislative records and statements by Senators Kyl and Feinstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017721.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article attached as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation, bearing the name of Epstein attorney David Schoen. The text discusses the legal limitations of the Victims' Rights Act and the Crime Victims' Rights Act, specifically analyzing the *United States v. McVeigh* (Oklahoma City bombing) case where victims were denied certain rights despite statutory protections. It argues that statutory measures often fail due to judicial interpretation and bureaucratic inertia, leading advocates to push for a constitutional amendment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017719.jpg
This document outlines the history and development of federal victims' rights legislation, beginning with the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982. It details subsequent acts and the resulting Department of Justice guidelines that established protocols for treating crime victims, including notification requirements and the right to confer with prosecutors. The text also highlights the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act of 1990, which created a comprehensive list of procedural rights for victims in the federal criminal justice process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017718.jpg
This document is page 4 of 52 from a production to the House Oversight Committee, stamped with the name David Schoen. The content is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the history of the victims' rights movement, specifically the 1982 President's Task Force on Victims of Crime and subsequent state constitutional amendments (highlighting Arizona). The text analyzes the legal shift towards protecting victims' rights to be present and heard during criminal proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017716.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the integration of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It argues that current federal rules largely ignore crime victims and outlines necessary amendments to ensure victims have rights to notice, presence, and participation in criminal proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017715.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2005 law review article by Paul G. Cassell titled 'Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure'. It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) of 2004 and proposes amendments to federal rules to better integrate victims into criminal proceedings. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp and the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' in the footer, suggesting it is part of a production related to congressional oversight, likely involving the Epstein case where the CVRA was a central legal issue.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017714.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis search log dated February 28, 2019, showing activity by attorney David Schoen. Schoen was researching legal articles related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the Sixth Amendment, specifically accessing a 2005 BYU Law Review article. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017713.jpg
This document is the final page (78 of 78) of a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing the legislative landscape of crime victims' rights, specifically mentioning Senator Kyl's bill and the potential need for a Constitutional amendment. It argues that Congress will likely intervene if the Advisory Committee fails to reform the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to protect victims. The document is stamped as a House Oversight exhibit (017713) and lists the name David Schoen at the bottom.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017711.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 76 of 78 in the specific file) analyzing changes to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rules 21, 32, and 60) regarding victims' rights and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critiques the Advisory Committee for not going far enough to ensure victims have a right to be heard during case transfer decisions and sentencing. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a legal file or submission related to the investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, specifically regarding victims' rights violations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017710.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding victims' rights (CVRA). It details changes to Rules 1, 5, 12.1, 12.3, and 17 proposed by the Advisory Committee in 2007, specifically focusing on victim representation, protection during detention hearings, and subpoena notifications. The document bears the name of David Schoen, Epstein's attorney, and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of legal materials submitted to Congress regarding the handling of the Epstein case and victims' rights statutes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017708.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and criticizing the NACDL's stance on cross-examining victims. It argues against giving defendants the right to cross-examine victims regarding their status, citing potential trauma and lack of legal precedent. The document bears the name "David Schoen" (Epstein's former attorney) and a "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT" Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as evidence or discovery material during a congressional investigation into the Epstein case, possibly regarding the non-prosecution agreement and violations of victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017707.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 72 of 78 in the production) bearing the name of David Schoen, a lawyer known for representing Jeffrey Epstein. The text presents a legal argument regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing that victim status and rights should apply even to crimes that have not yet been charged, citing Senator Kyl's legislative intent. It criticizes the NACDL's proposal for fact-finding hearings to determine victim status and argues against the Advisory Committee's limitations on victims' rights in proposed rules. The document appears to be part of an evidentiary submission to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to the investigation into the handling of the Epstein non-prosecution agreement and the violation of victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017706.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 71 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that the Advisory Committee's proposed rules improperly limit the venue for asserting victims' rights to cases where prosecution is already underway, potentially failing to protect victims during the investigation phase (pre-charge) when rights to fairness and dignity might be violated by federal agents. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of an investigation file, likely regarding the handling of the Epstein case and the non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017704.jpg
This document is page 69 of 78 from a House Oversight Committee file (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017704) associated with attorney David Schoen. It contains an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing 'Rule 60. Victim's Rights,' specifically regarding enforcement, limitations on relief, and the inability to request a new trial based on rights violations. The text includes a discussion section criticizing the Advisory Committee for deviating from the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in ways that reduce victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017703.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen, which cites a 2007 Utah Law Review article regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues for a broad interpretation of a victim's right to be heard in court proceedings, citing legislative history from Senators Feinstein and Kyl. It proposes a new rule (Rule 60(b)) regarding the enforcement of victims' rights and preserving claimed error.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017702.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to legal rules regarding a victim's right to be heard in court proceedings. It specifically critiques the 'Advisory Committee' for having too narrow a scope for when victims can be heard (bail, plea, sentencing) versus a broader approach advocated by the author (likely Paul Cassell). The document was produced by attorney David Schoen (who represented Jeffrey Epstein) to the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of research or evidence regarding the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen informs Epstein that Fox News is re-running an old piece about his civil settlement.
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen shares a Fox News article about a civil settlement, criticizes the article's framing of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement), expresses a desire for 'true facts' about accusers to be published, and wishes Epstein 'Good Shabbos'.
From Fox News...
I know it was an old piece but Fox is running it again today. [Includes text of Fox News article about Epstein lawsuit settlement]
Re: From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offen...
no worry how are you
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen informs Epstein that Fox News is re-running an old piece about his civil settlement.
From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit rela...
Forwarded a Fox News article snippet and link about the death of a federal judge overseeing an Epstein lawsuit.
Re: From Fox News...
Yup
From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit rela...
Sharing a Fox News article about the death of a federal judge involved in the Epstein lawsuit.
Mueller’s Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Ch...
Schoen shares a link to a 'nut site' article that alleges the recipient is a Mueller informant, noting the political contradictions involving Acosta and Trump.
Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped se...
yes, every outlet needs a sex story
Shared Article from AOL...
Discusses media coverage, Dershowitz, and Lefkowitz. Claims the article is wrong about victims being silenced.
Re: Hello
Asks if something is 'overblown' and questions why 'stryok' is treated differently than mob prosecutors who despised targets like Gotti.
Re: Hello
Detailed criticism of Mueller's team (Rhee, Andres), discussion of Russia election interference, and mention of being a guest on Hannity.
Re: Hello
Asks if the situation is overblown, compares it to mob prosecutors hating Gotti, asks why Strzok is different.
N/A
Discusses obsession with prosecutorial misconduct, mentions #metoo press tying Epstein to Trump, expresses regret at not being able to help Epstein legally.
Re: Hello
Discusses Strzok testimony, McCabe, bias, and asks 'we're on the same team'.
Re: Hello
Asks if something is 'overblown' and questions why 'stryok' is treated differently than mob prosecutors who despised targets like Gotti.
No Subject
Discusses his obsession with fighting prosecutorial/FBI misconduct, mentions an article tying Jeffrey E. to #metoo and Trump, hopes Jeffrey E.'s cases are behind him, and expresses regret for not having helped.
No Subject
A short message asking 'judge jeannie?'.
No Subject
The main body of text at the top of the document. David Schoen critiques Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, opines on Russian election interference, and mentions his friendship with the IG.
No Subject
Discusses his obsession with fighting prosecutorial/FBI misconduct, mentions an article tying Jeffrey E. to #metoo and Trump, hopes Jeffrey E.'s cases are behind him, and expresses regret for not having helped.
No Subject
A short message asking 'judge jeannie?'.
No Subject
The main body of text at the top of the document. David Schoen critiques Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, opines on Russian election interference, and mentions his friendship with the IG.
Hello (inferred from reply)
A detailed critique of the Mueller investigation team, accusing members Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, and Greg Andres of past prosecutorial misconduct, withholding evidence, and having strong political biases (pro-Clinton, anti-Trump). The author expresses his obsession with fighting FBI and prosecutorial misconduct.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity