SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00009967.jpg
This document is a single page from an index of a court transcript for the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. The page provides an alphabetical list of keywords from 'informed' to 'jurors' and cites the page and line numbers where these terms appear in the full transcript. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters and is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00009967.
DOJ-OGR-00009966.jpg
This document is a page from an index for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, from the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The page covers keywords from 'hardcopies' to 'information' and lists the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters and includes case and document identification numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00009964.jpg
This document is a single page from a transcript index (concordance) for the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.', dated February 15, 2012. It was filed as Exhibit A-5681 in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) on March 21, 2022. The page lists keywords alphabetically from 'experienced' to 'following' (including 'FBI', 'federal', 'felony', 'financial', 'firm') alongside the page and line numbers where they appear in the original transcript. While filed in the Maxwell/Epstein docket, the content originates from the Daugerdas tax fraud case.
DOJ-OGR-00009960.jpg
This document is a concordance (word index) page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It lists words alphabetically from 'communication' to 'counseled' along with line and page numbers where they appear in the full transcript. Notably, the name 'Conrad' appears 192 times, indicating this individual was a primary subject of the testimony recorded on that date.
DOJ-OGR-00009959.jpg
This document is a page from an index of a court transcript for the case "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.", dated February 15, 2012. The page provides an alphabetical list of words from "can" to "communicating" and the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The document also contains case and document identification numbers in the header and footer.
DOJ-OGR-00009958.jpg
This document is page A-5675 of an index from a legal transcript dated February 15, 2012, related to the court case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' (Case 2:09-cr-00582-ABN). The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'backdating' to 'came' and provides the page and line number references from the full transcript. The document was filed with the court on March 24, 2012.
DOJ-OGR-00009957.jpg
This document is a single page from an alphabetical index of a court transcript for the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. The page, marked with Bates number DOJ-OGR-00009957, covers keywords from 'allergic' to 'back' and provides the page and line numbers where these terms appear in the full transcript. Notable entries include 'Aponte', 'Arizona', and 'Attorney'.
DOJ-OGR-00009956.jpg
This document is an alphabetical index from a legal transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It lists keywords and their corresponding page and line numbers from the transcript, which was prepared by Southern District Reporters. The document was filed on March 22, 2012, as part of the court record.
DOJ-OGR-00009955.jpg
This document is a keyword index (concordance) page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' It lists occurrences of specific numbers (including dollar amounts like $12,000 and $14,000) and their corresponding page and line numbers in the transcript. While the document header (Case 1:20-cr-00330) indicates it was filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial on February 21, 2022, the content pertains to the Daugerdas tax fraud case, likely serving as a reference or sample in the Maxwell proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00009953.jpg
This document is a transcript index and exhibit list from the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.,' dated February 15, 2012. It outlines the examination of witnesses Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad by attorneys Hernandez, Shechtman, Gair, and Okula. It also lists Government Exhibits (4, 5, 9, 14, 28) and PMD (Paul M. Daugerdas) Exhibits admitted into evidence. The document is stamped with a 2022 filing date (Case 1:20-cv-00335-PAE), indicating it was submitted as an exhibit in the Giuffre v. Dershowitz case.
DOJ-OGR-00009952.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas. A witness, Conrad, apologizes for committing perjury to serve on a jury; the court acknowledges an arrest warrant for her but decides to release her. The attorneys discuss the scheduling of future witnesses, including a U.S. Marshal and a law student, before the court adjourns until the following morning.
DOJ-OGR-00009951.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It details the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who admits to perjuring herself during the jury selection (voir dire) process. The questioning focuses on her awareness of potential perjury charges, her receipt of use immunity, and her motivations for wanting to be on the jury, which she explains was for the 'interesting trial experience' and to get 'back in the swing of things' after a suspension.
DOJ-OGR-00009950.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a juror, Ms. Conrad. Attorney Mr. Shechtman questions her about why she made several omissions during jury selection, including failing to disclose her husband's criminal history. The questioning explores her motivations, such as a $40/day juror stipend, unemployment, and an intellectual curiosity for the courtroom, and challenges her distinction between an "omission" and a "lie".
DOJ-OGR-00009949.jpg
This document contains pages 225-228 of a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Paul M. Daugerdas. The text documents the redirect examination of Ms. Conrad, a former juror, who is being aggressively questioned about whether she followed Judge Pauley's instructions and whether she perjured herself during voir dire (jury selection). Conrad admits to not following instructions regarding voir dire and acknowledges 'omissions,' but insists she rendered a fair verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00009948.jpg
This document is a condensed transcript (pages 221-224) from the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, dated February 15, 2012. It features the testimony of Ms. Conrad, a suspended New York attorney who served as a juror in a complex tax shelter fraud case presided over by Judge Pauley. The questioning revolves around her motives for serving on the jury while suspended, specifically whether she used the service to demonstrate stability for her bar reinstatement petition, which she denies.
DOJ-OGR-00009946.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, containing the cross-examination of a juror named Conrad regarding her service in the trial of U.S. v. Daugerdas, et al. The questioning attorney probes Conrad's impartiality by referencing her past criminal record, her status as a suspended attorney, and a letter she wrote after the verdict. Conrad affirms that while she initially believed defendant David Parse was guilty, her final decision was based solely on Judge Pauley's legal instructions and was free from any bias.
DOJ-OGR-00009945.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It details the examination of a juror, Ms. Conrad, regarding her failure to disclose her background, which includes being a suspended lawyer and having a husband with a significant criminal record. The attorneys question whether she intentionally concealed this information to get on the jury and whether she holds any bias towards the defendants or the government, which she denies.
DOJ-OGR-00009944.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning focuses on her credibility, exploring her past actions as a juror for a Mr. Okula, her understanding of financial matters from an expert named Dr. DeRosa, and her failure to disclose a prior disciplinary suspension from the Bar Association during jury selection. The transcript also reveals personal details, such as her husband being a convicted felon, which are used to challenge her character and motivations.
DOJ-OGR-00009943.jpg
This document is a transcript excerpt from the trial 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012. It features the testimony of a witness named Conrad, who is questioned about a letter she wrote to Mr. Okula, her use of specific stamps, and her negative opinions of individuals named Brubaker and Parse (referring to them as 'idiot', 'stupid', and 'fricken crooks'). The witness also admits to having been suspended in the Southern District of New York. This document appears to have been filed as an exhibit in a later 2022 case (1:20-cv-00813), likely the US Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase litigation regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00009942.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad, who was a juror in a previous trial. The questioning focuses on a letter Conrad wrote to another individual, Mr. Okula, in which she claimed she held out for two days to convict a defendant, David Parse. This is contrasted with a later statement she made to Judge Pauley, where she stated that Parse should not have been convicted on a particular charge, highlighting a significant contradiction in her accounts of the jury deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00009940.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the questioning of a juror named Conrad. The questioning reveals that Conrad was aware of her husband's extensive criminal history but deliberately concealed it during jury selection (voir dire) to secure a place on the jury. The transcript explores her motivations and her understanding of her civic duty in light of her actions.
DOJ-OGR-00009939.jpg
This document is a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, from the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad (likely Juror Catherine Conrad), who admits to deliberately lying to Judge Pauley during jury selection (voir dire) about her criminal history. Specifically, she concealed an August 2007 arrest in Winslow, Arizona, for disorderly conduct following a domestic dispute with her husband. While found in an Epstein-related file dump (DOJ-OGR), this document appears to be legal precedent regarding juror misconduct/perjury, likely referenced in appeals for the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
DOJ-OGR-00009936.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It features the direct examination of a witness, Catherine Conrad, by attorney Mr. Gair. The questioning focuses on impeaching Conrad's credibility by highlighting her history of alcoholism, pancreatitis, and a suspension from the practice of law by the Appellate Division for 'shocking disregard for the judicial system' and mental/physical disability. The document bears a DOJ-OGR Bates stamp, often associated with document releases related to high-profile inquiries, though the specific link to Epstein in this fragment appears to be the document batch source rather than direct content.
DOJ-OGR-00009934.jpg
This document contains pages 165-168 of a court transcript from February 15, 2012, from the case United States v. Daugerdas. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad, a lawyer who admits to deliberately lying during voir dire (jury selection) about her education (claiming a BA instead of a law degree from Brooklyn Law School) and profession to ensure she was selected for the jury. While the text describes the Daugerdas tax fraud case, the blue header ('Case 1:20-cr-00332-AJN') indicates this document was filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial on February 24, 2022, likely by the defense to argue legal precedent regarding juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00009931.jpg
This document is a court transcript from the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' (2012), filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It features the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad, a lawyer who served as a juror in a 'tax shelter case.' The questioning focuses on her credibility, specifically accusing her of lying about her residence (Bronx vs. Bronxville) to appear more 'marketable' as a juror and concealing her domestic disturbances on Barker Avenue.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity