Trove
Sign In Sign Up

prospective jurors

Person
Mentions
14
Relationships
2
Events
28
Documents
7
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Judge
Judicial authority
5
1
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Jury Selection Process (Questionnaire and Voir Dire) Southern District of New York View
N/A Jury selection Prospective jurors completed a lengthy questionnaire and underwent in-person voir dire, after whi... N/A View
N/A Jury selection (voir dire) The process of screening prospective jurors for Ms. Maxwell's trial, during which Juror No. 50 al... Court View
N/A N/A Jury selection/Trial Court View
N/A N/A Jury Selection (Voir Dire) Courtroom View
N/A Voir dire Jury selection process where Judge Nathan asked follow-up questions regarding jurors' personal ex... N/A View
N/A Jury selection The voir dire process where prospective jurors were questioned. The document analyzes this proces... N/A View
N/A Jury selection The process of jury selection (voir dire) for the trial. The Government is arguing about the proc... N/A View
2022-04-01 N/A Voir Dire Court View
2022-02-24 N/A Voir Dire / Jury Selection Courtroom View
2022-02-16 N/A Jury Selection Court context View
2022-01-19 N/A Voir Dire process Court View
2021-11-18 Voir dire At the conclusion of voir dire, the Court qualified 58 jurors after questioning them on their abi... N/A View
2021-11-16 N/A Start of Voir Dire (Jury Selection) Courtroom 518, 40 Centre St... View
2021-11-16 N/A Voir Dire (Jury Selection) District Court View
2021-11-16 Jury selection Scheduled start of voir dire proceedings. N/A View
2021-11-16 N/A Start of Voir Dire proceedings. Court View
2021-11-16 N/A Voir dire proceedings Court View
2021-11-12 N/A Screening questionnaire administration for jury selection (Day 3). Court View
2021-11-05 N/A Screening questionnaire administration for jury selection (Day 2). Court View
2021-11-04 N/A Administration of screening questionnaire for jury selection Court View
2021-11-04 N/A Jury Selection - Questionnaire Administration (Scheduled) Court View
2021-11-04 Jury selection Scheduled date for administration of a screening questionnaire for jury selection. N/A View
2021-11-04 N/A Screening questionnaire administration for jury selection (Day 1). Court View
2021-11-04 N/A Jury Questionnaire Session Court context View

DOJ-OGR-00009125.jpg

This document is page 6 of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. It describes the conclusion of the voir dire process on November 18, 2021, where the Court questioned prospective jurors about their impartiality and subsequently qualified 58 jurors. The majority of the page is redacted.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010329.jpg

This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on April 1, 2022. It details the process of screening 694 prospective jurors in November 2021, specifically focusing on the inclusion of questions regarding sexual abuse, assault, and harassment in the juror questionnaire. The text describes how counsel for both the Government and the Defendant reviewed these questionnaires and categorized jurors into four lists regarding their eligibility to serve.

Court filing (order/opinion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010327.jpg

This document is page 4 of a court order filed on April 1, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text denies the defendant's Rule 33 motion for a new trial and outlines the background of the jury selection process, detailing how it was conducted under COVID-19 protocols using questionnaires and voir dire to screen for bias in a high-profile case. It references specific docket entries (366, 367, 404, 427, 459) and transcript dates.

Court order / legal opinion (federal court filing)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005321.jpg

This document is page 5 of 6 from a court transcript filed on October 22, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains instructions from the judge to prospective jurors regarding the logistics of jury selection during the COVID-19 pandemic, including masking and social distancing requirements. The text details how jurors should complete their questionnaires, protocols for restroom breaks, and emphasizes the civic importance of jury service.

Court document / jury instructions transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005280.jpg

This document is Page 4 of 40 from a court filing (Document 365) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains preliminary instructions for prospective jurors regarding a questionnaire, emphasizing the legal requirement to provide truthful answers under oath. The text explicitly prohibits jurors from discussing the case with anyone, using social media (citing Facebook and Twitter) to communicate about it, or conducting independent research.

Court filing - juror questionnaire instructions
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005253.jpg

This document is page 4 of a filing by the Government in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Government argues against attorney-led jury selection, supporting Court-led 'voir dire' instead. Additionally, the Government argues that individual sequestered voir dire is not warranted for all questions, suggesting that sensitive topics like sexual abuse and pretrial publicity can be handled at the sidebar rather than in a fully sequestered setting.

Court filing (government submission regarding voir dire)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
6
Total
6

Jury Instructions

From: THE COURT
To: prospective jurors

Videotaped instructions explaining the selection process and nature of charges

Video instructions
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: The Court/Parties
To: prospective jurors

Questions regarding victimization history.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: THE COURT
To: prospective jurors

Questions to determine impartiality and background.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Follow-up questions

From: Judge Nathan
To: prospective jurors

Questions posed to jurors who answered affirmatively to questions 25, 48, or 49.

Oral voir dire
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire (Questions 48 and 49)

From: THE COURT
To: prospective jurors

Questions regarding experience with sexual abuse, assault, and harassment.

Questionnaire
2021-11-04
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire Instructions

From: The Court (Judge)
To: prospective jurors

Instructions on filling out questionnaires, COVID-19 safety protocols (masks/distancing), and conduct rules.

Court instruction
2021-10-22
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search