SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00009249.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, from the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas'. It was filed as an exhibit (Doc 616-1) in the case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) on February 4, 2022. The transcript features the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, regarding her conduct as a juror in a previous trial. She admits to omitting the fact that she possessed a Juris Doctor (JD) degree during jury selection (voir dire) and is questioned aggressively about whether this omission constituted a lie to the Court and Judge Pauley. The testimony also covers discrepancies regarding her stated residence (Bronxville vs. Bronx Village).
DOJ-OGR-00009247.jpg
This document is a transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Daugerdas, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the cross-examination of Ms. Conrad (a former juror who is a suspended lawyer) regarding her financial status, specifically establishing she had approximately $14,000 in assets versus her claim of indigence for legal counsel. The questioning highlights discrepancies between her court testimony and a sworn affidavit submitted to the Bar disciplinary committee regarding her tax returns and income.
DOJ-OGR-00009246.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing an afternoon session where the Court addresses matters that arose during a luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and a voice mail she left stating she would not attend the hearing. The transcript also covers an examination by Mr. Gair and Mr. Okula regarding a prior conversation on December 20th with Judge Pauley about 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer and their personal finances, which 'The Answerer' claimed were irrelevant.
DOJ-OGR-00009245.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, by an attorney, Mr. Gair. The questioning focuses on a prior court appearance where Conrad, upon being given a financial affidavit to determine her eligibility for a court-appointed lawyer, declared, "This is garbage." Gair probes Conrad's memory, motivations, and the rationality of her statement, which she describes as a "kneejerk reaction."
DOJ-OGR-00009244.jpg
This document is a court transcript from the trial 'United States v. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012, which was filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The transcript features the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad, focusing on her mental state (medication use), her refusal to accept a subpoena during a December 20th hearing before Judge Pauley, and her financial inability to hire counsel. The questioning attorney challenges Conrad on whether her behavior of rejecting a subpoena and inviting arrest was 'rational' conduct for an officer of the court.
DOJ-OGR-00009243.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning focuses on Conrad's defiance of a previous court order from Judge Pauley to testify, her background as a suspended lawyer, and her mental health. Conrad is evasive, repeatedly stating she is not a psychologist, and provides minimal answers, including claiming she only takes "Water" as medication.
DOJ-OGR-00009242.jpg
This document is a court transcript from 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' (dated Feb 15, 2012) filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad (likely the infamous Juror 50 from the Daugerdas trial) regarding her bias, her admission to 'Googling' the judge and attorneys, and her 'smart a-s-s' comments about Judge Pauley being a 'Clinton appointee.' This transcript was likely used in the Maxwell case to argue legal precedent regarding juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00009241.jpg
This document is a condensed court transcript from the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas', filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It features the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, regarding her alcohol consumption (specifically 'cheap vodka') and her behavior during a previous court appearance before Judge Pauley on December 20th. The testimony highlights erratic statements Conrad previously made to Judge Pauley, including comments about his intelligence, his attendance at Duke University, and his potential desire for a 'Clinton appointment'.
DOJ-OGR-00009240.jpg
This court transcript from February 15, 2012, documents the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who is also a trained lawyer. The questioning centers on her defiance of a court order to appear, having told Judge Pauley's clerk she was not coming, and her rationale for this action which she is unable to explain. The testimony also reveals she was unaware of a potential immunity deal and had met with her apparent counsel, Ms. Sternheim, six times before the hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00009239.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It captures the direct examination of witness Catherine M. Conrad, who initially pleads the Fifth Amendment regarding her prior testimony from March 2011. After being granted use immunity by the court, Conrad admits under questioning that her previous testimony as a prospective juror contained both omissions and lies.
DOJ-OGR-00009238.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Daugertas. The transcript details a legal argument regarding a request to close the courtroom for the testimony of a witness, Catherine Conrad, due to sensitive information about her alcohol dependency and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior disclosures of the information and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. The transcript also reveals that Ms. Conrad intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment right, and counsel has submitted an application to compel her testimony with immunity.
DOJ-OGR-00009237.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, featuring Ms. Trzaskoma's testimony during redirect and recross-examination. The questioning primarily concerns information about juror Catherine Conrad, specifically when Ms. Trzaskoma became aware of Conrad's background as a suspended lawyer with a criminal record and civil lawsuit, and whether this information was properly disclosed during the trial. The Court also inquires about a juror replacement event on May 16th during deliberations, and Ms. Trzaskoma denies any intent to mislead the court.
DOJ-OGR-00009981.jpg
This document is an index page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the legal case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The index, prepared by Southern District Reporters, covers words from 'weeks' to 'younger' and lists their corresponding page and line numbers in the transcript. The index includes references to individuals named Weiss and Winslow, locations such as Westchester and York, and the legal research service Westlaw.
DOJ-OGR-00009980.jpg
This document is a single page from an index of a court transcript for the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. The page, produced by Southern District Reporters, lists words alphabetically from "Tylenol" to "week" and provides the corresponding page and line numbers where each word appears in the full transcript. The document is marked with the identifier A-5697 and DOJ-OGR-00009980.
DOJ-OGR-00009979.jpg
This document is a concordance (word index) page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' (Case 1:20-cv-03088-PAE, Document 646-20). While filed within a docket often associated with Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cv-03088 is Giuffre v. Maxwell), the document itself pertains to the Daugerdas tax fraud case, likely serving as a legal precedent or exhibit. The index lists occurrences of words starting with 'T' (testify, Theresa, Trzaskoma, trial, truth, etc.) and their corresponding page/line numbers in the full transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00009978.jpg
This document is a page from a 'Min-U-Script' word index (concordance) for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, in the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. The index lists words starting with 'S' through 'T', including names such as Sternheim (who testified), Stetler, Susan, Swan, Swann, and Sweeney, along with their frequency and line references in the transcript. The document bears a DOJ-OGR stamp, indicating it was processed as part of a Department of Justice release, potentially related to the Epstein/Maxwell document productions where this case may have been cited or included.
DOJ-OGR-00009977.jpg
This document is a page from an index for a legal transcript in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. The page covers keywords alphabetically from 'set' to 'step', providing the page and line numbers where each term appears in the full transcript. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters and is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00009977.
DOJ-OGR-00009976.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript index (concordance) dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.'. It lists words alphabetically (from 'revisit' to 'sessions') alongside their frequency counts and specific page:line citations within the transcript. While the content pertains to the Daugerdas tax fraud case, the header indicates this document was filed on March 10, 2022, as Document 646-2 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, which is the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, suggesting it was used as a legal exhibit or precedent in her trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009975.jpg
This document is Page 7 of 30 from a court transcript index (concordance) filed on February 24, 2022, for the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. Checks against the index indicate the transcript is from proceedings on February 15, 2012. The page lists the frequency and page:line citations for words beginning with 'recross-examination' through 'revised'.
DOJ-OGR-00009974.jpg
This document is a page from an alphabetical index for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012. It pertains to the legal case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The index on this page covers words from 'production' to 'recovery', listing the page and line numbers where each word appears in the full transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00009973.jpg
This document is an index (concordance) page from a court transcript in the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.', dated February 15, 2012. It lists words alphabetically from 'petition' to 'product' alongside their frequency and specific page/line citations within the full transcript. The document includes references to legal terms (plaintiff, plead, probation), generic terms, and the acronym 'PMD' (likely referring to the defendant, Paul M. Daugerdas).
DOJ-OGR-00009972.jpg
This document is a word index (concordance) page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' It tracks the frequency and location (page:line) of words alphabetically from 'otherwise' to 'petit'. Although the content concerns the Daugerdas tax fraud case, the header 'Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN' indicates this document was filed on February 14, 2022, as Exhibit A-5689 in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00009970.jpg
This document is a page from an index for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, from the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The page indexes words from 'measure' to 'next', providing the page and line number for each occurrence in the transcript. The document was produced by Southern District Reporters and is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00009970.
DOJ-OGR-00009969.jpg
This document is a page from an index for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, from the case of 'United States of America, v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.'. The page lists numerous words and proper names (such as McCarthy, McDonough, and Massachusetts) and provides the page and line numbers where they can be found in the full transcript. The document was produced by Southern District Reporters and bears the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00009969.
DOJ-OGR-00009968.jpg
This document is page 76 of a 767-page court transcript index from the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. The page provides an alphabetical index of terms found in the transcript, from 'Justice' to 'line', along with the corresponding page and line numbers for each occurrence. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters and is part of a larger legal filing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity