| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Nicholas Tartaglione
|
Client |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Mr. Tartaglione
|
Client |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Nick
|
Client |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Aida Leisenring
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Michael Bachrach
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Judge Karas
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Nicholas Tartaglione (Nick)
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nick Tartaglione
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ricco
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ricco
|
Co counsel defense team |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Client]
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
Bar
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Inmate
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Tartaglione
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
US Attorney's office
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Karas
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ricco
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachrach
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Karas
|
Counsel judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Tonyricco
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
USANYS (Margery/Ilan Graff)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Tonyricco
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-04 | N/A | Date Bruce Barket requested off from EDNY but was denied; intended date for Tartaglione status co... | Court (likely SDNY) | View |
| 2020-03-04 | N/A | Status conference for Mr. Tartaglione | Court (implied SDNY based o... | View |
| 2020-03-04 | N/A | Proposed Status Conference for Mr. Tartaglione (conflict with Barket's trial). | Court (likely SDNY) | View |
| 2020-03-03 | N/A | Bruce Barket's trial in EDNY is scheduled to begin (moved from Feb 24). | EDNY Court | View |
| 2020-03-03 | N/A | Trial start date for Bruce Barket in EDNY. | EDNY | View |
| 2020-01-22 | N/A | Upcoming court conference/deadline mentioned for filing motions | Court | View |
| 2020-01-22 | N/A | Upcoming court date/deadline where Barket intends to raise issues about the jail. | Court | View |
| 2020-01-13 | N/A | Motion filed by Bruce Barket seeking a hearing on the loss of the MCC video (date inferred from a... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-01-10 | N/A | Request for viewing of physical evidence related to the July 23rd incident. | N/A | View |
| 2019-11-27 | N/A | Scheduled conference call between defense counsel and US Attorney's office. | Phone (877-989-1320) | View |
| 2019-09-26 | N/A | Proposed meeting to discuss legal briefing schedule. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-24 | N/A | Target date (Tuesday) to have the briefing schedule finalized. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-23 | N/A | Proposed timeframe (early next week) to propose a schedule. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-21 | N/A | Discussion regarding scheduling a meeting for 'penalty phase pleadings'. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2019-09-01 | N/A | Next status conference | Unspecified (likely court) | View |
| 2019-09-01 | N/A | Meeting between defense counsel (Barket) and US Attorney's office to discuss briefing schedule. | Not specified | View |
| 2019-08-29 | N/A | Dispute regarding social visits for Nicholas Tartaglione. | Correspondence | View |
| 2019-08-28 | N/A | Legal meeting between Bruce Barket and Nicholas Tartaglione. | MCC New York | View |
| 2019-08-20 | N/A | Bruce Barket filed a letter on ECF. | ECF (Electronic Court Filing) | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding legal representation for Mr. Tartaglione in relation to investigat... | New York | View |
| 2019-08-09 | N/A | Conclusion of investigation into Epstein's (first) suicide attempt; Barket's client cleared of ch... | MCC New York | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Journalist Tracy Connor queries Bruce Barket about an alleged attack by Tartaglione on Jeffrey Ep... | Metropolitan Correctional C... | View |
| 2019-07-05 | N/A | Bruce Barket sends formal complaint regarding SHU conditions and seized legal documents. | View | |
| 2019-07-05 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding 'Nick' being moved to SHU. | View | |
| 2019-07-03 | N/A | Bruce Barket visited Nick; noted he had some legal paperwork but other documents were missing/sei... | MCC New York | View |
This document contains an email chain between US Attorney's Office prosecutors (including Jason Swergold) and defense attorneys (Aida Leisenring) regarding discovery materials related to the 'July 23 Incident' (Epstein's first suicide attempt). The defense requests access to hallway video surveillance, photos/video of Cell 124, and physical inspection of an 'orange rope.' The prosecution confirms they are investigating if these items exist or were preserved, specifically noting skepticism about the need to physically inspect the rope.
This document is an email dated July 28, 2019, circulating a Wall Street Journal article titled 'What Jail Is Like for Jeffrey Epstein.' The text details the grim conditions at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in Manhattan, where Epstein was held in 'the box' with former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione. It mentions Epstein's recent denial of bail, his move to suicide watch after being found unconscious, and complaints from other inmates and lawyers about vermin, cold temperatures, and sanitation issues at the facility.
This document is a letter from defense attorney Bruce Barket to Judge Kenneth Karas requesting an evidentiary hearing regarding the destruction of surveillance video from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). The missing video allegedly depicted the outside of the cell shared by Nicholas Tartaglione and Jeffrey Epstein during Epstein's suicide attempt on July 23, 2019. The defense argues this video is exculpatory for Tartaglione's sentencing mitigation, while the Government has admitted that the MCC inadvertently preserved the wrong video and that the backup system failed due to technical errors.
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between the US Attorney's Office (specifically the Narcotics Unit handling the Epstein case) and defense attorney Aida Leisenring. The defense is requesting access to video surveillance of the hallway and Cell 124, as well as a physical inspection of the 'orange rope' related to the July 23 incident (Epstein's suicide attempt). The prosecution confirms they are investigating the existence/preservation of these items but challenges the necessity of physically inspecting the rope.
This document is an email thread from December 2019 between defense attorney Aida Leisenring and federal prosecutors (USANYS) regarding discovery materials related to the 'July 23 incident' involving Jeffrey Epstein. The defense requests access to video surveillance of the hallway, photos/video of Cell 124, and physical inspection of an 'orange rope'. The prosecution confirms they are investigating the existence/preservation of these items but questions the necessity of physically inspecting the rope.
This document is an email chain from November 2019 between attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a discovery request for statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's attempted suicide on July 22-23, 2019. While the USANYS agreed to produce reports of Tartaglione's statements, they explicitly refused to produce reports and video of the attempted suicide itself, deeming them irrelevant to the current case.
This document is an email chain between defense attorneys (Michael Bachrach and Bruce Barket) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The attorneys are requesting records of statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's reported suicide attempt on July 22-23, 2019. The defense argues this is 'Rule 16' discovery material relevant to a 'penalty phase' (likely Tartaglione's capital case), while the government discusses the procedural requirements (Touhy regulations vs. Rule 16).
This document is an email chain from August 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), the Chambers of Judge Karas (NYSD), and defense attorney Bruce Barket of the firm Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP. The correspondence concerns the submission of letters regarding jail conditions (specifically at the MCC) and court appearances pursuant to a court order. The emails indicate coordination between the defense, the prosecution (Narcotics Unit), and the Judge regarding filings and memo endorsements.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) circulating a NY Daily News article dated September 12, 2019. The article details a letter written by Nick Tartaglione, Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate, in which Tartaglione denies harming Epstein and claims he was chosen as a cellmate because he would not extort him. The document discusses Epstein's suicide, the investigation into jail conditions at MCC, and Tartaglione's own legal troubles involving quadruple murder charges.
Barket expresses deep trouble regarding Tartaglione being ordered to an unsafe tier or SHU, requesting return to his previous safe cell.
States understanding that Tartaglione is not in quarantine.
Detailed request regarding Tartaglione's safety as a retired police officer, mentioning past assault and surgery, and requesting release from quarantine to a safe cell.
Attached memo endorsement from Judge Karas.
Providing a memo endorsement from Judge Karas.
Attached please find a memo endorsement from Judge Karas.
Asking to bring a letter to the attention of the judge regarding jail conditions.
Forwarding letter to Judge's chambers.
Forwarding a letter previously sent to another party, asking for confirmation that the judge will see it.
Request to bring letter to judge's attention; notes copying MCC lawyer, prosecution team, and firewall counsel.
Forwarding letter, asking for confirmation that the judge will see it.
Asking to bring a letter to the attention of the judge, noting that the MCC lawyer, prosecution team, and firewall counsel were copied.
Received. Thank you.
Confirmation that 'We are still producing inmates for court.'
Inquiry about whether Nick will be allowed to appear in court despite MCC lockdown.
Barket informs he got March 4th off for the status conference. Mentions his firm has 'sat on the sidelines' but possesses 'information, documents, emails, est that may be relevant depending on your needs.'
States they will be in a better position to answer his question tomorrow.
Barket acknowledges the reply, noting 'We will still be a week out'.
Margery replies that they will be in a better position to answer the next day.
Barket informs USANYS of a scheduling conflict due to an EDNY trial moving to March 3rd. He was denied a request for March 4th off to attend Mr. Tartaglione's status conference. He asks if USANYS needs more time to review material, suggesting an adjournment if so, or stating he will ask Judge Karas for help if not.
Discusses scheduling conflicts with a trial in EDNY and a status conference for Mr. Tartaglione on March 4th. Asks if DOJ needs more time to review material or if they should adjourn.
Barket informs DOJ that his EDNY trial moved to March 3rd and his request for March 4th off was denied, creating a conflict for the Tartaglione status conference. He asks if DOJ needs more time to review material, suggesting adjournment if so, or he will ask Judge Karas for help.
Response addressing security risks of tour, SIS scheduling evidence inspection, heat adjustments, and requirements for family visits.
Discussing motion for inspection of jail location, physical evidence of July 23rd suicide attempt, heat conditions, and family visits.
Original complaint listing 4 issues: refusing view of cells, viewing physical evidence of July 23rd suicide attempt, extreme heat, and family visit denial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity